CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00410163BIFROSTUpdated Feb 10, 2014Results posted

Ofatumumab With Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide in B-CLL Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of Ofatumumab 500mg and Ofatumumab 1000mg in Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-02-10.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the safety and efficacy of two dose regimes of ofatumumab in combination with chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with B-CLL

02

Conditions studied

  • Leukaemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic

Keywords

  • B-cell
  • cyclophosphamide
  • fludarabine
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Ofatumumab
03

In context

Leukemia, Lymphoid

1,780 studies on the registry are indexed under Leukemia, Lymphoid; 176 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is above the median of 36 across 1,416 interventional studies indexed under Leukemia, Lymphoid.

Browse Leukemia, Lymphoid studies →

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline is the lead sponsor of 3,562 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 258 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 232 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with active B-CLL and with an indication for treatment
  2. Age ≥ 18 years
  3. Following receipt of verbal and written information about the study, the patient must provide signed informed consent before any study related activity is carried out

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any previous treatment for B-CLL or any other treatments that can be considered active against B-CLL
  2. Glucocorticoid unless given in doses ≤ 10 mg /day for other indications than B-CLL (e.g. asthma)
  3. Known transformation of B-CLL
  4. Known CNS involvement of B-CLL
  5. Past or current malignancy, except for:

    1. Cervical carcinoma Stage 1B or less
    2. Non-invasive basal cell and squamous cell skin carcinoma
    3. Malignant melanoma with a complete response of a duration of > 10 years
    4. Other cancer diagnoses with a complete response of a duration of > 5 years
  6. Chronic or current infectious disease requiring systemic treatment
  7. Clinically significant cardiac disease
  8. Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition
  9. History of significant cerebrovascular disease
  10. Known HIV positive
  11. Positive serology for hepatitis B, unless due to vaccination
  12. Leukapheresis, except as a safety measure before chemotherapy
  13. ECOG Performance Status of 3 or 4
  14. Patients who at the time of inclusion are not expected to be able to complete the ofatumumab-FC regimen
  15. Patients who have received treatment with any non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
  16. Current participation in any other interventional clinical study
  17. Patients known or suspected of not being able to comply with a study protocol (e.g. due to alcoholism, drug dependency or psychological disorder)
  18. Breast feeding women or women with a positive pregnancy test at Visit 1
  19. Women of childbearing potential not willing to use adequate contraception for up to one year after last dose of ofatumumab. Adequate contraception is defined as hormonal birth control or intrauterine device. For patients in the USA the use of a double barrier method is also considered adequate.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator 1

    Each patient will receive a total of 6 infusions with ofatumumab every 4 weeks in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The first infusion will be 300mg followed by 5 infusions of 500mg

    Drug: Ofatumumab 500mg · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator 2

    Each patient will receive a total of 6 monthly infusions with ofatumumab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. The first infusion will be 300mg followed by 5 infusions of 1000mg

    Drug: Ofatumumab 1000mg · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Cyclophosphamide

Interventions

  • DrugOfatumumab 500mg

    Ofatumumab 500mg or should be diluted into 1000mL pyrogenefree saline and administered as an IV infusion.Duration of infusion will be approximately 6½ hours.Infusions should be given every 4 weeks until a total of 6 infusions has been given.

  • DrugOfatumumab 1000mg

    Ofatumumab 1000mg or should be diluted into 1000mL pyrogenefree saline and administered as an IV infusion.Duration of infusion will be approximately 6½ hours.Infusions should be given every 4 weeks until a total of 6 infusions has been given.

  • DrugFludarabine

    Fludarabine (25 mg/m2) should be administered as an IV infusion daily, Days 2 through 4 of Course 1, and Days 1 through 3 of Courses 2 through 6, every 4 weeks for 6 courses

  • DrugCyclophosphamide

    Cyclophosphamide (250 mg/m2) should be administered as an IV infusion daily, Days 2 through 4 of Course 1, and Days 1 through 3 of Courses 2 through 6, every 4 weeks for 6 courses.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion

    Par. were evaluated for response by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) 1996 guideline. Par. with Complete Remission (CR) were classified as "complete responders". As per NCI-WG, CR requires all of the following criteria for a period of \>=2 months: absence of lymphadenopathy (all lymph nodes \<1.0 centimeters), no hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, absence of constitutional symptoms, lymphocytes \<=4.0\*10\^9/liter (L), neutrophil leukocytes \>=1.5\*10\^9/L, platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, and hemoglobin \>11 grams/deciliter.

    Time frame: Start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)

  2. Number of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-responders

    Par. were evaluated by an IRC in accordance with NCI-WG 1996 guideline. Responders: CR, Nodular Partial Remission (nPR, same as CR, but persistent bone marrow nodules), and Partial Remission (PR, \>=50% decrease in lymphocytes from pretreatment baseline (BL) value, \>=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, \>=50% reduction of liver/spleen and neutrophils \>= 1.5\*10\^9/L or platelets \>100\*10\^9/L or hemoglobin \>11 g/dL (or 50% improvement over BL for neutrophils, platelets, hemoglobin); non-responders: Stable Disease (SD, did not achieve CR/PR, and no PD), Progressive Disease (PD), or Not Evaluable (NE).

    Time frame: From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Response

    The duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response (the first visit at which response was observed) to progression or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, duration of response was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.

    Time frame: From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years

  2. Progression-Free Survival

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first radiologically or clinically documented evidence of progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

    Time frame: From time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years

  3. Time to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death

    Time to next anti-CLL (anti-lymphoma) therapy was defined as the time from randomization until the time of first administration of the next anti-lymphoma therapy other than ofatumumab or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.

    Time frame: From time of randomization to first administration of next anti-CLL therapy other than ofatumumab or death, assessed over 5 years

  4. Median Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37

    Tumor size was measured by physical examination of palpable abnormal lymph nodes. Percent change from Baseline (Visit 2, Week 0) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 2 divided by value at Visit 2) \* 100. Visits 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 9 (Wk 4), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI), 35 (M 6 after start of LI), 36 (M 9 after start of LI), and 37 (M 12 after start of L

  5. Median Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to Screening

    Malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+) were measured in peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100. Visits 33 and 34 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.

    Time frame: Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 15 (Wk 8), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI)

  6. Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study at a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section.

    Time frame: From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)

  7. Number of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39

    HAHA are indicators of immunogenicity to ofatumumab. Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39 for analysis of HAHA. Analysis of HAHA was done in batches.

    Time frame: Visits 1 (Screening, Visit -2), 21 (Week 12), 35 (Month 6), and 39 (Month 18)

  8. Number of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)

    Myelosuppression is one of the expected AEs for FC treatment and is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. The number of participants with myelosuppression was assessed from laboratory measurements with Grades 3(severe)-4 (life-threatening/disabling) (1, mild; 2, moderate; 5, death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0. The CTCAE is issued by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and is the standard classification used for the severity grading scale for AEs in cancer therapy clinical studies.

    Time frame: From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)

  9. Percent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)

    Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1 and 9 for analysis of complement (CH50) levels. Analysis of CH50 was done in batches, and CH50 levels were measured two hours after the end of study medication infusion. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at Visit 9 minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100.

    Time frame: Visit 1 (Week -2) and Visit 9 (Week 4)

  10. Number of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

    MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment when the participant has achieved CR. For all participants who achieved CR, the follow-up bone marrow sample was tested for malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+) to determine if there was any MRD.

    Time frame: From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to course 6 or Week 32)

  11. Ctrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

    Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in plasma samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough plasma concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval \[taken directly before next administration\]). No drug is present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for the first infusion.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

  12. AUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

    AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-672) is AUC from start of infusion to 672 hours after start of infusion; AUC(0-inf) is AUC from start of infusion extrapolated to infinity.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

  13. t1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

    t1/2 is defined as terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

  14. CL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

    CL is the clearance of drug from plasma, which is defined as the volume of plasma from which the drug is cleared per unit time.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

  15. Vss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

    Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.

    Time frame: Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)

  16. Number of Participants With Progression or Death

    Disease progression is characterized by at least one of the following, per the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: a \>=50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes on two consecutive determinations 2 weeks apart (at least one node must be \>=2 centimeters); or the appearance of new palpable lymph nodes; or a \>=50% increase in liver and/or spleen size (measurement below the costal margin); or the appearance of palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly not previously present; or a \>=50% increase in the numbers of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5.0 \* 10\^9/Liter; or transformation to a more aggressive histology (e.g., Richter's syndrome or prolymphocytic leukemia with \>55% prolymphocytes). For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

    Time frame: From time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years

07

Results

Posted Oct 17, 2011

Participant flow

Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)
Participant flow — Treatment and Follow-up Phase (2 Years)
MilestoneOfatumumab 500 mg + Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC)Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Started3130
Completed1919
Not completed1211
Withdrew: Adverse event42
Withdrew: Death11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy04
Withdrew: Participant had no response21
Withdrew: Participant had stable disease10
Withdrew: Participant received new therapy11
Withdrew: Participant had bone marrow transplant10
Withdrew: Investigator decision01
Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 Years
Participant flow — Extended Follow-up (FU) Phase (2-5 Years
MilestoneOfatumumab 500 mg + Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC)Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Started2021
Completed1011
Not completed1010
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up31
Withdrew: Death11
Withdrew: Medical reasons10
Withdrew: New anti-cll treatment48
Withdrew: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia10

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion

Par. were evaluated for response by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in accordance with the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group (NCI-WG) 1996 guideline. Par. with Complete Remission (CR) were classified as "complete responders". As per NCI-WG, CR requires all of the following criteria for a period of \>=2 months: absence of lymphadenopathy (all lymph nodes \<1.0 centimeters), no hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, absence of constitutional symptoms, lymphocytes \<=4.0\*10\^9/liter (L), neutrophil leukocytes \>=1.5\*10\^9/L, platelets \>100\*10\^9/L, and hemoglobin \>11 grams/deciliter.

Time frame:
Start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion
participantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Number of Participants (Par.) With Complete Remission (CR), Measured From Start of Treatment Until 3 Months After Last Infusion1015
SecondaryDuration of Response

The duration of response was defined as the time from the initial response (the first visit at which response was observed) to progression or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, duration of response was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.

Time frame:
From time of initial response to disease progression or death, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Duration of Response
monthsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Duration of ResponseNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from randomization until the first radiologically or clinically documented evidence of progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

Time frame:
From time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Progression-Free Survival
monthsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Progression-Free SurvivalNA (NA to NA)23.5 (NA to NA)
SecondaryTime to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death

Time to next anti-CLL (anti-lymphoma) therapy was defined as the time from randomization until the time of first administration of the next anti-lymphoma therapy other than ofatumumab or death. For participants who were lost to follow-up, the time was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed.

Time frame:
From time of randomization to first administration of next anti-CLL therapy other than ofatumumab or death, assessed over 5 years
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death
monthsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Time to Next Anti-chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Therapy or Death33.4 (27.3 to 46.9)33.3 (26.7 to 54.6)
SecondaryMedian Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37

Tumor size was measured by physical examination of palpable abnormal lymph nodes. Percent change from Baseline (Visit 2, Week 0) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 2 divided by value at Visit 2) \* 100. Visits 33, 34, 35, 36, and 37 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.

Time frame:
Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 9 (Wk 4), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI), 35 (M 6 after start of LI), 36 (M 9 after start of LI), and 37 (M 12 after start of L
Reported as:
Median · percent change in tumor size
Median Percent Change in Tumor Size From Baseline (Visit 2, Wk 0) at Visits 9, 21, 25, 29, 33, 34, 35, and 37
percent change in tumor sizeOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Visit 9 (Week 4), n=29, 28-75.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-70.90 (-100.00 to 73.00)
Visit 21 (Week 12), n=24, 23-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -39.00)
Visit 25 (Week 16), n=23, 20-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -85.00)
Visit 29 (Week 20), n=22, 16-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -92.00)
Visit 33 (Month 1), n=21, 24-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -4.00)
Visit 34 (Month 3), n=22, 23-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -40.00)
Visit 35 (Month 6), n=19, 22-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to 12.00)
Visit 36 (Month 9), n=20, 22-100.00 (-100.00 to 0.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to 28.00)
Visit 37 (Month 12), n=20, 18-100.00 (-100.00 to -100.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -69.00)
SecondaryMedian Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to Screening

Malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+) were measured in peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at indicated visits minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100. Visits 33 and 34 are measured in the number of months from the start of the last infusion. The start of the last infusion could have occurred up to Week 20.

Time frame:
Baseline Visit 2 (Week [Wk] 0); Visits 15 (Wk 8), 21 (Wk 12), 25 (Wk 16), 29 (Wk 20), 33 (Month [M] 1 after start of last infusion [LI]), 34 (M 3 after start of LI)
Reported as:
Median · percent change in cells
Median Percent Change in CD5+CD19+ and CD5+CD20+ Cells in Peripheral Blood From Onset of Course 3 Throughout Follow-up (FU) Compared to Screening
percent change in cellsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
CD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 15 (Wk 8), n=25, 26-100.00 (-100.0 to 22.0)-100.00 (-100.00 to -81)
CD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 21 (Wk 12), n=24, 24-100.00 (-100.00 to -84.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -90.00)
CD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 25 (Wk16), n=23, 21-100.00 (-100.00 to -93.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -96)
CD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 29 (Wk 20), n=22, 19-100.00 (-100.00 to -98)-100.00 (-100.00 to -96)
CD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 33 (Wk 24), n=21, 24-100.00 (-100.00 to -99.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -73)
CD5+CD19+ cells, Visit 34 (Wk 32), n=20, 22-100.00 (-100.00 to -95)-100.00 (-100.00 to -97)
CD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 15 (Wk 8), n=25, 26-100.00 (-100.00 to 22.00)-100.00 (-100.00 to -92)
CD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 21 (Wk 12), n=24, 24-100.00 (-100.00 to -84)-100.00 (-100.00 to -96)
CD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 25 (Wk16), n=23, 21-100.00 (-100.00 to -93)-100.00 (-100.00 to -100)
CD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 29 (Wk 20), n=22, 19-100.00 (-100.00 to -99)-100.00 (-100.00 to -100)
CD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 33 (Wk 24), n=21, 24-100.00 (-100.00 to -99)-100.00 (-100.00 to -97.00)
CD5+CD20+ cells, Visit 34 (Wk 32), n=20, 22-100.00 (-100.00 to -96)-100.00 (-100.00 to -97.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study at a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section.

Time frame:
From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)
participantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event From First Treatment (Visit 2) to Visit 43 (Month 60)3130
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39

HAHA are indicators of immunogenicity to ofatumumab. Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39 for analysis of HAHA. Analysis of HAHA was done in batches.

Time frame:
Visits 1 (Screening, Visit -2), 21 (Week 12), 35 (Month 6), and 39 (Month 18)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Positive Human Anti-human Anti Bodies (HAHA) at Visits 1, 21, 35, and 39
participantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Visit 1 (Week -2), n=31, 3000
Visit 21 (Week 12), n=24, 2400
Visit 35 (Month 6), n=19, 2200
Visit 39 (Month 18), n=14, 1300
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)

Myelosuppression is one of the expected AEs for FC treatment and is defined as the decrease in the ability of the bone marrow to produce blood cells. The number of participants with myelosuppression was assessed from laboratory measurements with Grades 3(severe)-4 (life-threatening/disabling) (1, mild; 2, moderate; 5, death) according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 3.0. The CTCAE is issued by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and is the standard classification used for the severity grading scale for AEs in cancer therapy clinical studies.

Time frame:
From first treatment (Visit 2) up to Visit 43 (Month 60)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Who Reported Myelosuppression (Anemia, Leukopenia, Neutropenia, and Thrombocytopenia)
participantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Anemia68
Leukopenia2322
Neutropenia2926
Thrombocytopenia48
SecondaryPercent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)

Blood samples were drawn from participants at Visits 1 and 9 for analysis of complement (CH50) levels. Analysis of CH50 was done in batches, and CH50 levels were measured two hours after the end of study medication infusion. Percent change from Screening (Visit 1, Week -2) = (value at Visit 9 minus value at Visit 1 divided by value at Visit 1) \* 100.

Time frame:
Visit 1 (Week -2) and Visit 9 (Week 4)
Reported as:
Median · Percent change in complement levels
Percent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)
Percent change in complement levelsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Percent Change From Screening (Visit 1) in Complement (CH50) Levels at Visit 9 (Week 4)0 (-54 to 520)0 (-83 to 430)
PrimaryNumber of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-responders

Par. were evaluated by an IRC in accordance with NCI-WG 1996 guideline. Responders: CR, Nodular Partial Remission (nPR, same as CR, but persistent bone marrow nodules), and Partial Remission (PR, \>=50% decrease in lymphocytes from pretreatment baseline (BL) value, \>=50% reduction in lymphadenopathy, \>=50% reduction of liver/spleen and neutrophils \>= 1.5\*10\^9/L or platelets \>100\*10\^9/L or hemoglobin \>11 g/dL (or 50% improvement over BL for neutrophils, platelets, hemoglobin); non-responders: Stable Disease (SD, did not achieve CR/PR, and no PD), Progressive Disease (PD), or Not Evaluable (NE).

Time frame:
From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to Week 32)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants (Par.) Who Were Classified as Responders and Non-responders
participantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
All responders2422
Responders, CR1015
Responders, nPR11
Responders, PR136
All Non-responders78
Non-responders, SD32
Non-responders, PD25
Non-responders, NE21
SecondaryNumber of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)

MRD refers to small number of leukemic cells that remain in the participant during treatment or after treatment when the participant has achieved CR. For all participants who achieved CR, the follow-up bone marrow sample was tested for malignant B cells (CD5+CD19+) to determine if there was any MRD.

Time frame:
From start of treatment (Day 1 of Week 0) until 3 months after start of last infusion (up to course 6 or Week 32)
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)
participantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Number of Participants Classified as Responders Having CR Who Tested Negative for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)26
SecondaryCtrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in plasma samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough plasma concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval \[taken directly before next administration\]). No drug is present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for the first infusion.

Time frame:
Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Ctrough and Cmax at the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)
Milligrams per liter (mg/L)Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
First infusion, Cmax, n=31, 2967.5 ± 0.4757.2 ± 0.47
Sixth infusion, Cmax, n=22, 19201 ± 0.30427 ± 0.34
Sixth infusion, Ctrough, n=22, 1919.9 ± 12.6962.2 ± 10.36
SecondaryAUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-672) is AUC from start of infusion to 672 hours after start of infusion; AUC(0-inf) is AUC from start of infusion extrapolated to infinity.

Time frame:
Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)
AUC(0-inf) and AUC(0-672) After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)
Milligrams * hour per liter (mg.h/L)Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
First infusion, AUC(0-inf), n=24, 262453 ± 1.281915 ± 0.74
First infusion, AUC(0-672), n=24, 262452 ± 1.281915 ± 0.74
Sixth infusion, AUC(0-inf), n=16, 16145236 ± 0.54397577 ± 0.35
Sixth infusion, AUC(0-672), n=20, 1974728 ± 0.39149019 ± 0.75
Secondaryt1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

t1/2 is defined as terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half.

Time frame:
Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · hours
t1/2 After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)
hoursOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
First infusion, t1/2, n=24, 2619.4 ± 1.1318.8 ± 0.62
Sixth infusion, t1/2, n=16, 16551 ± 0.31746 ± 0.30
SecondaryCL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

CL is the clearance of drug from plasma, which is defined as the volume of plasma from which the drug is cleared per unit time.

Time frame:
Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Milliliters per hour (mL/h)
CL After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)
Milliliters per hour (mL/h)Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
First infusion, CL, n=24, 26122 ± 1.28157 ± 0.74
Sixth infusion, CL, n=20, 196.7 ± 0.396.7 ± 0.75
SecondaryVss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)

Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab.

Time frame:
Visit 2 (Week 0; up to 4 weeks after dose) and Visit 29 (Week 20; up to 9 months after dose)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · liters
Vss After the First Infusion (Visit 2, Week 0) and Sixth Infusion (Visit 29, Week 20)
litersOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
First infusion, Vss, n=24, 263.88 ± 0.374.57 ± 0.30
Sixth infusion, Vss, n=16, 165.15 ± 0.275.77 ± 0.38
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Progression or Death

Disease progression is characterized by at least one of the following, per the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: a \>=50% increase in the sum of the products of at least two lymph nodes on two consecutive determinations 2 weeks apart (at least one node must be \>=2 centimeters); or the appearance of new palpable lymph nodes; or a \>=50% increase in liver and/or spleen size (measurement below the costal margin); or the appearance of palpable hepatomegaly or splenomegaly not previously present; or a \>=50% increase in the numbers of circulating lymphocytes to at least 5.0 \* 10\^9/Liter; or transformation to a more aggressive histology (e.g., Richter's syndrome or prolymphocytic leukemia with \>55% prolymphocytes). For participants who were lost to follow-up, PFS was censored at the date of the last attended visit at which the endpoint was assessed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS.

Time frame:
From time of randomization to first documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever came first, assessed over 2 years
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Progression or Death
ParticipantsOfatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC
Number of Participants With Progression or Death37

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ofatumumab 500 mg + Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC)—17/31 (54.8%)31/31 (100%)
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FC—23/30 (76.7%)30/30 (100%)
Ofatumumab 500 mg + FC: Extended Follow-up Phase—7/31 (22.6%)—
Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FC: Extended Follow-up Phase—5/30 (16.7%)—
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 49
Most frequent serious events
EventOfatumumab 500 mg + Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC)Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCOfatumumab 500 mg + FC: Extended Follow-up PhaseOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC: Extended Follow-up Phase
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders10/3116/300/311/30
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders3/317/300/310/30
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/313/300/310/30
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/313/300/310/30
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/310/300/310/30
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/312/300/310/30
SepsisInfections and infestations0/312/300/310/30
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/312/300/311/30
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders2/310/300/310/30
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/311/300/311/30
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 38
Most frequent other events
EventOfatumumab 500 mg + Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (FC)Ofatumumab 1000 mg + FCOfatumumab 500 mg + FC: Extended Follow-up PhaseOfatumumab 1000 mg + FC: Extended Follow-up Phase
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders14/3123/30——
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders8/3116/30——
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders14/3113/30——
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders7/3112/30——
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders10/318/30——
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders9/316/30——
PyrexiaGeneral disorders9/317/30——
FatigueGeneral disorders8/316/30——
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/317/30——
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/315/30——

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FCTotal
Mean56.1 ± 8.456.4 ± 8.756.2 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FCTotal
Female11718
Male202343
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Ofatumumab 500 mg + FCOfatumumab 1000 mg + FCTotal
White312960
Black or African American011
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Plymouth, Devon PL68DH, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Durig J, Griskevicius L, Stilgenbauer S, Mayer J, Smolej L, Hess G, Griniute R, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Padmanabhan S, Gorczyca M, Chang CN, Chan G, Gupta I, Nielsen TG, Russell CA; 407 Study Investigators. Chemoimmunotherapy with O-FC in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011 Jun 16;117(24):6450-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-12-323980. Epub 2011 Apr 15. PubMed 21498674 ↗
  • Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Dürig J, Griskevicius L, Stilgenbauer S, Mayer J et al.. Chemoimmunotherapy with Ofatumumab, Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide (O-FC) in Previously Untreated Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL). [Blood]. 2010;E pub ahead of print:
  • Jewell RC, Kipps TJ, Durig J, Griskevicius L, Stilgenbauer S, Smolej L, Mayer J, Hess G, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Padmanabhan-Iyer S, Fang L, Goldstein N, Gorczyca M, Gupta I, Lisby S, Wierda WG; Hx-CD20-407 Study Investigators. Associations of ofatumumab exposure and treatment outcomes in patients with untreated CLL receiving chemoimmunotherapy. Leuk Lymphoma. 2017 Feb;58(2):348-356. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2016.1195497. Epub 2016 Jul 7. PubMed 27389174 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00410163
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2006
Start date
Jan 2007
Primary completion
Mar 2009
Completion
May 2013
Results posted
Oct 17, 2011
Last update
Feb 10, 2014

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion