CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00474097Updated Dec 15, 2014

Follow-Up Phone Calls After Colorectal Surgery

An observational study in Colorectal Surgery, Colorectal Neoplasms and Colitis, Ulcerative, sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-12-15.

Sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess if follow-up telephone calls after colorectal surgery affects a patient's satisfaction, the outcome of their surgery, and their quality of life. In addition, readmissions, complications and emergency room visits can be tracked via these telephone calls, ensuring optimal communication between patients and the surgical office.

Read the detailed description

Follow-up with patients after surgery is necessary to assess levels of rehabilitation, answer questions and expresses an attitude of caring, as well as assist in marketing procedures for the hospital or institution (Fallis, 2001). Surveillance after discharge from the hospital may be difficult as most patients are no longer monitored by health care professionals. If home health care is not required, the patient may not have contact with his/her doctor or nurse until the follow-up appointment which frequently is 4- 6 weeks post surgery.

There is evidence in the literature that telephone contact is beneficial for patients. The strongest and most current evidence came from a meta-analysis by Meade (2004) on research supporting phone calls post-operatively for hospitalized patients. This analysis provided a significant and valid review of health care professionals providing this service, looking at various patient populations and different hospital settings. 29 articles were published from 1981 to 2004 and reviewed to gather a compilation of research findings in this area. Regardless of the design of the research, the findings suggest that follow-up phone calls to patients after discharge provide invaluable opportunities to enhance practice in the following areas: Appraisal and evaluation of patient education, Practice improvement trends, Quality of care, Medication compliance and adherence to discharge instructions, Evaluation of overall hospital performance.

There is no evidence specifically addressing telephone contact after discharge in the colorectal surgery population which will be the basis of this study. Nurses providing follow-up phone calls to patients in the early post operative phase may assist in preventing or minimizing the effects of postoperative complications by reinforcing discharge instructions, answering patients' questions, and assessing their concerns. Potential serious complications may therefore be addressed early.

The purpose of this study is to assess if follow-up telephone calls after surgery affects patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes and quality of life in the early post-operative phase after colorectal surgery. In addition, tracking of readmissions, complications and emergency room visits via telephone calls can ensure communication between the patients and the surgical office is optimal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Surgery
  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Colitis, Ulcerative
  • Diverticulitis
  • Colonic Polyps

Keywords

  • Colorectal Neoplasms
  • Colitis, Ulcerative
  • Diverticulitis
  • Colonic Polyps
  • Crohn Disease
03

In context

Colorectal Neoplasms

5,599 studies on the registry are indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms; 1,459 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 250 across 1,226 observational studies indexed under Colorectal Neoplasms.

Browse Colorectal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 283 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 29 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Colorectal Surgery clinic patients

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who are 18 years of age and older
  • Subjects of either sex
  • Subjects who will undergo any moderate or major colorectal surgery requiring an overnight hospital stay at University Hospitals Case Medical Center
  • Subjects who agree to participate in the study program and provide written informed consent
  • Diagnoses such as Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, rectal or colon cancer, colon or rectal polyps and diverticulitis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in the middle of three part surgery or had recent surgery (i.e., back for stoma closure for J-pouch)
  • Patients with diagnosis of rectal prolapse, condyloma, and any conditions that require non-invasive outpatient procedures
  • Pregnant women, minors, psychiatric patients and prisoners
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. to assess if follow-up telephone calls after surgery affects patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes and quality of life in the early post-operative phase after colorectal surgery

    Time frame: not specific

Secondary outcomes

  1. to track readmissions, complications and emergency room visits via telephone calls to ensure communication between the patients and the surgical office is optimal.

    Time frame: not specific

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00474097
Lead sponsor
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Responsible party
Conor Delaney, MD, PhD (Principal Investigator, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 16, 2007
Start date
Feb 2006
Primary completion
Dec 2007
Completion
Dec 2007
Last update
Dec 15, 2014

Study contacts

Conor Delaney, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospitals of Cleveland/ Institute for Surgical Innovation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion