ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07918573TEBULA LEPROSYUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Telacebec in Adults With Multibacillary Leprosy (TEBULA Leprosy Trial)

A Phase 2 interventional study of Telacebec 300 mg and Telacebec 600 mg in Leprosy, Multibacillary, sponsored by Fondation Raoul Follereau. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Benin. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Fondation Raoul Follereau · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trail is to evaluate whether short-course telacebec-based regimens can induce rapid and measurable reductions in M. leprae viability, potentially establishing the foundation for future shorter, safer, and simplified therapeutic strategies for MB leprosy.

Participants will be randomised into one of the four study arms (A, B, C and D). The arm A is non interventional. For arms B, C, and D, the three-month study drug treatment will be followed by 9 months of MDT, bringing the total treatment time to 12 months. This provision of MDT ensures that the participant has received the recommended standard treatment for leprosy and is primarily for ethics considerations.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, randomised, controlled, multicentre phase II clinical trial conducted in Benin, Côte d'Ivoire and Ethiopia to evaluate the bactericidal efficacy of telacebec-based regimens in the treatment of multibacillary (MB) leprosy, with safety and tolerability as secondary objectives.

Participants who meet entry criteria and give consent will be randomised into four parallel groups: one control group (Group A) receiving standard WHO multidrug therapy (MDT); two investigational groups (Groups B and C) receiving telacebec monotherapy at two different dose levels; and one investigational group (Group D) receiving telacebec in combination with rifampicin. Upon completion of the assigned telacebec-based regimen, participants in Groups B, C, and D will subsequently receive standard WHO MDT.

Follow-up will be at least 12 months for all study arms; however, with the support of national programmes, patients may be followed for up to five years where possible.

Every fortnightly visit during the first three months (during which participants are taking study drugs) needs to be performed on the appointment day (±2 days). During post-IP treatment, once participants are on regular WHO MB-MDT, they are followed up on a monthly basis (-3/+2 days window). During the post-MDT period, they are followed up on a 3-monthly basis (±14 days window). The monthly dose of study medication must be taken as directly observed treatment (DOT) on the day of the visit. The Day 1 of the monthly WHO MB-MDT must also be taken as DOT.

The TEP is composed of clinicians experienced in the clinical management of leprosy, independent of the trial sites, and will provide assistance in reviewing the clinical response of participants included in the clinical trial. During the clinical follow-up, pictures of the lesions are taken systematically at every scheduled visit to document clinical evolution, identified with a code guaranteeing patient and treatment anonymity. After Day 84, pictures will be sent separately to each member of the TEP blinded to treatment allocation. The Technical Expert Panel (TEP) will give an independent assessment classifying each participant as showing clear improvement, moderate improvement, or no improvement.

At least three assessments from the TEP need to be collected for the decision. The decision will be taken by simple majority. If 4 out of 5 members provide an assessment and the decision is divided, a reserve list TEP member will be contacted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leprosy, Multibacillary

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tebula
  • Telacebec
  • Leprosy
  • Africa
03

In context

Leprosy

52 studies on the registry are indexed under Leprosy; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 70 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Leprosy.

Browse Leprosy studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Fondation Raoul Follereau as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be an individual aged 18-60 years.
  • Has been diagnosed with MB leprosy with a Bacillary Index (BI) of at least 2+ on a slit skin smear (SSS).
  • Have no prior leprosy treatment (WHO MDT and/or dapsone monotherapy).
  • Be able to give voluntary .
  • Be able to complete the full study period and follow-up (with no planned migration and an accurate, known and accessible address).
  • Be able to accept hospitalisation for at least three months (site-specific requirement).
  • "Body weight \< 85 kg at screening." (participants with weight >= 85 kg have an increased risk of severe transaminitis under telacebec)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to give voluntary .
  • Is a pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
  • Presenting with reinfection or relapse after WHO MDT/dapsone monotherapy, or has received anti-mycobacterial drugs in the last 30 days.
  • Presenting a leprosy reaction at diagnosis.
  • Being currently involved or having been involved within the last 30 days in a clinical trial.
  • Has any of the following medical conditions: a baseline of >450 ms or a abnormality or significant heart disease; co-infection; co-infection; history of or current pancreatitis; known or suspected cirrhosis of the liver; active clinical tuberculosis; any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may cause harm to the patient; known alcohol or drug addiction; known uncontrolled chronic disease such as diabetes ( >10%) or renal failure ( \<50 ml/min); anaemia requiring transfusion.
  • Known glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, due to risk of dapsone-induced haemolytic anaemia (G6PD testing required at screening).
  • Abnormal screening laboratory values, including: WBC \<2.5 × 10⁹/L; Neutrophils \<1.0 × 10⁹/L; \<100 × 10⁹/L; or ALT >2 times the upper limit of the reference range; Albumin \<30 mg/dL; >2 mg/dL (34 μmol/L); Calculated (Cockcroft-Gault) \<50 ml/min; Lipase ≥1.6 times the upper limit of the reference range.

Other eligibility consideration -

All women of must be tested for pregnancy at screening, and again before dosing at baseline (Day 0) and on Days 28, 42, 56, and 84 of the experimental treatment phase. Women with a positive pregnancy test after enrolment will have their treatment shifted to MDT if randomised to a telacebec-containing arm.

All women of reproductive potential must use two reliable and effective methods of contraception simultaneously while taking the study medication and up to two months after the last dose of telacebec. One highly effective form of contraception must be used (hormonal, IUD, prior tubal ligation, or partner's prior vasectomy) plus one additional effective method (male latex or synthetic condom, diaphragm or cervical cap). Male participants whose female partners are of reproductive age must also use contraception for up to 90 days after the last telacebec dose.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    (Group A) receiving standard WHO multidrug therapy (MDT)

    The World Health Organization recommends Multidrug Therapy (MDT) to cure leprosy. This standard treatment combines three medicines: (Rifampicin 300mg x 2) + (Clofazimin 100 mg x 3) + (Dapsone 50 mg) x 12 months

  • Experimental
    Group B (Low dose)

    (Telacebec 100 mg x 3 once monthly x 3 months) followed by (Rifampicin 300mg x 2) + (Clofazimin 100 mg x 3) + (Dapsone 50 mg) x 12 months

    Drug: Telacebec 300 mg

  • Experimental
    Group C (Hight dose)

    (Telacebec 100 mg x 6 once monthly x 3 months) followed by (Rifampicin 300mg x 2) + (Clofazimin 100 mg x 3) + (Dapsone 50 mg) x 12 months

    Drug: Telacebec 600 mg

  • Experimental
    Group D (Combinaison)

    (Telacebec 100 mg x 3 + Rifampicin 300 mg x 2 once monthly x 3 months) followed by (Rifampicin 300mg x 2) + (Clofazimin 100 mg x 3) + (Dapsone 50 mg) x 12 months

    Drug: Telacebec + Rifampicine

Interventions

  • DrugTelacebec 300 mg

    Telacebec 300 mg once monthly × 3 months

  • DrugTelacebec 600 mg

    Telacebec 600 mg once monthly × 3 months

  • DrugTelacebec + Rifampicine

    (Telacebec 300 mg + Rifampicine 600 mg) once monthly x 3 months

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in viable Mycobacterium leprae load in participants' skin lesions

    Treatment response of leprosy infection in each participant, measured in skin biopsies taken from the same lesion at baseline and Day 84 using the Molecular Viability Assay (MVA): quantitative RT-PCR of esxA and hsp18 transcripts, standardised to 3,000 bacilli. Reported as change in log10 viability; a larger decrease indicates a greater bactericidal effect of treatment in the participant. Arms B, C and D are compared with standard WHO MB-MDT (Arm A)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Clinical and laboratory adverse events, graded for severity and assessed for relationship to study drug, in participants receiving telacebec 300 mg, telacebec 600 mg, telacebec 300 mg + rifampicin 600 mg, or WHO MB-MDT

    Time frame: From first dose through Day 84 (end of study drug period)

  2. Proportion of participants with clinical improvement of leprosy skin lesions

    Assessed with standardised lesion-response criteria based on clinical examination and standardised photographs, classified as clear, moderate or no improvement. Classification validated by an independent external expert panel.

    Time frame: Day 84 and Month 12 (end of treatment)

  3. Incidence and severity of leprosy reactions

    Number of participants with Type 1 (reversal) reactions, defined by WHO criteria, and Type 2 reactions (erythema nodosum leprosum). ENL severity scored with the ENLIST ENL Severity Scale (EESS).

    Time frame: Baseline through Month 24 (end of follow-up)

  4. Change in peripheral nerve sensory function

    Semmes-Weinstein monofilament thresholds at standardised sites of the hands and feet.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 84, Month 12, Month 24

  5. Change in peripheral nerve motor function

    Voluntary Muscle Testing (VMT) scores.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 84, Month 12, Month 24

  6. Number of participants with new nerve function impairment

    Time frame: Baseline through Month 24

  7. Change in health-related quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 84, Month 12

Other outcomes

  1. Participant-reported global impression of change (PGI-C)

    Time frame: Day 84, Month 12

  2. Proportion of participants with viable M. leprae in skin lesions

    Skin biopsy material from a subset of participants (5 to 6 per group) are tested: Data reported per participant (presence of viable bacilli on day 84 compared to that participant's baseline sample).

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 84

  3. Change from baseline in M. leprae rRNA synthesis (RS) ratio in participants' skin lesions

    Marker of ongoing bacterial replication in each participant's lesion

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 84

  4. Number of participants who discontinue or interrupt study treatment because of adverse events

    Time frame: Throught Day 84

  5. Number of participants with treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities

    Haematology, biochemistry and liver function tests

    Time frame: Throught Day 84

  6. Plasma concentration of telacebec in participants

    Sparse pharmacokinetic sampling

    Time frame: Day 0 through Day 84

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centre de Dépistage et de Traitement de la Lèpre et de l'Ulcère de Buruli (Raoul et Madeline Follereau) de Pobè
    Pobé, Pobé, Benin
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The plan is not yet developed

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 23 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2028
CompletionEst.
Nov 2029
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07918573
Lead sponsor
Fondation Raoul Follereau
Collaborators
Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, Belgium, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Ministère de la Santé - Bénin, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Ethiopia, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, Ministère de la Santé, de l'Hygiène Publique et de la Couverture Maladie Universelle, Côte d'Ivoire, Université de Sorbonne, Paris, France, Board of Governors of the Colorado State University System (CSU)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Roch Christian JOHNSON, Medical Doctor, Phd, HDR
Contact
rochchristianjohnson@gmail.com
+229(01)96221132
Esai ANAGONOU, PhD
Contact
esaianagonou@yahoo.fr
+229(01)96826567
Roch Christian JOHNSON, Medical Doctor, PhD, HDR
principal investigator · Centre Interfacultaire de Formation et de Recherche en Environnement pour le Développement Durable (CIFRED), University of Abomey-Calavi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion