An interventional study of Initial Invasive Strategy and Initial Conservative Strategy in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Seung-Jung Park. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in South Korea. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-11.
Sponsored by Seung-Jung Park · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The PREVENT-2 trial is to determine whether an initial invasive strategy-consisting of early coronary angiography (CAG) with intent for preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT)-reduces the incidence of the primary composite outcome of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned urgent revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina at 3 years, compared with an initial conservative strategy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone, in patients with high-risk vulnerable plaque identified by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) showing:
Plaque with at least moderate stenosis in one or more major epicardial coronary arteries; and
At least two high-risk plaque (HRP) feature at the site of stenotic lesions, defined as any of the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<35%
→ Left ventricular ejection fraction \<35%
Procedure: Initial Invasive Strategy
Drug: Initial Conservative Strategy
Invasive coronary angiography (CAG) within 30 days after randomization, with the intent to perform preventive percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to optimal medical therapy (OMT). For further detailed assessment of vulnerable plaque lesions detected by coronary computed tomography angiography, the use of intracoronary imaging modalities (near-infrared spectroscopy, optical coherence tomography, or intravascular ultrasound) will be strongly recommended.
Optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone, with invasive coronary angiography (CAG) reserved only for failure of optimal medical therapy, defined as recurrent or worsening symptoms despite maximally tolerated medical therapy, or the occurrence of an acute coronary event.
The event rate of Composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, unplanned urgent revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina at 3 years after randomization.
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Individual components of the primary composite outcome
death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, unplanned urgent revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina at 3 years after randomization.
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Death (all-cause, cardiac, or non-cardiac causes)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Myocardial Infarction (any, periprocedural or spontaneous; target-vessel or non-target-vessel)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Revascularization (any, target-vessel, non-target-vessel)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Unplanned hospitalization for unstable or progressive angina
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Hospitalization (any, cardiac or noncardiac causes)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Stent thrombosis (definite or probable)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of stroke (any, ischemic, or hemorrhagic)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria)
Time frame: 3 years
The event rate of Procedural complications requiring active intervention related to Percutaneous coronary intervention
Time frame: 3 years
Patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO) (a composite of all-cause death, all myocardial infarction, or any repeat revascularization)
Time frame: 3 years
Change in Angina-related quality of life (assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ])
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Economic evaluation of healthcare resource use, costs, and cost-effectiveness
Healthcare resource utilization (including hospitalizations, procedures, and outpatient visits) will be collected and used to estimate total healthcare costs. Cost-effectiveness will be assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. These components will be analyzed within a unified economic evaluation framework.
Time frame: From baseline to 3 years; assessed at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seung-Jung Park