ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00392951Updated Nov 19, 2019Results posted

Sirolimus for Autoimmune Disease of Blood Cells

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of sirolimus in Autoimmune Pancytopenia, Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome (ALPS) and Evans Syndrome, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Year to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-19.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Year to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Treatment for patients with autoimmune destruction of blood cells is poor. The part of the body that fights infections is called the immune system and white blood cells (WBCs) are part of the immune system. Normally, a person's body creates WBCs to fight infections and eliminates WBCs which have stopped helping the body function. Patients with autoimmune destruction of blood cells have difficulty eliminating old WBCs. The abnormal WBCs build up and can damage other healthy cells, which can lead to anemia, fatigue, jaundice, internal bleeding, infection, and cancer. Few effective medications exist for treatment for patients with autoimmune cytopenias and those commonly used are fraught with side effects. Nevertheless, as scientific understanding of autoimmune diseases has improved, more directed and less toxic therapies are becoming available. A number of groups have been studying the efficacy of a medication called sirolimus in patients with autoimmune diseases. This medicine has been FDA-approved for over 20 years. Sirolimus is a medicine used in children with other diseases. Sirolimus works, in part, by eliminating old and abnormal WBCs. Our group and others have shown that sirolimus is effective in mice with autoimmunity and in children with a rare condition called Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome (ALPS). We believe sirolimus will help children with autoimmune cytopenias. We believe it will improve their symptoms and make them less sick. We propose to study sirolimus in children with chronic and/or refractory autoimmune cytopenias.

Read the detailed description

Patients with autoimmune destruction of hematopoietic cells frequently have severe and debilitating disease requiring aggressive and frequent medical management. These patients are often treated with non-specific immunosuppressive medications with limited efficacy and untoward side-effect profiles. We have been investigating the use of an immunosuppressive and anti-cancer agent, sirolimus in patients with an autoimmune cytopenias syndrome: Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome (ALPS). ALPS is a primary immune deficiency caused by mutations in the Fas apoptotic pathway, leading to abnormal lymphocyte survival. Clinical manifestations in patients with ALPS typically include autoimmune cytopenias, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, and a propensity to develop secondary malignancies. Thus, far we have found excellent results albeit the total number of patients treated is small.

Sirolimus is a signal transduction inhibitor with a tolerable side effect profile. Sirolimus has two properties making it an attractive agent to treat patients with autoimmune cytopenias syndromes, including ALPS. First, sirolimus induces apoptosis in normal and abnormal white blood cells, the cell type dysregulated in patients with autoimmune disease. In addition, sirolimus increases a T cell subset called Regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs are a cell population designed to suppress the immune system and control autoimmunity. These combined properties make sirolimus unique as compared with other immunosuppressive agents. Ample preclinical and clinical data exists demonstrating sirolimus in effective in patients with autoimmunity. Accordingly, we hypothesize sirolimus is a safe and efficacious medication for patients with autoimmune destruction of blood cells..

We plan to confirm our hypotheses by performing a pilot series in children with autoimmune cytopenias who are either refractory to standard therapy or have significant toxicity from standard treatments. Our primary aim is to define the toxicities of administration of oral sirolimus in children with autoimmune cytopenias. Our secondary aims are to evaluate the efficacy of sirolimus in children with autoimmune cytopenias, to determine the trough levels of sirolimus when used in these patients, and to evaluate the effects of sirolimus on intracellular targets of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). We intend to enroll 50 children with autoimmune cytopenias and treat for a 6 month period, however, if we find sirolimus is effective, we anticipate these children will continue to take sirolimus for a longer period of time. We anticipate the results of this work will establish sirolimus is an effective and well tolerated medication and will lead directly to a larger national phase II clinical trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Autoimmune Pancytopenia
  • Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome (ALPS)
  • Evans Syndrome
  • Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
  • Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune
  • Autoimmune Neutropenia
  • Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

  • ALPS
  • Autoimmune
  • Cytopenias
  • Treatment
  • Sirolimus
  • Rapamycin
  • Lymph Nodes
  • Spleen
  • Hemolytic Anemia
  • Immune Thrombocytopenia
  • Neutropenia
  • ITP
  • Lupus
03

In context

Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic

503 studies on the registry are indexed under Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; 158 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 58 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic.

Browse Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia is the lead sponsor of 489 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Year to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age > 12 months and \< 30 years at the time of study entry
  • Diagnosis of cytopenias requiring treatment with medications
  • At least one of the following: Autoimmune Neutropenia, Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, and/or Autoimmune Thrombocytopenia
  • Must be proven autoimmune by either a documented autoantibody (positive direct anti globulin test, positive anti-neutrophil, and/or anti- antibody) and/or a documented clinical response to
  • Autoimmune Cytopenias can be idiopathic (Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA), Autoimmune Neutropenia (AIN), or Evans syndrome) or secondary to one of following conditions: Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), ALPS (Autoimmune Lymphoproliferative Syndrome), or Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)
  • Patients must have chronic disease diagnosed by either a documented cytopenia syndrome (Lupus, ALPS, RA, or IBD), or by having Evans syndrome defined as idiopathic destruction of multiple blood cell types, and/or by having disease >6 months
  • Patients must be to or unable to tolerate standard front-line therapies for autoimmune cytopenias ( and/or IVIG)
  • Patients may be taking agents for autoimmune cytopenias (mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, mercaptopurine, and/or methotrexate) at time of study entry; however, attempts should be made to wean these agents. Patients may not stay on a combination of sirolimus and a calcineurin inhibitor for greater than 4 weeks
  • /assent must be obtained prior to initiating treatment
  • Patient must be able to consume oral medication in the form of tablets or solution

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Uncontrolled infection
  • Known allergy to Sirolimus or its components
  • Patients with a documented on therapy or not in remission
  • Patients who do not meet organ function requirements listed in protocol
  • Patients with a documented history of severe combined immunodeficiency or infection (HIV)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sirolimus treatment

    Sirolimus treatment

    Drug: sirolimus

Interventions

  • Tablet or liquid; taken once or twice daily; dosage is based on establishing a serum trough of 5-15 ng/ml by high-performance liquid chromatography (initial loading dose of 3 mg/m2 then 2.5 mg/m2 with adjustment based on serum trough)

    Also known as: rapamycin, rapamune

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities of Administration of Oral Sirolimus

    Grade 3 toxicities are those that are considered severe or medically equivalent requiring hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization (according to CTCAE criteria 3.0). Grade 4 toxicities are those that are life-threatening (urgent intervention indicated) (according to CTCAE criteria 3.0).

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Autoimmune Disease Response to Oral Sirolimus

    Complete response (CR) is complete resolution in all autoimmune cytopenias (neutropenia, anemia thrombocytopenia) maintained for more than two months, combined with an ability to wean off corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressive medication. Partial response (PR) is improvement in any cytopenias by at least one grade, lasting more than two months, without worsening any other cytopenias or stable disease with the ability to wean corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive medications by at least 50%. No response (NR) is no change in cytopenias with treatment, and the inability to wean corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications. Progressive disease (PD) refers to obtaining a CR or PR by the 3 month observation and relapsing or progressing by the 6 month observation, leading to cessation of study drug.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Trough Levels Produced by Administration of Oral Sirolimus

    Pharmacokinetic levels produced by administration of oral sirolimus

    Time frame: Within first 5 days of starting sirolimus

  3. Effect of Sirolimus on Intracellular Targets

    Needs more specific information

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Number of Participants With Lymphoproliferation Response to Oral Sirolimus

    Complete response (CR) is complete resolution of any lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly for at least two months. Partial response (PR) is a reduction in size of at least 50% of lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly for at least two months. No response (NR) is no change or \< 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. Progressive Disease (PD) is obtaining a CR or PR by the 3 month observation and relapsing or progressing by the 6 month observation, leading to cessation of study drug. Not Applicable (N/A) is there is no evidence of disease (No pathologic lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly at time of enrollment).

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Dec 6, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSirolimus Treatment
Started30
Completed30
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities of Administration of Oral Sirolimus

Grade 3 toxicities are those that are considered severe or medically equivalent requiring hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization (according to CTCAE criteria 3.0). Grade 4 toxicities are those that are life-threatening (urgent intervention indicated) (according to CTCAE criteria 3.0).

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities of Administration of Oral Sirolimus
participantsSirolimus Treatment
Number of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Toxicities of Administration of Oral Sirolimus1
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Autoimmune Disease Response to Oral Sirolimus

Complete response (CR) is complete resolution in all autoimmune cytopenias (neutropenia, anemia thrombocytopenia) maintained for more than two months, combined with an ability to wean off corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressive medication. Partial response (PR) is improvement in any cytopenias by at least one grade, lasting more than two months, without worsening any other cytopenias or stable disease with the ability to wean corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive medications by at least 50%. No response (NR) is no change in cytopenias with treatment, and the inability to wean corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive medications. Progressive disease (PD) refers to obtaining a CR or PR by the 3 month observation and relapsing or progressing by the 6 month observation, leading to cessation of study drug.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Autoimmune Disease Response to Oral Sirolimus
ParticipantsSirolimus Treatment
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Complete Response (CR)11
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Partial Response (PR)1
Response in patients w/ ALPS — No Response (NR)0
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Progressive Disease (PD)0
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Complete Response (CR)7
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Partial Response (PR)1
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — No Response (NR)2
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Progressive Disease (PD)2
Resp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Complete Response (CR)1
Resp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Partial Response (PR)2
Resp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — No Response (NR)3
Resp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Progressive Disease (PD)0
SecondaryTrough Levels Produced by Administration of Oral Sirolimus

Pharmacokinetic levels produced by administration of oral sirolimus

Time frame:
Within first 5 days of starting sirolimus
Reported as:
Mean · nanograms/dL
Trough Levels Produced by Administration of Oral Sirolimus
nanograms/dLSirolimus Treatment
Trough Levels Produced by Administration of Oral Sirolimus8.5 (2.9 to 20)
SecondaryEffect of Sirolimus on Intracellular Targets

Needs more specific information

Time frame:
6 months

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Lymphoproliferation Response to Oral Sirolimus

Complete response (CR) is complete resolution of any lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly for at least two months. Partial response (PR) is a reduction in size of at least 50% of lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly for at least two months. No response (NR) is no change or \< 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly. Progressive Disease (PD) is obtaining a CR or PR by the 3 month observation and relapsing or progressing by the 6 month observation, leading to cessation of study drug. Not Applicable (N/A) is there is no evidence of disease (No pathologic lymphadenopathy or splenomegaly at time of enrollment).

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Lymphoproliferation Response to Oral Sirolimus
ParticipantsSirolimus Treatment
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Complete Response (CR)11
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Partial Response (PR)1
Response in patients w/ ALPS — No Response (NR)0
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Progressive disease (PD)0
Response in patients w/ ALPS — Not Applicable (N/A)0
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Complete Response (CR)3
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Partial Response (PR)0
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — No Response (NR)1
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Progressive disease (PD)1
Response in patients w/ multilineage cytopenias — Not Applicable (N/A)7
esp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Complete Response (CR)1
esp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Partial Response (PR)0
esp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — No Response (NR)0
esp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Progressive disease (PD)0
esp pts w/ single-lineage autoimmune cytopenias — Not Applicable (N/A)5

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sirolimus Treatment—1/30 (3.3%)15/30 (50%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSirolimus Treatment
VasculitisNervous system disorders1/30
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSirolimus Treatment
MucositisGastrointestinal disorders10/30
Elevated triglycerides and cholesterolCardiac disorders2/30
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/30
Sun sensitivitySkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/30
Gastro-esophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders1/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sirolimus Treatment
<=18 years12
Between 18 and 65 years18
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sirolimus Treatment
Median11 (1.8 to 21)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sirolimus Treatment
Female10
Male20
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Sirolimus Treatment
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Sirolimus Treatment
United States30
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Teachey DT, Obzut DA, Axsom K, Choi JK, Goldsmith KC, Hall J, Hulitt J, Manno CS, Maris JM, Rhodin N, Sullivan KE, Brown VI, Grupp SA. Rapamycin improves lymphoproliferative disease in murine autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS). Blood. 2006 Sep 15;108(6):1965-71. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-010124. Epub 2006 Jun 6. PubMed 16757690 ↗
  • Teachey DT, Manno CS, Axsom KM, Andrews T, Choi JK, Greenbaum BH, McMann JM, Sullivan KE, Travis SF, Grupp SA. Unmasking Evans syndrome: T-cell phenotype and apoptotic response reveal autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS). Blood. 2005 Mar 15;105(6):2443-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3542. Epub 2004 Nov 12. PubMed 15542578 ↗
  • Teachey DT, Greiner R, Seif A, Attiyeh E, Bleesing J, Choi J, Manno C, Rappaport E, Schwabe D, Sheen C, Sullivan KE, Zhuang H, Wechsler DS, Grupp SA. Treatment with sirolimus results in complete responses in patients with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome. Br J Haematol. 2009 Apr;145(1):101-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07595.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4. PubMed 19208097 ↗
  • Bride KL, Vincent T, Smith-Whitley K, Lambert MP, Bleesing JJ, Seif AE, Manno CS, Casper J, Grupp SA, Teachey DT. Sirolimus is effective in relapsed/refractory autoimmune cytopenias: results of a prospective multi-institutional trial. Blood. 2016 Jan 7;127(1):17-28. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-07-657981. Epub 2015 Oct 26. PubMed 26504182 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00392951
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 26, 2006
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Feb 2016
Completion
Feb 2016
Results posted
Dec 6, 2017
Last update
Nov 19, 2019

Study contacts

David T. Teachey, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sirolimus

Start the discussion