ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07491419ACT-FASTUpdated Jun 24, 2026

The Impact of Fast Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing Tools on Stewardship Antibiotic and Clinical Outcome (ACT-FAST)

An interventional study of Diagnostic Test: Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (R-AST) guided Stewardship and Standard of Care (SOC) in Bloodstream Infection, Gram-Negative Infections and Gram-Positive Infections, sponsored by Istituto Clinico Humanitas. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-24.

Sponsored by Istituto Clinico Humanitas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ACT-FAST study aims to compare commercially available Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (R-AST) tools with the current standard of care for patients with Bloodstream Infections (BSI). The primary objective is to evaluate whether "early targeted" antibiotic prescriptions, guided by these rapid tests, can improve antimicrobial stewardship and patient clinical outcomes.

To facilitate the evaluation of various diagnostic tools-including those currently on the market and those emerging in the near future-this study utilizes an adaptive clinical trial platform. This flexible design allows for the continuous assessment of different R-AST technologies within a single master protocol, ensuring that the most effective diagnostic strategies are identified efficiently.

Read the detailed description

ACT-FAST is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, adaptive clinical trial designed as the first domain of a broader adaptive platform. The study evaluates the clinical and stewardship impact of "early targeted" antibiotic therapy guided by Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (R-AST) compared to standard empirical therapy in patients with suspected bloodstream infections (BSI).

The study population consists of patients with positive blood cultures for whom pathogen identification and susceptibility results are still pending. Participants are randomized into one of two diagnostic strategies:

  • Experimental Arm: Blood cultures are processed using R-AST testing tools to provide rapid phenotypic or genotypic susceptibility data.
  • Standard of Care (SoC) Arm: Blood cultures are processed according to the standard laboratory diagnostic workflow of the participating center.

In both arms, results are communicated to the treating clinicians, who adjust antibiotic therapy based on their clinical judgment and routine practice. As an adaptive trial, the randomization ratios may be adjusted based on the number of active intervention arms. To ensure scientific rigor, outcome assessors remain blinded to the treatment allocation.

Patients are followed for a total of 28 days to assess clinical outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship objectives. The platform design allows for the integration of additional R-AST tools or interventions through future protocol amendments, ensuring the study remains at the forefront of diagnostic innovation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bloodstream Infection
  • Gram-Negative Infections
  • Gram-Positive Infections
  • Bacteremia Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Blood Stream Infection
  • Gram-negative Infections
  • Gram-positive Infections
  • Bacteremia Sepsis
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 102 across 1,165 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Istituto Clinico Humanitas is the lead sponsor of 279 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients admitted to emergency department or hospitalized for any cause in participating hospitals with clinically suspected BSI and positive blood culture.
  • At least 18 years of age.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have previously taken part in this trial.
  • Concurrently participating in the active phase of a study considered incompatible.
  • Patient with severe or terminal disease with shorter than 48 h.
  • Have an existing directive to withhold life-sustaining treatment, in relation to antibiotic use.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental arm

    Diagnostic approach to blood cultures using rapid microbiological diagnosis testing (R-AST)

    Diagnostic Test: Diagnostic Test: Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (R-AST) guided Stewardship

  • Active comparator
    Standard of care

    Diagnostic approach to blood cultures using the standard method

    Diagnostic Test: Standard of Care (SOC)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testDiagnostic Test: Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (R-AST) guided Stewardship

    In patients randomized to the intervention arm, the test under evaluation will be performed by the Humanitas Core Lab on positive blood cultures. The test is expected to provide results in a certain amount of time. The Lab will notify the ID consultant as soon as the test provides the first result (even if partial). The ID physician is expected to revise the antibiotic therapy according to the identified species, guided by the tool.

  • Diagnostic testStandard of Care (SOC)

    Patients will be managed as usual, which typically consists of receiving standard empirical antibiotics, according to the local prescribing policy, continued until the results of the routine standard AST protocol in current use. In any case, both arms have standard microbiology culture and susceptibility testing performed, according to standard laboratory procedures and current guidelines, with results typically available after 48-72 hours from a blood culture positive result (day 3).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare commercially available R-AST testing tools with the current standard of care in BSI patients

    The primary objective is to determine if a management strategy based on a R-AST test results shorten the time for randomization to antimicrobial stewardship goals compared to standard care. "Antimicrobial stewardship goals" is defined by the administration of an antimicrobial agent that meets both conditions: i) an antimicrobial agent active against the organism(s) documented at conventional AST on blood culture (in vitro); AND ii) an antimicrobial agent targeted for the pathogen(s) identified, and not excessively broad spectrum

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Infectious Disease Unit - IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital
    Rozzano, Milan 20089, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Angus DC, Berry S, Lewis RJ, Al-Beidh F, Arabi Y, van Bentum-Puijk W, Bhimani Z, Bonten M, Broglio K, Brunkhorst F, Cheng AC, Chiche JD, De Jong M, Detry M, Goossens H, Gordon A, Green C, Higgins AM, Hullegie SJ, Kruger P, Lamontagne F, Litton E, Marshall J, McGlothlin A, McGuinness S, Mouncey P, Murthy S, Nichol A, O'Neill GK, Parke R, Parker J, Rohde G, Rowan K, Turner A, Young P, Derde L, McArthur C, Webb SA. The REMAP-CAP (Randomized Embedded Multifactorial Adaptive Platform for Community-acquired Pneumonia) Study. Rationale and Design. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Jul;17(7):879-891. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-192SD. PubMed 32267771 ↗
  • Marquet K, Liesenborgs A, Bergs J, Vleugels A, Claes N. Incidence and outcome of inappropriate in-hospital empiric antibiotics for severe infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 16;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0795-y. PubMed 25888181 ↗
  • Mettler J, Simcock M, Sendi P, Widmer AF, Bingisser R, Battegay M, Fluckiger U, Bassetti S. Empirical use of antibiotics and adjustment of empirical antibiotic therapies in a university hospital: a prospective observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 26;7:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-21. PubMed 17386104 ↗
  • Friedman ND, Kaye KS, Stout JE, McGarry SA, Trivette SL, Briggs JP, Lamm W, Clark C, MacFarquhar J, Walton AL, Reller LB, Sexton DJ. Health care--associated bloodstream infections in adults: a reason to change the accepted definition of community-acquired infections. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Nov 19;137(10):791-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-10-200211190-00007. PubMed 12435215 ↗
  • Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available. PubMed 34599691 ↗
  • Proschan M, Evans S. Resist the Temptation of Response-Adaptive Randomization. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 31;71(11):3002-3004. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa334. PubMed 32222766 ↗
  • Lin J, Bunn V. Comparison of multi-arm multi-stage design and adaptive randomization in platform clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Mar;54:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 13. PubMed 28089763 ↗
  • Pallmann P, Bedding AW, Choodari-Oskooei B, Dimairo M, Flight L, Hampson LV, Holmes J, Mander AP, Odondi L, Sydes MR, Villar SS, Wason JMS, Weir CJ, Wheeler GM, Yap C, Jaki T. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them. BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7. PubMed 29490655 ↗
  • Ilges D, Tande AJ, Stevens RW. A Broad Spectrum of Possibilities: Spectrum Scores as a Unifying Metric of Antibiotic Utilization. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 26;77(2):167-173. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad189. PubMed 36999909 ↗
  • Mulatero F, Bonnardel V, Micolaud C. The way forward for fast microbiology. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 May;17(5):661-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03520.x. PubMed 21521410 ↗
  • Pascale R, Corcione S, Bussini L, Pancaldi L, Giacobbe DR, Ambretti S, Lupia T, Costa C, Marchese A, De Rosa FG, Bassetti M, Viscoli C, Bartoletti M, Giannella M, Viale P. Non-fermentative gram-negative bloodstream infection in northern Italy: a multicenter cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 12;21(1):806. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06496-8. PubMed 34384380 ↗
  • Ruddel H, Thomas-Ruddel DO, Reinhart K, Bach F, Gerlach H, Lindner M, Marshall JC, Simon P, Weiss M, Bloos F, Schwarzkopf D; MEDUSA study group. Adverse effects of delayed antimicrobial treatment and surgical source control in adults with sepsis: results of a planned secondary analysis of a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2022 Feb 28;26(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03901-9. PubMed 35227308 ↗
  • Leone M, Martin C. How to break the vicious circle of antibiotic resistances? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008 Oct;14(5):587-92. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32830f1deb. PubMed 18787454 ↗
  • Bernhard M, Lichtenstern C, Eckmann C, Weigand MA. The early antibiotic therapy in septic patients--milestone or sticking point? Crit Care. 2014 Nov 30;18(6):671. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0671-1. PubMed 25672873 ↗
  • Breijyeh Z, Jubeh B, Karaman R. Resistance of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Current Antibacterial Agents and Approaches to Resolve It. Molecules. 2020 Mar 16;25(6):1340. doi: 10.3390/molecules25061340. PubMed 32187986 ↗
  • Goto M, Al-Hasan MN. Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013 Jun;19(6):501-9. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12195. Epub 2013 Mar 8. PubMed 23473333 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07491419
Collaborators
BioMérieux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2026
Start date
Mar 19, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 19, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 19, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 24, 2026

Study contacts

Michele Bartoletti, MD, PhD
Contact
michele.bartoletti@hunimed.eu
+ 39 02 8224 3568

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion