CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT00704210SpiDERSUpdated Oct 18, 2016

Effectiveness of Mechanical Decompression for Low Back Pain Relief

An interventional study of SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC and SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC in Low Back Pain, sponsored by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-18.

Sponsored by State University of New York - Upstate Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was withdrawn
Study withdrawn by sponsor
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective To demonstrate the effectiveness of a conservative treatment approach for chronic low back pain that addresses the underlying problem of intervertebral disc lesions and degenerative disc disease, namely vertebral pressure on vital structures of the lumbar region.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is a common medical problem and a challenging condition to treat. This study will investigate the effectiveness of a conservative treatment approach for chronic LBP. To this point few treatment approaches specifically address the resolution of underlying pathologies leading to a high probability of recurrence of LBP. Further, current treatment options for lumbar disc pathology have been of limited demonstrated effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a non-surgical therapeutic approach designed to effect intervertebral widening and allow for reduction of disc protrusion will reduce patients' pain and improve their activity levels.

The study will assess whether a computer-assisted traction treatment [decompression] protocol results in improvement in patient pain levels and daily activity levels. Further, to determine if such treatment results in intervertebral widening and reduction of any disc protrusions as demonstrated by direct imaging of the lumbar spine. A double-blind (treatment vs. sham treatment) design will be employed

Specific Aims To study the effectiveness of decompression therapy for LBP patients with lumbar disc herniation and degenerative disc problems.

To demonstrate that decompression therapy for LBP patients results in a demonstrated reduction in levels of reported pain.

To demonstrate that decompression therapy for LBP patients results in a demonstrated greater return to daily activities.

To demonstrate that decompression therapy for LBP patients results in increased intervertebral space and reduced disk protrusion (if present) as measured by MRI.

02

Conditions studied

  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Low Back Pain
03

In context

Back Pain

2,373 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 284 are open to participants now.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

State University of New York - Upstate Medical University is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (36%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-specific LBP of at least 6 weeks duration with no evidence of underlying disease or anatomic abnormalities,
  • Applicants may have pain radiating to their legs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any episode of Acute LBP within the last 6 weeks or less
  • Recent Fractures, less than 8 weeks of any bone
  • Tumors of any type including soft tissue tumors, myeloma, malignant or documented tumors of any type
  • Gross osteoporosis,
  • Spondylolisthesis grade 2 and above,
  • Hardware fixation, spine fixation or other boney fusion
  • Obesity as defined by a BMI greater than 35, body weight over 287 pounds,
  • Contra-indication for MRJ assessment,
  • Pregnancy,
  • neurologic deficits,
  • bowel or bladder incontinence,
  • progressive lower extremity weakness,
  • need for narcotic pain medications for other conditions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    B

    Group B will receive sham decompression treatment (i.e. tension not exceeding 15 lbs) for 30 minutes and ice treatment for 15 minutes once a day during each treatment session. No incremental increases will be used for Group B.

    Device: SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC

  • Experimental
    A

    For Group A (the treated group) the following tension adjustments will be used: starting treatment tension will equal 1/4 body weight minus 10 lbs. Incremental increases of 4 lbs. per session will be implemented until optimum tensions are reached, which would be a maximum of ¼ body weight plus 25 lbs, unless distraction tensions cause discomfort, which would require a reduction of the tensions applied.

    Device: SpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC

Interventions

  • DeviceSpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC

    For Group A (the treated group) the following tension adjustments will be used: starting treatment tension will equal 1/4 body weight minus 10 lbs. Incremental increases of 4 lbs. per session will be implemented until optimum tensions are reached, which would be a maximum of ¼ body weight plus 25 lbs, unless distraction tensions cause discomfort, which would require a reduction of the tensions applied.

  • DeviceSpineMed Table, Cert HealthSciences LLC

    Group B will receive sham decompression treatment (i.e. tension not exceeding 15 lbs) for 30 minutes and ice treatment for 15 minutes once a day during each treatment session. No incremental increases will be used for Group B.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain will be measured using a 0-100 visual analog scale.

    Time frame: 19 weeks

  2. Functional activity will be measured using the Roland Morris activity scale

    Time frame: 19 weeks

  3. MRI outcome measures include thickness of disc (disc height, intervertebral space), extent of disc bulging, intervertebral alignment.

    Time frame: 19 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical and social activities and quality of life will be measured with the COOP

    Time frame: 19 weeks

  2. Functional health will be measured with the SF-36

    Time frame: 19 weeks

  3. Depression will be measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

    Time frame: 19 weeks

  4. Treatment satisfaction will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale.

    Time frame: 19 weeks

  5. Reduction in pain medication usage

    Time frame: 19 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00704210
Lead sponsor
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Responsible party
William Grant (Professor, Family Medicine, State University of New York - Upstate Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 24, 2008
Start date
Aug 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2008 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2009 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 18, 2016

Study contacts

William D Grant, EdD
principal investigator · State University of New York - Upstate Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion