ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00638014TALONUpdated May 2, 2011Results posted

Rapid Sternal Closure System (TALON)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Rapid Sternal Closure System and Conventional wire closure in Sternal Wound Infection and Mediastinitis, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-02.

Sponsored by Duke University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective is to establish if the Rapid Sternal Closure System (RSCS) improves early postoperative recovery as manifested by decreased pain and improved pulmonary function.

Secondary objectives include evaluation of Rapid Sternal Closure System with regard to SWCs (surgical wound complication defined as surgically treated sternal wound infection and sternal instability/non-union) as outlined in the protocol.

For a given study endpoint, the null hypothesis will be no difference between the Rapid Sternal Closure System group and the control group. The alternative hypothesis will be a difference between 2 groups. The statistical objective of this study is to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sternal Wound Infection
  • Mediastinitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sternal wound closure
  • cardiac surgery
  • sternal nonunion
03

In context

Mediastinitis

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Mediastinitis; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is below the median of 83 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Mediastinitis.

Browse Mediastinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female. Women of must have a negative serum (or urine) human chorionic gonadotropin assay prior to surgery, and be willing to continue to use effective means of for at least 180 days following surgery. Medically acceptable contraceptives include: (1) surgical sterilization (such as a tubal ligation or hysterectomy), (2) approved hormonal contraceptives (such as birth control pills, patches, implants or injections), (3) barrier methods (such as a condom or diaphragm) used with a spermicide, or (4) an intrauterine device (IUD). Contraceptive measures such as Plan B(TM), sold for emergency use after unprotected sex, are not acceptable methods for routine use.
  2. Age ≥ 18 years.
  3. Scheduled to undergo nonemergent on or off pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or valve repair or replacement surgery through a full median sternotomy.
  4. At higher risk for SWC, defined as the presence of any of the following factors: obesity ( > 30), chronic use (>6 month duration and currently using), severe chronic obstructive pulomonary disease, planned bilateral internal mammary artery harvest, undergoing redo median sternotomy, and history of radiation to the chest.
  5. Willing and able to provide written .
  6. Available for evaluation from baseline until final evaluation at 180 days postsurgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Undergoing emergency cardiac surgery (urgent surgery is allowed if is obtained and the study procedures can be performed).
  2. Undergoing a significant concomitant surgical procedure (eg, carotid endarterectomy, aortic root repair or replacement, deep hypothermic circulatory arrest [DHCA], or pulmonary resection).
  3. Undergoing a minimally invasive or a thoracic surgical approach.
  4. Using a preoperative mechanical assist device or intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), if inserted for shock/low output syndrome (an IABP is allowed if it is inserted for unstable angina or low ).
  5. Active and significant systemic infection, eg, active endocarditis or a history of significant recurrent systemic infection.
  6. Receiving antibiotic therapy within the 2 weeks before the date of surgery.
  7. History of within the past year (except for squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has been treated, with no evidence of recurrence).
  8. History of major organ transplantation, including bone marrow transplantation.
  9. Recent history of significant drug or alcohol abuse.
  10. Current condition (eg, symptomatic [HIV] infection). Use of is not an exclusion criteria).
  11. Female subject who is pregnant (including a positive pregnancy test at screening or baseline) or nursing. Females of not practicing a method with a high degree of reliability.
  12. Postsurgical ≤ 90 days, in the investigator's or sponsor's opinion.
  13. Current participation or participation within 30 days before the start of this study in an experimental drug or device study or currently participating in a study during which the administration of drugs within 90 days is anticipated.
  14. Refusal to accept medically indicated blood products.
  15. Moderate or severe pectus deformity.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Conventional wires only

    Device: Conventional wire closure

  • Experimental
    2

    Rapid Sternal Closure System supplemented with wires

    Device: Rapid Sternal Closure System

Interventions

  • DeviceRapid Sternal Closure System

    Sternal talons will be used and supplemented with wires

  • DeviceConventional wire closure

    Conventional wire closure of sternum

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change of Preoperative Incentive Spirometry (IS) Volume Achieved

    Maximum incentive spirometry volume was measured at baseline (prior to surgery) and daily from postoperative day 1 through postoperative day 7 (or discharge if earlier) using a Coach 2 incentive spirometer with one way valve (Coach 2 model # 22-4000, Smiths Medical, Keene, NH).

    Time frame: Baseline, Maximum value during postoperatively days 1 thru 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Sternal Wound Infection or Sternal Instability/Non-union

    The Data and Safety Monitoring Board reviewed source documents for all cases with possible sternal wound infection and sternal instability or non-union and made a determination as to the presence of these complications.

    Time frame: Up to 180 days

07

Results

Posted May 2, 2011

Participant flow

Subjects were consented and enrolled in the study at 2 centers from April 2008 to July 2009.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConventional Wires OnlyTalon
Started2328
Completed2328
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Change of Preoperative Incentive Spirometry (IS) Volume Achieved

Maximum incentive spirometry volume was measured at baseline (prior to surgery) and daily from postoperative day 1 through postoperative day 7 (or discharge if earlier) using a Coach 2 incentive spirometer with one way valve (Coach 2 model # 22-4000, Smiths Medical, Keene, NH).

Time frame:
Baseline, Maximum value during postoperatively days 1 thru 7
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change
Percentage Change of Preoperative Incentive Spirometry (IS) Volume Achieved
percentage changeConventional Wires OnlyTalon
Percentage Change of Preoperative Incentive Spirometry (IS) Volume Achieved58 ± 2467 ± 32
Statistical analysis
  • Conventional Wires Only vs Talon · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.41
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Sternal Wound Infection or Sternal Instability/Non-union

The Data and Safety Monitoring Board reviewed source documents for all cases with possible sternal wound infection and sternal instability or non-union and made a determination as to the presence of these complications.

Time frame:
Up to 180 days
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Sternal Wound Infection or Sternal Instability/Non-union
ParticipantsConventional Wires OnlyTalon
Number of Participants With Sternal Wound Infection or Sternal Instability/Non-union11

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Conventional Wires Only—1/23 (4.3%)0/23 (0%)
Talon—1/28 (3.6%)0/28 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventConventional Wires OnlyTalon
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders1/230/28
Chest tube entrapment between sternal halves (not Talon)Surgical and medical procedures0/231/28

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Conventional Wires OnlyTalonTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years141630
>=65 years91221
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Conventional Wires OnlyTalonTotal
Mean63.0 ± 9.261.8 ± 10.062.4 ± 9.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Conventional Wires OnlyTalonTotal
Female9413
Male142438
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Conventional Wires OnlyTalonTotal
United States232851
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fry DE. The economic costs of surgical site infection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2002;3 Suppl 1:S37-43. doi: 10.1089/sur.2002.3.s1-37. PubMed 12573038 ↗
  • Friberg O, Dahlin LG, Levin LA, Magnusson A, Granfeldt H, Kallman J, Svedjeholm R. Cost effectiveness of local collagen-gentamicin as prophylaxis for sternal wound infections in different risk groups. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006 Apr;40(2):117-25. doi: 10.1080/14017430500363024. PubMed 16608782 ↗
  • Demmy TL, Park SB, Liebler GA, Burkholder JA, Maher TD, Benckart DH, Magovern GJ Jr, Magovern GJ Sr. Recent experience with major sternal wound complications. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990 Mar;49(3):458-62. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(90)90256-6. PubMed 2310254 ↗
  • Tang GH, Maganti M, Weisel RD, Borger MA. Prevention and management of deep sternal wound infection. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Spring;16(1):62-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2004.01.005. PubMed 15366689 ↗
  • Braxton JH, Marrin CA, McGrath PD, Morton JR, Norotsky M, Charlesworth DC, Lahey SJ, Clough R, Ross CS, Olmstead EM, O'Connor GT. 10-year follow-up of patients with and without mediastinitis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Spring;16(1):70-6. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2004.01.006. PubMed 15366690 ↗
  • Hollenbeak CS, Murphy DM, Koenig S, Woodward RS, Dunagan WC, Fraser VJ. The clinical and economic impact of deep chest surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest. 2000 Aug;118(2):397-402. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.2.397. PubMed 10936131 ↗
  • Boyce JM, Potter-Bynoe G, Dziobek L. Hospital reimbursement patterns among patients with surgical wound infections following open heart surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990 Feb;11(2):89-93. doi: 10.1086/646127. PubMed 2107250 ↗
  • Baskett RJ, MacDougall CE, Ross DB. Is mediastinitis a preventable complication? A 10-year review. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Feb;67(2):462-5. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)01195-3. PubMed 10197671 ↗
  • Sakamoto H, Fukuda I, Oosaka M, Nakata H. Risk factors and treatment of deep sternal wound infection after cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Aug;9(4):226-32. PubMed 13129420 ↗
  • Crabtree TD, Codd JE, Fraser VJ, Bailey MS, Olsen MA, Damiano RJ Jr. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for deep and superficial sternal infection after coronary artery bypass grafting at a tertiary care medical center. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Spring;16(1):53-61. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2004.01.009. PubMed 15366688 ↗
  • Fowler VG Jr, O'Brien SM, Muhlbaier LH, Corey GR, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Clinical predictors of major infections after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2005 Aug 30;112(9 Suppl):I358-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525790. PubMed 16159846 ↗
  • Olsen MA, Lock-Buckley P, Hopkins D, Polish LB, Sundt TM, Fraser VJ. The risk factors for deep and superficial chest surgical-site infections after coronary artery bypass graft surgery are different. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jul;124(1):136-45. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.122306. PubMed 12091819 ↗
  • Ridderstolpe L, Gill H, Granfeldt H, Ahlfeldt H, Rutberg H. Superficial and deep sternal wound complications: incidence, risk factors and mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Dec;20(6):1168-75. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00991-5. PubMed 11717023 ↗
  • Trick WE, Scheckler WE, Tokars JI, Jones KC, Reppen ML, Smith EM, Jarvis WR. Modifiable risk factors associated with deep sternal site infection after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jan;119(1):108-14. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(00)70224-8. PubMed 10612768 ↗
  • Abboud CS, Wey SB, Baltar VT. Risk factors for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Feb;77(2):676-83. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01523-6. PubMed 14759458 ↗
  • Dodds Ashley ES, Carroll DN, Engemann JJ, Harris AD, Fowler VG Jr, Sexton DJ, Kaye KS. Risk factors for postoperative mediastinitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 1;38(11):1555-60. doi: 10.1086/420819. Epub 2004 May 12. PubMed 15156442 ↗
  • Lu JC, Grayson AD, Jha P, Srinivasan AK, Fabri BM. Risk factors for sternal wound infection and mid-term survival following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jun;23(6):943-9. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00137-4. PubMed 12829070 ↗
  • Jonkers D, Elenbaas T, Terporten P, Nieman F, Stobberingh E. Prevalence of 90-days postoperative wound infections after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jan;23(1):97-102. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00662-0. PubMed 12493512 ↗
  • Eklund AM, Valtonen M, Werkkala KA. Prophylaxis of sternal wound infections with gentamicin-collagen implant: randomized controlled study in cardiac surgery. J Hosp Infect. 2005 Feb;59(2):108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.10.005. PubMed 15620444 ↗
  • Finkelstein R, Rabino G, Mashiah T, Bar-El Y, Adler Z, Kertzman V, Cohen O, Milo S. Vancomycin versus cefazolin prophylaxis for cardiac surgery in the setting of a high prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;123(2):326-32. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.119698. PubMed 11828293 ↗
  • Friberg O, Svedjeholm R, Soderquist B, Granfeldt H, Vikerfors T, Kallman J. Local gentamicin reduces sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):153-61; discussion 161-2. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.043. PubMed 15620935 ↗
  • Dickie SR, Dorafshar AH, Song DH. Definitive closure of the infected median sternotomy wound: a treatment algorithm utilizing vacuum-assisted closure followed by rigid plate fixation. Ann Plast Surg. 2006 Jun;56(6):680-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000202825.41069.c3. PubMed 16721085 ↗
  • Hendrickson SC, Koger KE, Morea CJ, Aponte RL, Smith PK, Levin LS. Sternal plating for the treatment of sternal nonunion. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Aug;62(2):512-8. PubMed 8694615 ↗
  • Pai S, Gunja NJ, Dupak EL, McMahon NL, Roth TP, Lalikos JF, Dunn RM, Francalancia N, Pins GD, Billiar KL. In vitro comparison of wire and plate fixation for midline sternotomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):962-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.089. PubMed 16122464 ↗
  • Song DH, Lohman RF, Renucci JD, Jeevanandam V, Raman J. Primary sternal plating in high-risk patients prevents mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug;26(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.04.038. PubMed 15296898 ↗
  • Edwards FH, Engelman RM, Houck P, Shahian DM, Bridges CR; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guideline Series: Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Cardiac Surgery, Part I: Duration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jan;81(1):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.06.034. No abstract available. PubMed 16368422 ↗
  • Bratzler DW, Houck PM; Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; American Association of Critical Care Nurses; American Association of Nurse Anesthetists; American College of Surgeons; American College of Osteopathic Surgeons; American Geriatrics Society; American Society of Anesthesiologists; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses; Ascension Health; Association of periOperative Registered Nurses; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Medical Letter; Premier; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Surgical Infection Society. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;38(12):1706-15. doi: 10.1086/421095. Epub 2004 May 26. PubMed 15227616 ↗
  • Engelman R, Shahian D, Shemin R, Guy TS, Bratzler D, Edwards F, Jacobs M, Fernando H, Bridges C; Workforce on Evidence-Based Medicine, Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery, part II: Antibiotic choice. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Apr;83(4):1569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.09.046. No abstract available. PubMed 17383396 ↗
  • Bolon MK, Morlote M, Weber SG, Koplan B, Carmeli Y, Wright SB. Glycopeptides are no more effective than beta-lactam agents for prevention of surgical site infection after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 May 15;38(10):1357-63. doi: 10.1086/383318. Epub 2004 Apr 21. PubMed 15156470 ↗
  • Harton SC, Grap MJ, Savage L, Elswick RK. Frequency and predictors of return to incentive spirometry volume baseline after cardiac surgery. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 2007 Winter;22(1):7-12. doi: 10.1111/j.0889-7204.2007.05199.x. PubMed 17342000 ↗
  • Dhadwal K, Al-Ruzzeh S, Athanasiou T, Choudhury M, Tekkis P, Vuddamalay P, Lyster H, Amrani M, George S. Comparison of clinical and economic outcomes of two antibiotic prophylaxis regimens for sternal wound infection in high-risk patients following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. Heart. 2007 Sep;93(9):1126-33. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.103002. Epub 2007 Feb 19. PubMed 17309908 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2008, a primary completion of Jul 2009 and a completion of Jul 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2011, 1 year 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 12, 2008
First posted
Mar 18, 2008
Start
Mar 2008
Primary completionActual
Jul 2009
CompletionActual
Jul 2009
Results first posted
May 2, 2011
Last update
May 2, 2011
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 2, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00638014
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
KLS Martin, L.P.
First posted
Mar 18, 2008
Start date
Mar 2008
Primary completion
Jul 2009
Completion
Jul 2009
Results posted
May 2, 2011
Last update
May 2, 2011

Study contacts

Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, M. D.
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion