CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00607126Updated Aug 15, 2016Results posted

Locomotor Training in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Lokomat and resistive training in Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-15.

Sponsored by University of California, Los Angeles · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Locomotor training is a new exercise modality that emphasizes task specificity to promote learning and neural plasticity. It has been reported to improve walking in patients with stroke, spinal cord injury and cerebral palsy. In this study, 40 patients with impaired ambulation due to Multiple Sclerosis will be randomized to receive 36 sessions of either locomotor training or an standard resistive exercise intervention.The locomotor training will be accomplished via a robotic device, the Lokomat, which will move the patient's legs on a treadmill while they are suspended in a harness.

Read the detailed description

In this study, subjects with confirmed diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis were randomized into one of two treatment arms. Subjects in the Lokomat arm trained on the Lokomat with a supervising physical therapist for 20-30 minutes/session 3 times/week. The Lokomat is a robotic exoskeleton which enables the subject to step on a moving treadmill. Subjects were suspended in a harness while in the Lokomat with full to partial body weight support as needed. After the training in the Lokomat, they practiced overground walking for 10 minutes.

The other treatment arm had subjects engage in resistance training with weights and resistance elastic bands matched to the Lokomat group for intensity, duration and frequency. they did not practice overground walking.

Primary outcome measure was speed to accomplish 25' timed walk.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • impaired ambulation
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is below the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Los Angeles is the lead sponsor of 1,142 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 91 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Persons with Secondary progressive or Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis who are ambulatory with difficulty and /or assistive device

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ataxia
  • Unable to ambulate
  • Within 3 months of exacerbation
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill, using robotic device to provide locomotor training. Locomotor training will be done using the Lokomat device. the patient is suspended over a treadmill while their legs are in the Lokomat, which moves the legs on the treadmill.

    Device: Lokomat

  • Active comparator
    2

    resistive training using weights and therabands

    Procedure: resistive training

Interventions

  • DeviceLokomat

    locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill

  • Procedureresistive training

    resistive training using theraband and/or weights

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Walking Speed as Assessed by 25' Timed Walk

    This is the time needed for participant to walk 25 feet. Participant walks on a level surface. the walk from start to finish is timed with a stop watch three measures are done and the average value is entered.

    Time frame: at beginning,mid point, end and 12 weeks after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Distance

    distance assessed by 6 minute walk test

    Time frame: baseline, mid point, end and 12 weeks after training

  2. Fatigue

    fatigue assessed by modified fatigue impact scale. This is a 21 item questionnaire which has a range from 0-84. Higher scores indicate more impact of fatigue on physical and cognitive functioning.

    Time frame: baseline, mid, completetion, 3 months post

  3. PASAT

    Cognitive measure of attention and information processing speed. Score goes from 0-60 with higher number indicating better performance. Scores are expressed as mean chamge rfom baseline; negative numbers indicate worse performance

    Time frame: baseline, mid, completion, 3 months post training

07

Results

Posted Aug 15, 2016
Limitations and caveats
This was a small study and the number of subjects enrolled may not have been sufficient to show an effect.

Participant flow

Prospective subjects were recruited from the MS clinic population of the UCLA Dep't/ of Neurology and from the general MS population in Los Angeles between 2007-2009. Recruitment flyers were approved by the UCLA Institutional Review board.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive Training
Started1719
Completed1719
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryWalking Speed as Assessed by 25' Timed Walk

This is the time needed for participant to walk 25 feet. Participant walks on a level surface. the walk from start to finish is timed with a stop watch three measures are done and the average value is entered.

Time frame:
at beginning,mid point, end and 12 weeks after intervention
Reported as:
Mean · seconds
Walking Speed as Assessed by 25' Timed Walk
secondsLokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive Training
25"TW baseline22.7 ± 17.610.6 ± 4.9
25'TW midpoint23.9 ± 20.99.8 ± 4.3
25'TW end point19.4 ± 15.29.6 ± 3.7
25'TW post21.7 ± 16.710.5 ± 4.3
SecondaryDistance

distance assessed by 6 minute walk test

Time frame:
baseline, mid point, end and 12 weeks after training
Reported as:
Mean · feet
Distance
feetLokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive Training
6 min walk baseline367 ± 241753 ± 232.3
6 min walk midpoint474 ± 354813 ± 253.8
6 minute walk end point436 ± 288769 ± 261.9
6 minute walk post457 ± 300.5742 ± 248.2
SecondaryFatigue

fatigue assessed by modified fatigue impact scale. This is a 21 item questionnaire which has a range from 0-84. Higher scores indicate more impact of fatigue on physical and cognitive functioning.

Time frame:
baseline, mid, completetion, 3 months post
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fatigue
units on a scaleLokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive Training
MFIS baseline34.1 ± 14.137.7 ± 15.6
MFIS mid point26.7 ± 13.729.4 ± 15.0
MFIS end point26.8 ± 16.629.9 ± 17.7
MFIS post27.4 ± 19.835.3 ± 15.9
SecondaryPASAT

Cognitive measure of attention and information processing speed. Score goes from 0-60 with higher number indicating better performance. Scores are expressed as mean chamge rfom baseline; negative numbers indicate worse performance

Time frame:
baseline, mid, completion, 3 months post training
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
PASAT
units on a scaleLokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive Training
PASAT baseline48.2 ± 5.146.8 ± 3.8
PASAT Mid point0.06 ± 1.170.42 ± 1.03
PASAT end point1.3 ± 1.130.58 ± 1.03
PASAT post1.90 ± 1.13-0.91 ± 1.13

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Lokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a Treadmill—0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)
Resistive Training—0/19 (0%)0/19 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Lokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive TrainingTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years171936
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Lokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive TrainingTotal
Female91423
Male8513
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Lokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive TrainingTotal
United States171936
EDSS
EDSS(units on a scale)Lokomat Training Using Body Weight Support on a TreadmillResistive TrainingTotal
Mean6.5 (5.5 to 6.5)6.0 (5 to 6.5)6.3 (5 to 6.5)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UCLA
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Giesser B, Beres-Jones J, Budovitch A, Herlihy E, Harkema S. Locomotor training using body weight support on a treadmill improves mobility in persons with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Mult Scler. 2007 Mar;13(2):224-31. doi: 10.1177/1352458506070663. PubMed 17450642 ↗
  • Giesser B, Herlihy E, Plummer D'Amato P et al. Randomized controlled trial of robotic locomotor training in persons with MS. Multiple Sclerosis Journal 17S481 ( 2011)
  • Giesser B, Herlihy, E, PlummerD'Amato P, et al. Locomotor training may improve cognitive performance in persons with MS. Neurology 72 ( Suppl.3) A 405 (2009)

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00607126
Lead sponsor
University of California, Los Angeles
Collaborators
National Multiple Sclerosis Society
Responsible party
Barbara Giesser (Clinical Professor of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2008
Start date
Jul 2006
Primary completion
Aug 2009
Completion
Aug 2009
Results posted
Aug 15, 2016
Last update
Aug 15, 2016

Study contacts

Barbara S Giesser, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Los Angeles

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion