A Phase 3 interventional study of 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250) and CT in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Kidney Cancer, sponsored by Heidelberg Pharma AG. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-02.
Sponsored by Heidelberg Pharma AG · Phase 3, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Among 1,142 studies in Carcinoma, Renal Cell with a site in United States — 157 open to participants now, 280 under way, 26 of them phase 3. Carcinoma, Renal Cell · United States.
Among the 1,142 studies in Carcinoma, Renal Cell with a site in United States, this one is the 128th largest by enrollment of the 1,008 interventional ones, is one of 43 that started in 2008, is one of 73 in phase 3, and was the 298th registered.
2,037 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell; 395 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 226 is above the median of 43 across 1,564 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell.
Browse Carcinoma, Renal Cell studies →157 of the 1,142 studies in Carcinoma, Renal Cell with a site in United States are open now, in 12 countries. Each count lists the studies.
Of the 308 Carcinoma, Renal Cell studies recruiting now, 255 (83%) set no upper age limit and 18 (6%) stop at 75 or younger; 20 take children under 18; 19 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →1,142 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 1990; this study’s year is marked. 43 started in 2008.
Median enrollment 40 across the 1,008 interventional studies, 100 across the 87 observational. Of the 791 that completed or were terminated, 335 (42%) have results posted.
467 of 1,142 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Heidelberg Pharma AG is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Heidelberg Pharma AG has 3 studies filed under Carcinoma, Renal Cell — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
100 of the studies in Carcinoma, Renal Cell with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 6 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT03815643Phase 3EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Avelumab Program Rollover Study | 2026-11-24 |
| NCT05678673Phase 3ExelixisStudy of XL092 + Nivolumab vs Sunitinib in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | 2026-12-15 |
| NCT03592472Phase 3Xynomic Pharmaceuticals, Inc.A Study of Pazopanib With or Without Abexinostat in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RENAVIV) | 2026-12-30 |
| NCT03873402Phase 3Bristol-Myers SquibbA Study of Nivolumab Combined With Ipilimumab Versus Nivolumab Alone in Participants With Advanced Kidney Cancer | 2027-03-11 |
| NCT05863351Phase 3ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research GroupFocused Radiation Versus Systemic Therapy for Kidney Cancer Patients With Limited Metastasis, SOAR Study | 2027-08-31 |
Among the 1,142 studies in Carcinoma, Renal Cell with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This is a multicenter Phase III study to demonstrate the diagnostic utility of 124I-cG250 PET/CT pre-surgical imaging in patients with operable renal masses.
A preoperative 124I-cG250 PET scan may distinguish between clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma in patients with renal masses. Studies of imaging characteristics of 124I by a variety of PET cameras, quantification of tumor uptake of 124I-labeled antibody and correlation with biopsy measurement of tumor and normal tissue have met with encouraging results. As clear cell renal cancers are associated with an aggressive phenotype their a priori determination may help guide appropriate surgical/therapeutic management.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
The following laboratory results should be within the following limits within the last 2 weeks prior to study day 1:
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.
It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.
Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
ECOG performance status
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)
The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.
It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Creatinine clearance (CrCl)
How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraception
Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.
Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
NYHA class (heart failure)
The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.
Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Autoimmune disease
A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.
Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Single arm study, comparing 124I cG250 PET/CT and CT. Each patient underwent a PET/CT and CT scan days (+/-2days) after receipt of 124I cG250.
Drug: 124-Iodine-cG250 (124I-cG250) · Procedure: CT
i.v. and PET/CT scan 4+/-2 days after administration
Also known as: Ca9-SCAN
contrast enhanced CT scan
Sensitivity and Specificity of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Versus Diagnostic CT.
Average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality on the proportion of participants that were correctly identified on the 124I-cG250 PET/CT Images of having (sensitivity) or not having (specificity) clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) compared to CT images. Histopathology provided the standard-of-truth because it is the only definitive method for accurately identifying ccRCC.
Time frame: 6 months
Accuracy of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Imaging Versus Diagnostic CT Imaging
The Accuracy is the proportion of participants with correct determinations of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
Time frame: 6 months
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) reflects the Proportion of positive results that are true positive. The PPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
Time frame: 6 months
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) reflects the proportion of negative results that are true negatives. The NPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
Time frame: 6 months
226 subjects were enrolled at 14 study sites in the USA.
| Milestone | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| Started | 226 |
| Completed | 204 |
| Not completed | 22 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 13 |
| Withdrew: Miscellaneous reasons | 9 |
Average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality on the proportion of participants that were correctly identified on the 124I-cG250 PET/CT Images of having (sensitivity) or not having (specificity) clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) compared to CT images. Histopathology provided the standard-of-truth because it is the only definitive method for accurately identifying ccRCC.
| Proportion of participants | Sensitivity CT | Sensitivity PET/CT | Specificity PET/CT | Specificity CT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity and Specificity of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Versus Diagnostic CT. | 0.76 (0.63 to 0.88) | 0.86 (0.75 to 0.97) | 0.86 (0.69 to 1.0) | 0.47 (0.19 to 0.75) |
The Accuracy is the proportion of participants with correct determinations of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
| Proportion of participants | PET/CT | Diagnostic CT |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of 124I-cG250 PET/CT Imaging Versus Diagnostic CT Imaging | 0.86 | 0.68 |
The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) reflects the Proportion of positive results that are true positive. The PPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
| Protportion of participants | PET/CT | Diagnostic CT |
|---|---|---|
| Positive Predictive Value (PPV) | 0.94 | 0.80 |
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) reflects the proportion of negative results that are true negatives. The NPV of 124I-cG250 PET/CT imaging compared to diagnostic CT Imaging in the detection of ccRCC as confirmed by histopathology diagnoses. The numbers represent the average estimate of three independent, blinded central readers per imaging modality. For the secondary efficacy variables no 95% CIs for differences of averages were calculated.
| Proportion of participants | PET/CT | Diagnostic CT |
|---|---|---|
| Negative Predictive Value (NPV) | 0.69 | 0.41 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| PET/CT Versus CT | — | 33/226 (14.6%) | 191/226 (84.5%) |
| Event | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| Urinary anastomotic leakInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 3/226 |
| Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 3/226 |
| Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 3/226 |
| HaematomaVascular disorders | 3/226 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 2/226 |
| DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 2/226 |
| HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders | 2/226 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 1/226 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 1/226 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 1/226 |
| Event | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 44/226 |
| Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 27/226 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 26/226 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 26/226 |
| Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders | 25/226 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 24/226 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 19/226 |
| Incision site painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19/226 |
| InsomniaPsychiatric disorders | 19/226 |
| Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 15/226 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 167 |
| >=65 years | 59 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| Mean | 56.1 ± 12.01 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| Female | 84 |
| Male | 142 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | PET/CT Versus CT |
|---|---|
| United States | 226 |
The record gives a start of Mar 2008, a primary completion of Nov 2009 and a completion of Dec 2009. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
Results were first posted in Apr 2014, 4 years 5 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Girentuximab I-124
Heidelberg Pharma AG