A Phase 4 interventional study of Clonidine or fentanyl in Labor Pain, sponsored by Columbia University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-14.
Sponsored by Columbia University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
Epidural analgesia is widely regarding as the most effective analgesic strategy for labor pain. Modern practice is to utilize dilute local anesthetics as a continuous infusion along with an opioid, e.g., our common "recipe" of 12 ml/hr of 0.0625% bupivacaine with 2 micrograms/ml fentanyl, after the initial dose to maintain patient comfort until delivery. This dose of the infusion often provides adequate comfort without interfering with the mobility of the patient and her ability to effectively push during delivery. However, this low dose epidural infusion strategy often results in recurrence of pain after an initial pain free period.
This breakthrough pain is treated by administering small boluses of analgesics via the epidural catheter. The pain occurring in labor is initially of visceral origin and is mediated by pain fibers originating from the low thoracic and upper lumbar segments of the spinal cord. As labor progresses to the late first phase (also known as transitional stage), pain sensations originating from the distension of the pelvic floor, vagina and perineum adds a somatic component to labor pain. This type of breakthrough pain is often difficult to treat.
Although requests from patients to alleviate late stage breakthrough pain are common, no one knows the most effective strategy for pain management in this stage of labor. This study is designed to compare the efficacy of two treatments for controlling late first stage breakthrough pain during labor with an epidural infusion in place: clonidine-bupivacaine versus fentanyl-bupivacaine.
Women who have labor epidural analgesia in place will be enrolled to be randomized if and when they present with breakthrough pain in the late first stage or second stage of labor (≥ 8 cm dilated). They will receive 8 ml of a solution containing 10 mg bupivacaine and 75 micrograms of either fentanyl (an opioid or "narcotic") or clonidine (an "alpha-2 agonist known to be effective as an epidural analgesic).
Pain relief, labor progress and outcome will be assessed to compare fentanyl versus clonidine.
It is the hypothesis of this study that clonidine added to bupivacaine is a better analgesic than fentanyl added to bupivacaine for breakthrough pain in advanced labor.
396 studies on the registry are indexed under Labor Pain; 66 are open to participants now.
Browse Labor Pain studies →Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.
Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants randomized to this arm of the study receive 75 micrograms clonidine with the bupivacaine in their epidural when requesting pain relief in advanced labor
Drug: Clonidine or fentanyl
Participants randomized to this arm of the study receive 75 micrograms fentanyl with the bupivacaine in their epidural when requesting pain relief in advanced labor
Drug: Clonidine or fentanyl
After obtaining consent, the patients will be randomized into two groups using a random allocation table. At the onset of late stage breakthrough pain one arm of patients will receive a mixture of 75 mcg clonidine and 10 mg bupivacaine in 8 ml of volume and the second group will receive 75 mcg fentanyl and 10 mg bupivacaine in 8 ml of volume.
Also known as: Clonidine = "DuraClon", Fentanyl= fentanyl = Sublimaze
Pain score on a VAS scale (success = score less than or equal to 2 on a 10 point scale)
Time frame: 15 minutes
Maternal blood pressure
Time frame: 2 hours
Maternal heart rate
Time frame: 2 hour
Neonatal Apgar score
Time frame: 1 and 5 minutes post delivery
Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal versus instrumental vaginal versus cesarean
Time frame: at delivery
This study is withdrawn, as verified in Feb 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Columbia University