CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00496964Updated Oct 23, 2017Results posted

Botox for Non-surgical Lateral Release in Patellofemoral Pain

A Phase 3 interventional study of Botulinum toxin A + exercise and Placebo in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-23.

Sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Insufficient recruitment in a reasonable time + expiration of study medication
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of botulinum toxin A injected into the lateral thigh muscle improves knee function and reduces knee pain secondary to patellofemoral syndrome. The study hypothesis is that botulinum toxin + specific exercises will be superior to specific exercises alone in improving knee function and reducing knee pain in individuals with patellofemoral syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Patellofemoral pain syndrome is a leading cause of knee pain in persons under 45 and is particularly common in women. The prevailing theory for the etiology of patellofemoral pain is an imbalance in force or timing of the pull of the knee extensor muscles on the patella resulting in improper tracking of the patella in the femoral grove. Specifically, the vastus medialis is thought to be ineffective in overcoming the lateral pull of the vastus lateralis. When exercises designed to focus on improving strength and timing of activation of the vastus medialis fail, surgical release of part of the attachment of the vastus lateralis to the patella is considered.

Botulinum toxin temporarily blocks acetylcholine release from motor neurons and is used clinically to produce muscle relaxation.

Subjects with patellofemoral syndrome will be recruited into the study. Half of the subjects will be given a placebo injection while the other half will be given an injection of Botox (Botulinum Toxin A, Allergen) into the vastus lateralis muscle. Group assignment will be randomized and a double blind protocol used. Prior to injection, the subject will record their level of knee pain, fill out several knee function questionnaires, and have the strength and endurance of their knee extensor muscles tested. All subjects will be given an exercise program designed to target strengthening of the medial thigh muscles as well as stretching of lateral structures.

At 4, 6 and 12 weeks knee pain and knee function will again be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • Botulinum toxin type A
  • Patellofemoral pain syndrome
  • Knee Injuries
  • Exercise Therapy
03

In context

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

295 studies on the registry are indexed under Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 45 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Browse Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Virginia Commonwealth University is the lead sponsor of 641 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Of its 88 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 62 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • retropatellar knee pain
  • pain with two of: prolonged sitting, climbing stairs, squatting, running, kneeling, hopping, jumping
  • pain with patellar palpation
  • symptoms minimum 1 month
  • Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS) usual pain 4 of 10 on VAS [0-10 scale, anchors 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable]

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history knee surgery
  • history patellar dislocation
  • clinical evidence of meniscal lesion, ligamentous instability, traction apophysitis around the patellofemoral complex, patellar tendon pathology, chondral damage, osteoarthrosis, spinal referred pain
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Injection of Botulinum toxin A into vastus lateralis of study limb plus exercise program

    Drug: Botulinum toxin A + exercise

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    Placebo injection + exercise

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugBotulinum toxin A + exercise

    Injection of 100 units Botox (Botulinum toxin type A) into the Vastus Lateralis of the study leg + 12 weeks of exercise for patellofemoral pain

    Also known as: Botox

  • DrugPlacebo

    Injection of 2 cc placebo containing 0.1cc sodium bicarbonate 8.4% (1meq/cc), 0.9cc normal saline and 1 cc of lidocaine into the vastus lateralis of the study leg followed by 12 weeks of exercise for patellofemoral pain syndrome

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale Pain Ratings (VAS)

    Visual Analog Scale pain rating (VAS). 10 cm line with anchors at 0 (no pain) and 10 cm (worst imaginable pain). Scores are in cm (0 - 10) 0 no pain, higher values greater pain. Results given are for change at 12 weeks compared to baseline (week 12 score - baseline score)

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

  2. Change in Anterior Knee Pain Scale.

    Anterior Knee Pain Scale: a 13-item questionnaire; a TOTAL score of 0 = severe disability; a score of 100 = no pain or disability. (items are scored 0-5 or 0-10). Change scores at 12 wks are reported. Inverted so positive values reflect improvement. Included items: difficulty with: weight bearing, walking, stairs, squat, run, jump, prolonged sitting; presence of limp, swelling, patellar subluxation, atrophy of thigh, reduced knee flexion. Reference: Kujala et al: Scoring of Patellofemoral Disorders. J Arthroscopic Rel Surg, 9(2)159-163, 1993

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

  3. Functional Index Questionnaire

    The Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ) is a self report functional rating scale. Individuals rate eight-activities. Each activity is rated from 0 - 2 with ) being unable to perform the activity and 2 being able to perform the activity without difficulty. The total score is summed for a final score of 0 - 16. 0 indicates that the individual is ubable to perform any of the tasks, 16 indicates that the subject is able to perform all tasks without difficulty. The eight items include: walking (1 block and 1 mile), climbing stairs (2 flights and 4 flights), squatting, kneeling, prolonged sitting, and running

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

  4. Lower Extremity Functional Scale

    The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) is a self report questionnaire. Subjects rate 19 items related to general activities that require the lower extremities on a scale of 0 - 4. 0 = extreme difficulty or unable to perform the activity, 4 = No difficulty performing the activity. The total of all rankings are summed and divided by the maximum score (76). The score is reported as a percentage. 100% = no difficulty in performing any of the tasks. 0% = extreme difficulty or unable to perform all of the tasks.

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximal Knee Extensor Force During Concentric and Isometric Contractions

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

  2. Knee Extensor Fatigue

    This is not available due to data collection errors

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

  3. Muscle Activation During Maximal Contractions and Fatigue Contractions

    muscle activation as EMG ratios of VMO/VL at 30 degrees maximal isometric contraction at 30degrees

    Time frame: 4, 6, 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted May 18, 2011
Limitations and caveats
Early termination due to small number of subjects. No statistical analysis of data due to small number of subjects.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
Started14
Completed13
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryVisual Analog Scale Pain Ratings (VAS)

Visual Analog Scale pain rating (VAS). 10 cm line with anchors at 0 (no pain) and 10 cm (worst imaginable pain). Scores are in cm (0 - 10) 0 no pain, higher values greater pain. Results given are for change at 12 weeks compared to baseline (week 12 score - baseline score)

Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · cm
Visual Analog Scale Pain Ratings (VAS)
cmBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
Visual Analog Scale Pain Ratings (VAS)63.7 ± 0.33
PrimaryChange in Anterior Knee Pain Scale.

Anterior Knee Pain Scale: a 13-item questionnaire; a TOTAL score of 0 = severe disability; a score of 100 = no pain or disability. (items are scored 0-5 or 0-10). Change scores at 12 wks are reported. Inverted so positive values reflect improvement. Included items: difficulty with: weight bearing, walking, stairs, squat, run, jump, prolonged sitting; presence of limp, swelling, patellar subluxation, atrophy of thigh, reduced knee flexion. Reference: Kujala et al: Scoring of Patellofemoral Disorders. J Arthroscopic Rel Surg, 9(2)159-163, 1993

Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Units on Scale
Change in Anterior Knee Pain Scale.
Units on ScaleBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
Change in Anterior Knee Pain Scale.1916.7 ± 4.37
PrimaryFunctional Index Questionnaire

The Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ) is a self report functional rating scale. Individuals rate eight-activities. Each activity is rated from 0 - 2 with ) being unable to perform the activity and 2 being able to perform the activity without difficulty. The total score is summed for a final score of 0 - 16. 0 indicates that the individual is ubable to perform any of the tasks, 16 indicates that the subject is able to perform all tasks without difficulty. The eight items include: walking (1 block and 1 mile), climbing stairs (2 flights and 4 flights), squatting, kneeling, prolonged sitting, and running

Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Functional Index Questionnaire
units on a scaleBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
Pre11 ± NA10 ± 1.7
Post 4 wk12 ± NA10 ± 1.7
Post 6 wk11 ± NA10.7 ± 0.6
Post 12 wk13 ± NA14 ± 1.7
PrimaryLower Extremity Functional Scale

The lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) is a self report questionnaire. Subjects rate 19 items related to general activities that require the lower extremities on a scale of 0 - 4. 0 = extreme difficulty or unable to perform the activity, 4 = No difficulty performing the activity. The total of all rankings are summed and divided by the maximum score (76). The score is reported as a percentage. 100% = no difficulty in performing any of the tasks. 0% = extreme difficulty or unable to perform all of the tasks.

Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of total possible score
Lower Extremity Functional Scale
percentage of total possible scoreBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
Pre69 ± NA66.7 ± 14.6
Post 4 wks87 ± NA71 ± 8
Post 6 wks87 ± NA73 ± 11.4
Post 12 wks91 ± NA75 ± 14
SecondaryMaximal Knee Extensor Force During Concentric and Isometric Contractions
Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Nm
Maximal Knee Extensor Force During Concentric and Isometric Contractions
NmBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
Isometric Torque 30deg pre26 ± NA31.3 ± 13.1
Isometric Torque 30deg 4w57 ± NA43.7 ± 8.1
Isometric Torque 30deg 6w43 ± NA39.0 ± 2.65
Isometric Torque 30deg 12w37 ± NA42.3 ± 5.1
SecondaryKnee Extensor Fatigue

This is not available due to data collection errors

Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryMuscle Activation During Maximal Contractions and Fatigue Contractions

muscle activation as EMG ratios of VMO/VL at 30 degrees maximal isometric contraction at 30degrees

Time frame:
4, 6, 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ratio VMO EMG to VL EMG
Muscle Activation During Maximal Contractions and Fatigue Contractions
ratio VMO EMG to VL EMGBotulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + Exercise
EMG ratio VMO/VL pre0.91 ± NA0.6 ± 0.14
EMG ratio VMO/VL 4wkNA ± NA0.61 ± 0.35
EMG ratio VMO/VL 6wk0.54 ± NA0.50 ± 0.15
EMG ratio VMO/VL 12wk0.55 ± NA0.69 ± 0.33

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Botulinum Toxin A Injection + Exercise—0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Placebo Injection + Exercise—0/4 (0%)0/4 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Botulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + ExerciseTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years145
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Botulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + ExerciseTotal
Mean3325.5 ± 2.5327.0 ± 2.47
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Botulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + ExerciseTotal
Female145
Male000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Botulinum Toxin A Injection + ExercisePlacebo Injection + ExerciseTotal
United States145
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Singer BJ, Silbert PL, Dunne JW, Song S, Singer KP. An open label pilot investigation of the efficacy of Botulinum toxin type A [Dysport] injection in the rehabilitation of chronic anterior knee pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2006 Jun 15;28(11):707-13. doi: 10.1080/09638280500301477. PubMed 16809213 ↗
  • Crossley K, Bennell K, Green S, McConnell J. A systematic review of physical interventions for patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2001 Apr;11(2):103-10. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200104000-00007. PubMed 11403109 ↗
  • Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, Green S. Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):815-22. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00613-0. PubMed 15129407 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00496964
Lead sponsor
Virginia Commonwealth University
Collaborators
Allergan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 6, 2007
Start date
May 2005
Primary completion
Jun 2008
Completion
Jun 2008
Results posted
May 18, 2011
Last update
Oct 23, 2017

Study contacts

Sheryl D Finucane, PhD, PT
principal investigator · Department of Physical Therapy, Virginia Commonwealth University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion