CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00624377Updated Mar 28, 2014Results posted

Safety and Effectiveness of Spiriva in COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Patients Under the Real Condition of Usual Practice

An observational study in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 17 sites in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-03-28.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,031
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to monitor the change in the health status of severe COPD patients after the initiation of Tiotropium therapy. This will be assessed by the physician's global evaluation of the patient's health status on a 8-point scale. This measure has been shown to correlate with a established standard measure of the patients health related quality of life. The primary analysis in this trial will only include patients not pre-treated with a long-acting beta-agonist to establish a clear efficacy signal in this patient population. As the reality of COPD treatment nowadays is poly-pharmacy, a secondary analysis will analyse patients who are pretreated with long-acting bronchodilators to put the changes in the health status in a likely real world context. In parallel to these evaluations of the health status, the lung function response of the patients will be assessed to gain an established objective measure of treatment response.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,031 is above the median of 157 across 929 observational studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

COPD

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of COPD according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD; updated 2005).
  2. Patients who are assessed to benefit from the intake of long-acting anticholinergics as a monotherapy or as add-on medication.
  3. Tiotropium bromide naïve patients.
  4. Patients with indication for tiotropium bromide according to Taiwanese Spiriva® label.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with contraindications to tiotropium bromide use (as per the Spiriva® package insert).
  2. Known hypersensitivity to the active ingredient or to any of the excipients of Spiriva®.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,031 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • COPD patients

    Drug: Tiotropium

Interventions

  • DrugTiotropium

    Tiotropium 18 mcg HandiHaler once daily

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of Physician's Global COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Assessment After 8-week of Treatment Severe COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA (Long-acting Beta Agonists) Treatment

    The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  2. Changes of FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second) After 8 Weeks of Treatment

    FEV1: Average values for FEV1 in healthy people depend mainly on sex and age. Values of between 80% and 120% of the average value is considered normal. FEV1 \< 80% of the predicted value in combination with an FEV1/FVC \< 70% confirms the presence of airflow limitation that is not fully reversible

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  3. Changes of FEV1/FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) After 8 Weeks of Treatment

    FEV1/FVC (FEV1%) is the ratio of FEV1 to FVC. In healthy adults this should be approximately 75-80%. In obstructive diseases, the value often decreased (\<80%, often \~45%).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in Severe COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment

    The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  2. Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA Treatment

    The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  3. Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment

    The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  4. Change of Patient's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment Grouped According to Patients Severity and Concomitant Medication With LABAs

    The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  5. Percentage of Participants Which Had a Reduction of Concomitant Drug Use

    The Physician has been asked to record any prescribed and other medication used for COPD (at the physician discretion) at every visit.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 15, 2012

Participant flow

A total of 2,031 patients were enrolled between Jan-11-2008 to Mar-24-2010

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Started2031
Completed1387
Not completed644
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up355
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject100
Withdrew: Adverse event14
Withdrew: Other91
Withdrew: Non-evaluable population84

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange of Physician's Global COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Assessment After 8-week of Treatment Severe COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA (Long-acting Beta Agonists) Treatment

The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change of Physician's Global COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Assessment After 8-week of Treatment Severe COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA (Long-acting Beta Agonists) Treatment
Units on a ScaleSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Change of Physician's Global COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) Assessment After 8-week of Treatment Severe COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA (Long-acting Beta Agonists) Treatment1.16 ± 1.34
PrimaryChanges of FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second) After 8 Weeks of Treatment

FEV1: Average values for FEV1 in healthy people depend mainly on sex and age. Values of between 80% and 120% of the average value is considered normal. FEV1 \< 80% of the predicted value in combination with an FEV1/FVC \< 70% confirms the presence of airflow limitation that is not fully reversible

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · liter per second
Changes of FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second) After 8 Weeks of Treatment
liter per secondSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Changes of FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 Second) After 8 Weeks of Treatment6.27 ± 12.99
PrimaryChanges of FEV1/FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) After 8 Weeks of Treatment

FEV1/FVC (FEV1%) is the ratio of FEV1 to FVC. In healthy adults this should be approximately 75-80%. In obstructive diseases, the value often decreased (\<80%, often \~45%).

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Ratio
Changes of FEV1/FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) After 8 Weeks of Treatment
RatioSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Changes of FEV1/FVC (Forced Vital Capacity) After 8 Weeks of Treatment4.36 ± 10.72
SecondaryChange of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in Severe COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment

The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in Severe COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment
Units on a ScaleSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in Severe COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment1.72 ± 1.77
SecondaryChange of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA Treatment

The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA Treatment
Units on a ScaleSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Without Concomitant LABA Treatment1.19 ± 1.31
SecondaryChange of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment

The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment
Units on a ScaleSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Change of Physician's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment in All COPD Patients Independent of Concomitant LABA Treatment1.54 ± 1.67
SecondaryChange of Patient's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment Grouped According to Patients Severity and Concomitant Medication With LABAs

The extent of satisfaction with tiotropium bromide treatment was evaluated based on the changes of the Global COPD Assessment performed by the physician. This evaluation was done with the help of an 8-point scale rated from 1 (Poor) to 8 (Excellent) following the question "Overall, how is the COPD of your patient?"

Time frame:
Baseline and 8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Change of Patient's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment Grouped According to Patients Severity and Concomitant Medication With LABAs
Units on a ScaleSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Change of Patient's Global COPD Assessment (8-point Scale) After 8-week of Treatment Grouped According to Patients Severity and Concomitant Medication With LABAs2.84 ± 2.21
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Which Had a Reduction of Concomitant Drug Use

The Physician has been asked to record any prescribed and other medication used for COPD (at the physician discretion) at every visit.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Which Had a Reduction of Concomitant Drug Use
Percentage of ParticipantsSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Percentage of Participants Which Had a Reduction of Concomitant Drug Use76

Adverse events

Collected over 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Spiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients—16/2,031 (0.8%)0/2,031 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventSpiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Chronic Obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/2031
DeathGeneral disorders2/2031
Acute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders2/2031
Cardiac disorderCardiac disorders1/2031
Hepatic cirrhosisHepatobiliary disorders1/2031
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/2031
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/2031
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2031
Respiratory therapySurgical and medical procedures1/2031
InfarctionVascular disorders1/2031

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Year)Spiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Mean72.87 ± 10.32
Gender
Gender(Participants)Spiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Female245
Male1781
Weight
Weight(kg)Spiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Mean61.94 ± 11.60
Height
Height(cm)Spiriva 18µg With HandiHaler Device on COPD Patients
Mean162.57 ± 7.38
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chan Wha, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chia Yi, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hsin Chu, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hwa Lian, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
    Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
    Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
    Kaohsiung, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
    Taichung, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
    Taichung, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Tainan, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 1
    Taipiei, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 2
    Taipiei, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 3
    Taipiei, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 4
    Taipiei, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 5
    Taipiei, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site 6
    Taipiei, Taiwan
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Taoyuan, Taiwan
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 28, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00624377
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 27, 2008
Start date
Dec 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
May 15, 2012
Last update
Mar 28, 2014

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion