CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00702819BLOCK-ROPUpdated Jan 27, 2010

Pan-VEGF Blockade for the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity

A Phase 1 interventional study of Bevacizumab in Retinopathy of Prematurity, sponsored by Vision Research Foundation. Terminated at 11 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 30 Weeks to 36 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-01-27.

Sponsored by Vision Research Foundation · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Low enrollment due to the stringent enrollment criteria. Unable to answer study questions
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
30 Weeks to 36 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of blindness in children in developed countries around the world, and an increasing cause of blindness in developing countries.

The retina lines the inside of the eye. It functions as "film" within the camera which is the eye. When an infant is born prematurely, the vascular network necessary to nourish the retina has not fully developed. As a consequence, in some infants abnormal vessels proliferate instead of the normal ones - a condition known as ROP. The abnormal vessels carry scar tissue along with them, and may lead to retinal detachment and blindness if the eye is not treated.

The Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP) Study demonstrated that ablation of the peripheral avascular retina reduced the risk of poor structural and visual outcome due to retinal distortion or detachment in ROP (1980's). The ablated retina is not functional and is not amenable to regeneration.

Peripheral retinal ablation is not universally effective in fostering regression of ROP. This is particularly true for an aggressive form of ROP (aggressive posterior ROP, or APROP) which typically afflicts profoundly premature and infirm neonates. In this subset of infants, progression of ROP to bilateral retinal detachment and blindness occurs despite timely and complete peripheral retinal laser ablation.

Rationale The development of ROP is largely dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). When an infant is born prematurely the relatively hyperoxic environment the baby is introduced to shuts down the production of VEGF. Retinal maturation is delayed. Subsequently, at a time when intraocular VEGF levels would normally be declining late in the third trimester of pregnancy, abnormally high levels of VEGF are seen due to large areas of avascular retina and associated tissue hypoxia.

The availability of FDA-approved drugs for anti-VEGF treatment renders it possible to treat such eyes off-label. Available drugs include pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) for partial blockage of VEGF-A, or drugs such as ranibizumab (Lucentis) and bevacizumab (Avastin), which cause complete blockage of VEGF-A.

As VEGF is required in the developing retina for normal angiogenesis, and our goal is not to penetrate tissue, but to block the excessive levels of VEGF trapped within the overlying vitreous which is responsible for the abnormal vasculature in ROP.

For purposes of this study the investigators have chosen bevacizumab (Avastin), which will: a) attain complete blockage (vs. Macugen) of intravitreal VEGF-A, and; b) which is limited in its ability to penetrate tissues because it is a full antibody (vs. Lucentis, an antibody fragment specifically designed for better tissue penetration), and is more likely to restore VEGF homeostasis within the developing retina.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinopathy of Prematurity

Keywords

  • Pan-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Blockade
  • Safety
03

In context

Retinal Diseases

815 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Diseases; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 60 across 500 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Diseases.

Browse Retinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Vision Research Foundation is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Weeks to 36 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  • Premature newborn infants with bilateral progressive APROP despite complete peripheral retinal ablation.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inborn babies at participating NICUs (must meet inclusion criteria 3 through 7)
  • Outborn babies transferred to participating NICU (must meet inclusion criteria 3 through 7)
  • Aggressive posterior ROP
  • Adequate/appropriate laser ablation
  • Failed standard laser treatment (persistent Plus or recurrent Plus at a minimum of 1 week post-laser)
  • Post-menstrual age less than 36 weeks
  • Post-menstrual age greater than 30 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fatal systemic anomaly
  • An ocular anomaly of one or both eyes affecting the retina or choroid
  • An ocular anomaly precluding use of the RetCam (eg: microphthalmia)
  • Neonatologist feels inclusion will unduly challenge the infant
  • Refusal of initial consent
  • Refusal of subsequent evaluation
  • Media opacity precluding fundus visualization (eg: cataract)
  • Any ocular or periocular infection(s)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • DrugBevacizumab

    Dosage of 0.75mg/0.03ml injectable, one time only.

    Also known as: Avastin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary aim is to evaluate the safety of Bevacizumab (Avastin) administered in a single dose into the vitreous cavity.

    Time frame: Weekly

Secondary outcomes

  1. The secondary therapeutic study aim is to determine the efficacy of treatment with Bevacizumab (Avastin) for improving structural outcome without surgical intervention.

    Time frame: Weekly

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • Childrens Hospital
    Los Angeles, California 90027, United States
  • Jules Stein Eye Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • California Vitreoretinal Center
    Menlo Park, California 94025, United States
  • Bascom Palmer Eye Institute
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Emory Eye Center
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Children's Hospital / Dept. Ophthalmology
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • University of North Carolina/Ophthalmology
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7040, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania/Scheie Eye Institute
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Calgary Health
    Calgary, Alberta T2S-=2H4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bakri SJ, Snyder MR, Pulido JS, McCannel CA, Weiss WT, Singh RJ. Six-month stability of bevacizumab (Avastin) binding to vascular endothelial growth factor after withdrawal into a syringe and refrigeration or freezing. Retina. 2006 May-Jun;26(5):519-22. doi: 10.1097/01.iae.0000225354.92444.7a. PubMed 16770257 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00702819
Lead sponsor
Vision Research Foundation
First posted
Jun 20, 2008
Start date
Jun 2008
Primary completion
Jun 2009
Completion
Jul 2009
Last update
Jan 27, 2010

Study contacts

Michael T Trese, MD
study chair · Vision Research Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion