ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00520494Updated Jun 20, 2013Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Vivaglobin® in Previously Untreated Patients With Primary Immunodeficiency

A Phase 4 interventional study of Vivaglobin in Common Variable Immunodeficiency and Agammaglobulinemia, sponsored by CSL Behring. Completed at 6 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-06-20.

Sponsored by CSL Behring (part of CSL Limited) · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Year to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Vivaglobin in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with primary immunodeficiency (PID) over a 25-week observation period. The purpose is to investigate whether PUPs will respond to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) treatment with adequate trough levels without first receiving immunoglobulins by the intravenous route by demonstrating that 100 mg immunoglobulin G/kg body weight (IgG/kg bw) administered on 5 consecutive days (i.e. resulting in a total dose of 500 mg IgG/kg bw) results in an IgG increase to ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12 after initiation of SCIG therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Common Variable Immunodeficiency
  • Agammaglobulinemia

Keywords

  • Previously Untreated Patient (PUP)
  • Primary Immunodeficiency (PID)
  • CVID
  • XLA
  • Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG)
  • IgG trough level
  • Quality of life
  • Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID)
  • X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA)
03

In context

Common Variable Immunodeficiency

54 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Variable Immunodeficiency; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 40 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Browse Common Variable Immunodeficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

CSL Behring is the lead sponsor of 145 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (71%) have results posted.

First submitted after CSL Behring became part of CSL Limited.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written , age-adapted
  • Male or female aged 1 to 70 years
  • Diagnosis of primary humoral immunodeficiency
  • No prior immunoglobulin substitution therapy
  • IgG level of \<5 g/L at screening
  • Women of must use medically approved and must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of serious infection between screening and first treatment
  • Bleeding disorders that require medical treatments
  • Any medical disorder causing secondary immune disorders, neutropenia, or a defect in cell mediated immunity
  • Any condition likely to interfere with evaluation of the study drug or satisfactory conduct of the trial
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vivaglobin

    Vivaglobin: 16% (160 mg/mL) liquid formulation of human IgG for SC use. Loading dose: 100 mg/kg for 5 consecutive days; maintenance dose: 100 mg/kg 1 to 2 times a week for 24 weeks.

    Drug: Vivaglobin

Interventions

  • DrugVivaglobin

    Human normal immunoglobulin G (IgG) for subcutaneous (SC) use.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12

    Time frame: On Day 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 19

    Time frame: On Day 19

  2. Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 26

    Time frame: On Day 26

  3. IgG Increase (Change From Baseline) on Day 12

    Time frame: Baseline to Day 12

  4. Overall Rate of Infections

    Annualized rate of any infection. The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of patient study days for all patients in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days. Infections were classified as all AEs with the system organ class "infections and infestations".

    Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  5. Total Serum IgG Trough Levels on Day 12

    Time frame: On Day 12

  6. Total Serum IgG Trough Levels at Week 25

    Time frame: At Week 25

  7. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles on Day 12

    Time frame: On Day 12

  8. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles at Week 25

    Time frame: At Week 25

  9. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae On Day 12

    Time frame: On Day 12

  10. Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae at Week 25

    Time frame: At Week 25

  11. Use of Antibiotics for Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment

    Number of patients. Medications were classified as antibiotics according to the anatomic therapeutic chemical code.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  12. Quality of Life as Measured by the Adapted Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36; Age ≥ 14 Years)

    The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that measures generic health concepts that are relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The questions are grouped into eight domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.

    Time frame: At study completion, approximately Week 25

  13. Quality of Life as Measured by the Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form-50 (CHQ-PF50; Age ≤ 13 Years)

    The CHQ-PF50 is a 50-item questionnaire that measures generic health concepts and is suitable for patients younger than 14 years of age. The questions are grouped into 15 domains: global health, physical functioning, role/social limitations - emotional/behavioral, role/social limitations - physical, bodily pain, behavior, global behavior, mental health, self esteem, general health perceptions, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.

    Time frame: At study completion, approximately Week 25

  14. Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity and Relatedness

    Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  15. Rate of AEs by Severity and Relatedness

    The rate was the number of AEs over the number of infusions administered. Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  16. Number of Patients With Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness

    Local reactions included: infusion site erythema, infusion site pain, infusion site pruritus, infusion site rash, infusion site reaction, infusion site swelling, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, edema peripheral, tenderness, erythema, pruritus, and skin swelling. Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  17. Rate of Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness

    The rate was the number of local reactions over the number of infusions administered. Local reactions included: * infusion site: erythema, pain, pruritus, rash, reaction, swelling; * injection site: bruising, erythema, irritation, pruritus, swelling; * edema peripheral; * tenderness; * erythema; * pruritus; and * skin swelling. Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

    Time frame: For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks

  18. Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters

    Laboratory parameters included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis parameters, and were assessed at screening, Week 12 (hematology and serum chemistry) and at the completion visit (approximately Week 25).

    Time frame: At Weeks 12 and 25

  19. Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs

    Vital signs included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body temperature.

    Time frame: At the screening visit, before and after infusions (Days 1 to 5), and at the completion visit (Week 25)

07

Results

Posted May 3, 2013

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVivaglobin
Started18
Completed17
Not completed1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1

Outcome measures

SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 19
Time frame:
On Day 19
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 19
proportion of participantsVivaglobin
Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 190.944 (0.7271 to 0.9986)
SecondaryProportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 26
Time frame:
On Day 26
Reported as:
Number · proportion of participants
Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 26
proportion of participantsVivaglobin
Proportion of Patients Achieving IgG Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 261.000 (0.8147 to 1.0000)
SecondaryIgG Increase (Change From Baseline) on Day 12
Time frame:
Baseline to Day 12
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
IgG Increase (Change From Baseline) on Day 12
g/LVivaglobin
IgG Increase (Change From Baseline) on Day 123.941 ± 0.7466
SecondaryOverall Rate of Infections

Annualized rate of any infection. The annualized rate was based on the total number of infections and the total number of patient study days for all patients in the specified analysis population and adjusted to 365 days. Infections were classified as all AEs with the system organ class "infections and infestations".

Time frame:
For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks
Reported as:
Number · infections per patient year
Overall Rate of Infections
infections per patient yearVivaglobin
Overall Rate of Infections2.785 (1.785 to 4.144)
SecondaryTotal Serum IgG Trough Levels on Day 12
Time frame:
On Day 12
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Total Serum IgG Trough Levels on Day 12
g/LVivaglobin
Total Serum IgG Trough Levels on Day 127.466 ± 1.4592
SecondaryTotal Serum IgG Trough Levels at Week 25
Time frame:
At Week 25
Reported as:
Mean · g/L
Total Serum IgG Trough Levels at Week 25
g/LVivaglobin
Total Serum IgG Trough Levels at Week 258.039 ± 1.1793
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles on Day 12
Time frame:
On Day 12
Reported as:
Mean · IU/mL
Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles on Day 12
IU/mLVivaglobin
Cytomegalovirus3.182 ± 0.8025
Tetanus1.399 ± 0.3846
Measles0.743 ± 0.3681
PrimaryProportion of Patients Achieving Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12
Time frame:
On Day 12
Reported as:
Number · proportion of patients
Proportion of Patients Achieving Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 12
proportion of patientsVivaglobin
Proportion of Patients Achieving Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels ≥ 5 g/L on Day 120.944 (0.7271 to 0.9986)
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles at Week 25
Time frame:
At Week 25
Reported as:
Mean · IU/mL
Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against Cytomegalovirus, Tetanus, and Measles at Week 25
IU/mLVivaglobin
Cytomegalovirus3.638 ± 2.2649
Tetanus1.623 ± 0.9344
Measles0.879 ± 0.8993
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae On Day 12
Time frame:
On Day 12
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae On Day 12
mg/LVivaglobin
H. influenzae1.023 ± 0.3141
S. pneumoniae18.588 ± 9.4659
SecondarySerum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae at Week 25
Time frame:
At Week 25
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Serum Concentrations of Specific IgGs Against H. Influenzae Type B and S. Pneumoniae at Week 25
mg/LVivaglobin
H. influenzae1.671 ± 0.7796
S. pneumoniae26.985 ± 22.2594
SecondaryUse of Antibiotics for Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment

Number of patients. Medications were classified as antibiotics according to the anatomic therapeutic chemical code.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Use of Antibiotics for Infection Prophylaxis and Treatment
participantsVivaglobin
Prophylaxis1
Treatment8
SecondaryQuality of Life as Measured by the Adapted Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36; Age ≥ 14 Years)

The SF-36 is a 36-item questionnaire that measures generic health concepts that are relevant across age, disease, and treatment groups. The questions are grouped into eight domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.

Time frame:
At study completion, approximately Week 25
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life as Measured by the Adapted Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36; Age ≥ 14 Years)
units on a scaleVivaglobin
Physical functioning75.50 ± 33.948
Role-physical70.63 ± 37.038
Bodily pain65.60 ± 37.262
General health56.40 ± 27.097
Vitality54.40 ± 28.575
Social functioning80.00 ± 30.162
Role-emotional79.17 ± 33.158
Mental health74.50 ± 23.268
SecondaryQuality of Life as Measured by the Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form-50 (CHQ-PF50; Age ≤ 13 Years)

The CHQ-PF50 is a 50-item questionnaire that measures generic health concepts and is suitable for patients younger than 14 years of age. The questions are grouped into 15 domains: global health, physical functioning, role/social limitations - emotional/behavioral, role/social limitations - physical, bodily pain, behavior, global behavior, mental health, self esteem, general health perceptions, change in health, parental impact - emotional, parental impact - time, family activities, and family cohesion. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health state.

Time frame:
At study completion, approximately Week 25
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Life as Measured by the Child Health Questionnaire Parent Form-50 (CHQ-PF50; Age ≤ 13 Years)
units on a scaleVivaglobin
Global health82.50 ± 15.353
Physical functioning97.91 ± 4.135
Role/social limitations - emotional/behavioral100.00 ± 0.000
Role/social limitations - physical95.84 ± 11.773
Bodily pain82.50 ± 24.349
Behavior74.06 ± 13.899
Global behavior75.63 ± 12.939
Mental health83.13 ± 13.871
Self esteem90.64 ± 6.948
General health perceptions61.66 ± 22.791
Change in health84.38 ± 18.601
Parental impact - emotional64.58 ± 39.530
Parental impact - time88.90 ± 15.698
Family activities86.98 ± 17.457
Family cohesion77.50 ± 15.353
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity and Relatedness

Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity and Relatedness
participantsVivaglobin
Total AEs14
Mild AEs14
Moderate AEs5
Severe AEs2
Not related AEs14
Possibly related AEs3
Probably related AEs4
Related AEs5
SecondaryRate of AEs by Severity and Relatedness

The rate was the number of AEs over the number of infusions administered. Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks
Reported as:
Number · AEs per infusion
Rate of AEs by Severity and Relatedness
AEs per infusionVivaglobin
Total AEs0.305
Mild AEs0.263
Moderate AEs0.034
Severe AEs0.007
Not related AEs0.200
Possibly related AEs0.013
Probably related AEs0.018
Related AEs0.074
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness

Local reactions included: infusion site erythema, infusion site pain, infusion site pruritus, infusion site rash, infusion site reaction, infusion site swelling, injection site bruising, injection site erythema, injection site irritation, injection site pruritus, injection site swelling, edema peripheral, tenderness, erythema, pruritus, and skin swelling. Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness
participantsVivaglobin
Total local reactions6
Mild local reactions6
Moderate local reactions0
Severe local reactions0
Not related local reactions1
Possibly related local reactions0
Probably related local reactions1
Related local reactions5
SecondaryRate of Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness

The rate was the number of local reactions over the number of infusions administered. Local reactions included: * infusion site: erythema, pain, pruritus, rash, reaction, swelling; * injection site: bruising, erythema, irritation, pruritus, swelling; * edema peripheral; * tenderness; * erythema; * pruritus; and * skin swelling. Mild AE: Did not interfere with activities; Moderate AE: Interfered somewhat with routine activities; Severe AE: Impossible to perform routine activities. Not related: Explained by factors not involving the drug, no temporal relationship; Possibly related: Occurred within a reasonable time of administration, could also be explained by concurrent disease or other drugs; Probably related: Compelling temporal relationship, could not be explained concurrent disease/other drugs; Related AE: Compelling temporal relationship, known/suspected response to the drug confirmed by improvement on stopping.

Time frame:
For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks
Reported as:
Number · local reactions per infusion
Rate of Local Reactions by Severity and Relatedness
local reactions per infusionVivaglobin
Total local reactions0.076
Mild local reactions0.076
Moderate local reactions0.000
Severe local reactions0.000
Not related local reactions0.004
Possibly related local reactions0.000
Probably related local reactions0.009
Related local reactions0.064
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters

Laboratory parameters included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis parameters, and were assessed at screening, Week 12 (hematology and serum chemistry) and at the completion visit (approximately Week 25).

Time frame:
At Weeks 12 and 25
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters
participantsVivaglobin
Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Routine Laboratory Parameters0
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs

Vital signs included heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and body temperature.

Time frame:
At the screening visit, before and after infusions (Days 1 to 5), and at the completion visit (Week 25)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs
participantsVivaglobin
Number of Patients With Clinically Relevant Changes in Vital Signs0

Adverse events

Collected over For the duration of the study, up to approximately 25 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Vivaglobin—2/18 (11.1%)14/18 (77.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventVivaglobin
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/18
MeningitisInfections and infestations1/18
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/18
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/18
Pseudomonal bacteraemiaInfections and infestations1/18
Haemophilus infectionInfections and infestations1/18
Pseudomonas bronchitisInfections and infestations1/18
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 74
Most frequent other events
EventVivaglobin
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/18
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/18
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders4/18
Injection site swellingGeneral disorders4/18
AstheniaGeneral disorders3/18
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders3/18
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations3/18
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/18
FatigueGeneral disorders2/18
Infusion site erythemaGeneral disorders2/18

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Vivaglobin
Mean25.9 ± 21.85
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Vivaglobin
2 to < 12 years6
≥ 12 to ≤ 16 years2
> 16 to < 65 years8
≥ 65 years2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Vivaglobin
Female8
Male10
08

Study locations

6 sites
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2B7, Canada
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details
    Montreal, Quebec H3H 1P3, Canada
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details
    Leipzig, 04129, Germany
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details
    Brescia, 25123, Italy
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details
    Roma, 00186, Italy
  • Contact CSL Behring for facility details
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Borte M, Quinti I, Soresina A, Fernandez-Cruz E, Ritchie B, Schmidt DS, McCusker C. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous vivaglobin(R) replacement therapy in previously untreated patients with primary immunodeficiency: a prospective, multicenter study. J Clin Immunol. 2011 Dec;31(6):952-61. doi: 10.1007/s10875-011-9588-5. Epub 2011 Sep 20. PubMed 21932110 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Mar 2007, a primary completion of Oct 2008 and a completion of Oct 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in May 2013, 4 years 7 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 23, 2007
First posted
Aug 24, 2007
Start
Mar 2007
Primary completionActual
Oct 2008
CompletionActual
Oct 2008
Results first posted
May 3, 2013
Last update
Jun 20, 2013
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 20, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00520494
Lead sponsor
CSL Behring
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2007
Start date
Mar 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
May 3, 2013
Last update
Jun 20, 2013

Study contacts

Michael Borte, MD
principal investigator · Klinik für Kinder-und Jugendmedizin am Städtischen Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion