ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00422448Updated Jan 14, 2011Results posted

Study to Test Genetic Alterations Among Different Dermoscopic Types of Melanocytic Nevi.

An interventional study of To test the frequency of BRAF and NRAS mutations among nevi in Nevi, sponsored by Medical University of Graz. Completed at 1 site in Austria. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-01-14.

Sponsored by Medical University of Graz · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
9 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This project is a multicenter study in which we will investigate a dual concept of nevogenesis. Study location is the Department of Dermatology at the Medical University of Graz in collaboration with centers in Austria (Vienna), Italy (Naples, Benevento, Modena), Spain (Barcelona) and the United States (New York).

The hypothesis is that small congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN), "early" acquired melanocytic nevi in childhood (AMN) and dermal nevi, all dermatoscopically characterized by globular pattern, belong to the same spectrum of genetically determined melanocytic proliferations that develop due to endogenous pathways, in contrast to "true" acquired melanocytic nevi, dermatoscopically showing reticular pattern, that develop due to exogeneous factors such as UV-exposure.

Read the detailed description

The investigations to this study will verify whether small CMN, "early" AMN and dermal nevi, characterized by globular pattern differ in their genetic alterations compared to reticular typed nevi. It will be expected that globular typed nevi and eventually dermal nevi lack B-RAF mutations whereas reticular nevi show alterations in the B-RAF gene. Study location: Graz

02

Conditions studied

  • Nevi

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dermoscopy
  • Histopathology
  • Genetics
  • Nevi
  • Nevogenesis
03

In context

Nevus

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Nevus; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 43 is below the median of 100 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Nevus.

Browse Nevus studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Graz is the lead sponsor of 471 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy individuals aged 9 to 80 years showing one or more dermoscopically benign nevi with either uniform globular-cobblestone pattern or reticular pattern or a combination of both types

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children under the age of 9 years
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patients with atypical nevi (i.e., melanoma cannot be clinically ruled out)
  • Patients with
  • Patients with sun exposure 4 weeks before enrollment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nevi from participants

    Benign nevi dermoscopically sub-classified into 4 dermoscopic types (i.e., with globular, reticular, mixed pattern with globules in the center and mixed pattern with globules at the periphery) were excised from healthy volunteers for further genetical analysis

    Genetic: To test the frequency of BRAF and NRAS mutations among nevi

Interventions

  • GeneticTo test the frequency of BRAF and NRAS mutations among nevi

    Benign nevi excised for the study purpose where genetically analyzed for the presence/absence of BRAF and NRAS mutations

    Also known as: NM_004333; Homo sapiens v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of BRAF Mutations Among Nevi

    All nevi were analyzed for BRAF mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. A random subset of nevi was also analyzed using the (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS). The frequency is reported here as the number of BRAF mutations found by each method.

    Time frame: up to 30 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of NRAS Mutations Among Nevi

    All nevi were analyzed for NRAS mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. The (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS) is not applicable for this mutation. The frequency is reported here as the number of NRAS mutations from the analyzed nevi.

    Time frame: 30 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2011
Limitations and caveats
During first year of enrollment too few patients agreed to participate. Therefore a sample of 21 nevi were additionally retrospectively included.

Participant flow

Pigmented lesion clinic from October 2006 to March 2009

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNevi
Started43
Completed43
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryFrequency of BRAF Mutations Among Nevi

All nevi were analyzed for BRAF mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. A random subset of nevi was also analyzed using the (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS). The frequency is reported here as the number of BRAF mutations found by each method.

Time frame:
up to 30 months
Reported as:
Number · BRAF mutations
Frequency of BRAF Mutations Among Nevi
BRAF mutationsNevi
Sanger method (n=45)6
UDPS (n=24)19
SecondaryFrequency of NRAS Mutations Among Nevi

All nevi were analyzed for NRAS mutations using the (less sensitive) Sanger method. The (more sensitive) Ultradeep pyro-sequencing method (UDPS) is not applicable for this mutation. The frequency is reported here as the number of NRAS mutations from the analyzed nevi.

Time frame:
30 months
Reported as:
Number · NRAS mutations
Frequency of NRAS Mutations Among Nevi
NRAS mutationsNevi
Frequency of NRAS Mutations Among Nevi0

Adverse events

Collected over were not collected or assessed. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nevi———

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Nevi
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years43
>=65 years0
Age Continuous
Age Continuous(years)Nevi
Mean39.3 ± 9.413
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Nevi
Female23
Male20
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Nevi
Austria22
Italy21
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz
    Graz, 8036, Austria
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zalaudek I, Grinschgl S, Argenziano G, Marghoob AA, Blum A, Richtig E, Wolf IH, Fink-Puches R, Kerl H, Soyer HP, Hofmann-Wellenhof R. Age-related prevalence of dermoscopy patterns in acquired melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Feb;154(2):299-304. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06973.x. PubMed 16433800 ↗
  • Zalaudek I, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Soyer HP, Ferrara G, Argenziano G. Naevogenesis: new thoughts based on dermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2006 Apr;154(4):793-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07152.x. No abstract available. PubMed 16536840 ↗
  • Pellacani G, Scope A, Ferrari B, Pupelli G, Bassoli S, Longo C, Cesinaro AM, Argenziano G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Malvehy J, Marghoob AA, Puig S, Seidenari S, Soyer HP, Zalaudek I. New insights into nevogenesis: in vivo characterization and follow-up of melanocytic nevi by reflectance confocal microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Dec;61(6):1001-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.04.018. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833408 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2006, a primary completion of Mar 2009 and a completion of Apr 2010. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Jan 2011, 1 year 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 15, 2007
First posted
Jan 17, 2007
Start
Sep 2006
Primary completionActual
Mar 2009
CompletionActual
Apr 2010
Results first posted
Jan 14, 2011
Last update
Jan 14, 2011
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00422448
First posted
Jan 17, 2007
Start date
Sep 2006
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Completion
Apr 2010
Results posted
Jan 14, 2011
Last update
Jan 14, 2011

Study contacts

Iris Zalaudek, MD
study chair · Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion