An interventional study of computer decision support tool and audit and feedback in Chronic Kidney Disease, sponsored by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2007-03-13.
Sponsored by Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
In 2001, an estimated 1.9 million Canadians had chronic renal disease and the number of patients being treated for end stage renal disease climbed by nearly 20% in 5 years. Many medications commonly used in elderly patients are excreted by the kidney. Failure to adjust doses in those with impaired renal function can result in medication overdose, leading to potentially serious morbidity and mortality. Studies in hospitals and long term care facilities have found a 19-67% rate of non-compliance with guidelines for medication dose adjustment in patients with renal insufficiency and in ambulatory care one study found a 69% rate of non-compliance. Since primary care physicians write 80% of prescriptions for those aged 65 years, there is a need for interventions to improve prescribing to patients with renal impairment in primary care.
This study will develop an audit tool and electronic decision support tool that will be incorporated into the electronic medical record in a large academic family health centre. It is seen as a preliminary step in a project to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention including chart audit, personalized feedback to prescribers, a pharmacist-facilitated group learning session and the use of an electronic decision support tool incorporated into the electronic medical record.
Study Design:
This descriptive study will develop and pilot test the tools for a multifaceted intervention to improve prescribing to patients with renal impairment in primary care. These tools include a chart audit tool, development of a group learning session and an electronic clinical decision support tool that will be incorporated into the electronic medical record.
Setting:
This study will be conducted at Stonechurch Family Health Centre, an academic family practice teaching site of McMaster University. Stonechurch Family Health Centre currently provides primary care to about 16,000 patients. There are three interdisciplinary clinical teams that include academic and community family physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, RPNs, a pharmacist, social workers and other professionals. Approximately 9.5% of the patient population is elderly.
Stonechurch Family Health Centre uses the Open Source Clinical Application Resource (OSCAR) system as its electronic medical record (EMR). OSCAR was developed by Dr. David Chan and colleagues and has the benefit of integrating clinical practice with clinical knowledge and delivering necessary tools including pharmaceutical and other clinical reference at the point of care. OSCAR has been used at Stonechurch since April 2002 and the transition from paper chart to electronic records has been successfully completed for all practices within the practice site
Patient Sample Inclusion: Patients over age 65 who have been prescribed one or more of the targeted medications and who have a creatinine from within the previous year on record will be included.
Exclusions: patients on dialysis.
Intervention:
The proposed multifaceted intervention employs a combination of high and low technology strategies. Following a pre-intervention chart audit, personalized feedback about prescribing practices will be provided to prescribers. This data will be used to design a curriculum for a pharmacist-facilitated group learning session for providers about dose adjustments for patients with renal impairment. Principles from the educational session will be reinforced through an electronic medical record decision support tool. The tool will consist of a calculator that will allow prescribers to estimate creatinine clearance. Electronically delivered lab data will be used to populate appropriate fields in the creatinine clearance calculator in order to improve the ease of use of this decision support tool. Users will be prompted to supply missing data and will be advised about necessary dose adjustments for the targeted medications. The targeted medications are those that have already been determined through a consensus panel at the Centre for Evaluation of Medicines, McMaster University and for which dose adjustment guidelines are available and that are being utilized for another related project to improve dosing of medications in the long term care setting. The list of included medications and recommended dose adjustments are attached (Appendix 1).
Measurements:
Targetted prescriptions:
The number of prescriptions written for the targeted medications will be collected. Each prescription will be reviewed and categorized as appropriate or inappropriate by examining the drug regimen and creatinine clearance for the patient. Two people will independently review each prescription and discrepancies will be resolved through concensus. The appropriateness rating process will be pilot tested.
Number of patients for whom a prescription for the target drug was written, number of times the electronic decision support tool was accessed and the time between initiation of the decision support tool and electronic prescribing of the precriotion will be collected.
Prescriber knowledge and comfort with adjusting doses of medications will be measured in a Likert scale before and after the teaching session. Prescriber assessement of the ease of use of the decision support tool will be measured through a brief useability survey.
Outcomes:
The primary outcome will be a change in the number of appropriately written prescriptions for the targeted medications 3 and 6 months after the educational intervention and introduction of the clinical decision support tool.
Secondary outcomes will include:
3,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; 706 are open to participants now.
Browse Renal Insufficiency, Chronic studies →Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
The primary outcome will be a change in the number of appropriately written prescriptions for the targeted medications 3 and 6 months after the educational intervention and introduction of the clinical decision support tool.
Prescribers' perception of their knowledge of and comfort with adjusting doses of medications as measured in a Likert scale and their assessement of the ease of use of the decision support tool
, cost savings, time for prescribers to use the decision support tool, number of times the decision support tool was used.
The record gives a start of Mar 2007 and a completion of Mar 2007. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2007. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic →
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation →