ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00534118Updated Aug 26, 2020Results posted

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion in Treating Patients With Recurrent or Persistent Hematologic Cancer After Donor Stem Cell Transplant

An interventional study of donor lymphocytes in Leukemia, Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm, sponsored by Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 76 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-08-26.

Sponsored by Roswell Park Cancer Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2003, registered Sep 2007).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
Up to 76 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Giving an infusion of donor lymphocytes may be able to kill cancer cells in patients with hematologic cancer that has come back after a donor stem cell transplant.

PURPOSE: This clinical trial is studying how well donor lymphocyte infusion works in treating patients with recurrent or persistent hematologic cancer after donor stem cell transplant.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine if the complete response rate exceeds 10% in patients with recurrent or persistent hematologic malignancies treated with donor lymphocyte infusion.

Secondary

  • Estimate the complete response rate in these patients.
  • Assess the toxicity of donor lymphocyte infusion in these patients.

OUTLINE: Patients receive up to four donor lymphocyte infusions at least 1 month apart in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Leukemia
  • Lymphoma
  • Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

  • accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • relapsing chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • childhood chronic myelogenous leukemia
  • previously treated myelodysplastic syndromes
  • recurrent adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22)
  • adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22)
  • recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia
  • recurrent childhood acute myeloid leukemia
  • stage I multiple myeloma
  • stage II multiple myeloma
  • stage III multiple myeloma
  • refractory multiple myeloma
  • recurrent adult Hodgkin lymphoma
  • recurrent/refractory childhood Hodgkin lymphoma
  • recurrent adult Burkitt lymphoma
  • recurrent adult diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult diffuse mixed cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult diffuse small cleaved cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent adult lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • recurrent grade 1 follicular lymphoma
  • recurrent grade 2 follicular lymphoma
  • recurrent grade 3 follicular lymphoma
  • recurrent mantle cell lymphoma
  • recurrent marginal zone lymphoma
  • recurrent small lymphocytic lymphoma
  • recurrent adult grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia
  • recurrent childhood grade III lymphomatoid granulomatosis
  • recurrent childhood large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent childhood lymphoblastic lymphoma
  • childhood diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • childhood immunoblastic large cell lymphoma
  • recurrent childhood small noncleaved cell lymphoma
  • de novo myelodysplastic syndromes
  • secondary acute myeloid leukemia
  • secondary myelodysplastic syndromes
  • splenic marginal zone lymphoma
  • extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue
  • nodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma
  • recurrent cutaneous T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
  • recurrent mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome
  • cutaneous B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
03

In context

Leukemia

2,381 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia; 253 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is close to the median of 40 across 1,769 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia.

Browse Leukemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Roswell Park Cancer Institute is the lead sponsor of 419 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 76 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Has undergone stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for hematologic at least 30 days ago

    • No failure to engraft following transplant
    • No active acute or chronic (GVHD)

      • Minimal GVHD allowed
  • Persistent or disease after ASCT, including 1 of the following:

    • Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), meeting any of the following criteria:

      • Molecular relapse (may be treated with imatinib mesylate after transplant), as defined by any of the following:

        • ASCT was non-T-cell depleted, a negative bcr/abl was documented by PCR post-transplant, and bcr/abl is now detectable by 2 consecutive PCR determinations > 30 days apart
        • ASCT was non-T-cell depleted and bcr/abl is detectable by PCR at any time after day 180 post-transplant
      • Cytogenetic relapse after 3-6 months of imatinib mesylate
      • Relapsed chronic phase, accelerated phase, or blastic phase CML after 3-6 months of imatinib mesylate

        • Must currently be in chronic phase or accelerated phase CML only
        • Patients with blastic phase CML must attain a second chronic phase
    • Acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or myelodysplastic syndromes, meeting any of the following criteria:

      • Molecular relapse, as evidenced by \< 5% blasts in the bone marrow and the patient's leukemia-specific molecular abnormality detectable by PCR
      • Cytogenetic relapse, as evidenced by \< 5% blasts in the bone marrow and the patient's leukemia-specific chromosome abnormality detectable by standard cytogenetics at any time after day 60 post-transplant
      • Hematologic relapse, as evidenced by > 20% blasts in bone marrow or soft tissue recurrence

        • Must be treated with chemotherapy after transplant, but before study donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)
    • Multiple myeloma

      • Relapsed disease or recurrence of M-protein after thalidomide or other salvage treatment

        • Prior post-transplant documentation of disappearance of M-protein by immunofixation
      • Residual or progressive disease
      • Rising M-protein level at any time post-transplant (measured at 3-month intervals)
      • Original M-protein detectable at 6 months post-transplant
      • Immune protein electrophoresis (IPEP) is required to show that M-component is the same on day 60 post-transplant as pre-transplant
      • Residual (> 5%) plasma cells in bone marrow
    • Relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma

      • Relapse or progression of disease must be evidenced within 3 months prior to donor lymphocyte infusion by physical exam, radiographic studies, or molecular studies

        • Tumor should be re-biopsied to determine histology
      • If Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) lymphoma is suspected, peripheral blood must be assayed for EBV genome (i.e., EBV DNA testing by PCR) within the past 30 days
    • EBV infection with associated pancytopenia

      • Persistent or refractory pancytopenia with EBV genome detected by PCR in the peripheral blood

        • Refractory pancytopenia is defined as pancytopenia that is poorly responsive to growth factors and/or transfusions
    • EBV lymphoproliferative disorder

      • Clonal lymphadenopathy that is refractory to standard therapy with acyclovir and immunoglobulin (DLI may be given with rituximab)
  • Not a candidate for repeat ASCT

    • Chimerism status is not required for determining eligibility for DLI
  • Patients eligible for allogeneic ASCT, but for whom DLI is offered as the first option, should have full donor chimerism at relapse or after therapy for relapsed disease
  • Patients with relapsed underlying disease after transplant who achieved remission after chemotherapy are allowed
  • No CNS recurrence that is not cleared by standard chemotherapy

    • CNS remission status must be maintained for 2 weeks
  • Original hematopoietic progenitor stem cell donor must be available for cell donation

    • No syngeneic donors

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • performance status 60-100%
  • ≥ 8 weeks
  • Creatinine \< 3 mg/dL
  • ABO/Rh and CMV IgG/IgM status known
  • No HIV1 and HIV2 antibody
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective during and for 3 months (males) or 6 months (females) after completion of study treatment

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • See Disease Characteristics
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GVHD (graft-versus-host disease)

After a transplant from a donor, the donor’s immune cells attack the recipient’s body, often the skin, gut or liver.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Infusion

    Patients receive up to four donor lymphocyte infusions at least 1 month apart in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease

    Biological: donor lymphocytes

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete Remission Rate

    continued or induced complete remission after DLI

    Time frame: 100 days post DLI

  2. Duration of Complete Response in Months (Maximum 12)

    For participants who achieve a complete remission after DLI, the duration of time until 1) relapse or 2) death in remission or 3) subsequent DLI or 4) last followup (at 1 year after DLI)

    Time frame: 1 year post DLI

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acute Graft-versus-host Disease

    development of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) per Glucksberg criteria

    Time frame: 100 days post DLI

07

Results

Posted Aug 26, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMultiple DLISingle DLI
Started1722
Completed1722
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryComplete Remission Rate

continued or induced complete remission after DLI

Time frame:
100 days post DLI
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Complete Remission Rate
ParticipantsMultiple DLISingle DLI
Complete Remission Rate86
PrimaryDuration of Complete Response in Months (Maximum 12)

For participants who achieve a complete remission after DLI, the duration of time until 1) relapse or 2) death in remission or 3) subsequent DLI or 4) last followup (at 1 year after DLI)

Time frame:
1 year post DLI
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Complete Response in Months (Maximum 12)
monthsMultiple DLI - Complete RespondersSingle DLI - Complete Responders
Duration of Complete Response in Months (Maximum 12)10.1 (1.7 to 12)9 (1.0 to 12)
SecondaryAcute Graft-versus-host Disease

development of grade III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) per Glucksberg criteria

Time frame:
100 days post DLI
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Acute Graft-versus-host Disease
ParticipantsMultiple DLISingle DLI
Acute Graft-versus-host Disease04

Adverse events

Collected over All cause mortality includes individual participants who experienced death due to any cause before 3 years after first DLI and is the only SAE/AE captured per protocol. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Multiple DLI10/15 (66.7%)10/15 (66.7%)0/15 (0%)
Single DLI7/12 (58.3%)7/12 (58.3%)0/12 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMultiple DLISingle DLI
All cause mortality by 3 years after first DLIGeneral disorders10/157/12

Baseline characteristics

Participants can be accrued more than once; Accruals are based on the number of times the participant had a treatment (DLI) cycle that was evaluable (ie. \>8 weeks between infusions per the protocol). DLIs which were given \<8 weeks apart counted as one accrual.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
<=18 years112
Between 18 and 65 years12921
>=65 years224
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
Median45 (16 to 66)53.5 (9 to 68)51 (9 to 68)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
Female527
Male101020
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino151227
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White131225
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
United States151227
Disease
Disease(Participants)Multiple DLISingle DLITotal
Acute Myeloid Leukemia8917
Myelodysplastic Syndrome202
Non Hodgkin Leukemia213
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia101
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia112
Hodgkin Lymphoma101
Prolymphocytic Leukemia011
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
    Buffalo, New York 14263-0001, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2003 to primary completion in Jul 2018, 177 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2020, 2 years 1 month after primary completion.

Of 103 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Leukemia, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 128. This study's 177 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 110 studies reached it within 38 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 75.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 20, 2007
First posted
Sep 24, 2007
StartActual
Oct 1, 2003
Primary completionActual
Jul 26, 2018
CompletionActual
Jul 26, 2018
Results first posted
Aug 26, 2020
Last update
Aug 26, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 26, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00534118
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2007
Start date
Oct 1, 2003
Primary completion
Jul 26, 2018
Completion
Jul 26, 2018
Results posted
Aug 26, 2020
Last update
Aug 26, 2020

Study contacts

Philip L. McCarthy, MD
principal investigator · Roswell Park Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Donor Lymphocytes

Start the discussion