CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00416182Updated Nov 14, 2014Results posted

Nasally Delivered Pulmozyme for Sinusitis in Cystic Fibrosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Pulmozyme (dornase alfa) and Placebo in Sinusitis and Cystic Fibrosis, sponsored by University of Vermont. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-11-14.

Sponsored by University of Vermont · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic sinusitis is a frequent complication in cystic fibrosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether Pulmozyme(dornase alfa) would maintain sinus health (compared to placebo) in patients with cystic fibrosis who have recently undergone sinus surgery.

Read the detailed description

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of Pulmozyme(dornase alfa) in decreasing post-operative sinusitis symptoms in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF)

PROCEDURES: 20 patients with CF will be randomized to receive either Pulmozyme or placebo via nasal inhalation daily for 12 months. Consent will be obtained following surgery and treatment will begin 1 week post-operatively.

Monitoring will include examination and recording of adverse effects and follow up weekly for one month and then at 2.5, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Outcome measures will include ciliary function testing, pulmonary function testing, sinus questionnaires and CT scan.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sinusitis
  • Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

  • Cystic fibrosis
  • chronic sinusitis
  • mucolytic
03

In context

Sinusitis

415 studies on the registry are indexed under Sinusitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 60 across 313 interventional studies indexed under Sinusitis.

Browse Sinusitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Vermont is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of cystic fibrosis
  • Age greater than or equal to 5 years
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) greater than or equal to 40% predicted
  • Sinus surgery within one week of enrollment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Intolerance of orally inhaled Pulmozyme (dornase alfa)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Pulmozyme

    2.5 mg Pulmozyme (dornase alfa) delivered intranasally once daily

    Drug: Pulmozyme (dornase alfa)

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    2.5 mg/2mL placebo administered intranasally once daily

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugPulmozyme (dornase alfa)

    2.5 mg/2.5 mL of Pulmozyme (dornase alfa) delivered via Sinustar nasal nebulizer device

    Also known as: Pulmozyme, dornase alfa, human recombinant DNase 1

  • DrugPlacebo

    2.5 mL of placebo delivered via Sinustar nebulizer device

    Also known as: placebo comparator

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Computed Tomography Evidence of Less Sinus Disease

    compare sinus CT pre-op (baseline) to one year after initiation of study drug Difference in pre and post scores by Lund-McKay scoring system are reported (1 year minus baseline) The Lund-Mackay scoring system was used to evaluate the extent and severity of sinusitis. The scale ranges from 0 (best possible outcome with complete lucency of all sinuses) to 24 (worst possible outcome with complete opacification of all sinuses)

    Time frame: baseline and 1 year

  2. Improvement in Appearance of Nasal Passages/Sinuses

    periodic endoscopic photos of sinuses by ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgeon. The scale for scoring severity of disease ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 2 (worst possible outcome). independent blinded scoring by 2 surgeons difference in scores pre and post are reported (1 year minus baseline)

    Time frame: baseline and 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chronic Sinusitis Survey Score

    pre-surgery and end of trial (12 months) Reduction in scores (baseline minus 1 year) are recorded The chronic sinusitis survey consists of 6 questions, ranges from 0-24, a lower score indicates the best possible outcome.

    Time frame: baseline and 1 year

  2. Pulmonary Function

    prior to surgery and end of study spirometry as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted. The change over the course of the study (1 year minus baseline) is reported. A higher value indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: baseline and 1 year

07

Results

Posted Nov 14, 2014
Limitations and caveats
recruitment for a long trial was difficult so enrollment was truncated.

Participant flow

Patients undergoing sinus surgery meeting inclusion criteria were approached in the outpatient or hospital setting

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePulmozyme (Dornase Alfa)Placebo
Started88
Completed56
Not completed32

Outcome measures

PrimaryComputed Tomography Evidence of Less Sinus Disease

compare sinus CT pre-op (baseline) to one year after initiation of study drug Difference in pre and post scores by Lund-McKay scoring system are reported (1 year minus baseline) The Lund-Mackay scoring system was used to evaluate the extent and severity of sinusitis. The scale ranges from 0 (best possible outcome with complete lucency of all sinuses) to 24 (worst possible outcome with complete opacification of all sinuses)

Time frame:
baseline and 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Computed Tomography Evidence of Less Sinus Disease
units on a scalePulmozymePlacebo
Computed Tomography Evidence of Less Sinus Disease5.875 (-0.436 to 12.19)3 (0.055 to 5.945)
Statistical analysis
  • Pulmozyme vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2 (P-value of \< 0.05 is considered significant)
PrimaryImprovement in Appearance of Nasal Passages/Sinuses

periodic endoscopic photos of sinuses by ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgeon. The scale for scoring severity of disease ranges from 0 (best possible outcome) to 2 (worst possible outcome). independent blinded scoring by 2 surgeons difference in scores pre and post are reported (1 year minus baseline)

Time frame:
baseline and 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · units
Improvement in Appearance of Nasal Passages/Sinuses
unitsPulmozymePlacebo
Improvement in Appearance of Nasal Passages/Sinuses0.2 (-0.84 to 1.24)-1 (-2.24 to 0.24)
Statistical analysis
  • Pulmozyme vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.048 (P-value of \< 0.05 is considered significant.)
SecondaryChronic Sinusitis Survey Score

pre-surgery and end of trial (12 months) Reduction in scores (baseline minus 1 year) are recorded The chronic sinusitis survey consists of 6 questions, ranges from 0-24, a lower score indicates the best possible outcome.

Time frame:
baseline and 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Chronic Sinusitis Survey Score
units on a scalePulmozymePlacebo
Chronic Sinusitis Survey Score8.5 (5.45 to 11.55)3 (-1.92 to 7.92)
Statistical analysis
  • Pulmozyme vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.003 (P-value \< 0.05 is considered significant)
SecondaryPulmonary Function

prior to surgery and end of study spirometry as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted. The change over the course of the study (1 year minus baseline) is reported. A higher value indicates a better outcome.

Time frame:
baseline and 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of predicted FEV1
Pulmonary Function
percentage of predicted FEV1PulmozymePlacebo
Pulmonary Function0.8 (-20 to 17)5.4 (-3 to 18)
Statistical analysis
  • Pulmozyme vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4 (P \<0.05 is considered significant)

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year (study period). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pulmozyme—1/8 (12.5%)1/8 (12.5%)
Placebo—2/8 (25%)0/8 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPulmozymePlacebo
hospitalization for pulmonary exacerbationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/82/8
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPulmozymePlacebo
sinus surgeryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/80/8

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Pulmozyme (Dornase Alfa)PlaceboTotal
<=18 years369
Between 18 and 65 years527
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pulmozyme (Dornase Alfa)PlaceboTotal
Female5510
Male336
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Pulmozyme (Dornase Alfa)PlaceboTotal
United States8816
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Fletcher Allen Health Care
    Burlington, Vermont 05401, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Lahiri T, Herrington H, Diehl S, Landrigan G. The effect of intranasal dornase alfa on chronic sinusitis in patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study. Pediatr Pulmonol S35:354, 2012.
  • Yang C, Montgomery M. Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 18;3(3):CD001127. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001127.pub5. PubMed 33735508 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 14, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00416182
Lead sponsor
University of Vermont
Collaborators
Genentech, Inc.
Responsible party
Thomas Lahiri (Professor of Pediatrics, University of Vermont) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 27, 2006
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Jun 2012
Completion
Jun 2012
Results posted
Nov 14, 2014
Last update
Nov 14, 2014

Study contacts

Thomas Lahiri, MD
principal investigator · University of Vermont
Sandra Diehl, MS
study director · University of Vermont Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion