CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00683852Updated Jul 19, 2017Results posted

A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Aripiprazole Adjunctive to Antidepressant Therapy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Aripiprazole 5mg and Aripiprazole 2mg in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-07-19.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
225
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a reduced dose of aripiprazole is effective in treating patients with major depressive disorder

Read the detailed description

This is a 60-day, multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study on the efficacy of aripiprazole (Abilify) augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or selective serotonin norepinephrine uptake inhibitors (SNRIs) venlafaxine in patients with MDD who have responded inadequately to treatment with ADTs. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose (2 mg/day) aripiprazole (Abilify) as an augmentation strategy in MDD non-responding to ADT with SSRIs or the SNRI venlafaxine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Depression
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 225 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients able to give informed consent, and/or consent obtained from a legally acceptable representative (as required by IRB/IEC), prior to the initiation of any protocol required procedures.
  2. Patients must be able to understand the nature of the study, agree to comply with the prescribed dosage regimens, report for regularly scheduled office visits, and communicate to study personnel about adverse events and concomitant medication use.
  3. Patients with a diagnosis of major depressive episode as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria, based on the SCID-I/P; their major depressive episode must be deemed "valid" using the SAFER criteria interview administered by remote, independent raters.
  4. Patients who have reported a history for the current depressive episode of an inadequate response to at least one and no more than three adequate antidepressant treatments. An inadequate response is defined as less than a 50% reduction in depressive symptom severity, as assessed by the MGH ATRQ administered by remote, independent raters. An adequate trial is defined as an antidepressant treatment for at least 6 weeks duration at least at a minimum dose as specified in the MGH ATRQ.
  5. Patients must have a HAM-D17 ≥ 18 at the end of the screening phase to qualify for inclusion. The HAM-D17 will be administered by the study clinicians at the screening and baseline visits, and by remote, independent raters during the screening phase at the time of the SAFER interview.
  6. Patients must be able to be reliably rated on the psychiatric scales required by the protocol.
  7. Men and women, ages 18 to 65 Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must be using an adequate method of contraception to avoid pregnancy throughout the study and for up to 4 weeks after the last dose of investigational product in such a manner that the risk of pregnancy is minimized.

    WOCBP include any female who has experienced menarche and who has not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or is not postmenopausal (defined as amenorrhea ³ 12 consecutive months; or women on hormone replacement therapy [HRT] with documented serum follicle stimulating hormone [FSH] level > 35 mIU/mL). Even women who are using oral contraceptives, other hormonal contraceptives (vaginal products, skin patches, or implanted or injectable products), or mechanical products such as an intrauterine device or barrier methods (diaphragm, condoms, spermicides) to prevent pregnancy, or are practicing abstinence or where their partner is sterile (e.g., vasectomy) should be considered to be of childbearing potential.

    WOCBP must have a negative urine pregnancy test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 72 hours prior to the start of investigational product.

  8. Meet DSM-IV criteria (by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV - SCID-I/P) for MDD, current;
  9. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated (QIDS-SR) (22) score of at least 16 at both screen and baseline visits;
  10. Treated with an SSRI at adequate doses (defined as 20mg/day or more of fluoxetine, citalopram; paroxetine 30mg/day or more or 37.5 mg/day or more of paroxetine CR; 10 mg/day or more of escitalopram, 50mg/day or more of sertraline, and 150 mg/day or more of venlafaxine) during the current episode for at least 8 weeks, with the same, adequate dose over the last 4 weeks;
  11. Between the screen and baseline visit, patients must be documented prospectively to have received a stable dose of their SSRI or venlafaxine for at least 2 weeks.

Additional criteria for defining response and non-response for patients in Phase 2 eligible for the pooling of the data with all the patients in Phase 1. Among patients pre-randomized to receive placebo in both phases or to receive placebo in Phase 1 and aripiprazole in phase 2, only those meeting non-response criteria will be added to the primary efficacy sample:

  • Placebo non-responders are defined as those patients who failed to achieve a 50% decrease in their MADRS score at visit 3,
  • Have a MADRS score of > 16 at visit 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. WOCBP who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy for the entire study period [and for up to 4 weeks after the last dose of investigational product].
  2. WOCBP using a prohibited contraceptive method.
  3. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  4. Women with a positive pregnancy test on enrollment or prior to investigational product administration.
  5. Sexually active fertile men not using effective birth control if their partners are WOCBP.
  6. Patients who report an inadequate response (less than 50% decrease in depressive symptom severity) to more than two adequate trials of antidepressant treatments during the current depressive episode (including monotherapy treatment and distinct combination regimens) at a therapeutic dose (as defined by the ATRQ) and for an adequate duration (minimum six weeks for any monotherapy).
  7. Patients who report treatment with adjunctive antipsychotic medication with an antidepressant for a minimum of two weeks during the current depressive episode.
  8. Patients with a current need for involuntary commitment or who have been hospitalized within four weeks of the Screening Visit for the current major depressive episode.
  9. Patients who have received ECT during the current episode.
  10. Patients who have a current Axis I diagnosis of:

    1. Delirium, dementia, amnestic, or other cognitive disorder;
    2. Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, based on the SCID-I/P;
    3. Bipolar I or II disorder, based on the SCID-I/P;
  11. Patients with a clinically significant Axis II (DSM-IV-TR) diagnosis of borderline, antisocial, paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal or histrionic personality disorder.
  12. Patients experiencing hallucinations, delusions, or any psychotic symptomatology in the current depressive episode.
  13. Patients who have met DSM-IV-TR criteria for any significant substance use disorder within the past six months, based on the SCID-I/P.
  14. Patients receiving new onset psychotherapy within 6 weeks of screening, or at any time during participation in the trial.
  15. Patients who have been previously randomized in an aripiprazole clinical trial (lifetime).
  16. Patients who have participated in any clinical trial with an investigational drug or device within the past month.
  17. Unstable medical illness including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, respiratory, endocrine, neurological, or hematological disease;
  18. Patients who, in the investigator's judgment represent a significant risk of committing suicide during the course of the trial based on history or evaluation of current mental status
  19. Patients who have a history or evidence of a medical condition that would expose them to an undue risk of a significant adverse event or interfere with assessments of safety or efficacy during the course of the trial
  20. Patients with thyroid pathology (unless condition has been stabilized with medications for at least the past three months)
  21. Patients with a lifetime history of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or serotonin syndrome
  22. Patients with a significant history of a seizure disorder
  23. Patients with detectable levels of cocaine, heroin or opioids in the urine drug screen
  24. Diastolic blood pressure > 105 mmHg
  25. Any signs or symptoms that in the investigator's judgment are medically significant, in that it would impact the patients safety.

    1. Patients who are known to be allergic or hypersensitive to aripiprazole or other dihydrocarbostyrils (e.g. carteolol, vesnarinone, and cilostazol)
    2. Patients previously treated with and not responding to aripiprazole
    3. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (e.g., Nardil, phenelzine, Parnate, tranylcypromine, Marplan, isocarboxazid) treatment within the two weeks prior to enrollment
    4. Patients who would likely require prohibited concomitant medication during the trial
    5. Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated
    6. Subjects who are compulsorily detained for treatment of either a psychiatric or physical (eg, infectious disease) illness
    7. Patients who no longer meet DSM-IV criteria for MDD during the baseline visit;
    8. Patients who demonstrate a greater than 25% decrease in depressive symptoms as reflected by the QIDS-SR or HAM-D17 total score from screen visit to baseline visit;
    9. Patients with a history of antidepressant-induced hypomania.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
225 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Drug 2mg/Drug 5mg

    patients randomly assigned to the drug/drug sequence, the dose of aripiprazole will be 2 mg/day during the first phase of the study, and 5 mg/day in the second phase.

    Drug: Aripiprazole 5mg · Drug: Aripiprazole 2mg

  • Active comparator
    Placebo/Drug 2mg

    For patients randomly assigned to the placebo/drug sequence, the dose of aripiprazole will be 2 mg/day during the second phase of the study.

    Drug: Aripiprazole 2mg · Drug: Placebo

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo/Placebo

    for patients randomly assigned to the placebo/placebo sequence, study medication will be placebo during both phases of the study.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAripiprazole 5mg

    Tablet dose of aripiprazole will be 2 mg/day during the first phase (30 days) of the study, and 5 mg/day in the second phase (30 days)

    Also known as: Abilify

  • DrugAripiprazole 2mg

    For patients randomly assigned to the placebo/drug sequence, the dose of aripiprazole will be 2 mg/day during the second phase of the study (30 days)

    Also known as: Abilify

  • DrugPlacebo

    for patients randomly assigned to the placebo/placebo sequence, study medication will be placebo during both phases of the study (60 days)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Response Rate

    The primary outcome was the difference in response rate (decrease in MADRS total score of at least 50%) using the SPCD (sequential parallel comparison design). The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Readmission Rate

    MADRS readmission rate is defined as MADRS score\<11. The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Mean Change in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Score From Baseline to the End of Follow-up

    The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks

  3. Mean Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

    The CGI-S scale was administered by clinicians based on assessment of the patient's clinical status. They measured, based on history and scores on other instruments, depressive severity. It consists of one question scored on a seven-point scale (1 = normal to 7 = among the most severe), so a higher total score indicates greater depressive severity. The minimum score is 1, and the maximum score is 7.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  4. Mean Change in Symptom Questionnaire (SQ)

    The SQ, a 92-item (yes/no) self-rating questionnaire, includes 4 distress and 4 well-being subscales. There are 68 items for the distress subscales and 24 items for the well-being subscales. Each item has either a Yes/No or True/False answer. For the distress symptom score, add together the following items and score 1 when the answer is Yes/True: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 68. A higher score indicates more distress symptoms. For the well-being subscale score, add together the following items and score 1 when the answer is No/False: 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 29, 31, 35, 38, 40, 43, 46, 50, 51, 71, 78, 83, 89. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 24. A higher score indicates more well-being.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Safety Sample

    Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. In this analysis, AEs were summarized according to person-phase of occurrence. Each AE was attributed to the person and then to phase 1 or phase 2, depending on the initial date of onset.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  2. Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Placebo Non-Responders

    Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. This analysis focused on placebo non-responders in phase 1 and presented them by their treatment assignment in phase 2.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

  3. Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - People Exclusively on Drug or Placebo Throughout the Study

    Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. This analysis compared AEs between the arms that received exclusively drug throughout the study or placebo throughout the study.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 19, 2017

Participant flow

23 U.S. sites enrolled 225 patients over 10 months. 221 patients are included in the analysis. Enrollment began in September, 2008 and completed in July, 2009.

30-Day Phase 1 Period
Participant flow — 30-Day Phase 1 Period
MilestoneADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo/Placebo GroupADAPT Placebo/Drug Group
Started568485
Completed548384
Not completed211
30-Day Phase 2 Period
Participant flow — 30-Day Phase 2 Period
MilestoneADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo/Placebo GroupADAPT Placebo/Drug Group
Started548384
Completed487875
Not completed659

Outcome measures

PrimaryMADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Response Rate

The primary outcome was the difference in response rate (decrease in MADRS total score of at least 50%) using the SPCD (sequential parallel comparison design). The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Response Rate
ParticipantsPhase 1 DrugPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2Phase I PlaceboPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2
MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Response Rate1011295
SecondaryMADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Readmission Rate

MADRS readmission rate is defined as MADRS score\<11. The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Readmission Rate
ParticipantsPhase 1 DrugPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2Phase I PlaceboPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2
MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Readmission Rate48164
SecondaryMean Change in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Score From Baseline to the End of Follow-up

The 10-item Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), which measures depression severity over the past week, was completed by clinicians using an MGH structured interview. Each item is measured on a scale from 0 to 6, and the items are summed to find the total score. The total minimum score is 0 units on a scale and the total maximum score is 60 units on a scale, where higher scores indicate more severe depression.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Score From Baseline to the End of Follow-up
units on a scalePhase 1 DrugPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2Phase I PlaceboPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2
Mean Change in MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) Score From Baseline to the End of Follow-up-8.54 ± 7.21-5.80 ± 7.08-8.09 ± 8.13-3.32 ± 5.97
SecondaryMean Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

The CGI-S scale was administered by clinicians based on assessment of the patient's clinical status. They measured, based on history and scores on other instruments, depressive severity. It consists of one question scored on a seven-point scale (1 = normal to 7 = among the most severe), so a higher total score indicates greater depressive severity. The minimum score is 1, and the maximum score is 7.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)
units on a scalePhase 1 DrugPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2Phase I PlaceboPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2
Mean Change in Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)-0.81 ± 1.03-0.64 ± 0.95-0.84 ± 1.15-0.43 ± 0.78
SecondaryMean Change in Symptom Questionnaire (SQ)

The SQ, a 92-item (yes/no) self-rating questionnaire, includes 4 distress and 4 well-being subscales. There are 68 items for the distress subscales and 24 items for the well-being subscales. Each item has either a Yes/No or True/False answer. For the distress symptom score, add together the following items and score 1 when the answer is Yes/True: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 15, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36, 37, 39, 41, 42, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 68. A higher score indicates more distress symptoms. For the well-being subscale score, add together the following items and score 1 when the answer is No/False: 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 29, 31, 35, 38, 40, 43, 46, 50, 51, 71, 78, 83, 89. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 24. A higher score indicates more well-being.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change in Symptom Questionnaire (SQ)
units on a scalePhase 1 DrugPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2Phase I PlaceboPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2
Sum of 4 subscaled distress scores-9.44 ± 11.19-6.78 ± 13.78-9.70 ± 12.51-4.52 ± 9.52
Sum of 4 subscaled well-being scores3.71 ± 5.123.34 ± 5.792.75 ± 5.881.98 ± 4.97
Other pre-specifiedTreatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Safety Sample

Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. In this analysis, AEs were summarized according to person-phase of occurrence. Each AE was attributed to the person and then to phase 1 or phase 2, depending on the initial date of onset.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · adverse events
Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Safety Sample
adverse eventsADAPT Drug GroupADAPT Placebo Group
Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Safety Sample58110
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Placebo Non-Responders

Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. This analysis focused on placebo non-responders in phase 1 and presented them by their treatment assignment in phase 2.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Patients
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Placebo Non-Responders
PatientsPhase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Drug in Phase 2Phase 1 Placebo Non-Responders on Placebo in Phase 2
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - Placebo Non-Responders4044
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - People Exclusively on Drug or Placebo Throughout the Study

Differences in the incidence of treatment emergent AEs between the treatment groups were examined and evaluated using descriptive statistics. This analysis compared AEs between the arms that received exclusively drug throughout the study or placebo throughout the study.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · Patients
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - People Exclusively on Drug or Placebo Throughout the Study
PatientsADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo/Placebo Group
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent AEs in Two Treatment Groups - People Exclusively on Drug or Placebo Throughout the Study3960

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected for the 12 week study period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Drug/Drug Group—0/54 (0%)39/54 (72.2%)
Placebo/Placebo Group—0/83 (0%)60/83 (72.3%)
Placebo/Drug Group—0/85 (0%)58/85 (68.2%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventDrug/Drug GroupPlacebo/Placebo GroupPlacebo/Drug Group
Weight increasedInvestigations13/5423/836/85
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders14/5411/831/85
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/549/8313/85
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders7/547/839/85
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations7/541/834/85
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders6/542/833/85
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/549/834/85
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders5/547/837/85
Upper respiratory tract infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/547/834/85
SomnolenceNervous system disorders4/543/831/85

Baseline characteristics

This data was analyzed for the study by comparing placebo vs. drug. Therefore the two groups (placebo/placebo and placebo/drug) that started with placebo during the first phase of the study are combined as one group called Placebo. The patients who were took the study drug in both phases are in the Drug/Drug group.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo Group (Placebo/Placebo & Placebo/Drug Groups)Total
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years56169225
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo Group (Placebo/Placebo & Placebo/Drug Groups)Total
Mean45.36 ± 10.3545.06 ± 11.3445.16 ± 10.85
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo Group (Placebo/Placebo & Placebo/Drug Groups)Total
Female37108145
Male196180
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ADAPT Drug/Drug GroupADAPT Placebo Group (Placebo/Placebo & Placebo/Drug Groups)Total
United States56169225
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Marcus RN, McQuade RD, Carson WH, Hennicken D, Fava M, Simon JS, Trivedi MH, Thase ME, Berman RM. The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a second multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;28(2):156-65. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31816774f9. PubMed 18344725 ↗
  • Berman RM, Marcus RN, Swanink R, McQuade RD, Carson WH, Corey-Lisle PK, Khan A. The efficacy and safety of aripiprazole as adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;68(6):843-53. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0604. PubMed 17592907 ↗
  • Fava M, Mischoulon D, Iosifescu D, Witte J, Pencina M, Flynn M, Harper L, Levy M, Rickels K, Pollack M. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of aripiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant therapy among depressed outpatients with inadequate response to prior antidepressant therapy (ADAPT-A Study). Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(2):87-97. doi: 10.1159/000332050. Epub 2012 Jan 25. Erratum In: Psychother Psychosom. 2012;81(4):261. PubMed 22286203 ↗
  • Mischoulon D, Witte J, Levy M, Papakostas GI, Pet LR, Hsieh WH, Pencina MJ, Ward S, Pollack MH, Fava M. Efficacy of dose increase among nonresponders to low-dose aripiprazole augmentation in patients with inadequate response to antidepressant treatment: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, efficacy trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;73(3):353-7. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06541. Epub 2011 Sep 20. PubMed 21939613 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00683852
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Responsible party
Maurizio Fava, MD (Executive Vice Chair, Department of Psychiatry; Executive Director, Clinical Trials Network and Institute (CTNI); Director, Depression Clinical and Research Program (DCRP), Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 26, 2008
Start date
Sep 2008
Primary completion
Sep 2009
Completion
Sep 2009
Results posted
Jul 19, 2017
Last update
Jul 19, 2017

Study contacts

Maurizio Fava, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion