ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00461097Updated Dec 13, 2017Results posted

Oral Immunotherapy for Childhood Egg Allergy

A Phase 2 interventional study of Egg oral immunotherapy and Control Group in Hypersensitivity, Immediate Hypersensitivity and Food Hypersensitivity, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-13.

Primary conditionEgg HypersensitivityRegistry: HypersensitivityReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Hypersensitivity — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Egg Hypersensitivity
Why
  1. The study's title name Egg Hypersensitivity, a narrower term within Hypersensitivity.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if oral immunotherapy (OIT) will desensitize a child with an allergy to egg and eventually lead to the development of tolerance to egg.

Read the detailed description

In the United States, as many as 6% to 8% of children are affected by food allergy. In young children, allergic reactions to egg can range from mild rash to systemic anaphylaxis. The usual standard of care for allergy is complete avoidance of this food allergen and treatment of accidental systemic reactions by access to self-injected epinephrine. However, accidental exposure to allergens in processed foods may be difficult to avoid. Currently, several therapeutic strategies are being investigated to prevent and treat food allergies. Since standard injection (under the skin) immunotherapy for food allergy is associated with a high rate of allergic reactions, a few studies have recently tried oral immunotherapy (OIT) in food allergy. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of the administration of OIT. The intent is to develop desensitization and eventually tolerance to egg allergen. This study will evaluate tolerance to egg white solid that may be gained by gradually increasing the amounts of egg white solid given to a child over a long period of time.

This study will last up to 48 months. The participants will be randomly assigned to receive oral immunotherapy treatment with egg white solid or placebo. This study will include dose escalation and maintenance followed by oral food challenge (OFC).

For participants receiving egg OIT, visit 1 consists of multiple small incremental doses of egg white solid. This is followed by 32-40 weeks of gradual dose escalation to a stable maintenance dose of egg white solid for at least 8 weeks. At approximately Week 44, participants are given an OFC using 5 grams of egg white solid to identify desensitized individuals. Participants and study staff are unblinded following this initial OFC. Maintenance egg OIT therapy is continued for an additional 1-3 years. Oral Food Challenges with 10 grams of egg white solid will be performed for participants on maintenance egg OIT at subsequent time points (approximately Week 96 and annually thereafter) to test for desensitization. If passed, a repeat OFC after being off therapy for 4-6 weeks will be performed to test for tolerance. An OFC to test for tolerance will use 10 grams of egg white solid and be followed by an open feeding of egg.

Participants receiving placebo during dose escalation and maintenance are given an OFC using 5 grams of egg white solid to test for desensitization at approximately 44 weeks. They are unblinded at that time, continue on an egg-restricted diet, and are followed until up to 2 years. These participants will only receive an OFC at a subsequent time point if their egg Immunoglobulin E (IgE) declines to be less than 2 kilounits of antibody per liter; this OFC will use 10 grams of egg white solid and be followed by an open feeding of egg.

At selected visits, blood and urine collection, physical examination, prick skin tests, and atopic dermatitis and asthma evaluations will occur.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypersensitivity
  • Immediate Hypersensitivity
  • Food Hypersensitivity

Keywords

  • Egg Allergy
  • Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)
  • Food Allergy
03

In context

Egg Hypersensitivity Reclassified

38 studies on the registry are indexed under Egg Hypersensitivity; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 73 across 27 interventional studies indexed under Egg Hypersensitivity.

Browse Egg Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.

Compared within Egg Hypersensitivity, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Hypersensitivity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Convincing clinical history of egg allergy
  • Age 6 to 18 years, with a serum IgE [UniCAP] to egg > 5 kUA/L OR
  • Age 5 to 6 years, with a serum IgE [UniCAP] to egg ≥ 12kUA/L
  • Parent/guardian willing to provide
  • Willing to use acceptable forms of

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to egg. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
  • Known allergy to corn
  • Chronic disease requiring therapy (e.g., heart disease, diabetes). Participants who have asthma, atopic dermatitis, or rhinitis are not excluded.
  • Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the 6 months prior to study entry
  • Participant is on "build-up phase" of immunotherapy and has not reached maintenance dosing. Participants tolerating maintenance allergen immunotherapy are not excluded.
  • Severe asthma, uncontrolled mild or moderate asthma. More information on this criterion can be found in the protocol.
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for the initial day of escalation, skin testing, and OFC
  • Omalizumab or other nontraditional forms of oral or sublingual allergen immunotherapy, immunomodulator therapy, or biologic therapy in the 12 months prior to study entry. Participants who have taken are not excluded.
  • drugs 90 days prior to study entry or planned use of an investigational drug during the study period
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)

    Subjects ingest egg white solid (EWS) on Visit 1 (initial day dose escalation up to 50 mg), followed by a build-up phase (escalating daily egg doses every 2 wks, achieving a maintenance dose by 32-40 wks). Thereafter, subjects are on a maximally tolerated daily egg dose (306 mg to 2 gm) for ≥8 wks. After wk 44, subjects are given a 5 gm Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using EWS to identify desensitized \[1\] subjects. Subjects/study staff are unblinded following this OFC and either continue on their egg OIT maintenance dose of 2 gm/day or are allowed to attempt escalation up to 2 gm/day for the remainder of the study (1-3 years). A 10 gm OFC to identify desensitized \[1\] subjects occurs at specified intervals under prescribed conditions (yrs 2 - 4). Subjects who pass this 1st 10 gm OFC stop study therapy for 4-6 wks, then have a 2nd 10 gm OFC. Subjects that pass this 2nd 10 gm OFC are considered tolerant \[2\], stop EWS dosing and add egg to their diet.

    Drug: Egg oral immunotherapy

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group

    Subjects ingest placebo (cornstarch) during Visit 1 (initial day of dose escalation up to 50 mg), followed by a build-up phase (escalating daily placebo doses every 2 wks, achieving a maintenance dose by 32-40 wks). Thereafter, subjects were on a maximally tolerated daily placebo dose (306 mg to 2 gm) for ≥8 wks. After wk 44, subjects were given a 5 gm Oral Food Challenge (OFC) using egg white solid to identify desensitized \[1\] subjects. Subjects/study staff were unblinded following this initial 5 gm OFC. After unblinding, subjects discontinued further placebo dosing and continued on an egg-restricted diet. A 10 gm OFC was administered under prescribed conditions to subjects if their egg-specific serum IgE level was below 2 kUA/L. They were followed in the study up to 2 years. \[1\] Desensitized: Subject does not react to egg during OFC while taking daily doses of therapy. \[2\] Tolerant: Subject does not react to egg during OFC 4-6 wks after abstinence from egg consumption.

    Drug: Control Group

Interventions

  • DrugEgg oral immunotherapy

    Egg white solid powder

  • DrugControl Group

    Placebo for egg white solid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid Followed by Open Feeding of Egg

    Tolerance Assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 10,000 mg of egg white solid during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were then given an open feeding of egg and those who successfully consumed the open feeding of egg were counted as successes.

    Time frame: At the 2 year time point; Egg OIT participants must be approximately 4-6 weeks post-discontinuation of therapy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Egg White Solid

    Desensitization assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 5,000 mg of egg white solid during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were counted as successes.

    Time frame: Following the blinded desensitization phase at approximately Week 44

  2. Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed a 50 mg Dose at Initial Escalation

    On the initial day of dosing, participants were offered 0.1 mg of egg white solid or placebo followed by an approximate doubling every 30 minutes up to a 50 mg dose providing limiting reactions do not occur.

    Time frame: Initial day of dosing

  3. Percent of Participants Who Achieved a Maintenance Dose of 2,000 mg

    For participants whose maximum tolerated dose on the initial escalation day was less than 50 mg, doses were doubled every 2 weeks up to 50 mg. After 50 mg, dosing was increased to 75 mg, and then dosing increased by 25% until the 2000 mg dose was reached. The maximum time allowed for the build-up phase was 40 weeks; the dose achieved at 40 weeks was considered the maintenance dose.

    Time frame: Following the blinded desensitization phase at approximately Week 44

  4. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    This study graded the severity of Adverse Events experienced by participants according to the criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.

    Time frame: Baseline through the 2-year primary endpoint

  5. Percent of Participants in the Egg OIT Treatment Arm Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid

    Tolerance Assessment: Participants in the Egg OIT treatment arm who were not tolerant at 2 years were offered an additional 2 years of therapy. A 10,000 mg double-blind placebo controlled oral food challenge to egg was done the same way as the one performed at 2 years for these participants in order to identify tolerant individuals in the 2 to 4 year extension segment. The tolerant individuals from this segment were then added to the tolerant individuals from the 2 year segment.

    Time frame: 4 years (48 months)

07

Results

Posted May 1, 2012

Participant flow

Recruitment took place at five university-based medical centers in the United States (Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Duke University, National Jewish Medical Center, University of Arkansas Children's Hospital) from July 2007 to December 2008.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)Placebo
Started4015
Had month 10 (wk 44) oral food challenge3513
Had month 22 (wk 96) oral food challenge341
Had year 3 (mnth 36) oral food challenge160
Had year 4 (mnth 48) oral food challenge70
Completed4015
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid Followed by Open Feeding of Egg

Tolerance Assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 10,000 mg of egg white solid during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were then given an open feeding of egg and those who successfully consumed the open feeding of egg were counted as successes.

Time frame:
At the 2 year time point; Egg OIT participants must be approximately 4-6 weeks post-discontinuation of therapy
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid Followed by Open Feeding of Egg
percentage of participantsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)Placebo
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid Followed by Open Feeding of Egg27.50
Statistical analysis
  • Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT) vs Placebo · Barnard's statistic · p = 0.025 (No adjustments were made to the p-value.) · Risk difference (rd): 27.5 · 95% CI 4.3 to 43.9The a priori threshold for statistical significance is 0.05.
SecondaryPercent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Egg White Solid

Desensitization assessment: Participants who successfully consumed without dose-limiting symptoms 5,000 mg of egg white solid during a double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge were counted as successes.

Time frame:
Following the blinded desensitization phase at approximately Week 44
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Egg White Solid
percentage of participantsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)Placebo
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed 5,000 mg of Egg White Solid55.00.0
SecondaryPercent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed a 50 mg Dose at Initial Escalation

On the initial day of dosing, participants were offered 0.1 mg of egg white solid or placebo followed by an approximate doubling every 30 minutes up to a 50 mg dose providing limiting reactions do not occur.

Time frame:
Initial day of dosing
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed a 50 mg Dose at Initial Escalation
percentage of participantsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)Placebo
Percent of Participants Who Successfully Consumed a 50 mg Dose at Initial Escalation22.586.7
SecondaryPercent of Participants Who Achieved a Maintenance Dose of 2,000 mg

For participants whose maximum tolerated dose on the initial escalation day was less than 50 mg, doses were doubled every 2 weeks up to 50 mg. After 50 mg, dosing was increased to 75 mg, and then dosing increased by 25% until the 2000 mg dose was reached. The maximum time allowed for the build-up phase was 40 weeks; the dose achieved at 40 weeks was considered the maintenance dose.

Time frame:
Following the blinded desensitization phase at approximately Week 44
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants Who Achieved a Maintenance Dose of 2,000 mg
percentage of participantsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)Placebo
Percent of Participants Who Achieved a Maintenance Dose of 2,000 mg45.080.0
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

This study graded the severity of Adverse Events experienced by participants according to the criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.

Time frame:
Baseline through the 2-year primary endpoint
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
participantsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)Placebo
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)30
SecondaryPercent of Participants in the Egg OIT Treatment Arm Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid

Tolerance Assessment: Participants in the Egg OIT treatment arm who were not tolerant at 2 years were offered an additional 2 years of therapy. A 10,000 mg double-blind placebo controlled oral food challenge to egg was done the same way as the one performed at 2 years for these participants in order to identify tolerant individuals in the 2 to 4 year extension segment. The tolerant individuals from this segment were then added to the tolerant individuals from the 2 year segment.

Time frame:
4 years (48 months)
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percent of Participants in the Egg OIT Treatment Arm Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid
percentage of participantsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)
Percent of Participants in the Egg OIT Treatment Arm Who Successfully Consumed 10,000 mg of Egg White Solid52.5

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through 2 year primary endpoint for Egg OIT and Placebo groups; then for Egg OIT only from 2 to 4 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), 0-2 Years—3/40 (7.5%)40/40 (100%)
Placebo, 0-2 Years—0/15 (0%)15/15 (100%)
Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), 2-4 Years—1/36 (2.8%)26/36 (72.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), 0-2 YearsPlacebo, 0-2 YearsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), 2-4 Years
Streptococcal bacteraemiaInfections and infestations0/400/151/36
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders1/400/150/36
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations1/400/150/36
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/400/150/36
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 97
Most frequent other events
EventEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), 0-2 YearsPlacebo, 0-2 YearsEgg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT), 2-4 Years
Abdominal discomfortGastrointestinal disorders34/404/154/22
Oral disorderGastrointestinal disorders31/403/158/22
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders28/402/154/22
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders28/403/154/22
UrticariaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders27/405/155/22
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders26/405/153/22
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations20/409/1510/36
Oropharyngeal discomfortRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders22/401/154/22
SneezingRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders21/406/151/22
FlushingVascular disorders18/403/152/22

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
<=18 years401555
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
Mean7.1 ± 1.67.1 ± 1.67.1 ± 1.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
Female15621
Male25934
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino213
Not Hispanic or Latino381452
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian505
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American112
White341448
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
United States401555
Atopic Dermatitis Total Score
Atopic Dermatitis Total Score(Scores on a scale)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
Mean3.1 ± 2.53.0 ± 2.83.1 ± 2.5
Total IgE
Total IgE(kU/L)Egg Oral Immunotherapy (OIT)PlaceboTotal
Mean1378.7 ± 1728.61464.7 ± 1182.71402.1 ± 1588.1

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

5 sites
  • University of Arkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute
    Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, United States
  • National Jewish Medical and Research Center
    Denver, Colorado 80206, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hills, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Baral VR, Hourihane JO. Food allergy in children. Postgrad Med J. 2005 Nov;81(961):693-701. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030288. PubMed 16272231 ↗
  • Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. 9. Food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb;117(2 Suppl Mini-Primer):S470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.048. PubMed 16455349 ↗
  • Wood RA. The natural history of food allergy. Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 3):1631-7. PubMed 12777603 ↗
  • Burks AW, Jones SM, Wood RA, Fleischer DM, Sicherer SH, Lindblad RW, Stablein D, Henning AK, Vickery BP, Liu AH, Scurlock AM, Shreffler WG, Plaut M, Sampson HA; Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR). Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy in children. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):233-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200435. PubMed 22808958 ↗
  • Jones SM, Burks AW, Keet C, Vickery BP, Scurlock AM, Wood RA, Liu AH, Sicherer SH, Henning AK, Lindblad RW, Dawson P, Berin C, Fleischer DM, Leung DYM, Plaut M, Sampson HA; Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR). Long-term treatment with egg oral immunotherapy enhances sustained unresponsiveness that persists after cessation of therapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1117-1127.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.12.1316. Epub 2016 Mar 9. PubMed 26924470 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Participant level data and additional relevant materials are available to the public in the Immunology Database and Analysis Portal (ImmPort). ImmPort is a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00461097
Collaborators
Consortium of Food Allergy Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2007
Start date
May 2007
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Dec 2013
Results posted
May 1, 2012
Last update
Dec 13, 2017

Study contacts

Wesley Burks, MD
study chair · University of North Carolina
Stacie Jones, MD
study chair · Allergy/Immunology Department, Arkansas Children's Hospital
Robert Wood, MD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University
Scott Sicherer, MD
principal investigator · Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David Fleischer, MD
principal investigator · National Jewish Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion