CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00713583Updated Apr 23, 2018Results posted

Carbidopa/Levodopa Combined With Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Cocaine Dependence

A Phase 2 interventional study of levodopa and Placebo in Cocaine Dependence, sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-23.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cocaine dependence is a major public health problem and the development of a treatment for this disorder is a priority. To date, treatment interventions based on positive incentive principles have shown the strongest effects for improving substance use outcomes. One such example is contingency management (CM) interventions in which nondrug rewards are used to compete with cocaine. Recent evidence suggests that certain medications improve response to CM interventions, particularly agents that target dopamine reward systems in the brain. A promising dopamine-enhancing medication is levodopa. The study team has observed the strongest effects of levodopa when the medication is administered in the context of CM therapy, perhaps through mechanisms that enhance reward saliency. The proposed study is designed to further evaluate this promising treatment approach. Cocaine dependent outpatients will participate in a randomized, 2-group (levodopa vs. placebo), double-blind clinical trial. CM will be behavioral therapy platform for both treatment groups. The study will test the primary hypothesis that CM+levodopa will be more effective than CM+placebo in reducing cocaine use. This study is expected to validate the usefulness of a new behavioral-pharmacological treatment approach for cocaine dependence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cocaine Dependence

Keywords

  • Cocaine, levodopa, contingency management
03

In context

Cocaine-Related Disorders

415 studies on the registry are indexed under Cocaine-Related Disorders; 12 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 60 across 312 interventional studies indexed under Cocaine-Related Disorders.

Browse Cocaine-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston is the lead sponsor of 880 studies on the registry; 209 are open to participants now.

Of its 170 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 140 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • between 18 and 60 years of age
  • meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for current cocaine dependence.
  • be in acceptable health on the basis of interview, medical history and physical exam.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current DSM-IV diagnosis of any psychoactive substance dependence other than cocaine, marijuana, or nicotine.
  • have a DSM-IV axis I psychiatric disorder or neurological disease or disorder requiring ongoing treatment and/or making study participation unsafe.
  • have significant current suicidal or homicidal ideation.
  • have medical conditions contraindicating levodopa/carbidopa pharmacotherapy. Conditions include severe pulmonary disease (bronchial asthma, emphysema), cardiovascular disease (severe or history of myocardial infarction with residual arrhythmias), narrow angle glaucoma, melanoma, history of peptic ulcer, renal function impairment.
  • taking medications known to have significant drug interactions with levodopa/carbidopa (e.g., monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors, anticonvulsants, haloperidol, phenothiazines, selegiline, anesthetics).
  • currently or recently (last 3 months) treated for substance use or another psychiatric condition.
  • having conditions of probation or parole requiring reports of drug use to officers of the court.
  • impending incarceration.
  • pregnant or nursing for female patients.
  • inability to read, write, or speak English.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Levodopa pharmacotherapy

    Levodopa pharmacotherapy (800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).

    Drug: levodopa · Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · Behavioral: Contingency Management

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and contingency management (CM).

    Drug: Placebo · Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy · Behavioral: Contingency Management

Interventions

  • Druglevodopa

    800mg levodopa and 200mg carbidopa per day

    Also known as: Sinemet

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo

  • BehavioralCognitive Behavioral Therapy

    Participants received individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in 50-minute weekly sessions. These sessions were manual-driven and based on the relapse prevention model proposed by Marlatt and Gordon (1985). Trained masters-level therapists, under the supervision of senior therapists and the principal investigator, worked with participants to teach them how to recognize and cope with risky situations that could influence their cocaine use through self-monitoring of situational craving and drug use stimuli, coping skills training, and lifestyle modifications.

  • BehavioralContingency Management

    An abstinence-based contingency management (CM) procedure was used. Participants earned vouchers according to the reward schedule recommended by Budney and Higgins (1998), beginning at $2.50 for the first cocaine-negative urine. For each consecutive cocaine-negative urine, voucher values increased by $1.25 with a $10 bonus given for provision of three consecutive cocaine-negative urines within a week. A cocaine-positive urine or failure to provide a scheduled urine sample resulted in a reset of the schedule to the initial value of $2.50. After provision of five negative urines, the voucher returned to the value prior to the reset. Participants were able to redeem their vouchers for small amounts of cash (≤$25) or gift cards for goods and services.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Confirmed Abstinence From Cocaine as Assessed by Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)

    The Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES) is the number of cocaine-negative urines collected out of the total scheduled urine tests for the 12-week trial (36 total scheduled urine tests per participant). The mean number of cocaine-negative urines over all time points is reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: 12 weeks of treatment

07

Results

Posted Mar 19, 2018
Limitations and caveats
Lower than expected rates of retention and medication compliance likely reduced the statistical power of the study for estimating treatment effects of the medication intervention.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLevodopa PharmacotherapyPlacebo
Started4540
Completed4540
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryConfirmed Abstinence From Cocaine as Assessed by Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)

The Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES) is the number of cocaine-negative urines collected out of the total scheduled urine tests for the 12-week trial (36 total scheduled urine tests per participant). The mean number of cocaine-negative urines over all time points is reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
12 weeks of treatment
Reported as:
Mean · cocaine-negative urines
Confirmed Abstinence From Cocaine as Assessed by Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)
cocaine-negative urinesLevodopa PharmacotherapyPlacebo
Confirmed Abstinence From Cocaine as Assessed by Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES)7 ± 11.79 ± 12.6

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Levodopa Pharmacotherapy—6/45 (13.3%)0/45 (0%)
Placebo—3/40 (7.5%)0/40 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLevodopa PharmacotherapyPlacebo
Suicide ideationPsychiatric disorders0/451/40
abscessInfections and infestations0/451/40
Pulmonary embolismVascular disorders0/451/40
Stomach painGastrointestinal disorders1/450/40
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/450/40
PhotosensitivityEye disorders1/450/40
Head injuryGeneral disorders1/450/40
Transient inability to speakGeneral disorders1/450/40
Blood clotVascular disorders1/450/40

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Levodopa PharmacotherapyPlaceboTotal
Mean46 ± 7.945 ± 9.246 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Levodopa PharmacotherapyPlaceboTotal
Female10515
Male353570
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Levodopa PharmacotherapyPlaceboTotal
United States454085
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00713583
Lead sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Joy Schmitz (Professor - Psychiatry, Behavioral Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 11, 2008
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Results posted
Mar 19, 2018
Last update
Apr 23, 2018

Study contacts

Joy M Schmitz, PhD
principal investigator · University of Texas at Houston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion