CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT00486395OLIVIAUpdated Feb 10, 2012

Will CPAP Reduce Length Of Respiratory Support In Premature Infants?

A Phase 3 interventional study of CPAP and Mechanical ventilation in Prematurity and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, sponsored by Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia. Terminated at 6 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 28 Weeks to 32 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-02-10.

Sponsored by Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Decreasing recruitment
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
126
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
28 Weeks to 32 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In Canada each year, there are approximately 800 infants born between 28 and 32 weeks gestation. Up to 60% of these infants will require breathing tube placement for Respiratory Distress Syndrome or RDS. RDS is a lung disease of prematurity due to a lack of a compound called surfactant. The breathing tube is placed as a conduit for placing surfactant into the babies' lungs to improve the lung disease. Most babies are then placed on a breathing machine or ventilator. Ventilation is not without harm and can be associated with lung damage, delays in feeding, increased hospital stay and interruption of bonding. An alternative that does not require the presence of a breathing tube is Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP). We will randomize babies to either ventilation or CPAP to try to minimize the length of time the baby is kept on respiratory support.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: To determine whether infants 28 to 32 weeks gestational age with RDS treated with surfactant followed by CPAP have a shorter length of respiratory support (length of time on a ventilator and CPAP) than similar infants who are treated with MV after surfactant therapy; and to examine secondary outcomes including outcomes related to lung disease, feeding issues and hospital length of stay (secondary outcomes).

Hypothesis: The use of CPAP after surfactant in infants born 28 to 32 weeks with RDS will reduce the length of respiratory support as compared with infants treated with MV. We hypothesize that the incidence of lung disease and feeding issues will be similar between groups while length of hospital stay will be shorter in the CPAP group.

Methods: A multi-center, randomized trial conducted in seven neonatal intensive care units in Canada and France. Parents will be approached for consent prior to delivery or after the infant shows signs of RDS. Infants 28 to 32 weeks gestation with RDS will be eligible for the study. After intubation and surfactant administration, babies will be randomized to either receive CPAP or MV. Strict criteria for CPAP failure, weaning ventilation and weaning and discontinuing CPAP will be specified. Infants will be followed in the nursery until hospital discharge or until all outcomes have been determined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prematurity
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Keywords

  • prematurity
  • randomized trial
  • RDS
  • surfactant
  • CPAP
  • ventilation
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 126 is above the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
28 Weeks to 32 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Infants born greater than or equal to 28 weeks (28+0) and less than 32 weeks (31+6) gestation admitted to the NICU at a participating center
  2. Diagnosis of RDS in the first 24 hours of life requiring intubation for surfactant administration by any combination of the following: Classic clinical signs of RDS include tachypnea, moderate to severe intercostal and subcostal retractions, grunting respirations and oxygen needs of >0.30 and/or on CPAP of 5 to 6 H2O cm and/or radiographic signs of RDS including low lung volumes, a reticular-granular pattern of lung infiltrates and air bronchograms. A chest radiograph is not a mandatory criterion for the diagnosis of RDS if clinical signs are present
  3. Parental consent obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Infants with a major congenital anomaly
  2. Infants with pulmonary hypoplasia; 3. Infants known or suspected to have a neuromuscular disorder;
  3. Infants from mothers that had greater than 2 weeks ruptured membranes.
  4. Infants that had vigourous resuscitation including chest compressions and cardiac meds.
  5. No parental consent obtained.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
126 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1

    Mechanical ventilation

    Device: Mechanical ventilation

  • Experimental
    2

    CPAP

    Device: CPAP

Interventions

  • DeviceCPAP

    CPAP administered via "Bubble" method or Infant Flow Driver

  • DeviceMechanical ventilation

    Volume guarantee strategy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of respiratory support

    CPAP plus MV days

    Time frame: Variable

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, pneumothorax rate and BPD by Walsh test, time to full feeds, time to regain birthweight, necrotizing enterocolitis, time to discharge, achievement of readiness for discharge criteria

    Time frame: Variable

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • The Royal Alexandra Hspital
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • The Royal Columbian Hospital
    New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
  • Surrey Memorial Hospital
    Surrey, British Columbia V3L3W7, Canada
  • Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H3V4, Canada
  • Victoria General Hospital
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
  • The Ottawa Hospital-General campus
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00486395
Lead sponsor
Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
Collaborators
Child and Family Research Institute
Responsible party
Rebecca Sherlock (Neonatologist, Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 14, 2007
Start date
Sep 2007
Primary completion
Jan 2011
Completion
Feb 2011
Last update
Feb 10, 2012

Study contacts

Rebecca L Sherlock, MD, FRCPC, PhD(c)
principal investigator · Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion