A Phase 1 interventional study of cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) in Lung Cancer Metastatic and Lung Cancer (NSCLC), sponsored by University of Vermont. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.
Sponsored by University of Vermont · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment
The addition of intravenous (given through a vein) cisplatin to immunotherapy improves treatment outcomes for lung cancer, but unfortunately results in significantly more side effects since the rest of the body is exposed to significant amounts of the drug. Our clinical trial data indicate that injecting cisplatin directly into the tumor using a bronchoscope (a small flexible tube with a camera in it) has very few side effects, and results in significant cell death and potentially improvement in the immune response. The goal of this proposal is to evaluate a computational approach, that incorporates data from a CT scan, to determine the optimal dose and delivery location within a tumor to maximize tumor cell killing and the immune response.
Rationale:
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. The mainstay of therapy for lung cancer remains platinum-based chemotherapy. One of the most commonly used agents is cisplatin, due to the fact that it is highly toxic to cancer cells. Cisplatin binds with DNA, cross-linking strands and thereby inhibiting mitosis, which in turn leads to apoptosis and death of the cell. However, it has more recently been recognized that cisplatin has immunomodulatory effects that extend beyond those related merely to cell death. Cisplatin has been shown to upregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC class 1), promote the recruitment and proliferation of effector cells, upregulate the activity of cytotoxic effector cells, and downregulate the immunosuppressive environment. Importantly, mechanisms by which cisplatin modulates the immune system may be present even at sublethal doses. In fact, the addition of an intravenous (i.v.) platinum agent to pembrolizumab increases the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in Stage IV NSCLC.
Although many standard regimens for the treatment of NSCLC include a platinum agent, this approach is associated with significant toxicity. Systemic i.v. cisplatin is associated with greater than 40 untoward effects; the most common is nephrotoxicity, but may commonly include gastrointestinal, hematologic, cardiac, and hepatic events. These off-target effects greatly impair patient quality of life and tolerance of the drug, which in turn limits the dose and frequency at which the medication can be given. In Stage IV NSCLC there is evidence that platinum-based chemotherapy may hasten death compared to palliative care. Adding i.v. chemotherapy to immunotherapy results in a dramatic and synergistic increase in adverse events. In fact, the FDA guidance document for cisplatin highlights a feature of this drug that is atypical for chemotherapeutics, namely that it is more highly absorbed in normal tissues than in tumor tissue.
Direct intratumoral delivery of cisplatin thus has the potential to dramatically reduce adverse systemic effects while providing an immunoadjuvant effect to optimize the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy for Stage IV NSCLC.
One approach for direct intratumoral delivery is endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle injection of cisplatin (EBUS-TBNI cisplatin). A bronchoscope with an integrated ultrasound is used to deliver cisplatin, through a needle, directly into tumors that lie next to the airway. This therapy has been evaluated as treatment for recurrent lung cancer in a previously radiated field. Patients undergo one bronchoscopic procedure per week (one cycle) for 3 weeks. Our prior multicenter study of EBUS-TBNI cisplatin demonstrated a 71% complete or partial response of the treated tumor. Given the demonstrated tumor cytotoxicity of EBUS-TBNI cisplatin for recurrent cancer, the potential ability of cisplatin to augment the immune response, and the systemic toxicity associated with IV delivery, it is critical to evaluate EBUS-TBNI cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in the first-line setting. Importantly, this approach is additive to standard of care, does not replace any current therapeutic approach, and has the potential to dramatically reduce time-to-treatment and improve immunotherapy efficacy.
In Phase 1B we will test dosing based on tumor volume and morphology over the course of 3 procedures, 1 week apart, prior to the initiation of systemic therapy. Three intratumoral cisplatin deliveries, with the first typically given in the same procedural instance as diagnosis, was chosen as the treatment course since it would not delay standard of care therapy. During each of the procedures either a low or high microvascular region will be targeted for delivery.
HYPOTHESIS:
Delivery of an image-enabled, computationally selected, dose of intratumoral cisplatin into regions of low microvascular density within a lung tumor, will be safe and result in improved drug retention
STUDY POPULATION:
Patients eligible for consent will be age 18 or older Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2 Patients will have known or suspected Stage IV, metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after multidisciplinary review
STUDY DESIGN:
This a randomized, single blind, 3+3, Phase 1 study of Intratumoral Neoadjuvant Cisplatin for Stage IV Lung Cancer delivered via EBUS-TBNI. The primary endpoint is safety. This study utilizes a within-patient approach with all patients undergoing three EBUS-TBNI procedures, 1 week apart, where the dose will be delivered into either a low or high microvascular region (randomized).
The initial dose level will be 95% tumor coverage. Tumor morphology and volume will be obtained from each participant's preoperative CT scan. The dose to be delivered will be calculated using the validated computational model based on the goal % tumor coverage (e.g. dose needed to cover 95% of the tumor).
The dose escalation cohort is 98%. The dose de-escalation cohort is 90% coverage). Escalation/de-escalation will occur in standard 3+3 design.
ENDPOINT EVALUATION:
Primary Endpoint:
Safety (dose limiting toxicity, DLT), as defined by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v 6.0. CTCAE grade 3 or above will be considered a DLT. There will be no dose escalation but standard 3+3 dose reduction will be performed as described in the statistical section. Briefly, any CTCAE grade 3 event within a patient's treatment regimen will result in discontinuation from the study and no further procedures (if the participant has not completed the treatment regimen).
Secondary Endpoints:
1) Retained cisplatin mass by low versus high microvascular regions.
5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →University of Vermont is the lead sponsor of 221 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.
Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (53%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:
2.5.2 Exclusion criteria
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
ECOG performance status
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Platelets
Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Bilirubin
A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.
Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ULN (upper limit of normal)
The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.
“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ALT and AST (liver enzymes)
Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.
Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 95% of the tumor
Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))
Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 90% of the tumor
Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))
Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 98% of the tumor
Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))
The safety of intratumoral cisplatin will be evaluated by delivery region will be evaluated.
Safety, as defined by dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
Safety (dose limiting toxicity, DLT), as defined by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v 6.0. CTCAE grade 3 or above will be considered a DLT.
Time frame: For 4 weeks after initial delivery of intratumoral cisplatin
Cisplatin retention
Post-injection platinum blood levels will allow calculation of retained cisplatin mass via an established pharmacokinetic model. Cisplatin retention will be evaluated by location of injection (low vs high % blood volume)
Time frame: At each delivery
Changes in the tumor microenvironment by dose
Biopsies will be evaluated for cell death and changes in the tumor microenvironment. Specifically CD8+/CD4+, total CD8, and T cell receptor epitope variability
Time frame: At 1 week after each delviery of intratumoral cisplatin, by delivery region
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Jul 2030, 48 months later.
Of 163 non-industry phase 1 interventional studies under Lung Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 90. This study's planned 48 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 290 studies reached it within 52 months; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 74.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Cisplatin