CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00411463Updated May 30, 2017Results posted

Psychotherapy for Bipolar II Depression, Pilot Study, Phase II

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT-BPII) and Seroquel in Bipolar II Disorder, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-30.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of an experimental psychotherapy (talk therapy) for the treatment of bipolar II depression. The name of this psychotherapy is Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy for Bipolar II Depression (IPSRT-BPII). Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either IPSRT-BPII or the medication Seroquel (quetiapine) to manage their symptoms of bipolar II depression. Subjects will receive the assigned therapy for up to 20 weeks.

Read the detailed description

The proposed pilot study is an experimental design intended to investigate the preliminary efficacy of Interpersonal Social Rhythm Therapy for Bipolar II Depression (IPSRT-BPII). A total of 56 eligible subjects with a diagnosis of bipolar II disorder will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups : Seroquel (n=28) or IPSRT-BPII (n=28). Following baseline assessment, all participants will undergo up to 20 weeks of their assigned treatment. Patients assigned to IPSRT-BPII who fail to respond (at least 50% reduction in HRSD-25 scores and YMRS ≤ 10) by week 12 will have Seroquel added to IPSRT-BPII. Subjects who achieve remission (defined as 3 consecutive weeks where both HRSD-25 and YMRS scores average ≤ 7) and have participated in the trial for a minimum of 12 weeks will be moved into a continuation phase where they will receive maintenance treatment (bi-monthly therapy sessions and/or pharmacotherapy) until week 20. Patients who do not achieve remission by Week 20 will be discontinued from treatment and referred for follow-up care. All subjects (remitters and non-remitters) will be assessed at 20 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bipolar II Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Interpersonal Therapy
  • Social Rhythm Therapy
  • Bipolar Disorder
  • Depression
  • Seroquel
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,385 studies on the registry; 167 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Meets DSM-IV Criteria for Bipolar Disorder, Type II, currently depressed;
  2. HRSD-25 ≥15
  3. Age 18-65 years;
  4. Able to give informed consent;
  5. Women of child bearing potential will be included if they agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Not competent to give informed consent in the opinion of the investigator (e.g., psychotic at time of evaluation);
  2. Unwilling or unable to comply with study requirements;
  3. Meets DSM-IV criteria for borderline personality disorder or antisocial personality disorder;
  4. Active substance abuse within the past 6 months(episodic abuse related to mood episodes will not exclude a subject);
  5. Currently a high suicide risk, as assessed by an active plan and intent to behave in a way that risks ending ones life;
  6. Non-English speaking;
  7. Significant, unstable, medical illness that might confound symptom scores or preclude treatment with pharmacotherapy
  8. Currently applying for disability because of psychiatric illness (we have found that these individuals have a vested interested in appearing to remain ill which potentially confounds outcome scores).
  9. Women who are pregnant, lactating or plan to become pregnant during their study participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Psychotherapy

    Subjects randomized to the Psychotherapy arm will receive Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT-BPII)

    Behavioral: Interpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT-BPII)

  • Experimental
    Medication

    Subjects randomized to the medication arm will receive the FDA approved medication Seroquel (quetiapine)

    Drug: Seroquel

Interventions

  • BehavioralInterpersonal and Social Rhythm Therapy (IPSRT-BPII)

    IPSRT is comprised of three components: psychoeducation, social rhythm therapy, and standard IPT as developed for unipolar depression. Psychoeducation focuses on a) the illness and its consequences, b) treatment options and associated side effects, and c) prodromal symptoms/detection of early warning symptoms.

    Also known as: IPSRT

  • DrugSeroquel

    Subjects will be started at 100 mg/day titrated to a maximum of 800 mg /day Day 1-BID doses totaling 100 mg/day, increased to 400 mg/day on Day 4 in increments of up to 100 mg/day in BID divided doses, by Day 6 begin titration up to a maximum dose of 800 mg/day in increments no greater than 200 mg/day. This titration schedule may be adjusted based on the subject's response and ability to tolerate Seroquel. Subjects who are unable to tolerate the study medications, or for whom the study medications are an inappropriate clinical choice, will be treated openly by a clinic physician according to the standard of care guidelines designated by the American Psychiatric Association (2002) for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

    Also known as: Quetiapine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Depression Scores, With a Mania Score Less Than or Equal to 10

    Overall response rates (defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in depression scores without an increase in mania scores) were 29% (n=4) in the IPSRT group and 27% (n=3) in the quetiapine group. HRSD-25 scores are based on first 17 responses. Eight items are scored on a 5-pt scale, from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe.) Other nine items on the assessment are scored from 0-2. The higher the score on the HRSD-25, the worse the outcome is considered to be. A score of 0-7 is considered to be normal; 8-13 indicates mild depression, 14-18 indicates moderate depression, 19-22 indicates severe depression, and any score greater than or equal to 23 indicates very severe depression. The YMRS is an 11 point assessment. There are 4 items assessed on a scale ranging from 0 to 8 and the other 7 items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. As with the HRSD, the higher the score on the YMRS indicates the presence of more or more severe manic symptoms and is associated with a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life (QOL) Collected Using the Q-LES-Q (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form)

    The total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Descriptive Measures of the Feasibility of IPSRT-BPII

    Feasibility was assessed by ability to enroll, randomize, and retain participants in this trial. Completion of the study was used as evidence of feasibility.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Number of Participants With a Response

    Number of participants with response defined as an average of 50% (or greater) reduction in the subject's baseline HRSD-25 score over three consecutive weeks and a current YMRS score ≤ 10

    Time frame: Week 12

07

Results

Posted Apr 19, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePsychotherapyMedication
Started1411
Completed118
Not completed33

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Depression Scores, With a Mania Score Less Than or Equal to 10

Overall response rates (defined as greater than or equal to 50% reduction in depression scores without an increase in mania scores) were 29% (n=4) in the IPSRT group and 27% (n=3) in the quetiapine group. HRSD-25 scores are based on first 17 responses. Eight items are scored on a 5-pt scale, from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe.) Other nine items on the assessment are scored from 0-2. The higher the score on the HRSD-25, the worse the outcome is considered to be. A score of 0-7 is considered to be normal; 8-13 indicates mild depression, 14-18 indicates moderate depression, 19-22 indicates severe depression, and any score greater than or equal to 23 indicates very severe depression. The YMRS is an 11 point assessment. There are 4 items assessed on a scale ranging from 0 to 8 and the other 7 items are graded on a 0 to 4 scale. As with the HRSD, the higher the score on the YMRS indicates the presence of more or more severe manic symptoms and is associated with a worse outcome.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 50% Reduction in Depression Scores, With a Mania Score Less Than or Equal to 10
participantsPsychotherapyMedication
50% reduction in HRSD 25 score and YMRS <= 1043
Non-responder108
SecondaryQuality of Life (QOL) Collected Using the Q-LES-Q (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form)

The total score is derived by summing item scores 1 to 14. Higher scores are indicative of greater enjoyment or satisfaction in each domain. The Q-LES-Q-SF % maximum total score is calculated as 100% × (Q-LES-Q-SF total score - 14) / 56, and can range from 0% to 100%.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on Q-LES-Q scale
Quality of Life (QOL) Collected Using the Q-LES-Q (Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form)
scores on Q-LES-Q scalePsychotherapyMedication
Baseline34.6 (30.0 to 39.3)40.0 (35.2 to 45.6)
Post-Intervention37.0 (32.0 to 41.9)48.7 (43.2 to 54.3)
SecondaryDescriptive Measures of the Feasibility of IPSRT-BPII

Feasibility was assessed by ability to enroll, randomize, and retain participants in this trial. Completion of the study was used as evidence of feasibility.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Descriptive Measures of the Feasibility of IPSRT-BPII
ParticipantsPsychotherapyMedicationTotal
Descriptive Measures of the Feasibility of IPSRT-BPII11819
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Response

Number of participants with response defined as an average of 50% (or greater) reduction in the subject's baseline HRSD-25 score over three consecutive weeks and a current YMRS score ≤ 10

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Response
ParticipantsPsychotherapyMedication
Number of Participants With a Response43

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Psychotherapy—0/14 (0%)0/14 (0%)
Medication—0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PsychotherapyMedicationTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years141125
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PsychotherapyMedicationTotal
Mean40.1 ± 11.732.1 ± 12.836.1 ± 12.25
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PsychotherapyMedicationTotal
Female7815
Male7310
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PsychotherapyMedicationTotal
United States141125
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Pittsburgh /University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Swartz HA, Frank E, Cheng Y. A randomized pilot study of psychotherapy and quetiapine for the acute treatment of bipolar II depression. Bipolar Disord. 2012 Mar;14(2):211-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.00988.x. PubMed 22420597 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00411463
Lead sponsor
University of Pittsburgh
Collaborators
National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
Responsible party
Holly Swartz (Associate Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2006
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Sep 2010
Completion
Sep 2010
Results posted
Apr 19, 2017
Last update
May 30, 2017

Study contacts

Holly Swartz, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion