CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00467285Updated Aug 13, 2026Results posted

Effect of Diabetic Medications on Bone Metabolism

An observational study in Osteoporosis and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-13.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
96
Ages
30 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Subjects with diabetes and pre-diabetes are said to have increased bone loss when compared to the general population. Pioglitazone a thiazolidinedione, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral anti-diabetic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Though there are many benefits for using thiazolidinediones in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, there is data that indicates that rosiglitazone therapy results in a significant decrease in total body bone mineral density in mice. Whether it is true in humans is not clear. If the animal data can be extrapolated to humans, thiazolidinediones may pose a significant risk of adverse effects on bone. This study hypothesizes that treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in significant reduction in bone mineral density. The aims of this are: 1. to evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on skeletal health; 2. to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and hip, as well as bone turnover markers, at different times of persons taking thiazolidinediones and others not taking them; 3. to determine the change in BMD and bone turnover markers within different groups at different times; and 4. to compare these changes.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence rate of diabetes among veterans is 16% in general and 27% at out medical center compared to 6.3% among United States population. Subjects with diabetes and prediabetes said to have increased bone loss compared to the general population. Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione, is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved oral anti-diabetic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Most of the pleiotropic effects of teh thiazolidinediones are beneficial in atherosclerosis and cancer, in addition to improving insulin resistance. Data from studies in mice show that rosiglitazone and pioglitazone therapy results in a significant decrease in total body bone mineral density was observed. Whether it is true in humans is not clear. There are no prospective studies to date. Subjects with diabetes are already at an increased risk for femoral fractures. If the animal data can be can be extrapolated to humans, thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in significant risk of adverse skeletal effects. This study hypothesizes that treatment with the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone may result in a significant reduction in bone mineral density. The aims of the study include: 1. To prospectively evaluate the effect of pioglitazone on skeletal health, we will study 140 subjects with diabetes receiving pioglitazone as part of their diabetes management and compare them with 140 diabetic controls (matched for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and alcohol history), not treated with pioglitazone. 2. To measure the bone mineral density by DXA at AP spine and hip, as well as bone turnover markers-procollagen type 1C-terminal propeptide (P1CP), and procollagen type 1N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), bone specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, plasma C-telopeptide (CTx) and N-telopeptide (NTx) at baseline, six and 12 months of follow-up. 3. To determine the change in BMD and bone turnover markers within each group from baseline to follow-up at six and 12 months. 4. To compare the changes in the BMD and bone turnover markers between groups at baseline and follow-up at six and 12 months.

Subjects: Prospectively study 140 subjects with type 2 diabetes and on pioglitazone, age, and sex matched controls.

Sample Size: The sample size is based on the primary objective of comparing the levels bone turnover markers and bone mineral density changes in diabetes with or without avandia.

Number of visits: 140 subjects with diabetes and on pioglitazone and 140 subjects with diabetes not on pioglitazone

  1. Subjects will be studies at three visits.
  2. The procedures to be done include assessment of bone mineral density measurement by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), measurement of bone turnover markers like serum osteocalcin and urinary N-telopeptide after the informed consent. About 15ml (one tablespoonful) of blood will be drawn at each visit for the study.
  3. All the baseline measurements will be repeated at 6 months and at one year.
  4. Statistical analysis of the data will be done to compare the changes in bone turnover markers and bone mineral density between the two groups.

Site of the study: Overton Brooks VAMC Diabetics clinic and Primary care clinics.

If our hypothesis is proven correct, subjects with diabetes requiring thiazolidinediones should have bone turnover markers and BMD measurement at baseline and have serial follow up. Identification of subjects at high risk will allow health care providers to initiate necessary protective measures to protect the bone to decrease the fracture risk.

Potential Impact on Veterans Health Care: Identification of subjects at high risk will allow health care providers to initiate necessary preventive measures to protect the bone and decrease the risk of fractures, or avoid the use of TZDs altogether in select patients. Since the prevalence of diabetes is very high among veterans, evaluation of a possible risk of skeletal health with the use of pioglitazone is highly relevant to VA health care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoporosis
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Bone Density
  • C-telopeptide
  • Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
  • N-telopeptide
  • Osteocalcin
  • Osteoporosis
  • Thiazolidinediones
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
03

In context

Osteoporosis

1,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 212 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is below the median of 174 across 446 observational studies indexed under Osteoporosis.

Browse Osteoporosis studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

subjects with type 2 diabetes and less than 55 years with or without pioglitazone as part of their therapy for diabetes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 30-55 years
  • Gender: men and women
  • Ethnicity: all ethnic groups
  • 140 subjects with diabetes and no pioglitazone (recently started i.e. less than 3 months as well as those who have just initiated pioglitazone treatment)
  • 140 control subjects (subjects with diabetes and not on pioglitazone) will be included
  • The control subjects will be chosen to match age, sex, ethnicity and comparable smoking and alcohol history
  • To avoid confusion factor of vitamin D and calcium intake, all the subjects will be given vitamin D and calcium supplements (USDA recommended doses)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable or unwilling yo give informed consent
  • Immobilized or bed bound subject
  • Subjects wil known diseases associated with disordered bone metabolism such as chronic renal insufficiency, chronic steroid use, primary hyperparathyroidism, untreated subclinical or clinical hyperthyroidism and Paget's disease. To identify subjects with decreased Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) even if creatinine is normal will be excluded (at the proposed study site, routine bm includes calculated GFR from the chemistry lab)
  • Patients on medications that will alter bone metabolism will be excluded. They are glucocorticoids, gonadal hormones (testosterone in men and estrogen in women).
  • Subjects with known history of chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy or malabsorption syndromes to avoid confounding factors known to affect vitamin D metabolism and indirectly bone mineral metabolism.
  • Female patients with perimenopause or menopause: history of hypogonadism (History of ovariectomy or postmenopausal women) to avoid bone turn over changes secondary to hypogonadism. Perimenopausal women identifies by screening FSH and LH and excluding women with elevated FSH be excluded to avoid perimenopausal effect on bone turnover (women over 35 will still have a screening gonadal hormonal evaluation).
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Group 1

    140 subjects with type 2 diabetes on pioglitazone.

  • Group 2

    140 subjects with type 2 diabetes not on pioglitazone.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck

    % changes in BMD ( BMD at Lumbar spine, femoral neck and 0.33 radius) and bone turn over markers in subjects with diabetes on pioglitazone compared to those who are not on Pioglitazone

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Changes in BMD Total Hip

    % change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Changes in BMD AP Spine

    % change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius

    % change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. CTx

    % Change in bone turnover markers at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Osteocalcin

    % change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Changes in CTx at Follow up

    % change in the levels of CTx at 6 months follow up compared to baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2015

Participant flow

Endo-Research clinic

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1Group 2
Started3264
Completed2860
Not completed44
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up44

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in BMD at Femoral Neck

% changes in BMD ( BMD at Lumbar spine, femoral neck and 0.33 radius) and bone turn over markers in subjects with diabetes on pioglitazone compared to those who are not on Pioglitazone

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of change in BMD
Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck
percentage of change in BMDPiogliazoneNo Pioglitazone
Changes in BMD at Femoral Neck-3.2 ± 0.250.25 ± 0.24
Statistical analysis
  • Piogliazone vs No Pioglitazone · t-test, 2 sided · p = <0.05
SecondaryCTx

% Change in bone turnover markers at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
CTx
pg/mLBaseline Characteristics: Group 1Baseline Characteristics: Group 2
CTx4.9 ± 2.14.8 ± 1.28
SecondaryOsteocalcin

% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Osteocalcin
% changePiogliazoneNo Pioglitazone
Osteocalcin-20.49 ± 2.5-12.44 ± 2
PrimaryChanges in BMD Total Hip

% change at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · % change in BMD
Changes in BMD Total Hip
% change in BMDPiogliazoneNo Pioglitazone
Changes in BMD Total Hip-3.5 ± 0.24-0.2 ± 0.21
SecondaryChanges in CTx at Follow up

% change in the levels of CTx at 6 months follow up compared to baseline

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · % change
Changes in CTx at Follow up
% changePiogliazoneNo Pioglitazone
Changes in CTx at Follow up29 ± 219 ± 3
PrimaryChanges in BMD AP Spine

% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · % change in BMD
Changes in BMD AP Spine
% change in BMDPiogliazoneNo Pioglitazone
Changes in BMD AP Spine-0.1 ± 0.040.89 ± 0.1
PrimaryChanges in BMD 0.33 Radius

% change in BMD at 6 month follow up compared to baseline

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · % change in BMD
Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius
% change in BMDPiogliazoneNo Pioglitazone
Changes in BMD 0.33 Radius-3.8 ± 0.22-0.21 ± 0.4

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pioglitazone———
No Pioglitazone———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PioglitazoneNo PioglitazoneTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years326496
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PioglitazoneNo PioglitazoneTotal
Mean49 ± 249 ± 249 ± 2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PioglitazoneNo PioglitazoneTotal
Female000
Male326496
Ctx
Ctx(pg/mL)PioglitazoneNo PioglitazoneTotal
Mean29 ± 219 ± 322 ± 3
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Yaturu S, Dier U, Cui H, Mousa SA. Aspirin resistance in young men with Type 2 diabetes. Journal of diabetes mellitus. 2014 Jan 1; 4(1):72-6.
  • Yaturu S, Davis J, Shi R. Decreased bone mineral density in young male veterans on Pioglitazone*. Journal of diabetes mellitus. 2012 Jan 1; 2(1):35-9.
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00467285
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 30, 2007
Start date
Oct 2006
Primary completion
Sep 2009
Completion
Sep 2009
Results posted
Jan 14, 2015
Last update
Aug 13, 2026

Study contacts

Subhashini Yaturu, MD
principal investigator · Albany VA Medical Center Samuel S. Stratton, Albany, NY

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion