CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00589732VAL-SUPPRESUpdated Aug 8, 2012

Valsartan for Suppression of Plaque Volume and Restenosis After Drug-Eluting Stent

A Phase 4 interventional study of Valsartan in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Seung-Jung Park. Completed at 5 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-08.

Sponsored by Seung-Jung Park · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce the risk of restenosis after DES implantation.

Read the detailed description

Stimulation of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors after arterial injury promotes vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration, proliferation, and extracellular matrix production, leading to the hope that blockade of this receptor by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or specific (AT1) receptor antagonists (ARBs) might reduce intimal hyperplasia. However, despite confirmatory evidence in several animal models of restenosis, the large scale MERCATOR and MARCATOR trials of cilazapril with balloon angioplasty failed to show benefit. In 1999, Kondo reported the results of a randomized pilot trial of 100 patients who received Palmaz-Schatz stents and were randomized to receive the ACE inhibitor quinapril or placebo. The volume of neointimal hyperplasia assessed by IVUS was significantly less quinapril than the control group (18 ± 0.6 mm3 vs. 25 ± 0.6 mm3; p \< 0.05). The quinapril group's restenosis rate was 16%, with the quinapril benefit being observed only in patients with the D/D and I/D genotypes. Also, other study reported on a consecutively treated cohort of 1,598 stented patients, noting that ACE inhibitor usage at the time and after stenting reduced the risk of subsequent revascularization dramatically (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; p = 0.001). In the ValPREST trial which is a single-center randomized trial of patients receiving stents for type B2/C lesions, comparing valsartan (and ARV) 80 mgs daily with open treatment, patients randomized to valsartan had a 19% incidence of restenosis compared with 39% in the open treatment arm (p = 0.005).

Recently, several randomized studies were conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of the two leading drug-eluting stent (DES). However, data on the association of ARBs for suppression of neointimal hyperplasia are limited in the DES era. Therefore, a pivotal randomized study is warranted.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • stents
  • angiotensin-converting enzyme
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Seung-Jung Park is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Clinical 1) Patients with angina and documented ischemia or patients with documented silent ischemia 2) Patients who are eligible for intracoronary stenting 3) Age >18 years, \<75 ages 4) Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>40%) 5) Written informed consent to the study protocol 6) Patients with hemodynamic stability and appropriate blood pressure, which were suitable for administration of valsartan 160mg
  2. Angiographic: Patients who have
  1. Significant ischemic narrowing (target vessel)
  1. De novo coronary lesion (no restriction of lesion length)
  2. Percent diameter stenosis ≥50% by visual estimate
  3. Reference vessel size ≥2.5 mm by visual estimation
  4. Lesions suitable for stenting

And/Or

  1. Non-significant non-ischemic intermediate narrowing (non-target vessel)
  1. Percent diameter stenosis 20%\~50% by visual estimate
  2. No objective evidence of ischemia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients received a Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or ACE-receptor blockers (ARBs) in the previous week prior to enrollment
  2. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  3. Pregnant
  4. Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to contrast agent and heparin
  5. Limited life-expectancy (less than 1 year)
  6. Acute ST-elevation myocardial within 1 week
  7. Characteristics of lesion 1) Left main disease 2) In-stent restenosis 3) Graft vessels
  8. Hematological disease (Neutropenia \<3000/mm3, Thrombocytopenia \<100,000/mm3)
  9. Hepatic dysfunction, liver enzyme (ALT and AST) elevation >3 times normal
  10. Renal dysfunction, creatinine >2.0mg/dL
  11. Contraindication to aspirin and clopidogrel
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
220 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Valsartan treatment gorup

    Valsartan 160mg per day group

    Drug: Valsartan

  • No intervention
    No Valsartan treatment group

    No valsartan treatment

Interventions

  • DrugValsartan

    Valsartan 160mg per day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Angiographic in-stent late-loss (target vessel)

    Time frame: at 8-month follow-up.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Composite of Major cardiac adverse events including death, Q-MI, Non Q-MI, and target lesion or vessel revascularization -Delta change in percent atheroma area and volume

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Composite of Major cardiac adverse events including death, Q-MI, Non Q-MI, and target lesion or vessel revascularization

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. Each component of MACE

    3 day hospitalization is normal for index procedure and outcome needs to be measured at discharge.

    Time frame: 3 days in average

  4. Each component of MACE

    Time frame: 30 days

  5. Each component of MACE

    Time frame: 9 months

  6. In-stent and in-segment restenosis rate

    Time frame: 8 months

  7. In-segment late loss

    Time frame: 8 months

  8. Percent atheroma volume of 10mm length by IVUS examination (non-target vessel) in IVUS-substudy

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Asan Medical Center
    Seoul, 138-736, Korea, Republic of
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • St. Mary's Catholic Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Yonsei University Medical Center
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Ajou University Hospital
    Suwon, Korea, Republic of
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00589732
Lead sponsor
Seung-Jung Park
Collaborators
Novartis
Responsible party
Seung-Jung Park (M.D., Ph.D.,Professor of Medicine Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, CardioVascular Research Foundation, Korea) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2008
Start date
Sep 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Last update
Aug 8, 2012

Study contacts

Seung-Jung Park, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion