ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00669643U-MDTUpdated Jun 1, 2017

Uniform Multidrug Therapy Regimen for Leprosy Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of PB 6 doses - Rifampicin and Dapsone and PB 6 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone in Leprosy, sponsored by University of Brasilia. Completed at 2 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-01.

Sponsored by University of Brasilia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
859
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized trial is to verify if leprosy patients, despite of their classification, can be treated with the same regimen without compromising patient cure and acceptability of the treatment. At present, patients classified as multibacillary leprosy are treated for 12 months with three drugs, and patients classified as paucibacillary leprosy are treated for 6 months with two drugs. The study is going to test a unified regimen for paucibacillary and multibacillary patients by treating leprosy patients with three drugs for 6 doses.

Read the detailed description

In the past both the treatment of new leprosy patients and the classification criteria for treatment purposes have gone through major changes. At the moment, newly diagnosed leprosy patients are classified into PB and MB based on the number of lesions only. More than 5 lesions leads to a classification as MB patient and treatment for 12 months with MDT composed of three drugs, i.e. rifampicin, dapsone and clofazimine. One to 5 lesions leads to a classification as PB patient and treatment for 6 months with MDT composed of two drugs, i.e. rifampicin and dapsone.

Despite all the favorable data from the point of view of practical application, this therapeutic regimen still presents some constraints, including the lengthy course of treatment. Especially in those situations where leprosy control is integrated into the general health services classification is a problem for the general health worker that has only received one or two days of training in leprosy.

A uniform regimen for leprosy would simplify treatment in the field. Results from control programs and research projects have demonstrated that relapse rates after MDT are extremely low, approximately 0.2% annually among MB cases on the 24-dose regimen. The low relapse rates indicate that there was room to shorten the course of MDT to less than 24 monthly-supervised doses of rifampicin plus self-administered doses of dapsone and clofazimine. Although some papers have suggested that relapse rates after MDT may be significantly higher in MB patients with an initial bacterial index equals or bigger than 3, the present diagnostic universe of leprosy includes few such patients, and the total number of relapses caused by them would account for a minimal percentage of cases in a control program. Since 1998, a 12-month treatment course for MB leprosy is advised by WHO. The main problem when evaluating any new treatment regimen for leprosy, is that there are no good and reliable data available for the current treatment regimen: relapse rates have never been systematically determined and the same holds true for reaction and nerve function impairment rates, the major cause of the nerve damage that leads to handicaps and deformities in leprosy patients.

Currently, WHO is exploring possibilities to introduce a short uniform treatment regimen for all types of leprosy patients called Uniform Multidrug Therapy (U-MDT), as a replacement for the present regular multidrug therapy (R-MDT). This U-MDT would consist of treatment of all patients for 6 months with a regimen consisting of three drugs: rifampicin, dapsone and clofazimine. The efficacy of this U-MDT is currently being studied in an open non-controlled treatment trial. Classification of patients is only done on clinical criteria: no skin smears or other lab tests are included. The diagnosis of relapse will rely on clinical diagnosis only. It will therefore not be possible to identify high-risk groups for relapse, such as highly skin smear positive patients.

The objective of our study is to evaluate both the R-MDT and the U-MDT regimens in a randomised trial in order to:

  1. determine the efficacy of the current R-MDT regimen with regard to relapse rates and acceptability to the patient.
  2. determine the efficacy of the U-MDT regimen with regard to relapse rate and acceptability to the patient.
02

Conditions studied

  • Leprosy

Keywords

  • Leprosy
  • Communicable Diseases
  • Skin Diseases
  • Multidrug Therapy
  • MDT
  • Uniform Multidrug Therapy
  • U-MDT
03

In context

Leprosy

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Leprosy; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 859 is above the median of 70 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Leprosy.

Browse Leprosy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Brasilia is the lead sponsor of 66 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All newly diagnosed leprosy cases with characteristic skin lesions, with or without systemic symptoms or confirmed by histopathological study previously untreated PB and MB leprosy patients.
  • Never treated or patient treated more than five years ago

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Safety concerns:

  • History of intolerance to one of the medications

Lack of suitability for the trial:

  • Absence of leprosy skin lesions
  • Pure neural leprosy (PNL)
  • Patient previously (defaulters and relapse) treated for leprosy less than 5 years ago
  • Association with other serious diseases such as /AIDS, Tuberculosis, Malaria, American Cutaneous leishmaniasis, Visceral Leishmaniasis, Lymphoma, Leukaemia, , etc.

Administrative reasons

  • Patients who are not permanent residents of the area or who are unable to come to the clinic every month during their treatment and in the first half year (the intensive follow-up period) after their treatment.
  • Patients who do not give or are not capable to give informed consent due to mental impairment.
  • Patients with overt signs of AIDS because it is unlikely that we can follow them up for the whole study period. As we will not be testing patients for HIV positivity, HIV-infected leprosy patients can be included in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
859 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    R-MDT PB

    R-MDT PB group: standard/regular treatment recommended by WHO - All patients presenting fewer than 6 skin lesions will receive the standard treatment regimen for paucibacillary patients as the intervention; Intervention - PB 6 doses of rifampicin and dapsone

    Drug: PB 6 doses - Rifampicin and Dapsone

  • Experimental
    U-MDT PB

    U-MDT PB group: a unified treatment for all patients - All patients presenting fewer than 6 lesions (WHO PB) will receive 6 doses of rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone as the intervention; Intervention - PB 6 doses of rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone

    Drug: PB 6 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone

  • Experimental
    R-MDT MB

    R-MDT MB group: standard/regular treatment recommended by WHO - All patients presenting 6 skin or more lesions will receive the standard treatment regimen for multibacillary patients as the intervention; Intervention - MB 12 doses of rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone

    Drug: MB 12 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone

  • Experimental
    U-MDT MB

    U-MDT MB group: a unified treatment for all patients - All patients presenting 6 lesions or more (WHO MB) will receive 6 doses of rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone as the intervention; Intervention - MB 6 doses of rifampicin, clofazimine and dapsone

    Drug: MB 6 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone

Interventions

  • DrugPB 6 doses - Rifampicin and Dapsone

    Adult: 6 doses; 1 monthly supervised dose: 600 mg Rifampicin + 100 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 100 mg Dapsone; Children: 6 doses; 1 monthly supervised dose: 450 mg Rifampicin + 50 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 50 mg Dapsone

    Also known as: PB 6 doses of 2 drugs

  • DrugPB 6 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone

    Adult: 6 doses; 1 monthly supervised dose: 600 mg Rifampicin + 300 mg Clofazimine + 100 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 100 mg Dapsone + 50 mg Clofazimine; Children: 6 doses; 1 monthly supervised dose: Rifampicin 450 mg + 150 mg Clofazimine + 50 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 50 mg Dapsone + 25 mg Clofazimine

    Also known as: PB 6 doses of 3 drugs

  • DrugMB 12 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone

    Drug pages: Clofazimine · Dapsone

    Adult: 12 doses; 1 monthly supervised dose: 600 mg Rifampicin + 300 mg Clofazimine + 100 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 100 mg Dapsone + 50 mg Clofazimine; Children: 12 doses; 1 monthly supervised dose: Rifampicin 450 mg + 150 mg Clofazimine + 50 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 50 mg Dapsone + 25 mg Clofazimine

    Also known as: MB 12 doses of 3 drugs

  • DrugMB 6 doses - Rifampicin, Clofazimine and Dapsone

    Adult: 6 doses 1 monthly supervised dose: 600 mg Rifampicin + 300 mg Clofazimine + 100 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 100 mg Dapsone + 50 mg Clofazimine Children: 6 doses 1 monthly supervised dose: Rifampicin 450 mg + 150 mg Clofazimine + 50 mg Dapsone; 27 days: p/day - 50 mg Dapsone + 25 mg Clofazimine

    Also known as: MB 6 doses of 3 drugs

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Relapse

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Type I Reaction - Reversal Reactions

    Time frame: 6 years

  2. Type II Reaction - Erythema nodosum leprosum

    Time frame: 6 years

  3. Neurological damage

    Time frame: 6 years

  4. Neuritis

    Time frame: 6 years

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Centro de Referência Nacional Alfredo da Matta - FUAM
    Manaus, Amazonas 69.065-130, Brazil
  • Centro de Referência Nacional Dona Libânia - CDERM
    Fortaleza, Ceará 60.101-035, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Becx-Bleumink M. Relapses among leprosy patients treated with multidrug therapy: experience in the leprosy control program of the All Africa Leprosy and Rehabilitation Training Center (ALERT) in Ethiopia; practical difficulties with diagnosing relapses; operational procedures and criteria for diagnosing relapses. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1992 Sep;60(3):421-35. PubMed 1474281 ↗
  • Britton WJ, Lockwood DN. Leprosy. Lancet. 2004 Apr 10;363(9416):1209-19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15952-7. PubMed 15081655 ↗
  • Buhrer-Sekula S, Smits HL, Gussenhoven GC, van Leeuwen J, Amador S, Fujiwara T, Klatser PR, Oskam L. Simple and fast lateral flow test for classification of leprosy patients and identification of contacts with high risk of developing leprosy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 May;41(5):1991-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.1991-1995.2003. PubMed 12734239 ↗
  • Dasananjali K, Schreuder PA, Pirayavaraporn C. A study on the effectiveness and safety of the WHO/MDT regimen in the northeast of Thailand; a prospective study, 1984-1996. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Mar;65(1):28-36. PubMed 9207751 ↗
  • Jamet P, Ji B. Relapse after long-term follow up of multibacillary patients treated by WHO multidrug regimen. Marchoux Chemotherapy Study Group. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1995 Jun;63(2):195-201. PubMed 7602214 ↗
  • Jesudasan K, Vijayakumaran P, Manimozhi N, Jeyarajan T, Rao PS. Absence of relapse within 4 years among 34 multibacillary patients with high BIs treated for 2 years with MDT. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1996 Jun;64(2):133-5. PubMed 8690971 ↗
  • Li HY, Hu LF, Wu PW, Luo JS, Liu XM. Fixed-duration multidrug therapy in multibacillary leprosy. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Jun;65(2):230-7. PubMed 9251596 ↗
  • Li HY, Hu LF, Huang WB, Liu GC, Yuan LC, Jin Z, Li X, Li JL, Yang ZM. Risk of relapse in leprosy after fixed-duration multidrug therapy. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1997 Jun;65(2):238-45. PubMed 9251597 ↗
  • Lockwood DN, Suneetha S. Leprosy: too complex a disease for a simple elimination paradigm. Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Mar;83(3):230-5. Epub 2005 Mar 16. PubMed 15798849 ↗
  • Hungria EM, Buhrer-Sekula S, Oliveira RM, Aderaldo LC, Pontes MAA, Cruz R, de Goncalves HS, Penna MLF, Penna GO, Stefani MMA. Mycobacterium leprae-Specific Antibodies in Multibacillary Leprosy Patients Decrease During and After Treatment With Either the Regular 12 Doses Multidrug Therapy (MDT) or the Uniform 6 Doses MDT. Front Immunol. 2018 May 14;9:915. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00915. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29867930 ↗
  • Penna GO, Buhrer-Sekula S, Kerr LRS, Stefani MMA, Rodrigues LC, de Araujo MG, Ramos AMC, de Andrade ARC, Costa MB, Rosa PS, Goncalves HS, Cruz R, Barreto ML, Pontes MAA, Penna MLF. Uniform multidrug therapy for leprosy patients in Brazil (U-MDT/CT-BR): Results of an open label, randomized and controlled clinical trial, among multibacillary patients. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 13;11(7):e0005725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005725. eCollection 2017 Jul. PubMed 28704363 ↗
  • Hungria EM, Buhrer-Sekula S, de Oliveira RM, Aderaldo LC, Pontes AA, Cruz R, Goncalves HS, Penna ML, Penna GO, Stefani MM. Leprosy reactions: The predictive value of Mycobacterium leprae-specific serology evaluated in a Brazilian cohort of leprosy patients (U-MDT/CT-BR). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Feb 21;11(2):e0005396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005396. eCollection 2017 Feb. PubMed 28222139 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data sharing was not previously requested to the Ethical Committee. Therefore, if there will be a request for it, new ethical approval must be obtained.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2007, a primary completion of Sep 2012 and a completion of Dec 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 24, 2008
First posted
Apr 30, 2008
Start
Feb 2007
Primary completionActual
Sep 2012
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2016
Last update
Jun 1, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 1, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00669643
Lead sponsor
University of Brasilia
Collaborators
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil, Ministry of Health, Brazil, Fundação Alfredo da Matta, Manaus, Brazil, Instituto de Dermatologia Dona Libania, Fortaleza, Brazil
Responsible party
Gerson Oliveira Penna (Dr., University of Brasilia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 30, 2008
Start date
Feb 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Dec 31, 2016
Last update
Jun 1, 2017

Study contacts

Gerson O Penna, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Brasilia
Samira Buhrer, PhD
study director · Federal University of Goiás

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Clofazimine · Dapsone

Start the discussion