CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00492349Updated Jan 5, 2022Results posted

Varenicline Adjunctive Treatment in Schizophrenia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Varenicline and Placebo in Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder and Schizophreniform Disorder, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-05.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The principal aim of the project is to conduct an off-label adjunctive clinical trial evaluating varenicline as a treatment for core neurobiological and clinical deficits in schizophrenia, in addition to evaluating for smoking cessation in schizophrenia patients.

Read the detailed description

This is a double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial in schizophrenia patients. Outcome measures include biomarkers and clinical symptoms and functions, and smoking cessation. Neurobiological and cognitive markers will be measured for short term (2 weeks) and longer-term (8 weeks). Current schizophrenia treatments are mostly ineffective against primary negative symptoms and the cognitive and information processing deficits associated with the disorder. Previous research has identified several neurophysiological deficits in schizophrenia that are enduring, frequently occurring before psychosis, and mark the disease liability. These schizophrenia endophenotypes provide important targets for novel treatment development as they represent the core deficits of the disorder. We hypothesize that sustained nicotinic and dopaminergic modulation by varenicline may ameliorate the core neurobiological deficits seen in schizophrenia patients, which would lead to subsequent clinical improvement. Neurobiological and neurocognitive markers and clinical and functional measures will be obtained to determine 1) short-term effect of varenicline on biomarkers; and 2) longer-term improvement in clinical symptoms, smoking cessation, and functions; and how biomarker changes predict these improvements.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Schizophreniform Disorder

Keywords

  • Varenicline
  • Neurobiology
  • clinical trial
  • cognitive deficits
  • Schizophreniform Disorder
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 687 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 63 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-60
  • DSM-IV Diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder
  • Clinically stable with no change in antipsychotic medications and increase of daily dose for 4 weeks prior to enrollment
  • Sufficient understanding of the study and risks (ESC score 10 or above)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major medical illness history including, but not limited to, history of heart attack, stroke, TIA (transient ischemic attack)
  • History of organic brain disorders that may affect neurophysiological measurements, including seizure disorder, brain tumor, head injury with evidence of significant cognitive deterioration
  • DSM-IV diagnosis of substance dependence within 6 months except nicotine and marijuana
  • On nicotine replacement therapy (nicotine patch, gum, or nasal spray)
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure (persistent systolic above 155 or diastolic above 95)
  • EKG of second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block
  • Renal insufficiency with estimated creatinine clearance \<40 ml/min
  • Women who have positive urine pregnancy tests
  • Women who are pregnant, plan to become pregnant, or in breastfeeding
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Varenicline

    Drug: Varenicline

  • Placebo comparator
    2

    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugVarenicline

    Varenicline 0.5mg po qd x 7 days then titrated to Varenicline 0.5mg po bid x 7 weeks

    Also known as: Chantix

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo 0.5mg po qd x 7 days then titrated to Placebo 0.5mg po bid x 7 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D)

    Ham-D Total Score (range 0 to 54, higher score is worse). Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 8

  2. Memory Saccadic Positional Error, Degrees

    A saccade is a quick eye movement. Spatial working memory was assessed by memory saccade. Participants were asked to focus on a target while a peripheral cue was flashed. Participants were signaled to look in the direction of the peripheral cue when the central target was removed, and the positional error was calculated as the distance between the saccadic and peripheral target positions. Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 8

  3. Predictive Pursuit Gain

    Pursuit gain is the averaged artifact-free eye velocity divided by target velocity. Participants are asked to track a target with their eyes. Participants may use a predictive mechanism to perform the tracking. The pursuit gain using the predictive mechanism is calculated. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 8

  4. Maintenance Pursuit Gain

    Pursuit gain is the averaged artifact-free eye velocity divided by target velocity. Eye velocity during the regular eye-tracking period (without foveal stabilization) divided by target velocity was used to calculate the maintenance pursuit gain. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 8

  5. Digit Symbol Test

    Digit symbol test score (0 to no definite upper range, higher score is better). Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8

  6. Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Detectability Score

    Conner's CPT Detectability Score (no set normal range, higher is generally better). Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8

  7. Antisaccade Error Rates

    In antisaccade, participants were asked to focus on a central target. When a peripheral cue was presented, participants were asked to look in an equidistant and opposite direction of the peripheral cue. The error rate is calculated as the number of trials in which the participant looked toward the cue, rather than in the opposite direction, divided by the total number of trials. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8

  8. P50

    P50 response is a measure of the amplitude of the brain wave in response to a sound, where the positive going amplitude of the brain wave occurring at about 50 milliseconds after the sound. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

    Time frame: Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8

07

Results

Posted Dec 11, 2017
Limitations and caveats
The small number of nonsmokers in the placebo arm could have led to reduced power and false negatives.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVareniclinePlacebo
Started3534
Week 23233
Week 83227
Completed3227
Not completed37

Outcome measures

PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D)

Ham-D Total Score (range 0 to 54, higher score is worse). Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D)
units on a scaleVareniclinePlacebo
Smoker22.9 ± 3.220.6 ± 3.4
Nonsmoker19.4 ± 3.218.6 ± 2.2
PrimaryMemory Saccadic Positional Error, Degrees

A saccade is a quick eye movement. Spatial working memory was assessed by memory saccade. Participants were asked to focus on a target while a peripheral cue was flashed. Participants were signaled to look in the direction of the peripheral cue when the central target was removed, and the positional error was calculated as the distance between the saccadic and peripheral target positions. Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · degrees
Memory Saccadic Positional Error, Degrees
degreesVareniclinePlacebo
Smoker1.6 ± 0.21.7 ± 0.2
Nonsmoker1.7 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.2
PrimaryPredictive Pursuit Gain

Pursuit gain is the averaged artifact-free eye velocity divided by target velocity. Participants are asked to track a target with their eyes. Participants may use a predictive mechanism to perform the tracking. The pursuit gain using the predictive mechanism is calculated. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · velocity ratio
Predictive Pursuit Gain
velocity ratioVareniclinePlacebo
Smoker0.31 ± 0.030.34 ± 0.04
Nonsmoker0.24 ± 0.040.31 ± 0.04
PrimaryMaintenance Pursuit Gain

Pursuit gain is the averaged artifact-free eye velocity divided by target velocity. Eye velocity during the regular eye-tracking period (without foveal stabilization) divided by target velocity was used to calculate the maintenance pursuit gain. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · velocity ratio
Maintenance Pursuit Gain
velocity ratioVareniclinePlacebo
Smoker0.8 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.04
Nonsmoker0.8 ± 0.10.8 ± 0.1
PrimaryDigit Symbol Test

Digit symbol test score (0 to no definite upper range, higher score is better). Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Digit Symbol Test
units on a scaleVareniclinePlacebo
Week 053.9 ± 19.353.2 ± 19.1
Week 255.9 ± 19.053.8 ± 20.6
Week 854.2 ± 20.354.3 ± 21.7
Statistical analysis
  • Varenicline vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.05
PrimaryConner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Detectability Score

Conner's CPT Detectability Score (no set normal range, higher is generally better). Definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Conner's Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Detectability Score
units on a scaleVareniclinePlacebo
Week 00.87 ± 0.380.87 ± 0.50
Week 20.89 ± 0.420.97 ± 0.54
Week 80.95 ± 0.480.97 ± 0.53
Statistical analysis
  • Varenicline vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = >0.05 (All treatment main and interaction effect p-values were \> 0.05.)
PrimaryAntisaccade Error Rates

In antisaccade, participants were asked to focus on a central target. When a peripheral cue was presented, participants were asked to look in an equidistant and opposite direction of the peripheral cue. The error rate is calculated as the number of trials in which the participant looked toward the cue, rather than in the opposite direction, divided by the total number of trials. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · percentage errors
Antisaccade Error Rates
percentage errorsVareniclinePlacebo
Week 00.61 ± 0.270.54 ± 0.27
Week 20.49 ± 0.270.54 ± 0.26
Week 80.45 ± 0.260.53 ± 0.28
Statistical analysis
  • Varenicline vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = <0.05
PrimaryP50

P50 response is a measure of the amplitude of the brain wave in response to a sound, where the positive going amplitude of the brain wave occurring at about 50 milliseconds after the sound. Further definition is fully described in a peer-review journal reported at Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206.

Time frame:
Week 0, Week 2 and Week 8
Reported as:
Mean · microvolts
P50
microvoltsVareniclinePlacebo
Week 03.2 ± 0.733.1 ± .71
Week 23.2 ± 0.753.0 ± .72
Week 83.2 ± 0.62.5 ± .77

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Varenicline—0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)
Placebo—0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)VareniclinePlaceboTotal
Smoker43.0 ± 2.541.5 ± 2.542.2 ± 2.5
Non-Smoker45.7 ± 2.642.1 ± 3.243.9 ± 2.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VareniclinePlaceboTotal
Female121022
Male232447
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)VareniclinePlaceboTotal
United States353469
BPRS Total
BPRS Total(units on a scale)VareniclinePlaceboTotal
Smoker36.2 ± 1.935.0 ± 2.035.6 ± 1.9
Non-Smoker31.2 ± 2.034.0 ± 2.532.6 ± 2.2
Ham-D Total Score
Ham-D Total Score(units on a scale)VareniclinePlaceboTotal
Smoker5.0 ± 0.95.76 ± 1.155.38 ± 1.0
Nonsmoker5.2 ± 0.76.6 ± 1.05.8 ± 0.8
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • UMB School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • University of Maryland Medical System
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Maryland Psychiatric Research Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21228, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hong LE, Thaker GK, McMahon RP, Summerfelt A, Rachbeisel J, Fuller RL, Wonodi I, Buchanan RW, Myers C, Heishman SJ, Yang J, Nye A. Effects of moderate-dose treatment with varenicline on neurobiological and cognitive biomarkers in smokers and nonsmokers with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;68(12):1195-206. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.83. Epub 2011 Aug 1. PubMed 21810630 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00492349
Lead sponsor
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Collaborators
Stanley Medical Research Institute
Responsible party
L. Elliot Hong (Principal Investigator, University of Maryland, Baltimore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 27, 2007
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
May 2010
Completion
Apr 2011
Results posted
Dec 11, 2017
Last update
Jan 5, 2022

Study contacts

L. Elliot Hong, M.D.
principal investigator · Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion