CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00654888ALKSBKUpdated Apr 11, 2008

Automated Lamellar Keratectomy in Symptomatic Patients With Bullous Keratopathy

An interventional study of ALK (automated lamellar keratectomy) and Mitomycin in Corneal Disease, sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo. Completed. Open to participants aged 10 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-04-11.

Sponsored by Federal University of São Paulo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To relieve pain in patients with symptomatic bullous keratopathy (BK) until keratoplasty and in patients without visual prediction.

The automated lamellar keratectomy represents a alternative in treatment of pain in symptomatic patients with BK.

Read the detailed description

Only patients with BK symptomatic (with pain) were submitted to automated lamellar keratectomy (ALK).

Complete ophthalmological examination including UCVA,BSVA, biomicroscopy, tonometry, esthesiometry, UBM pachymetry, impression cytology and pain questionnaire were performed in preoperative, postoperative of one, seven, 30, 90, 180 days and one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Corneal Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cataract extraction
  • surgery
  • corneal disease
03

In context

Corneal Diseases

130 studies on the registry are indexed under Corneal Diseases; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 32 across 78 interventional studies indexed under Corneal Diseases.

Browse Corneal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of São Paulo is the lead sponsor of 427 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with bullous keratopathy symptomatic (with pain)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • herpetic endotelial disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Group one submitted to automated lamellar keratectomy(ALK) with mitomycin (0,02% in 30 seconds after keratectomy).

    Drug: Mitomycin

  • Active comparator
    2

    automated lamellar keratectomy without mitomycin

    Procedure: ALK (automated lamellar keratectomy)

Interventions

  • ProcedureALK (automated lamellar keratectomy)

    ALK is performed with a microkeratome, to make a free cap.

    Also known as: automated lamellar keratectomy with PTK

  • DrugMitomycin

    mitomycin 0,02%, 30 seconds after ALK

    Also known as: automated lamellar keratectomy associated with PTK

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain questionnaire

    Time frame: preoperative and postoperative 1,7,30,90,180 days and one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. biomicroscopy, esthesiometry, UBM pachymetry, impression cytology

    Time frame: preoperative, postoperative 1,7,30,90,180 days and one year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00654888
Lead sponsor
Federal University of São Paulo
First posted
Apr 9, 2008
Start date
Mar 2005
Primary completion
Mar 2006
Completion
Feb 2008
Last update
Apr 11, 2008

Study contacts

Eliana D Gonçalves, MD
principal investigator · Federal University of São Paulo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion