ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07792629Updated Sep 1, 2026

Postpartum Effects of Mirror Therapy During Labor

An interventional study of Mirror Therapy in Labor Anxiety, Labor Delivery and Labor, sponsored by NURTEN ÖZÇALKAP. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-01.

Sponsored by NURTEN ÖZÇALKAP · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
86
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Today, childbirth is considered one of the most physically and psychologically intense experiences in a woman's life. Labor is a critical period during which fear, anxiety, and stress related to childbirth may increase, potentially affecting both the course of labor and postpartum emotional well-being. Supportive approaches implemented during this period may contribute to a more positive perception of the childbirth experience and enhance postpartum well-being.

Mirror therapy is a non-pharmacological approach that enables individuals to visually perceive their own bodies and the ongoing process, thereby strengthening self-perception and promoting positive body awareness. The use of mirror therapy during labor may increase women's active participation in the childbirth process and enhance their sense of control. It may also support emotional well-being and reduce negative emotional states during the postpartum period.

Accordingly, this study aims to evaluate the effects of mirror therapy administered during labor on postpartum pain, mood, and emotional well-being. The findings are expected to contribute to strengthening midwifery support during childbirth, integrating non-pharmacological approaches into clinical practice, promoting their wider use, and protecting women's psychological well-being. Thus, the study is expected to provide scientific evidence that may inform midwifery education and practice as well as postpartum care policies.

02

Conditions studied

  • Labor Anxiety
  • Labor Delivery
  • Labor
  • Labor Pain and to Reduce Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mirror Therapy,
  • Childbirth,
  • Mood,
  • Postpartum
03

In context

Labor Pain

423 studies on the registry are indexed under Labor Pain; 74 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 86 is below the median of 100 across 347 interventional studies indexed under Labor Pain.

Browse Labor Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

NURTEN ÖZÇALKAP is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 years or older,
  • Able to read and write in Turkish,
  • Admitted for vaginal delivery,
  • Willing to participate voluntarily in the study,
  • Providing written by signing the "Informed Voluntary Consent Form."

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having difficulty communicating,
  • Having a high-risk pregnancy (e.g., hypertension, diabetes),
  • Experiencing complications during labor or delivery (e.g., emergency cesarean section, fetal distress).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
86 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1 Mirror Therapy

    Mirror Therapy Application

    Other: Mirror Therapy

  • No intervention
    2 control

    Routine Care

Interventions

  • OtherMirror Therapy

    Mirror Therapy Application

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Descriptive Information Form:

    This form was developed by the researchers and includes questions regarding the participants' demographic and obstetric characteristics.

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Emotional Well-Being Scale: Baseline (before the intervention)

    The Psychological Well-Being Scale was developed by Diener et al. (2010) and adapted into Turkish by Telef (2013). The scale consists of eight items within a single-factor structure and is rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 7. The single-factor structure explains 42% of the total variance, with factor loadings ranging from .54 to .76. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of the scale was reported as .80 (Telef, 2013, p. 381).

    Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention), Immediately after the intervention

  3. Visual Analog Scale (VAS):

    The Visual Analog Scale is a unidimensional instrument used to assess the participant's perceived pain intensity by converting a subjective experience into a quantitative value. The VAS consists of a 100-mm (10-cm) horizontal line, with one endpoint representing "no pain" (0) and the other representing the "worst possible pain" (10). Participants are asked to mark the point on the line that best represents the intensity of their current pain. The distance between the "no pain" endpoint and the participant's mark is measured using a ruler and recorded in centimeters, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity. VAS scores are interpreted according to the predefined pain-intensity categories used in the study (Ergin, 2013; Aslan, 2006; Mucuk, 2009).

    Time frame: Baseline (before the intervention), Immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 2 months after the start.

Of 191 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Labor Pain, half reached primary completion within 9 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 14. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 193 studies reached it within 9 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 14.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 24, 2026
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
StartActual
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 27, 2027
Last update
Sep 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07792629
Lead sponsor
NURTEN ÖZÇALKAP
Responsible party
NURTEN ÖZÇALKAP (Asisst. prof, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 28, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 27, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2026

Study contacts

yağlu
Contact
yoret@yoret.org.tr
0542 466 58 20
BÜŞRA YAĞLU, Midwife
principal investigator
Nurten OZCALKAP, asisst. prof
study director · Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
Gizem Barakanlı, Midwife
study chair

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion