ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00493064Updated Dec 21, 2018Results posted

To Study the Effectiveness and Safety of Niacin and a Topical Steroid Eye Drop to Treat Retinal Vein Occlusions

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Nicotinic acid and Prednisolone acetate in Retinal Vein Occlusion, sponsored by Palo Alto Medical Foundation. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-12-21.

Sponsored by Palo Alto Medical Foundation · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Niacin, a B vitamin, may act as a vasodilator to encourage earlier formation of collateral blood vessels that may serve to bypass the obstructed vein in the eye. The topical steroid eye drops are aimed at reducing swelling in the retina, until the collateral vessels have a chance to develop.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to develop a less risky, yet effective and more sustainable treatment for retinal vein occlusions than the current commonly used approach of repeated intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (Kenalog) injections. The types of retinal vein occlusion that are being studied include central (CRVO), hemi-retinal (HRVO), and branch (BRVO) retinal vein occlusion. Niacin, (Nicotinic Acid, not Nicotinamide)a B-vitamin, has lipid lowering and vasodilating properties. The combination of Niacin and Prednisolone Acetate steroid eye drops as a non-invasive treatment approach was developed by the Principal Investigator. The Niacin dilates the retinal vessels, hopefully encouraging earlier collateral vessel formation aimed at bypassing the venous obstruction, thus restoring venous outflow. The Prednisolone Acetate steroid eye drops are aimed at reducing vascular leakage and therefore the macular edema in the eye while the Niacin is taking effect.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinal Vein Occlusion
03

In context

Retinal Vein Occlusion

291 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Vein Occlusion; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is above the median of 49 across 217 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Browse Retinal Vein Occlusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Palo Alto Medical Foundation is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be able to understand the study procedures, agree to participate, and give written consent.
  • Patient must have central retinal vein occlusion, hemi-retinal vein occlusion or branch retinal vein occlusion.
  • Patients must be able to follow the study medication regimen.
  • Patients must agree to return for the once monthly eye exams.
  • Patients must agree to have liver function tests performed on a regular basis.
  • Patients must agree to have regular appointments with their Internist on an established basis.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with active Gout, or high levels of Uric
  • Patients may not be pregnant or lactating.
  • The Principal Investigator reserves the right to exclude any patient who he feels will not make a good candidate.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prospective active treatment

    Niacin 500mg TID PO for treatment of retinal vein occlusions.

    Drug: Nicotinic acid · Drug: Prednisolone acetate

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With An Improvement in Vision, as Measured by an Increase of 15 Letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) Vision Chart.

    improvement with combination of niacin and topical prednisolone acetate

    Time frame: one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. A Decrease in the Thickness of the Retina

    data not available

    Time frame: one year

07

Results

Posted Dec 21, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneProspective Active Treatment
Started63
Completed52
Not completed11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With An Improvement in Vision, as Measured by an Increase of 15 Letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) Vision Chart.

improvement with combination of niacin and topical prednisolone acetate

Time frame:
one year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With An Improvement in Vision, as Measured by an Increase of 15 Letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) Vision Chart.
ParticipantsProspective Active Treatment
Number of Participants With An Improvement in Vision, as Measured by an Increase of 15 Letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS) Vision Chart.63
SecondaryA Decrease in the Thickness of the Retina

data not available

Time frame:
one year

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Prospective Active Treatment———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Prospective Active Treatment
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years14
>=65 years49
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Prospective Active Treatment
Female26
Male37
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Prospective Active Treatment
United States63
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Palo Alto Medical Foundation Department of Ophthalmology
    Palo Alto, California 94301, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Oct 2006, a primary completion of Oct 2016 and a completion of Oct 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Dec 2018, 2 years 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 25, 2007
First posted
Jun 27, 2007
Start
Oct 2006
Primary completionActual
Oct 2016
CompletionActual
Oct 2016
Results first posted
Dec 21, 2018
Last update
Dec 21, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00493064
Lead sponsor
Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 27, 2007
Start date
Oct 2006
Primary completion
Oct 2016
Completion
Oct 2016
Results posted
Dec 21, 2018
Last update
Dec 21, 2018

Study contacts

Michael Gaynon, MD
principal investigator · Palo Alto Medical Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Niacin

Start the discussion