ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07923305Updated Nov 6, 2026

Phase 2 and 3 Placebo Controlled & Long-term Extension Study of Rilzabrutinib in Adults With iCVID to Evaluate Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of rilzabrutinib and placebo in Immunodeficiency Common Variable, sponsored by Sanofi. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a 4-part study where both Part A and Part B, which starts after the completion of Part A, are randomized (2:1), double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies, followed by an open label (Part C) and long-term extension period (Part D), phase 2 and 3 study, designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of rilzabrutinib in adult patients with iCVID.

In Part A, all participants will have iCVID associated ILD and at least one additional inflammatory/ autoimmune complication (cytopenia [thrombocytopenia, anemia] and/or lymphoproliferative disease [splenomegaly, lymphoid hyperplasia]). At the completion of 24 weeks in Part A, participants will be assessed to the predefined No Response Citeria and may elect to discontinue the DB period (Part A) and enter the OL period (Part C).

Alternatively, for Part B, all participants will have CVID associated with at least one of the following: ILD, other inflammatory/ autoimmune complications (cytopenia, lymphoproliferative disease).

Part A: 32-week DB treatment of rilzabrutinib or placebo. Part B: 32-week DB treatment of rilzabrutinib or placebo. Part C: 32-week OL treatment of rilzabrutinib. Part D: OL treatment of rilzabrutinib until the last-patient-in (LPI- Part D) completes 52 weeks of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Immunodeficiency Common Variable
03

In context

Common Variable Immunodeficiency

54 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Variable Immunodeficiency; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 96 is above the median of 40 across 39 interventional studies indexed under Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Browse Common Variable Immunodeficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,557 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Of its 205 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 123 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants who have previously been diagnosed with CVID based on the following criteria A) Documented low serum IgG compared to age-adjusted reference ranges B) Documented low IgA and/or IgM compared to age-adjusted reference range C) Immunophenotypic findings consistent with CVID D) Absence of any other defined immunodeficiency state
  • Receiving immunoglobulin IV or SC replacement therapy
  • Participants who have been diagnosed with one or more of the following inflammatory complications (iCVID) A) Interstitial lung disease (ILD) B) CVID-related cytopenia for >3 months since diagnosis - thrombocytopenia or anemia C) Lymphoproliferative disease on historical CT imaging - splenomegaly or lymphoid hyperplasia
  • performance status Grade 2 or lower, at screening
  • use by men and women should be consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Active pulmonary infection at screening that could account for the HRCT abnormalities
  • medical history or ongoing chronic illness that would jeopardize the safety of the participant or compromise the quality of the data derived from his or her participation in the study as determined by the Investigator (e.g. hepatobiliary conditions causing hepatic impairment)
  • nausea or vomiting
  • Chronic uncontrolled infectious diseases as determined by the Investigator
  • Laboratory abnormalities at the screening visit (e.g. elevated liver enzymes)
  • Recent history of substance, alcohol abuse or mental illness
  • Malabsorption syndromes, active moderate-to-severe enteropathy
  • Concurrent treatment with or immunomodulatory drugs other than The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
96 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rilzabrutinib

    rilzabrutinib

    Drug: rilzabrutinib

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    placebo

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants with iCVID who meet any responder definitions

    In participants with ILD at baseline, a responder is defined as achieving a clinically meaningful response at Week 32. In participants with cytopenia (thrombocytopenia, anemia) at baseline, a responder is defined as achieving therapeutic efficacy at Week 32, defined as Durable platelet response or Durable hemoglobin response (DHR) between W16 and W32, and no rescue medication for thrombocytopenia is taken at any time. In participants with lymphoproliferative disease (splenomegaly or lymphoid hyperplasia) at baseline, a responder is defined as achieving therapeutic efficacy by Week 32.

    Time frame: At Week 32

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue total score at Week 24 in Part A and Week 32 in Part B

    Time frame: At Week 24 in Part A and Week 32 in Part B

  2. Percent change from baseline in FVC% predicted at Week 32

    Time frame: At Week 32

  3. Percent change from baseline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide at Week 32

    Time frame: At Week 32

  4. Change from baseline in FACIT-dyspnea severity score at Week 24 in Part A and Week 32 in Part B

    Time frame: At Week 24 in Part A and Week 32 in Part B

  5. Change from baseline in time spend in moderate to vigorous physical activity measured with a wearable device

    Time frame: At Week 32

  6. Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), serious AEs (SAE), TEAE leading to permanent discontinuation, adverse events of special interest (AESI)

    including clinical laboratory evaluations, vital sign measurements, and electrocardiograms

    Time frame: Until Week 116 of LPI for Part D

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07923305
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Nov 9, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 10, 2035 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 8, 2036 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Trial Transparency email recommended (Toll free for US & Canada)
Contact
Contact-US@sanofi.com
800-633-1610 ext. option 6

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Rilzabrutinib

Start the discussion