CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00622700TOPICUpdated Mar 13, 2017Results posted

Phase III Study With Teriflunomide Versus Placebo in Patients With First Clinical Symptom of Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Teriflunomide and Placebo in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Sanofi. Completed at 131 sites in 21 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-13.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
618
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective was to demonstrate the effect of teriflunomide (HMR1726) (14 milligram per day [mg/day] and 7 mg/day), in comparison to placebo, for reducing conversion of participants presenting with their first clinical episode consistent with multiple sclerosis (MS) to clinically definite multiple sclerosis (CDMS).

The secondary objectives were:

  • To demonstrate the effect of teriflunomide, in comparison to placebo, on:

    • Reducing conversion to definite multiple sclerosis (DMS)
    • Reducing annualized relapse rate (ARR)
    • Reducing disease activity/progression as measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
    • Reducing accumulation of disability for at least 12 weeks as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
    • Proportion of disability-free participants as assessed by the EDSS
    • Reducing participant-reported fatigue
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of teriflunomide
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of teriflunomide
  • Optional pharmacogenomic testing aimed at assessing the association between the main enzyme systems of teriflunomide metabolism and hepatic safety, and other potential associations between gene variations and clinical outcomes
Read the detailed description

The study consisted of 4 periods:

  • Screening period: up to 4 weeks,
  • Placebo-controlled treatment period: up to 108 weeks (at least 24 weeks for participants who experienced conversion to CDMS),
  • Extension treatment period (without placebo-control): the extension period continued until teriflunomide was commercially available in participant's country of residence.
  • Post-treatment washout period: 4 weeks after last treatment intake.

The maximal duration of the study period per participant was expected to be 116 weeks if he/she did not continue in the extension treatment period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • MS
  • Clinically Isolated Syndrome
  • CIS
  • CDMS
  • relapses
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 618 is above the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • First acute or subacute, well-defined neurological event consistent with demyelination (that is, optic neuritis confirmed by an ophthalmologist, spinal cord syndrome, brainstem/cerebellar syndromes)
  • Onset of MS symptoms occurring within 90 days of randomization
  • A screening MRI scan with 2 or more T2 lesions at least 3 millimeter (mm) in diameter that are characteristic of MS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically relevant cardiovascular, hepatic, neurological, endocrine or other major systemic disease
  • Significantly impaired bone marrow function
  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Use of cladribine, mitoxantrone, or other immunosuppressant agents such as azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, methotrexate or mycophenolate before enrollment
  • Any known condition or circumstance that would prevent in the investigator's opinion compliance or completion of the study

The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
618 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg or Teriflunomide 14 mg

    Core treatment period: Placebo matched to teriflunomide tablet once daily orally. Extension treatment period: Re-randomized in 1:1 ratio to either teriflunomide 7 mg or 14 mg once daily orally.

    Drug: Teriflunomide · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg

    Core treatment period: Teriflunomide 7 mg tablet once daily orally. Extension treatment period: Teriflunomide 7 mg tablet once daily orally.

    Drug: Teriflunomide

  • Experimental
    Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg

    Core treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg tablet once daily orally. Extension treatment period: Teriflunomide 14 mg tablet once daily orally.

    Drug: Teriflunomide

Interventions

  • DrugTeriflunomide

    Film-coated tablet Oral administration

    Also known as: HMR1726, Aubagio

  • DrugPlacebo

    Film-coated tablet Oral administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Core Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS)

    Conversion to CDMS was defined by the occurrence of a relapse, which was defined as a new neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event, presented for at least 24 hours and occurred in the absence of fever or known infection. Percent probability of conversion at 24, 48, and 108 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Core Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Definite Multiple Sclerosis (DMS)

    Conversion to DMS was demonstrated by dissemination of MRI lesions in time (as per McDonald criteria) or a relapse, whichever occurs first. MRI Imaging criteria were detection of Gadolinium (Gd) enhancement at least 3 months after onset of initial clinical event, if not at site corresponding to initial event; detection of new T2 lesion if it appears at any time compared with reference scan (done at time of screening) done at least 30 days after onset of the initial clinical event. Occurrence of relapse was defined as new neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of preceding clinical event, present for at least 24 hours and occurring in absence of fever or known infection. New clinical abnormality (neurological sign) that is consistent with participant's symptoms with increase in at least one Functional System (FS) or EDSS score compared to last EDSS assessment. Percent probability of conversion at 24, 48, and 108 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

  2. Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

    ARR is the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of patient-years treated. Each episode of relapse (appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever) was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System scores. ARR was assessed using Poisson regression model with robust error variance. To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses onset between randomization date and last dose date as the response variable, treatment, region and baseline monofocal/multifocal status as covariates, and log-transformed treatment duration as an offset variable).

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

  3. Core Treatment Period: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume at Week 108

    The total lesion volume (burden of disease) is the total volumes of hyperintense on T2 plus hypointense on T1 as measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data with factors for treatment, baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline burden of disease, and baseline-by-visit interaction.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 108

  4. Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)

    Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is the total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. To account for the different numbers of scans performed among the participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable, treatment, baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates, and log-transformed number of scans as an offset variable).

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

  5. Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Volume of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan

    Total volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is the sum of the volumes of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. To account for the different numbers of scans performed among the participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable, treatment, baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates, and log-transformed number of scans as an offset variable).

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

  6. Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of Hypointense Post-Gadolinium T1 Lesion Component

    Volume of hypointense post-gadolinium T1 lesion component was measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data adjusted for baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 108

  7. Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of T2 Lesion Component

    Volume of T2 lesion component was measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data adjusted for baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 108

  8. Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Atrophy

    Atrophy was measured by MRI scan.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 108

  9. Core Treatment Period: Time to 12-Week Sustained Disability Progression

    The 12-week sustained disability progression was defined as increase from baseline of at least 1-point in EDSS score (at least 0.5-point for participants with baseline EDSS score of greater than \[\>\] 5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks. Percent probability of participants free of 12-week sustained disability progression at 24, 48, and 108 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment

  10. Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in EDSS at Week 108

    EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data adjusted for baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value and baseline-by-visit interaction

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 108

  11. Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score at Week 108

    FIS is a participant-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in participants with MS. It consists of 40 statements that measure fatigue in three areas; physical, cognitive, and social. FIS total score ranges from 0 (no problem) to 160 (extreme problem). Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures \[MMRM\] on FIS total score data adjusted for or baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value and baseline-by-visit interaction.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 108

  12. Core Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)

    AEs are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.

    Time frame: From first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the placebo-controlled period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first

  13. Extension Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS)

    Conversion to CDMS was defined by the occurrence of a relapse, which was defined as a new neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event, presented for at least 24 hours and occurred in the absence of fever or known infection. Percent probability of conversion was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From randomization in the core period up to 390 Weeks (Extension treatment period [maximum exposure: 283 Weeks])

  14. Extension Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)

    AEs are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. Safety population included all randomized population who actually received at least 1 dose of the IMP in extension and analyzed according to the treatment actually received in core study followed by treatment actually received in the extension treatment period.

    Time frame: From re-randomization up to 283 Weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Core Treatment Period: Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)

    PCSA values are abnormal values considered medically important by the Sponsor according to predefined criteria based on literature review. Hepatic parameters thresholds were defined as follows: * Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) \>3, 5, 10 or 20 upper limit of normal(ULN); * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3, 5, 10 or 20 ULN; * Alkaline Phosphatase \>1.5 ULN; * Total Bilirubin (TB) \>1.5, 2, or 3 ULN; * ALT \>3 ULN and TB \>2 ULN.

    Time frame: From first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the placebo-controlled period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first

07

Results

Posted Dec 19, 2014

Participant flow

A total of 846 participants were screened, of which 618 randomized in core treatment period. Out of 618, 423 entered in extension treatment period. End date of core treatment period was 17 December 2012 (maximum treatment duration: 120 weeks). End date of extension treatment period was 05 February 2016 (maximum treatment duration: 283 weeks).

Core Treatment Period
Participant flow — Core Treatment Period
MilestonePlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgPlacebo/ Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
Started1972052160000
Treated1972032140000
Completed1411501630000
Not completed5655530000
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated0220000
Withdrew: Adverse event1825180000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy196120000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1110000
Withdrew: Death1000000
Withdrew: Progressive disease3100000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1218150000
Withdrew: Other than specified above2250000
Extension Treatment Period
Participant flow — Extension Treatment Period
MilestonePlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgPlacebo/ Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
Started0006414267150
Completed0004310350120
Not completed00021391730
Withdrew: Adverse event0005968
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0002819
Withdrew: Protocol violation0000020
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0000100
Withdrew: Progressive disease0001202
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0001116610
Withdrew: Missing0002310
Withdrew: Other than specified above0000011

Outcome measures

PrimaryCore Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS)

Conversion to CDMS was defined by the occurrence of a relapse, which was defined as a new neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event, presented for at least 24 hours and occurred in the absence of fever or known infection. Percent probability of conversion at 24, 48, and 108 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · percent probability
Core Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS)
percent probabilityPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Percent Probability of Conversion at 24 weeks14.3 (9.2 to 19.4)8.7 (4.6 to 12.8)9.0 (5.0 to 13.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 48 weeks26.0 (19.2 to 32.8)14.2 (8.9 to 19.6)13.7 (8.6 to 18.7)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 108 weeks35.9 (27.8 to 43.9)27.6 (19.9 to 35.4)24.0 (17.0 to 31.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Teriflunomide 14 mg · Wald chi-squared · p = 0.0087 (P value was derived using Wald chi-squared test in the Cox proportional hazard model.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.574 · 95% CI 0.379 to 0.869
  • Placebo vs Teriflunomide 7 mg · Wald chi-squared · p = 0.0271 (P value was derived using Wald chi-squared test in the Cox proportional hazard model.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.628 · 95% CI 0.416 to 0.949
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Definite Multiple Sclerosis (DMS)

Conversion to DMS was demonstrated by dissemination of MRI lesions in time (as per McDonald criteria) or a relapse, whichever occurs first. MRI Imaging criteria were detection of Gadolinium (Gd) enhancement at least 3 months after onset of initial clinical event, if not at site corresponding to initial event; detection of new T2 lesion if it appears at any time compared with reference scan (done at time of screening) done at least 30 days after onset of the initial clinical event. Occurrence of relapse was defined as new neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of preceding clinical event, present for at least 24 hours and occurring in absence of fever or known infection. New clinical abnormality (neurological sign) that is consistent with participant's symptoms with increase in at least one Functional System (FS) or EDSS score compared to last EDSS assessment. Percent probability of conversion at 24, 48, and 108 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · percent probability
Core Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Definite Multiple Sclerosis (DMS)
percent probabilityPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Percent Probability of Conversion at 24 weeks58.2 (51.0 to 65.4)45.7 (38.5 to 52.9)46.0 (39.0 to 53.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 48 weeks72.4 (65.7 to 79.1)57.3 (49.8 to 64.7)57.8 (50.6 to 64.9)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 108 weeks87.0 (81.2 to 92.7)73.3 (66.0 to 80.7)71.5 (64.5 to 78.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Teriflunomide 14 mg · Wald chi-squared · p = 0.0003 (P value was derived using Wald chi-squared test in the Cox proportional hazard model.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.651 · 95% CI 0.515 to 0.822
  • Placebo vs Teriflunomide 7 mg · Wald chi-squared · p = 0.0020 (P value was derived using Wald chi-squared test in the Cox proportional hazard model.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.686 · 95% CI 0.540 to 0.871
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)

ARR is the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of patient-years treated. Each episode of relapse (appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever) was to be confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System scores. ARR was assessed using Poisson regression model with robust error variance. To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses onset between randomization date and last dose date as the response variable, treatment, region and baseline monofocal/multifocal status as covariates, and log-transformed treatment duration as an offset variable).

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · relapses per patient year
Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
relapses per patient yearPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)0.284 (0.214 to 0.378)0.190 (0.139 to 0.260)0.194 (0.143 to 0.263)
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume at Week 108

The total lesion volume (burden of disease) is the total volumes of hyperintense on T2 plus hypointense on T1 as measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data with factors for treatment, baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline burden of disease, and baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 108
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milliliter
Core Treatment Period: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume at Week 108
milliliterPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Assessment: Change From Baseline in Total Lesion Volume at Week 1080.053 ± 0.0330.041 ± 0.032-0.038 ± 0.029
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)

Number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is the total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions that occurred during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. To account for the different numbers of scans performed among the participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable, treatment, baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates, and log-transformed number of scans as an offset variable).

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · lesions per scan
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)
lesions per scanPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Number of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan (Poisson Regression Estimates)0.953 (0.708 to 1.284)0.749 (0.433 to 1.294)0.395 (0.262 to 0.598)
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Volume of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan

Total volume of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions per scan is the sum of the volumes of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions observed during the treatment period divided by the total number of scans performed during the treatment period. To account for the different numbers of scans performed among the participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as response variable, treatment, baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region and baseline number of Gd-enhancing T1-lesions as covariates, and log-transformed number of scans as an offset variable).

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · milliliters per scan
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Volume of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan
milliliters per scanPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Volume of Gadolinium Enhancing (Gd-enhancing) T1-lesions Per MRI Scan0.0790.0580.034
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of Hypointense Post-Gadolinium T1 Lesion Component

Volume of hypointense post-gadolinium T1 lesion component was measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data adjusted for baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 108
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milliliter
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of Hypointense Post-Gadolinium T1 Lesion Component
milliliterPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of Hypointense Post-Gadolinium T1 Lesion Component0.028 ± 0.0180.025 ± 0.018-0.033 ± 0.016
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of T2 Lesion Component

Volume of T2 lesion component was measured by MRI scan. Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data adjusted for baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, cubic root transformed baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 108
Reported as:
Least squares mean · milliliter
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of T2 Lesion Component
milliliterPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Change From Baseline in Volume of T2 Lesion Component0.052 ± 0.0330.036 ± 0.032-0.035 ± 0.029
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Atrophy

Atrophy was measured by MRI scan.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 108
Reported as:
Mean · percent change
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Atrophy
percent changePlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Brain MRI Assessment: Percent Change From Baseline in Atrophy-0.386 ± 1.326-0.197 ± 1.218-0.366 ± 1.151
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Time to 12-Week Sustained Disability Progression

The 12-week sustained disability progression was defined as increase from baseline of at least 1-point in EDSS score (at least 0.5-point for participants with baseline EDSS score of greater than \[\>\] 5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks. Percent probability of participants free of 12-week sustained disability progression at 24, 48, and 108 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 108 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Reported as:
Number · percent probability
Core Treatment Period: Time to 12-Week Sustained Disability Progression
percent probabilityPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Percent Probability at 24 weeks96.0 (93.0 to 98.9)94.3 (90.9 to 97.8)97.9 (95.9 to 99.9)
Percent Probability at 48 weeks91.7 (87.3 to 96.1)90.1 (85.4 to 94.7)93.9 (90.2 to 97.6)
Percent Probability at 108 weeks85.5 (79.2 to 91.8)86.5 (80.8 to 92.1)89.2 (84.1 to 94.3)
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in EDSS at Week 108

EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing seven functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation. EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS). Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on cubic root transformed volume data adjusted for baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value and baseline-by-visit interaction

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 108
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in EDSS at Week 108
units on a scalePlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in EDSS at Week 1080.069 ± 0.087-0.191 ± 0.086-0.166 ± 0.080
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score at Week 108

FIS is a participant-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in participants with MS. It consists of 40 statements that measure fatigue in three areas; physical, cognitive, and social. FIS total score ranges from 0 (no problem) to 160 (extreme problem). Least-square means were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures \[MMRM\] on FIS total score data adjusted for or baseline monofocal/multifocal status, region, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value and baseline-by-visit interaction.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 108
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score at Week 108
units on a scalePlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Core Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) Total Score at Week 108-2.537 ± 2.794-2.524 ± 2.710-1.827 ± 2.551
SecondaryCore Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.

Time frame:
From first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the placebo-controlled period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first
Reported as:
Number · participants
Core Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
Any AE155161183
Any serious AE181824
Any AE leading to death100
Any AE leading to treatment discontinuation192518
SecondaryExtension Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS)

Conversion to CDMS was defined by the occurrence of a relapse, which was defined as a new neurological abnormality separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical event, presented for at least 24 hours and occurred in the absence of fever or known infection. Percent probability of conversion was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From randomization in the core period up to 390 Weeks (Extension treatment period [maximum exposure: 283 Weeks])
Reported as:
Number · Percent probability
Extension Treatment Period: Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS)
Percent probabilityPlacebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/ 7mgPlacebo/ Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
Percent Probability of Conversion at 24 Weeks4.7 (0.0 to 9.9)3.5 (0.5 to 6.6)13.5 (5.3 to 21.6)4.7 (1.3 to 8.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 48 Weeks12.5 (4.4 to 20.6)9.9 (5.0 to 14.8)21.2 (11.3 to 31.0)8.7 (4.2 to 13.3)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 72 Weeks15.7 (6.8 to 24.6)17.1 (10.9 to 23.4)24.3 (13.9 to 34.6)14.8 (9.1 to 20.6)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 96 Weeks18.9 (9.3 to 28.6)23.9 (16.7 to 31.0)27.4 (16.6 to 38.2)16.2 (10.3 to 22.1)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 120 Weeks22.3 (12.0 to 32.7)27.7 (20.2 to 35.2)32.2 (20.8 to 43.6)18.3 (12.1 to 24.6)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 144 Weeks22.3 (12.0 to 32.7)29.4 (21.7 to 37.1)33.9 (22.3 to 45.4)22.0 (15.3 to 28.8)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 168 Weeks22.3 (12.0 to 32.7)32.2 (24.2 to 40.3)33.9 (22.3 to 45.4)22.8 (16.0 to 29.7)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 192 Weeks22.3 (12.0 to 32.7)37.5 (28.6 to 46.4)35.9 (24.0 to 47.8)24.8 (17.6 to 32.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 216 Weeks25.6 (13.9 to 37.3)38.9 (29.8 to 48.1)39.3 (26.3 to 52.3)24.8 (17.6 to 32.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 240 Weeks29.5 (16.1 to 42.9)40.8 (31.3 to 50.4)39.3 (26.3 to 52.3)26.3 (18.7 to 34.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 264 Weeks29.5 (16.1 to 42.9)43.0 (32.9 to 53.2)39.3 (26.3 to 52.3)26.3 (18.7 to 34.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 288 Weeks29.5 (16.1 to 42.9)43.0 (32.9 to 53.2)39.3 (26.3 to 52.3)26.3 (18.7 to 34.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 312 Weeks29.5 (16.1 to 42.9)43.0 (32.9 to 53.2)49.4 (28.3 to 70.5)26.3 (18.7 to 34.0)
Percent Probability of Conversion at 336 Weeks29.5 (16.1 to 42.9)48.7 (34.7 to 62.7)49.4 (28.3 to 70.5)26.3 (18.7 to 34.0)
SecondaryExtension Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)

AEs are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study. Safety population included all randomized population who actually received at least 1 dose of the IMP in extension and analyzed according to the treatment actually received in core study followed by treatment actually received in the extension treatment period.

Time frame:
From re-randomization up to 283 Weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Extension Treatment Period: Overview of Adverse Events (AEs)
participantsPlacebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/ 7mgPlacebo/ Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
Any AE4711057120
Any Serious AE817824
Any AE Leading to Death0000
Any AE leading to Permanent Discontinuation5857
Other pre-specifiedCore Treatment Period: Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)

PCSA values are abnormal values considered medically important by the Sponsor according to predefined criteria based on literature review. Hepatic parameters thresholds were defined as follows: * Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) \>3, 5, 10 or 20 upper limit of normal(ULN); * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>3, 5, 10 or 20 ULN; * Alkaline Phosphatase \>1.5 ULN; * Total Bilirubin (TB) \>1.5, 2, or 3 ULN; * ALT \>3 ULN and TB \>2 ULN.

Time frame:
From first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the placebo-controlled period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first
Reported as:
Number · participants
Core Treatment Period: Liver Function: Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormalities (PCSA)
participantsPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg
ALT >3 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)182526
ALT >5 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)121011
ALT >10 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)513
ALT >20 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)001
AST >3 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)91210
AST >5 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)146
AST >10 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)101
AST >20 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)001
Alkaline Phosphatase >1.5 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)001
TB >1.5 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)1498
TB >2 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)803
TB >3 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)001
ALT >3 ULN and TB >2 ULN (n=190, 207, 216)202

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse Events (AE) were collected from signature of the informed consent form up to the final visit (up to 390 weeks [maximum exposure in core treatment period: 120 weeks and maximum exposure in extension treatment period: 283 weeks]) regardless of seriousness or relationship to investigational product.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—18/191 (9.4%)117/191 (61.3%)
Teriflunomide 7 mg—18/207 (8.7%)129/207 (62.3%)
Teriflunomide 14 mg—24/216 (11.1%)135/216 (62.5%)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 7 mg—8/62 (12.9%)33/62 (53.2%)
Teriflunomide 7 mg/7 mg—17/145 (11.7%)66/145 (45.5%)
Placebo/Teriflunomide 14 mg—8/66 (12.1%)38/66 (57.6%)
Teriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg—24/150 (16%)70/150 (46.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 100
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations3/1915/2074/2160/621/1450/660/150
AppendicitisInfections and infestations0/1910/2072/2161/620/1450/660/150
PharyngitisInfections and infestations0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
LiposarcomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
Speech disorderNervous system disorders0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
Diffuse alopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
Intervertebral disc protrusionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/661/150
OsteochondrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
Cervical cystReproductive system and breast disorders0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
MenorrhagiaReproductive system and breast disorders0/1910/2070/2161/620/1450/660/150
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 20
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 7 mg/7 mgPlacebo/Teriflunomide 14 mgTeriflunomide 14 mg/14 mg
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations29/19124/20735/2169/6214/1459/6615/150
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations28/19132/20735/2160/625/1456/663/150
HeadacheNervous system disorders25/19131/20730/2164/628/1458/666/150
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders15/19112/20725/2162/623/1457/665/150
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations14/19123/20720/2162/625/1452/664/150
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders12/19122/20715/2164/629/1454/6614/150
ParaesthesiaNervous system disorders9/19111/20722/2163/621/1453/664/150
SinusitisInfections and infestations9/1917/2076/2166/624/1454/666/150
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations10/19110/20720/2163/625/1455/664/150
InfluenzaInfections and infestations9/1918/20716/2163/625/1455/664/150

Baseline characteristics

Randomized population: all randomized participants according to the treatment group to which they were assigned in the core treatment period.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgTotal
Mean32.0 ± 8.431.6 ± 9.032.8 ± 8.132.7 ± 8.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgTotal
Female135130154419
Male627562199
Region
Region(participants)PlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgTotal
Eastern Europe9496101291
Western Europe767474224
Americas and Australia273541103
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score
Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score(units on a scale)PlaceboTeriflunomide 7 mgTeriflunomide 14 mgTotal
Mean1.71 ± 1.001.50 ± 1.021.80 ± 0.971.67 ± 1.00
08

Study locations

131 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 8965
    Cullman, Alabama 35058, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8954
    Phoenix, Arizona 85013-4496, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8946
    Phoenix, Arizona 85060, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8962
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80528, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8920
    Maitland, Florida 32761, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8953
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8914
    Ft. Wayne, Indiana 63104, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8940
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46256, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8922
    Shreveport, Louisiana 71103, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8955
    Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8949
    Traverse City, Michigan 49684, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8937
    St Louis, Missouri 63104, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8951
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8925
    New York, New York 10029-6574, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8941
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28204, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8924
    Dayton, Ohio 45409, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8905
    Round Rock, Tennessee 78681, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8930
    Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8963
    Seattle, Washington 98122, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 1405
    Geelong, 3220, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number 1404
    Heidelberg, 3081, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number 1407
    Hobart, 7001, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number 1401
    Parkville, 3050, Australia
  • Investigational Site Number 4004
    Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
  • Investigational Site Number 4005
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Investigational Site Number 4001
    Wien, 1010, Austria
  • Investigational Site Number 5312
    Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
  • Investigational Site Number 5307
    Sofia, 1000, Bulgaria
  • Investigational Site Number 5304
    Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
  • Investigational Site Number 5309
    Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria
  • Investigational Site Number 5303
    Sofia, 1527, Bulgaria
  • Investigational Site Number 5306
    Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
  • Investigational Site Number 5402
    Greenfield Park, J4V 2J2, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5403
    London, N6A 5A5, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5409
    Montreal, H1T 2M4, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5401
    Ottawa, K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5406
    Quebec, G1J 1Z4, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5408
    Sherbrooke, J1H 5N4, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5410
    Toronto, M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5404
    Toronto, M5B 1W8, Canada
  • Investigational Site Number 5602
    Santiago, 760-0746, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 5601
    Santiago, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 5606
    Santiago, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 5605
    Viña Del Mar, 2520997, Chile
  • Investigational Site Number 5801
    Brno, 65691, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 5803
    Hradec Kralove, 50005, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 5804
    Olomouc, 77520, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 5805
    Ostrava - Poruba, 70852, Czech Republic
  • Investigational Site Number 6002
    Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark
  • Investigational Site Number 6004
    Esbjerg, 6700, Denmark
  • Investigational Site Number 6201
    Tallinn, 10617, Estonia
  • Investigational Site Number 6203
    Tartu, 50406, Estonia
  • Investigational Site Number 6405
    Helsinki, 00100, Finland
  • Investigational Site Number 6403
    Kuopio, 70210, Finland
  • Investigational Site Number 6401
    Turku, 20100, Finland
  • Investigational Site Number 6611
    Besancon, 25030, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6601
    Clermont Ferrand Cedex 1, 63003, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6609
    Lille Cedex, 59037, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6604
    Montpellier Cedex 05, 34295, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6612
    Nancy Cedex, 54036, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6605
    Nantes Cedex 01, 44093, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6602
    Nice Cedex, 06002, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6614
    Nimes, 30029, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6607
    Strasbourg Cedex, 67091, France
  • Investigational Site Number 6801
    Bayreuth, 95445, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6810
    Berlin, 10713, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6805
    Berlin, 10785, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6807
    Erbach, 64711, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6803
    Essen, 45122, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6809
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6804
    Ludwigshafen, 67063, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6815
    Minden, 32429, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6802
    Münster, 48149, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 6806
    Wiesbaden, 65191, Germany
  • Investigational Site Number 7101
    Budapest, 1076, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 7103
    Budapest, 1145, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 7108
    Esztergom, 2500, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 7105
    Veszprém, 8200, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 7402
    Klaipeda, LT-92288, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 7403
    Siauliai, LT-76231, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 7401
    Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
  • Investigational Site Number 7501
    Chihuahua, 31203, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 7502
    Guadalajara, 45110, Mexico
  • Investigational Site Number 7709
    Gdansk, 80-803, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 7710
    Lodz, 93-513, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 7707
    Warszawa 44, 04-141, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 7701
    Warszawa, 02-097, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 7703
    Warszawa, 02-957, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 7803
    Bucuresti, 020125, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 7806
    Bucuresti, 050098, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 7805
    Cluj-Napoca, 400012, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 7807
    Cluj-Napoca, 400012, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 7808
    Timisoara, 300736, Romania
  • Investigational Site Number 7907
    Kazan, 420021, Russian Federation
  • Investigational Site Number 7909
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603000, Russian Federation
  • Investigational Site Number 7906
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603076, Russian Federation
  • Investigational Site Number 7904
    Nizhny Novgorod, 603126, Russian Federation
  • Investigational Site Number 7912
    Novosibirsk, 630007, Russian Federation
  • Investigational Site Number 7910
    Rostov-On-Don, 344085, Russian Federation
  • Investigational Site Number 7905
    Smolensk, 214019, Russian Federation

Showing the first 100 of 131 sites across 21 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Miller AE, Wolinsky JS, Kappos L, Comi G, Freedman MS, Olsson TP, Bauer D, Benamor M, Truffinet P, O'Connor PW; TOPIC Study Group. Oral teriflunomide for patients with a first clinical episode suggestive of multiple sclerosis (TOPIC): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Oct;13(10):977-86. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70191-7. Epub 2014 Sep 2. PubMed 25192851 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00622700
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2008
Start date
Feb 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2012
Completion
Feb 2016
Results posted
Dec 19, 2014
Last update
Mar 13, 2017

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion