An observational study in Osteoporosis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.
Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Observational
Subjects with diabetes and pre-diabetes are said to have increased bone loss when compared to the general population. Pioglitazone a thiazolidinedione, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral anti-diabetic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Though there are many benefits for using thiazolidinediones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, there is data that indicates that rosiglitazone therapy results in a significant decrease in total body bone mineral density in mice. Whether it is true in humans is not clear. If the animal data can be extrapolated to humans, thiazolidinediones may pose a significant risk of adverse effects on bone. This study hypothesizes that treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in significant reduction in bone mineral density. The aims of this are: 1. to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on skeletal health; 2. to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip, as well as bone turnover markers, at different times of persons taking thiazolidinediones and others not taking them; 3. to determine the change in BMD and bone turnover markers within different groups at different times; and 4. to compare these changes.
The prevalence rate of diabetes among veterans is 16% in general and 27% at out medical center compared to 6.3% among United States population. Subjects with diabetes and prediabetes said to have increased bone loss compared to the general population. Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral anti-diabetic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Most of the pleiotropic effects of teh thiazolidinediones are beneficial in atherosclerosis and cancer, in addition to improving insulin resistance. Data from studies in mice show that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone therapy results in a significant decrease in total body bone mineral density was observed. Whether it is true in humans is not clear. There are no prospective studies to date. Subjects with diabetes are already at an increased risk for femoral fractures. If the animal data can be can be extrapolated to humans, thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in significant risk of adverse skeletal effects. This study hypothesizes that treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in a significant reduction in bone mineral density. The aims of the study include: 1. To prospectively evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on skeletal health, we will study 140 subjects with diabetes receiving pioglitazone as part of their diabetes management and compare them with 140 diabetic controls (matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and alcohol history), not treated with pioglitazone. 2. To measure the bone mineral density by DXA at AP spine and hip, as well as bone turnover markers-procollagen type 1C-terminal propeptide (P1CP), and procollagen type 1N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), bone specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, plasma C-telopeptide (CTx) and N-telopeptide (NTx) at baseline, six and 12 months of follow-up. 3. To determine the change in BMD and bone turnover markers within each group from baseline to follow-up at six and 12 months. 4. To compare the changes in the BMD and bone turnover markers between groups at baseline and follow-up at six and 12 months.
Subjects: Prospectively study 140 subjects with type 2 diabetes and on pioglitazone, age, and sex matched controls.
Sample Size: The sample size is based on the primary objective of comparing the levels bone turnover markers and bone mineral density changes in diabetes with or without avandia.
Number of visits: 140 subjects with diabetes and on pioglitazone and 140 subjects with diabetes not on pioglitazone
Site of the study: Overton Brooks VAMC Diabetics clinic and Primary care clinics.
If our hypothesis is proven correct, subjects with diabetes requiring thiazolidinediones should have bone turnover markers and BMD measurement at baseline and have serial follow up. Identification of subjects at high risk will allow health care providers to initiate necessary protective measures to protect the bone to decrease the fracture risk.
Potential Impact on Veterans Health Care: Identification of subjects at high risk will allow health care providers to initiate necessary preventive measures to protect the bone and decrease the risk of fractures, or avoid the use of TZDs altogether in select patients. Since the prevalence of diabetes is very high among veterans, evaluation of a possible risk of skeletal health with the use of pioglitazone is highly relevant to VA health care.
1,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 212 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 96 is below the median of 174 across 446 observational studies indexed under Osteoporosis.
Browse Osteoporosis studies →VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.
Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
subjects with type 2 diabetes and less than 55 years with or without pioglitazone as part of their therapy for diabetes
Exclusion Criteria:
140 subjects with type 2 diabetes on pioglitazone.
140 subjects with type 2 diabetes not on pioglitazone.
Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck
% changes in BMD ( BMD at Lumbar spine, femoral neck and 0.33 radius) and bone turn over markers in subjects with diabetes on pioglitazone compared to those who are not on Pioglitazone
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in BMD Total Hip
% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in BMD AP Spine
% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius
% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
CTx
% Change in bone turnover markers at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Osteocalcin
% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Changes in CTx at Follow up
% change in the levels of CTx at 6 months follow up compared to baseline
Time frame: 6 months
Endo-Research clinic
| Milestone | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 32 | 64 |
| Completed | 28 | 60 |
| Not completed | 4 | 4 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 4 | 4 |
% changes in BMD ( BMD at Lumbar spine, femoral neck and 0.33 radius) and bone turn over markers in subjects with diabetes on pioglitazone compared to those who are not on Pioglitazone
| percentage of change in BMD | Piogliazone | No Pioglitazone |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck | -3.2 ± 0.25 | 0.25 ± 0.24 |
% Change in bone turnover markers at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
| pg/mL | Baseline Characteristics: Group 1 | Baseline Characteristics: Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| CTx | 4.9 ± 2.1 | 4.8 ± 1.28 |
% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
| % change | Piogliazone | No Pioglitazone |
|---|---|---|
| Osteocalcin | -20.49 ± 2.5 | -12.44 ± 2 |
% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
| % change in BMD | Piogliazone | No Pioglitazone |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in BMD Total Hip | -3.5 ± 0.24 | -0.2 ± 0.21 |
% change in the levels of CTx at 6 months follow up compared to baseline
| % change | Piogliazone | No Pioglitazone |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in CTx at Follow up | 29 ± 2 | 19 ± 3 |
% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
| % change in BMD | Piogliazone | No Pioglitazone |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in BMD AP Spine | -0.1 ± 0.04 | 0.89 ± 0.1 |
% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline
| % change in BMD | Piogliazone | No Pioglitazone |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius | -3.8 ± 0.22 | -0.21 ± 0.4 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pioglitazone | — | — | — |
| No Pioglitazone | — | — | — |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Pioglitazone | No Pioglitazone | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 32 | 64 | 96 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Pioglitazone | No Pioglitazone | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 49 ± 2 | 49 ± 2 | 49 ± 2 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Pioglitazone | No Pioglitazone | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Male | 32 | 64 | 96 |
| Ctx(pg/mL) | Pioglitazone | No Pioglitazone | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 29 ± 2 | 19 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
VA Office of Research and Development