ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00526162Updated Jul 2, 2025Results posted

ConsultaTM CRT-D Clinical Evaluation Study

An interventional study of Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Tachyarrhythmias, Heart Failure and Ventricular Dysfunction, sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-02.

Sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure (part of Medtronic) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the Consulta clinical study is to evaluate the overall system safety and clinical performance of the Consulta Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT-D).

Read the detailed description

The Consulta CRT-D is an investigational bi-ventricular device that provides atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection and therapy, cardioversion, defibrillation and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

The study will be a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter clinical study, conducted in approximately 18 centers.

To allow for sufficient experience with the device, a maximum of 80 subjects may be implanted with the Consulta device. Data will be collected at baseline (enrollment), implant, 1-, 3-, and 6- months post implant and every 6 months thereafter or until study closure (whichever occurs first), unscheduled follow-up visits, System Modifications, Technical Observations, Study Deviations, Study Exit, upon notification of new or updated Adverse Events and in case of death.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tachyarrhythmias
  • Heart Failure
  • Ventricular Dysfunction
03

In context

Tachycardia

189 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is close to the median of 80 across 117 interventional studies indexed under Tachycardia.

Browse Tachycardia studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure is the lead sponsor of 240 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (95%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who have an indication for a defibrillator.
  • Patients who are optimally treated with medication.
  • Patients who are (NYHA) Class III or IV

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a less than the duration of the study.
  • Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required for all patients by the study protocol or that otherwise limit study participation required for all patients.
  • Patients with mechanical tricuspid heart valves.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Implantation of Consulta CRT-D

    Patients have an implant attempt with a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

    Device: Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

Interventions

  • DeviceBi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

    Implantation of a Bi-ventricular Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator

    Also known as: ConsultaTM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.

    Percentage of subjects without an unanticipated serious adverse device effects at 1-month post implant.Only subjects implanted with a Consulta device that were followed at least 28 days post-implant or have had a unanticipated device effect within 28 days after implant were included in the analysis.

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. System Performance Assessed by Holter Records

    The first 20 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted subjects were analysed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  3. System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files

    94 Save to Disk files were reviewed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

  4. System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations

    Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues.

    Time frame: 1 month follow-up

07

Results

Posted Jun 10, 2009

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConsulta Implant
Started83
Completed80
Not completed3
Withdrew: Device not implanted3

Outcome measures

PrimaryFreedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.

Percentage of subjects without an unanticipated serious adverse device effects at 1-month post implant.Only subjects implanted with a Consulta device that were followed at least 28 days post-implant or have had a unanticipated device effect within 28 days after implant were included in the analysis.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.
percentage of patientsConsulta Implant
Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant.100 (90 to 100)
Statistical analysis
  • Consulta Implant · One proportion binomial exact · p = <0.03 (Using a confidence interval of 97%, the exact binomial upper confidence bound was 9.5% which is lower than the 10% set for the primary safety objective. Therefore, the actual p-value has not been calculated further.) · Percentage: 0The confidence interval was calculated based on 35 patients who completed 1-month follow-up at interim analysis.
SecondaryAdverse Events

Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Number · number of adverse events
Adverse Events
number of adverse eventsConsulta Implant
Adverse Events70
SecondarySystem Performance Assessed by Holter Records

The first 20 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted subjects were analysed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.

Time frame:
1 month follow-up
Reported as:
Number · number of Holter recordings
System Performance Assessed by Holter Records
number of Holter recordingsConsulta Implant
System Performance Assessed by Holter Records20
SecondarySystem Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files

94 Save to Disk files were reviewed on observation of device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias.

Time frame:
1 month follow-up
Reported as:
Number · number of Save to Disk files
System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files
number of Save to Disk filesImplantation of Consulta CRT-D
System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files94
SecondarySystem Performance Assessed by Technical Observations

Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues.

Time frame:
1 month follow-up
Reported as:
Number · number of Technical Observations
System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations
number of Technical ObservationsImplantation of Consulta CRT-D
System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations3

Adverse events

Collected over From implant to 1 month follow-up visit. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Consulta Implant0/80 (0%)18/80 (22.5%)33/80 (41.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent serious events
EventConsulta Implant
Lead dislodgementInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/80
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders3/80
Cardiac FailureCardiac disorders2/80
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/80
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders1/80
Atypical AnginaCardiac disorders1/80
Sinus TachycardiaCardiac disorders1/80
Cardiac PerforationSurgical and medical procedures1/80
EpistaxisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/80
HemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders1/80
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 27
Most frequent other events
EventConsulta Implant
Cardiac FailureCardiac disorders5/80
Elevated pacing thresholdsInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/80
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders3/80
Phrenic nerve stimulationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/80
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders2/80
Lung infectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/80
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/80
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/80
Implant site haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/80
Implant site painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/80

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Consulta Implant
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years34
>=65 years47
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Consulta Implant
Mean66.0 ± 10.18
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Consulta Implant
Female19
Male62
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Consulta Implant
Germany23
Israel15
United Kingdom11
Netherlands7
Norway6
Denmark5
Switzerland5
Austria4
France3
Sweden2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital
    Bonn, Germany
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Murgatroyd FD, Helmling E, Lemke B, Eber B, Mewis C, van der Meer-Hensgens J, Chang Y, Khalameizer V, Katz A. Manual vs. automatic capture management in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):811-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq053. Epub 2010 Mar 14. PubMed 20231152 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2007, a primary completion of Jan 2008 and a completion of Oct 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jun 2009, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 6, 2007
First posted
Sep 10, 2007
Start
Oct 2007
Primary completionActual
Jan 2008
CompletionActual
Oct 2008
Results first posted
Jun 10, 2009
Last update
Jul 2, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 2, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00526162
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2007
Start date
Oct 2007
Primary completion
Jan 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
Jun 10, 2009
Last update
Jul 2, 2025

Study contacts

Consulta Clinical Study Team
study chair · Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion