A Phase 4 interventional study of Valsartan in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Seung-Jung Park. Completed at 5 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-08-08.
Sponsored by Seung-Jung Park · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
To evaluate that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme receptor blockers (ARBs) reduce the risk of restenosis after DES implantation.
Stimulation of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptors after arterial injury promotes vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration, proliferation, and extracellular matrix production, leading to the hope that blockade of this receptor by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or specific (AT1) receptor antagonists (ARBs) might reduce intimal hyperplasia. However, despite confirmatory evidence in several animal models of restenosis, the large scale MERCATOR and MARCATOR trials of cilazapril with balloon angioplasty failed to show benefit. In 1999, Kondo reported the results of a randomized pilot trial of 100 patients who received Palmaz-Schatz stents and were randomized to receive the ACE inhibitor quinapril or placebo. The volume of neointimal hyperplasia assessed by IVUS was significantly less quinapril than the control group (18 ± 0.6 mm3 vs. 25 ± 0.6 mm3; p \< 0.05). The quinapril group's restenosis rate was 16%, with the quinapril benefit being observed only in patients with the D/D and I/D genotypes. Also, other study reported on a consecutively treated cohort of 1,598 stented patients, noting that ACE inhibitor usage at the time and after stenting reduced the risk of subsequent revascularization dramatically (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46; p = 0.001). In the ValPREST trial which is a single-center randomized trial of patients receiving stents for type B2/C lesions, comparing valsartan (and ARV) 80 mgs daily with open treatment, patients randomized to valsartan had a 19% incidence of restenosis compared with 39% in the open treatment arm (p = 0.005).
Recently, several randomized studies were conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of the two leading drug-eluting stent (DES). However, data on the association of ARBs for suppression of neointimal hyperplasia are limited in the DES era. Therefore, a pivotal randomized study is warranted.
5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 220 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →Seung-Jung Park is the lead sponsor of 82 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
And/Or
Exclusion Criteria:
Valsartan 160mg per day group
Drug: Valsartan
No valsartan treatment
Valsartan 160mg per day
Angiographic in-stent late-loss (target vessel)
Time frame: at 8-month follow-up.
Composite of Major cardiac adverse events including death, Q-MI, Non Q-MI, and target lesion or vessel revascularization -Delta change in percent atheroma area and volume
Time frame: 30 days
Composite of Major cardiac adverse events including death, Q-MI, Non Q-MI, and target lesion or vessel revascularization
Time frame: 9 months
Each component of MACE
3 day hospitalization is normal for index procedure and outcome needs to be measured at discharge.
Time frame: 3 days in average
Each component of MACE
Time frame: 30 days
Each component of MACE
Time frame: 9 months
In-stent and in-segment restenosis rate
Time frame: 8 months
In-segment late loss
Time frame: 8 months
Percent atheroma volume of 10mm length by IVUS examination (non-target vessel) in IVUS-substudy
Time frame: 8 months
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seung-Jung Park