ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00571974Updated Mar 24, 2015Results posted

Treatment of Oral Premalignant Lesions With 5-ALA PDT

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser and 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan KerastickTM) in Leukoplakia and Erythroplakia, sponsored by University of Arkansas. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-03-24.

Sponsored by University of Arkansas · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Oral leukoplakia within the mouth is a visible white patch which can develop into cancer if not treated. There is no good treatment for these lesions, apart from surgery which is associated with significant side effects and physical deformation of the treated area.

The investigators hypothesized that photodynamic therapy can be used safely and effectively to induce significant regression of oral leukoplakia.

Read the detailed description

This is a combined Phase I/II non-randomized prospective study designed to determine the safety and assess the clinical efficacy of PDT in the treatment of oral leukeplekia with 5-ALA and 585-nm PDL with 1.5 ms pulse time. In the first part of the study we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the PDL radiant exposure in combination with 5-ALA. In the second phase of the study, this dose is used to treat subjects at the MTD in order to determine the efficacy of the treatment by documenting the regression of the treated lesions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leukoplakia
  • Erythroplakia

Browse trials for

03

In context

Leukoplakia

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukoplakia; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 35 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Leukoplakia.

Browse Leukoplakia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Arkansas is the lead sponsor of 399 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 34 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least one grossly visible premalignant lesion (i.e. leukoplakia or erythroplakia) in the oral cavity or oropharynx, with a confirmed diagnosis of leukoplakia with or without dysplasia,measuring ≥ 10 mm in diameter.
  • Informed of alternative treatment methods including watchful waiting, laser ablation, or surgical resection.
  • Eligible for long-term follow-up for at least one year and be able to tolerate .
  • Subject has signed an .
  • Subject is between the ages of 18 - 80 years of age.
  • Male or Female
  • Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1 at screening. See Appendix A

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known sensitivity to porphyrins or photoactive medications - See Appendix B
  • Invasive carcinoma of the lesion as demonstrated by .
  • Subjects with inherited or acquired blood clotting defects
  • Women who are breast feeding, have a positive (+) urine pregnancy test, or refuse to use 2 effective means of during drug exposure and up to 48 hours after.
  • Subjects with porphyria
  • less than 12 months
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phase 1 light dose escalation

    During Phase I, to determine the maximum tolerated energy density of the Pulse Dye Laser operated at 585 nm with a pulse time of 1.5 ms (PDL-585), when used in combination with 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) applied topically to the premalignant lesion. The maximum tolerated energy density will be called the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD). Procedure: Fluorescence Diagnosis Imaging Interventions: Application of 5-ALA to lesion followed by activation with high power 585 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser) at 6, 7 and 8 J/cm2.

    Device: PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser · Drug: 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan KerastickTM) · Procedure: Fluorescence Diagnosis Imaging

  • Experimental
    Phase 2 - Treatment efficacy of PDT

    Procedure: Fluorescence Diagnosis Imaging Interventions: Application of 5-ALA to lesion followed by activation with high power 585 nm pulsed dye laser (PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser) at 8 J/cm2.

    Device: PDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser · Drug: 5-Aminolevulinic Acid (Levulan KerastickTM) · Procedure: Fluorescence Diagnosis Imaging

Interventions

  • DevicePDL-585, ScleroPLUS laser

    PDT Treatment; emits light with 585 nm wavelength in pulses of 1.5 milliseconds in sections of 5 mm diameter to target the lesion and surrounding tissue

  • Topically administered; incubation time 60-180 minutes; single dose (345 mg of active 5-ALA in 1.5 ml solution); soaked onto white gauze and applied to lesion, covered with sterile Xeroform gauze

    Also known as: 5-ALA

  • ProcedureFluorescence Diagnosis Imaging

    FD Image taken prior to PDL-585 usage

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Tolerated Dose

    The traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was employed. Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Dose escalation rules were the same as those provided by Storer 1989.

    Time frame: Day 2

  2. The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).

    The response rate was quantified by examination by an experienced head and neck surgeon and classified as follows: significant response (SR) was one where the lesion had greater than 75% resolution, partial response (PR) was one in which the lesion was reduced in size by at least 25%, and no response (NR) was one where the lesion was reduced by less than 25% in size.

    Time frame: Day 90

07

Results

Posted Nov 13, 2012
Limitations and caveats
Since all but one subject responded to treatment, no correlative analysis of response with change in expression of p53 or Ki-67 was undertaken.

Participant flow

Subjects were identified in the head and neck oncology clinic and enrolled into the study within the time period of January 1, 2007 to November 18, 2009.

Phase I
Participant flow — Phase I
MilestonePhase IPhase II
Started90
Completed90
Not completed00
Phase II
Participant flow — Phase II
MilestonePhase IPhase II
Started021
Completed017
Not completed04

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Tolerated Dose

The traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was employed. Three cohorts were enrolled at 3 subjects per cohort, and treated with escalating radiant exposures of 6, 7, or 8 J/cm2. In each cohort, the number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Dose escalation rules were the same as those provided by Storer 1989.

Time frame:
Day 2
Reported as:
Number · J/cm2
Maximum Tolerated Dose
J/cm2Phase I
Maximum Tolerated Dose8
PrimaryThe Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).

The response rate was quantified by examination by an experienced head and neck surgeon and classified as follows: significant response (SR) was one where the lesion had greater than 75% resolution, partial response (PR) was one in which the lesion was reduced in size by at least 25%, and no response (NR) was one where the lesion was reduced by less than 25% in size.

Time frame:
Day 90
Reported as:
Number · participants
The Objective Response Rate is the Number of Participants With Significant Response (SR), Partial Response (PR) or No Response (NR).
participantsPhase II
Participants with Significant Response (SR)7
Participants with Partial Response (PR)9
Participants with no Response (NR)1
Statistical analysis
  • Phase II · One-sided exact binomial test · p = 0.0001 (One-sided exact binomial test to compare the observed response rate to the 20% rate envisioned under the original null hypothesis.)Because all but one subject responded to treatment, the Fisher's exact test was addedd.

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Phase I—0/9 (0%)9/9 (100%)
Phase II—0/21 (0%)2/21 (9.5%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventPhase IPhase II
PainNervous system disorders2/92/21
Dry mouthGeneral disorders1/90/21
Bad breathGeneral disorders1/90/21
InsomniaGeneral disorders1/90/21
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/90/21
Swollen lipGeneral disorders1/90/21
Redness on chinGeneral disorders1/90/21
Taste alteredGeneral disorders1/90/21
Burning sensationGeneral disorders1/90/21
Sensitive to coldGeneral disorders1/90/21

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Phase IPhase IITotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 80 years111829
>=80 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Phase IPhase IITotal
Female7714
Male41115
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shafirstein G, Friedman A, Siegel E, Moreno M, Baumler W, Fan CY, Morehead K, Vural E, Stack BC Jr, Suen JY. Using 5-aminolevulinic acid and pulsed dye laser for photodynamic treatment of oral leukoplakia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Nov;137(11):1117-23. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.178. PubMed 22106236 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00571974
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2007
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Jan 2012
Completion
Jan 2012
Results posted
Nov 13, 2012
Last update
Mar 24, 2015

Study contacts

Gal Shafirstein, PhD
principal investigator · University of Arkansas

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Aminolevulinic Acid

Start the discussion