CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00472823VIDOSUpdated Mar 14, 2016

Vitamin D Supplementation in Older Women

An interventional study of Vitamin D3 and Calcium Citrate (Citracal) in Osteoporosis and Aging, sponsored by Creighton University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 57 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-03-14.

Sponsored by Creighton University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
273
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
57 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of several doses of vitamin D on hormones related to bone, calcium absorption, bone density and muscle strength.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of osteoporosis is high in the United States, with about 10 million people over the age of 50 already having the disease and another 34 million at risk for developing it. Development of low-cost and effective strategies is important for preventing osteoporosis and reducing osteoporotic fractures. A simple inexpensive strategy to prevent osteoporosis is adequate nutrition with calcium and vitamin D. Serum 25OHD (25-hydroxyvitamin D) is now accepted as the objective measure of vitamin D nutrition. There is a growing understanding that serum 25OHD concentrations of at least 30-32 ng/ml are needed for optimal bone health at which serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations reach a minimum.

There are no systematic prospective dose response studies aimed at determining the optimum amount of vitamin D intake required to maintain optimum serum 25OHD levels in the population which will help in determining the estimated average requirement (EAR) and recommended dietary requirement (RDA) for vitamin D. More work to determine the RDA for vitamin D has been recommended by the Panel on Calcium and Related Nutrients of the Food and Nutrition Board. This study is aimed at filling the information gap by concentrating on the high risk group of postmenopausal women. We are testing the theory that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml will reduce serum PTH in the high risk group of vitamin D insufficient postmenopausal women with an adequate intake of calcium. We also believe that the dose of vitamin D that will achieve this level is approximately 4400IU per day, which is well above the suggested adequate intake of 400-600 ID recommended for the elderly.

In a one year double blind, randomized prospective clinical trial, we will examine the dose response effect of supplementation with different doses of vitamin D3 (400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, 4800IU/day) on the primary outcomes of serum 25OHD and PTH in 160 postmenopausal Caucasian and 160 African American women who have inadequate vitamin D levels in winter. We expect that the results from this study will add useful and important information about the RDA for vitamin D for postmenopausal women who are more susceptible to osteoporosis. The results from this study will also help in designing future clinical trials to study the effect of vitamin D, for example in preventing fractures, falls, cancer.

The main objective of the current proposal is to study the effect of increasing doses of vitamin D3 in the high risk group of postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD \<20 ng/ml) in winter in presence of sufficient calcium intake, in order to determine the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) that covers 50% and the Recommended Daily allowance (RDA) covers 97.5% of population for vitamin D. We will use a serum 25OHD concentration equal >30 ng/ml and normalization of serum PTH as indicators of adequacy. We expect that the results from this proposal will add important information helpful in designing future larger clinical trials to determine the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for vitamin D in other ethnic groups and designing clinical trials on the effect of vitamin D on falls and fractures.

We hypothesize that increasing serum 25OHD to a level greater than 30 ng/ml with vitamin D supplements in 97 percent of the study subjects will reduce serum PTH and bone markers to premenopausal range. We postulate that the RDA of vitamin D that will achieve a serum 25OHD of ≥ 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of women during winter is approximately 4400 IU/d and the EAR dose of vitamin D is between 800-1000 IU.

The specific aims of the proposal are,

  1. To examine the dose response effect of vitamin D3, 400, 800, 1600, 2400, 3200, 4000, and 4800 IU /d in postmenopausal Caucasian and African American women with hypovitaminosis D (serum 25OHD equal \<20 ng/ml) in winter plus an adequate calcium intake compared to a calcium control group, on serum 25OHD and PTH levels, which constitute our primary outcome measures.
  2. To determine the EAR and RDA for postmenopausal women by establishing the dose of vitamin D3 that will increase serum 25OHD above 30 ng/ml in 97.5% of study subjects in winter and reduce serum PTH to the normal premenopausal range.
  3. To study the dose response effect of vitamin D3 on calcium absorption, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3) serum calcium, serum bone markers, bone mineral density (BMD) and falls (only in elderly) (the secondary outcome measures)
  4. To establish the long term safety of these doses relating to hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria

Progress: Caucasian enrollment completed July 2008; African American enrollment completed May 2009

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis
  • Aging

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • cholecalciferol
  • vitamin D deficiency
  • bone density
  • dietary calcium
  • hypercalcemia
  • hypercalciuria
03

In context

Osteoporosis

1,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 212 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 273 is above the median of 95 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.

Browse Osteoporosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Creighton University is the lead sponsor of 126 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
57 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 7 years post-menopause
  • Serum 25OHD level 5 ng/ml to 20 ng/ml
  • BMI less than or equal to 40 kg/m2
  • Willing to discontinue multivitamins that contain vitamin D during the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cancer (except basal cell carcinoma) or terminal illness
  • Previous hip fracture
  • Hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body)
  • Uncontrolled type I diabetes or fasting blood sugar greater than 140 mg in type II
  • Kidney stones more than twice in a lifetime
  • Chronic renal failure
  • Evidence of chronic liver disease, including alcoholism
  • Physical conditions such as severe osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, heart failure severe enough to prevent reasonable physical activity
  • Previous treatment with bisphosphonates (more that 3 months), PTH or PTH derivatives, (e.g. Teriparatide or Fluoride) in the last 6 months
  • Previous treatment within the last 6 months with calcitonin or estrogen
  • Chronic high dose corticosteroid therapy (more than 10 mg per day) for over 6 months and not within the last 6 months
  • Anticonvulsant therapy
  • High dose thiazide therapy (more than 37.5 mg)
  • 24 hour urine calcium greater than 290 mg on 2 baseline tests
  • Serum calcium exceeding upper normal limit on 2 baseline tests
  • Bone Mineral Density T-score less than -3.0 for spine or hip
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
273 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 400 IU daily

    vitamin D3 400 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 800 IU daily

    vitamin D3 800 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 1600 IU daily

    vitamin D3 1600 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 2400 IU daily

    vitamin D3 2400 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 3200 IU daily

    vitamin D3 3200 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 4000 IU daily

    vitamin D3 4000 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Experimental
    vitamin D3 4800 IU daily

    vitamin D3 4800 IU daily

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3 · Dietary Supplement: Calcium Citrate (Citracal)

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    matched to vitamin D tablet

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D3

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementVitamin D3

    Orally for one year

  • Dietary supplementCalcium Citrate (Citracal)

    Orally for one year; dosage adjusted so that calcium intake is 1200-1400mg daily

    Also known as: Citracal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels

    Time frame: Baseline, 6months,12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Calcium absorption

    100mg calcium+ calcium45

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  2. Serum/urine calcium

    Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months

  3. Bone markers

    Time frame: Baseline, and 12 months

  4. Bone density

    spine,hip,total body,lateral

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 months

  5. Muscle strength

    leg strength( Cybex),timed up and go,hand grip,chair stand,gait speed,quiet stance,postural stability( biodex),standing balance

    Time frame: Baseline,6 months,12 months

  6. Falls

    questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months

  7. Pulmonary function studies

    FEV1

    Time frame: baseline and final test

  8. Genotyping

    Time frame: one time

  9. Molecular studies of peripheral leucocytes

    Time frame: baseline and final test

  10. Adult Depression Score

    questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months

  11. Physical Activity Scale form ( PASE)

    questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline,6 months,12 months

  12. sun exposure

    sun exposure form and skin color evaluation by a reflective meter (SmartProbe)

    Time frame: baseline and every 3 months

  13. Basic metabolic panel

    Time frame: baseline and every 3 months

  14. serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months

  15. quality of life

    questionnaire

    Time frame: baseline and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Creighton University Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68131, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gallagher JC, Kinyamu HK, Fowler SE, Dawson-Hughes B, Dalsky GP, Sherman SS. Calciotropic hormones and bone markers in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Mar;13(3):475-82. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.475. PubMed 9525348 ↗
  • Holick MF, Siris ES, Binkley N, Beard MK, Khan A, Katzer JT, Petruschke RA, Chen E, de Papp AE. Prevalence of Vitamin D inadequacy among postmenopausal North American women receiving osteoporosis therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Jun;90(6):3215-24. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2364. Epub 2005 Mar 29. PubMed 15797954 ↗
  • Aloia JF, Talwar SA, Pollack S, Feuerman M, Yeh JK. Optimal vitamin D status and serum parathyroid hormone concentrations in African American women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Sep;84(3):602-9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.3.602. PubMed 16960175 ↗
  • Smith LM, Gallagher JC. Effect of vitamin D supplementation on total and free 25 hydroxyvitamin D and parathyroid hormone. An analysis of two randomized controlled trials. J Intern Med. 2019 Dec;286(6):651-659. doi: 10.1111/joim.12950. Epub 2019 Jul 29. PubMed 31215092 ↗
  • Smith LM, Gallagher JC, Kaufmann M, Jones G. Effect of increasing doses of vitamin D on bone mineral density and serum N-terminal telopeptide in elderly women: a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):685-693. doi: 10.1111/joim.12825. Epub 2018 Sep 17. PubMed 30137647 ↗
  • Gallagher JC, Smith LM, Yalamanchili V. Incidence of hypercalciuria and hypercalcemia during vitamin D and calcium supplementation in older women. Menopause. 2014 Nov;21(11):1173-80. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000270. PubMed 24937025 ↗
  • Gallagher JC, Jindal PS, Smith LM. Vitamin D does not increase calcium absorption in young women: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(5):1081-7. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2121. PubMed 24166866 ↗
  • Gallagher JC, Peacock M, Yalamanchili V, Smith LM. Effects of vitamin D supplementation in older African American women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):1137-46. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3106. Epub 2013 Feb 5. PubMed 23386641 ↗
  • Gallagher JC, Sai A, Templin T 2nd, Smith L. Dose response to vitamin D supplementation in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Mar 20;156(6):425-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-6-201203200-00005. Erratum In: Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):672. PubMed 22431675 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00472823
Lead sponsor
Creighton University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA), Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), University of Nebraska
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2007
Start date
Apr 2007
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Aug 2011
Last update
Mar 14, 2016

Study contacts

J C Gallagher, MD
principal investigator · Creighton University Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion