A Phase 2 interventional study of Ifosfamide, Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine and Bortezomib + IGEV in Hodgkin Disease, sponsored by Istituto Clinico Humanitas. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-09-02.
Sponsored by Istituto Clinico Humanitas · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the addition of Bortezomib (Velcade) to IGEV combination (Ifosfamide, Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine) in patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma increases the rate of complete remission (PET negativity) at transplantation.
885 studies on the registry are indexed under Hodgkin Disease; 132 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 44 across 726 interventional studies indexed under Hodgkin Disease.
Browse Hodgkin Disease studies →Istituto Clinico Humanitas is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
IGEV regimen (Ifosfamide, Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine)
Drug: Ifosfamide, Gemcitabine, Vinorelbine
B-IGEV (Bortezomib + IGEV)
Drug: Bortezomib + IGEV
Ifosfamide 2000 mg/sqm, day 1-4 (plus MESNA); Gemcitabine 800 mg/sqm, day 1 and 4; Vinorelbine 20 mg/sqm, day 1; Prednisone 100 mg, day 1-4; G-CSF 1 vial sc, day 7-12 of each 21-day course.
Bortezomib 1,3 mg/sqm, day 1, 4, 8; Ifosfamide 2000 mg/sqm, day 1-4 (plus MESNA); Gemcitabine 800 mg/sqm, day 1 and 4; Vinorelbine 20 mg/sqm, day 1; Prednisone 100 mg, day 1-4; G-CSF 1 vial sc, day 7-12 of each 21-day course.
PET negativity rate obtained with IGEV or B-IGEV will be compared
Time frame: PET negativity after 4 courses of induction (IGEV or B-IGEV)
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Istituto Clinico Humanitas