CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00433212NIPPVUpdated Dec 5, 2014

Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Premature Infants (NIPPV)

A Phase 3 interventional study of nCPAP and NIPPV in Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity, sponsored by McMaster University. Completed at 35 sites in 10 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 28 Days. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-12-05.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,011
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 28 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The machines and oxygen used to help very premature babies breathe can have side-effects, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD get more complications (a higher death rate, a longer time in intensive care and on assisted ventilation, more hospital readmissions in the first year of life, and more learning problems) than infants who do not develop BPD. Doctors try to remove the tube in the wind-pipe that links the baby to the breathing machine as soon as possible. However, small babies get tired, and still require help to breathe. One of the standard and common techniques to help them breathe without a tube in the wind-pipe is to use simple pressure support, nasal continuous positive airway pressure or nCPAP. This supports breathing a little, but it is often not enough to prevent the need to go back on the breathing machine.

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is similar to nCPAP, but also gives some breaths, or extra support, to babies through a small tube in the nose. NIPPV is safe and effective, and already in use as an alternate "standard" therapy.

The main research question: After being weaned from the breathing machine, is NIPPV better than nCPAP in preventing BPD in premature babies weighing 999 grams or less at birth?

Read the detailed description

The immature lung of extremely low birth weight (ELBW, \< 1000 g) infants is easily damaged by the placement of an endotracheal tube to deliver mechanical ventilation and oxygen. This and the total time of mechanical ventilation contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Infants with BPD have an increased risk of later death or neuro-impairment. With the increasing survival of ELBW infants in the NICU, there has been a proportionate increase in the number of infants surviving with BPD.

Following invasive ventilation via an endotracheal tube (ETT), extubation to nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP)ventilation is the standard approach. Currently, 40% of infants who are extubated and given nCPAP support fail, and require re-intubation. Previous work suggests that a less invasive respiratory support such as Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), without an endotracheal tube is less injurious to the lung. NIPPV may thereby reduce the duration of invasive ventilator support, and aid successful early extubation. We hypothesize that the use of NIPPV leads to a higher rate of survival without BPD than standard therapy with nCPAP.

This randomized clinical trial is appropriately powered to compare NIPPV with nCPAP to detect effects on clinically relevant long-term outcomes, such as death and BPD at 36 weeks. This is a multi-national, randomized, open clinical trial of two different standard methods of providing non-invasive respiratory support to 1000 extremely preterm infants weighing less than 1000 grams at birth.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Insufficiency of Prematurity

Keywords

  • prematurity
  • respiratory insufficiency
  • non-invasive ventilation
  • bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  • hyaline membrane disease
03

In context

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,011 is above the median of 70 across 228 interventional studies indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Browse Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 720 studies on the registry; 124 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 28 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Birth weight \<1000 gm
  • Gestational age \<30 completed weeks
  • Intention to manage the infant with non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. no endotracheal tube), where either:

    • the infant is within the first 7 days of life and has never been intubated or has received less than 24 hours of total cumulative intubated respiratory support;
    • the infant is within the first 28 days of life, has been managed with intubated respiratory support for 24 hours or more and is a candidate for extubation followed by non-invasive respiratory support.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Considered non-viable by clinician (decision not to administer effective therapies)
  • Life-threatening congenital abnormalities including congenital heart disease (excluding patent ductus arteriosis)
  • Infants known to require surgical treatment
  • Abnormalities of the upper and lower airways
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Infants who are >28 days old and continue to require mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,011 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    A

    Non-invasive respiratory support via nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

    Device: NIPPV

  • Active comparator
    B

    Non-invasive respiratory support via nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

    Device: nCPAP

Interventions

  • DevicenCPAP

    Deliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with nCPAP device

  • DeviceNIPPV

    Deliver non-invasive respiratory support via ventilator with NIPPV device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of survival to 36 weeks gestational age, free of moderate-severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age

Secondary outcomes

  1. All cause mortality at 36 weeks gestational age

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age

  2. All cause mortality before first discharge home

    Time frame: first discharge home

  3. retinopathy of prematurity

    Time frame: discharge home

  4. ultrasonographic evidence of brain injury

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestional age

  5. necrotizing enterocolitis

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age

  6. growth

    Time frame: discharge home

  7. time to establish full feeds

    Time frame: discharge home

  8. nosocomial infections

    Time frame: discharge home

  9. need for re-intubation

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age

  10. time on supplemental oxygen

    Time frame: discharge home

  11. duration of positive pressure respiratory support

    Time frame: discharge home

  12. comparison of synchronized and non-synchronized NIPPV

    Time frame: discharge home

  13. bronchopulmonary dysplasia

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age

  14. air leak syndromes

    Time frame: 36 weeks gestational age

  15. nasal trauma

    Time frame: discharge home

07

Study locations

35 sites
  • Georgetown University Children's Medical Center
    Washington, District of Columbia 20007, United States
  • The George Washington University Hospital
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Tufts University Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Virtua West Jersey Hospital
    Voorhees, New Jersey 08043, United States
  • SUNY Downstate Medical Center
    Brooklyn, New York 11023, United States
  • Kings County Hospital
    Brooklyn, New York 11203, United States
  • New York Hospital Queens
    Brooklyn, New York 11355, United States
  • Queens Hospital Center
    Jamaica, New York 11432, United States
  • Brookdale University Hospital & Medical Center
    New York, New York 11212, United States
  • Stony Brook University Medical Center
    Stony Brook, New York 11794-8111, United States
  • Pennsylvania Hospital/U. of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19035, United States
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84158-1289, United States
  • LKH Feldkirch
    Feldkirch, 6800, Austria
  • CHC St. Vincent
    Rocourt, B-4000, Belgium
  • St. Boniface General Hospital/University of Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 0L8, Canada
  • Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • IWK Health Centre
    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • McMaster University
    Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4J9, Canada
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L1, Canada
  • The Ottawa Hospital General Campus
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Royal University Hospital
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • Cork University Maternity Hospital
    Wilton, Cork, Ireland
  • Coombe Women's Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
  • National Maternity Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
  • University Medical Center Groningen/Beatrix Children's Hosp
    Groningen, 9700 RB, Netherlands
  • Princess Amalia Dept of Pediatrics, Isala Clinics
    Zwolle, 8000 GK, Netherlands
  • Hamad Medical Corporation
    Doha, Qatar
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital
    Singapore, 229899, Singapore
  • Karolinska University Hospital/Astrid Lingrenn's Children's Hospital
    Stockholm, S-171 76, Sweden
  • Royal Maternity Hospital
    Belfast, Northern Ireland BT12 6BB, United Kingdom
  • University of Leicester
    Leicester, LE1 6TP, United Kingdom
  • St. Mary's Hospital
    London, W2 1NY, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, Yoder BA, Chiu A, Roberts RS; NIPPV Study Group. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):611-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214533. PubMed 23944299 ↗
  • Bamat NA, Guevara JP, Bryan M, Roberts RS, Yoder BA, Lemyre B, Chiu A, Millar D, Kirpalani H. Variation in Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Levels for Mechanically Ventilated Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. J Pediatr. 2018 Mar;194:28-33.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.065. Epub 2017 Dec 22. PubMed 29275926 ↗
  • Millar D, Lemyre B, Kirpalani H, Chiu A, Yoder BA, Roberts RS. A comparison of bilevel and ventilator-delivered non-invasive respiratory support. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jan;101(1):F21-5. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-308123. Epub 2015 Jul 10. PubMed 26162889 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 5, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00433212
Lead sponsor
McMaster University
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2007
Start date
Apr 2007
Primary completion
Aug 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Last update
Dec 5, 2014

Study contacts

Haresh Kirpalani, MD, MSc
study chair · Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Brigitte Lemyre, MD
study director · Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Aaron Chiu, MD
study director · St. Boniface Hospital
David Millar, MD
study director · Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast
Robin S Roberts, MTech
study director · Hamilton Health Sciences/McMaster University
Bradley Yoder, MD
study director · University of Utah
Peter H Dijk, MD, PhD
study director · University Medical Centrum Groningen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion