CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00725725Updated Oct 16, 2018Results posted

Org 25935 Versus Placebo as Augmentation to Cognitive-behavioral Therapy to Treat Panic Disorder (P05705)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Cognitive-behavioral therapy and Org 25935 in Panic Disorder, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Terminated. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-16.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
46
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Org 25935 vs. placebo given in combination with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to reduce the symptoms of panic disorder. It is hypothesized that treatment with Org 25935 at a dose of 4 mg or 12 mg will differ significantly from placebo with respect to the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) total score over 3 weeks of therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Panic Disorder

Browse trials for

03

In context

Panic Disorder

250 studies on the registry are indexed under Panic Disorder; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 46 is below the median of 80 across 195 interventional studies indexed under Panic Disorder.

Browse Panic Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • is a male, or a female who is not of childbearing potential or who is non-pregnant, non-lactating and using a medically accepted method of contraception.
  • is between the ages of 18 and 65, inclusive;
  • signed written informed consent after the scope and nature of the investigation have been explained to them before Screening evaluations;
  • is fluent in English;
  • is diagnosed at Screening with current panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia;
  • has a Clinical Global Impressions (CGI)-Severity score at Screening of >= 4 and \<= 6;
  • is currently taking no psychotropic medications or is able and willing to discontinue these medications prior to the first CBT session. Anti-depressant and anxiolytic medications are acceptable only if they are stabilized for at least 8 weeks prior to Screening;
  • is able to complete all scheduled assessment and treatment visits and is willing to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • is diagnosed with a primary Axis I disorder other than panic disorder;
  • has a Screening Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of >= 35 (severe depression);
  • has any history of bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, or obsessive compulsive disorder;
  • has a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder, eating disorder, or substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine) within the past six months;
  • is known or suspected to have significant personality dysfunction that could, in the investigator's opinion, interfere with trial participation. Participants with known borderline or avoidant personality disorder are excluded;
  • are at imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others, in the investigator's opinion based on clinical interview and responses provided on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS). Participants must be excluded if they report suicidal ideation of Type 4 or 5 in the past 3 months or suicidal behavior in the past 12 months as measured by the C-SSRS at Screening;
  • is currently a psychiatric inpatient or has been hospitalized for a psychiatric condition within the past year;
  • has ever been diagnosed with organic brain syndrome, mental retardation, or other cognitive dysfunction that could interfere with their capacity to participate in CBT or to complete safety and efficacy assessments;
  • has any history of head trauma causing ongoing cognitive impairment;
  • has any history of seizures (apart from childhood febrile seizures);
  • has an uncontrolled, unstable clinically significant medical condition (e.g., renal, endocrine, hepatic, respiratory, cardiovascular, hematologic, immunologic or cerebrovascular disease, or malignancy) that may interfere with the interpretation of safety and efficacy evaluations in the opinion of the investigator;
  • has a clinically relevant visual disturbance, such as cataract, color blindness, macular degeneration, glaucoma, or retinal disease;
  • has clinically significant abnormal laboratory, vital sign, physical examination, or electrocardiogram (ECG) findings at Screening that may interfere with the interpretation of safety or efficacy assessments in the opinion of the investigator;
  • has a Corrected QT interval (QTc) value >450 milliseconds at Screening using Bazett's QTc formula;
  • for females, has a positive result on serum pregnancy test (at Screening), or plan to become pregnant during the course of the trial;
  • has a positive urine drug or alcohol breath test at Screening, unless the positive finding can be accounted for by documented prescription use;
  • is unable or unwilling to comply with the investigator's instructions regarding drug and alcohol use during the trial period;
  • has a history of sensitivity/idiosyncrasy to glutamatergic drugs or chemically related compounds or excipients which may be employed in the trial or to any other unknown drug used in the past;
  • are receiving concurrent psychotherapy for the treatment of panic disorder [general supportive psychotherapy is acceptable if therapy was initiated at least 3 months prior to Screening] or have received a prior adequate trial of CBT for panic disorder;
  • has been exposed to an investigational drug within 6 months prior to Screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
46 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4 mg Org 25935

    Participants took a total of 3 doses of 4 mg Org 25935 prior to therapy sessions over a 2-week period.

    Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioral therapy · Drug: Org 25935

  • Experimental
    12 mg Org 25935

    Participants took a total of 3 doses of 12 mg Org 25935 prior to therapy sessions over a 2-week period.

    Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioral therapy · Drug: Org 25935

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants took a total of 3 doses of placebo matched to Org 25935 prior to therapy sessions over a 2-week period.

    Behavioral: Cognitive-behavioral therapy · Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive-behavioral therapy

    Participants underwent 5 weekly CBT session (sessions were 60-90 minutes in duration).

  • DrugOrg 25935

    4 mg Org 25935 is given in tablet form, a single dose 2 hours prior to 3 CBT sessions. A total of 3 doses of trial medication is given over a 2-week period.

  • DrugOrg 25935

    12 mg Org 25935 is given in tablet form, a single dose two hours prior to 3 CBT sessions. A total of 3 doses of trial medication is given over a two-week period.

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo is given in tablet form, a single dose 2 hours prior to 3 CBT sessions. A total of 3 doses of trial medication is given over a 2-week period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) Score From Baseline to End-of-Treatment (EOT)

    The mean change in PDSS score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The PDSS is a 7-item clinician-rated scale that assesses multiple dimensions of panic disorder severity (e.g., frequency of panic attacks). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28 (higher scores indicate greater panic disorder severity).

    Time frame: Screening and Day 36

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in PDSS Score From Baseline to Visit 4

    The mean change in PDSS score from baseline (Screening) to Visit 4 (Day 22) was calculated for each arm. The PDSS is a 7-item clinician-rated scale that assesses multiple dimensions of panic disorder severity (e.g., frequency of panic attacks). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28 (higher scores indicate greater panic disorder severity).

    Time frame: Screening and Visit 4 (Day 22)

  2. Change in PDSS Score From Baseline to Follow-Up

    The mean change in PDSS score from baseline (Screening) to Follow-Up (Day 59) was calculated for each arm. The PDSS is a 7-item clinician-rated scale that assesses multiple dimensions of panic disorder severity (e.g., frequency of panic attacks). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28 (higher scores indicate greater panic disorder severity).

    Time frame: Screening and Follow-Up (Day 59)

  3. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis 1 Disorders, Patient Edition With Psychotic Screen (SCID-I/P With Psy Screen) Score at Screening

    The SCID-I/P with Psy Screen, Panic Disorder Module was used to score participants' PD (with \[w\] or without \[w/o\] AGP) as being current (full criteria for the disorder met), in full remission (IFR) \[there are no longer any symptoms or signs of the disorder, but it is still clinically relevant to note the disorder\], or in partial remission (IPR) \[full criteria for the disorder were previously met, but currently only some of the symptoms or signs of the disorder remain\] at baseline (Screening). The SCID-I/P is a diagnostic exam used to assess for Axis-1 mental disorders.

    Time frame: Screening

  4. SCID-I/P With Psy Screen Score at EOT

    The SCID-I/P with Psy Screen, Panic Disorder Module, was used to score participants' PD (w or w/o AP) as being current (full criteria for the disorder are met), IFR (there are no longer any symptoms or signs of the disorder, but it is still clinically relevant to note the disorder), or IPR (full criteria for the disorder were previously met, but currently only some of the symptoms or signs of the disorder remain) at EOT (Day 36). The SCID-I/P is a diagnostic exam used to assess for Axis-1 mental disorders.

    Time frame: Day 36

  5. Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score

    The mean change in CGI-S score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The CGI-S is a clinician-rated instrument used to assess global severity of general anxiety symptoms. The instrument consists of a 7-point scale that the clinician uses to rate the severity of the patient's illness, from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (extremely ill).

    Time frame: Screening and Day 36

  6. Change in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Score

    The mean change in SIGH-A score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The SIGH-A is a 14-item scale to assess anxiety in a clinical population. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity).

    Time frame: Screening and Day 36

  7. Change in Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) Score

    The mean change in ASI score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The ASI is a 16-item self-report questionnaire that assesses fear of anxiety sensations. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 64 (higher scores indicate greater fear of anxiety sensations).

    Time frame: Screening and Day 36

  8. Change in Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS) Score

    The mean change in MADRS score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The MADRS is a 10-item clinical-administered scale designed to assess severity of depression. Each item is rated from 0 to 6, with total score ranging from 0 to 60 (higher MADRS scores indicate more severe depression).

    Time frame: Screening and Day 36

  9. Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Score

    The mean change in Q-LES-Q score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The Q-LES-Q is a self-report questionnaire rating 16 aspects of quality of life, including physical health and mood. Scores range from 0 ("very poor") to 5 ("very good"), with total score ranging from 0 to 80 (higher O-LES-Q scores indicate greater quality of life).

    Time frame: Screening and Day 36

  10. Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

    The number of participants experiencing one or more AEs throughout the study period was determined. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 59 days

  11. Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to AEs

    The number of participants withdrawing from study treatment during the treatment period was determined. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 2 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 30, 2016

Participant flow

Adult (18 to 65 years of age) male and female participants with a diagnosis of current panic disorder (PD; with or without agoraphobia \[AGP\]) were recruited.

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Started141517
Treated111514
Completed101112
Not completed445
Withdrew: Adverse event132
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up202
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject101
Withdrew: Protocol violation010

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) Score From Baseline to End-of-Treatment (EOT)

The mean change in PDSS score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The PDSS is a 7-item clinician-rated scale that assesses multiple dimensions of panic disorder severity (e.g., frequency of panic attacks). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28 (higher scores indicate greater panic disorder severity).

Time frame:
Screening and Day 36
Reported as:
Mean · PDSS Score
Change in Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) Score From Baseline to End-of-Treatment (EOT)
PDSS Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening11.5 ± 1.5115.8 ± 4.0017.1 ± 3.99
EOT (Placebo n=12)5.3 ± 1.497.6 ± 4.626.6 ± 4.29
EOT - Screening (Placebo n=12)-6.2 ± 2.15-8.2 ± 4.49-10.4 ± 4.23
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3934 · Mean difference (final values): 1.5299 · 95% CI -2.0781 to 5.1380
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3515 · Mean difference (final values): 1.2667 · 95% CI -1.4665 to 4.0000
SecondaryChange in PDSS Score From Baseline to Visit 4

The mean change in PDSS score from baseline (Screening) to Visit 4 (Day 22) was calculated for each arm. The PDSS is a 7-item clinician-rated scale that assesses multiple dimensions of panic disorder severity (e.g., frequency of panic attacks). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28 (higher scores indicate greater panic disorder severity).

Time frame:
Screening and Visit 4 (Day 22)
Reported as:
Mean · PDSS Score
Change in PDSS Score From Baseline to Visit 4
PDSS Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening11.5 ± 1.5115.8 ± 4.0017.1 ± 3.99
Visit 4 (4 mg O n= 9; 12 mg O n=12)7.1 ± 4.0810.5 ± 4.5612.2 ± 4.00
Visit 4 - Screening (4 mg O n= 9; 12 mg O n=12)-4.2 ± 3.70-5.3 ± 4.03-4.9 ± 4.52
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3597 · Mean difference (final values): -1.8246 · 95% CI -5.8307 to 2.1815
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7770 · Mean difference (final values): -0.4414 · 95% CI -3.5952 to 2.7124
SecondaryChange in PDSS Score From Baseline to Follow-Up

The mean change in PDSS score from baseline (Screening) to Follow-Up (Day 59) was calculated for each arm. The PDSS is a 7-item clinician-rated scale that assesses multiple dimensions of panic disorder severity (e.g., frequency of panic attacks). Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28 (higher scores indicate greater panic disorder severity).

Time frame:
Screening and Follow-Up (Day 59)
Reported as:
Mean · PDSS Score
Change in PDSS Score From Baseline to Follow-Up
PDSS Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening11.5 ± 1.5115.8 ± 4.0017.1 ± 3.99
Follow-Up (12 mg O, Placebo n=12)4.8 ± 2.207.4 ± 5.855.3 ± 4.56
Follow-Up - Screening (12 mg O, Placebo n=12)-6.7 ± 2.54-8.3 ± 5.80-11.7 ± 4.23
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2683 · Mean difference (final values): 2.3356 · 95% CI -1.8933 to 6.5644
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0844 · Mean difference (final values): 3.1317 · 95% CI -0.4518 to 6.7152
SecondaryStructured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis 1 Disorders, Patient Edition With Psychotic Screen (SCID-I/P With Psy Screen) Score at Screening

The SCID-I/P with Psy Screen, Panic Disorder Module was used to score participants' PD (with \[w\] or without \[w/o\] AGP) as being current (full criteria for the disorder met), in full remission (IFR) \[there are no longer any symptoms or signs of the disorder, but it is still clinically relevant to note the disorder\], or in partial remission (IPR) \[full criteria for the disorder were previously met, but currently only some of the symptoms or signs of the disorder remain\] at baseline (Screening). The SCID-I/P is a diagnostic exam used to assess for Axis-1 mental disorders.

Time frame:
Screening
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis 1 Disorders, Patient Edition With Psychotic Screen (SCID-I/P With Psy Screen) Score at Screening
Participants4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
PD w AGP: Current91212
PD w/o AGP: Current121
SecondarySCID-I/P With Psy Screen Score at EOT

The SCID-I/P with Psy Screen, Panic Disorder Module, was used to score participants' PD (w or w/o AP) as being current (full criteria for the disorder are met), IFR (there are no longer any symptoms or signs of the disorder, but it is still clinically relevant to note the disorder), or IPR (full criteria for the disorder were previously met, but currently only some of the symptoms or signs of the disorder remain) at EOT (Day 36). The SCID-I/P is a diagnostic exam used to assess for Axis-1 mental disorders.

Time frame:
Day 36
Reported as:
Number · Participants
SCID-I/P With Psy Screen Score at EOT
Participants4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
PD w AGP: Current346
PD w AGP: IFR010
PD w AGP: IPR445
PD w/o AGP: Current130
PD w/o AGP: IFR001
PD w/o AGP: IPR210
SecondaryChange in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score

The mean change in CGI-S score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The CGI-S is a clinician-rated instrument used to assess global severity of general anxiety symptoms. The instrument consists of a 7-point scale that the clinician uses to rate the severity of the patient's illness, from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (extremely ill).

Time frame:
Screening and Day 36
Reported as:
Mean · CGI-S Score
Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score
CGI-S Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening4.0 ± 0.04.6 ± 0.744.8 ± 0.83
EOT (Placebo n=12)2.8 ± 0.423.1 ± 0.923.0 ± 1.13
EOT - Screening (Placebo n=12)-1.2 ± 0.42-1.6 ± 0.85-1.8 ± 0.97
SecondaryChange in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Score

The mean change in SIGH-A score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The SIGH-A is a 14-item scale to assess anxiety in a clinical population. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with the total score ranging from a minimum of zero to a maximum of 56 (higher scores indicate greater anxiety severity).

Time frame:
Screening and Day 36
Reported as:
Mean · SIGH-A Score
Change in Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Score
SIGH-A Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening17.2 ± 8.4214.3 ± 6.3714.6 ± 9.14
EOT (12 mg O n=13; Placebo n=12)9.7 ± 7.2110.0 ± 6.438.5 ± 6.96
EOT - Screening (12 mg O n=13; Placebo n=12)-7.5 ± 7.37-3.8 ± 5.97-6.4 ± 7.62
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.8894 · Mean difference (final values): 0.3456 · 95% CI -4.6211 to 5.3124
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.3765 · Mean difference (final values): 2.0417 · 95% CI -2.5526 to 6.6360
SecondaryChange in Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) Score

The mean change in ASI score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The ASI is a 16-item self-report questionnaire that assesses fear of anxiety sensations. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4) with total score ranging from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 64 (higher scores indicate greater fear of anxiety sensations).

Time frame:
Screening and Day 36
Reported as:
Mean · ASI Score
Change in Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) Score
ASI Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening31.1 ± 9.9237.1 ± 9.5637.5 ± 12.91
EOT (12 mg O n=13)20.1 ± 10.2926.3 ± 10.5624.8 ± 13.95
EOT - Screening (Placebo n=11)-11.0 ± 10.23-10.8 ± 14.48-13.8 ± 13.58
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.8073 · Mean difference (final values): -1.2502 · 95% CI -11.4963 to 8.9958
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6610 · Mean difference (final values): 2.0291 · 95% CI -7.2132 to 11.2714
SecondaryChange in Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS) Score

The mean change in MADRS score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The MADRS is a 10-item clinical-administered scale designed to assess severity of depression. Each item is rated from 0 to 6, with total score ranging from 0 to 60 (higher MADRS scores indicate more severe depression).

Time frame:
Screening and Day 36
Reported as:
Mean · MADRS score
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS) Score
MADRS score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening12.4 ± 8.0311.1 ± 6.3814.2 ± 9.20
EOT (12 mg O n=13, Placebo n=12)6.6 ± 4.337.0 ± 6.986.3 ± 5.12
EOT - Screening (12 mg O n=13, Placebo n=12)-5.8 ± 6.76-4.2 ± 5.06-7.8 ± 8.53
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7895 · Mean difference (final values): 0.7296 · 95% CI -4.7291 to 6.1883
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5488 · Mean difference (final values): 1.5260 · 95% CI -3.5495 to 6.6015
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Score

The mean change in Q-LES-Q score from baseline (Screening) to EOT (Day 36) was calculated for each arm. The Q-LES-Q is a self-report questionnaire rating 16 aspects of quality of life, including physical health and mood. Scores range from 0 ("very poor") to 5 ("very good"), with total score ranging from 0 to 80 (higher O-LES-Q scores indicate greater quality of life).

Time frame:
Screening and Day 36
Reported as:
Mean · Q-LES-Q Score
Change in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) Score
Q-LES-Q Score4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Screening49.8 ± 6.2047.2 ± 8.8845.3 ± 11.63
EOT (12 mg O n=11)56.6 ± 3.2050.5 ± 9.3255.3 ± 7.69
EOT - Screening (12 mg O n=11, Placebo n=11)6.8 ± 5.393.7 ± 5.0610.8 ± 11.79
Statistical analysis
  • 4 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6516 · Mean difference (final values): -1.2766 · 95% CI -6.9269 to 4.3738
  • 12 mg Org 25935 vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0256 · Mean difference (final values): -6.1867 · 95% CI -11.5864 to -0.7869
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)

The number of participants experiencing one or more AEs throughout the study period was determined. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame:
Up to 59 days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)
Participants4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE)8125
SecondaryNumber of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to AEs

The number of participants withdrawing from study treatment during the treatment period was determined. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame:
Up to 2 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to AEs
Participants4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935Placebo
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Therapy Due to AEs131

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 59 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Org 25935 4 mg—0/11 (0%)8/11 (72.7%)
Org 25935 12 mg—0/15 (0%)12/15 (80%)
Placebo—0/14 (0%)5/14 (35.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 48
Most frequent other events
EventOrg 25935 4 mgOrg 25935 12 mgPlacebo
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/117/150/14
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders0/115/150/14
Visual impairmentEye disorders1/114/150/14
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/114/150/14
VertigoEar and labyrinth disorders0/113/150/14
Vision blurredEye disorders0/112/151/14
Visual brightnessEye disorders0/112/150/14
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/112/150/14
FatigueGeneral disorders1/112/151/14
DerealisationPsychiatric disorders0/112/150/14

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935PlaceboTotal
Mean33.1 ± 9.936.4 ± 8.932.8 ± 10.834.1 ± 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)4 mg Org 2593512 mg Org 25935PlaceboTotal
Female991331
Male56415
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Nations KR, Smits JA, Tolin DF, Rothbaum BO, Hofmann SG, Tart CD, Lee A, Schipper J, Sjogren M, Xue D, Szegedi A, Otto MW. Evaluation of the glycine transporter inhibitor Org 25935 as augmentation to cognitive-behavioral therapy for panic disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 May;73(5):647-53. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07081. Epub 2012 Feb 21. PubMed 22394471 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 16, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00725725
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2008
Start date
Jul 23, 2008
Primary completion
Apr 23, 2010
Completion
Apr 23, 2010
Results posted
Dec 30, 2016
Last update
Oct 16, 2018

Study contacts

Medical Director
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion