ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00512434IMOCAUpdated Oct 22, 2018

Percutaneous Autologous Bone-marrow Grafting for Open Tibial Shaft Fracture

An interventional study of Osteosynthesis in Tibial Fractures and Fractures, Open, sponsored by University Hospital, Tours. Completed at 11 sites in France. Open to participants aged 17 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-22.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Tours · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
17 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The treatment of open tibial shaft fracture is often complicated by delayed union or non-union. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of autologous concentrated bone-marrow to accelerate healing of open tibial shaft fractures and to reduce the need for secondary intervention.

In a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 186 patients with an open tibial will be randomized to receive either the standard of care (fixation by nail or external fixator and routine soft-tissue management), or the standard of care with percutaneous injection, one month after fracture, of autologous concentrated bone-marrow. Randomization will be stratified by severity of the open wound. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve months post-fracture.

Read the detailed description

This study will be conducted at 13 University Hospitals in France. The protocol has been approved by the institutional review board. After written informed consent, patients will be randomized, in the days after the fracture in 2 groups of 93 patients : 1) the control group (standard of care only: fixation by nail or external fixator and routine soft-tissue management) and 2) the study group (standard of care with percutaneous injection, one month after fracture, of autologous concentrated bone-marrow). Randomization will be stratified by severity of the open wound and by center. For the wound, strata A comprise Gustilo-Anderson types I, II and III-A and strata B, type III-B.

For the study group, the injection is scheduled at 1 month ± 5 days after the fracture. The techniques have been described by Hernigou (J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006; 88(sup 1 part 2): 322-327). There are 3 steps: marrow aspiration (300 - 500 g) from iliac crest under general anesthesia, centrifugation in cell therapy unit to obtain a concentrated buffy coat of about 50 ml containing progenitor cells and other mononuclear cells, percutaneous injection in the fracture site of 20-30 ml of the buffy coat under fluoroscopy control.

Apart from the injection, the standard of care is the same for the 2 groups. Patients will be followed for 12 months, with assessments at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

All analysis will be based on the intent to treat the population. The primary outcome measure will be the proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve months post fracture. An independent panel of surgeons will evaluate all secondary procedure with the potential of promoting fracture-healing.

An independent evaluation of fracture union will be conducted by a radiology panel blinded to treatment allocation and all other patient data.

An outcome will be considered to be successful when the fracture heal, according to the investigator, without secondary intervention and is radiographically united during patient follow-up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tibial Fractures
  • Fractures, Open

Keywords

  • tibial
  • shaft
  • fracture
  • open
  • bone-marrow
  • graft
  • injection
  • mesenchymal stem cell
03

In context

Tibial Fractures

135 studies on the registry are indexed under Tibial Fractures; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 65 across 91 interventional studies indexed under Tibial Fractures.

Browse Tibial Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Tours is the lead sponsor of 307 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
17 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 17 years or more
  • Open tibial shaft fracture with Gustilo-Anderson type I, II, III A or B
  • Written
  • Affiliated to French Social Security

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Circumferential bone loss
  • Vascular or nerve injury
  • Injury, other than tibial fracture, interfering with weight bearing
  • Infection (skin, soft-tissue or bone)
  • Disease or treatment interfering with bone union: head injury with coma, pathologic fracture
  • Medical history on iliac wing contraindicating bone-marrow aspiration
  • Corticoid or therapy more than one week
  • Pregnancy at the day of inclusion in study
  • History of positive serology for HIV1+2, HBs,
  • Adult in the care of a guardian
  • Impossibility to meet at the appointments for the follow-up
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control in arm fields

    Standard treatment Intervention no'Osteosynthesis'

    Procedure: Osteosynthesis

  • Experimental
    IMOCA

    Intervention 'Osteosynthesis' Percutaneous autologous bone-marrow grafting - surgical technique (ref: Hernigou Ph et al J Bone Joint Surg Am ,2006; 88 (sup 1 part 2): 322-327

    Procedure: Osteosynthesis

Interventions

  • ProcedureOsteosynthesis

    Nail or external fixator Intervention 'Osteosynthesis'

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients requiring secondary intervention because of delayed union or nonunion within twelve month post fracture.

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relation between the number of the progenitor available injected with concentrated bone marrow aspirated and the rate of bone union.

    Time frame: one year

  2. Comparison of the rate of complications between the 2 groups.

    Time frame: one year

  3. Economic impact study.

    Time frame: one year

07

Study locations

11 sites
  • UH Angers
    Angers, 49933, France
  • UH Besançon Jean Minjoz
    Besancon, 25030, France
  • UH Brest Cavale Blanche
    Brest, 29200, France
  • UH Clermont Ferrand Gabriel Montpied
    Clermont Ferrand, 63 000, France
  • UH Grenoble Michallon Hospital
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • UH Grenoble South Hospital
    Grenoble, 38434, France
  • UH Nancy Central Hospital
    Nancy, 54000, France
  • UH Nantes Hôtel Dieu
    Nantes, 44, France
  • UH Pitié Salpétrière AH HP
    Paris, 75013, France
  • UH Tours CHRU Trousseau
    Tours, 37 044, France
  • UHTOURS
    Tours, France
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00512434
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 7, 2007
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Sep 2013
Last update
Oct 22, 2018

Study contacts

Philippe Rosset, Pr
principal investigator · Service d'orthopédie II - CHRU de Tours

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion