CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00321269Updated Dec 24, 2015Results posted

Depression and Congestive Heart Failure in Outpatients.

An interventional study of Single Illness Management and Comorbid Illness Management in Heart Failure and Depression, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-12-24.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with a diagnosis of CHF, NYHA class II, III or IV will be recruited for a study comparing a nursing intervention addressing CHF (SIM group) or CHF and depression (CIM group). Participants in the standard illness management program will receive an 8-week, 8-session intervention designed to help them improve daily weighing, salt-restriction, medication management, etc. This intervention will be conducted in a combination of home visits and phone visits. They will also receive interactive, telephone-based daily monitoring that assesses daily weight, dyspnea, fatigue and medication compliance. Patients in the comorbid illness management program will receive the same illness management program PLUS education and behavioral techniques designed to help them cope emotionally with the illness. The comorbid illness management home monitoring will include a twice-monthly screen for depression. Major Variables: The major outcomes will be depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, functional status, heart failure symptom severity, and self-care behaviors in heart failure.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Between 4 and 5% of patients seen at Veterans Affairs Medical Centers suffer heart failure. HF is the number one discharge diagnosis within the VHA. One of the most significant comorbidities in heart failure is depression. Depression predicts increased hospitalization and mortality even after controlling for key prognostic indicators. This HSR\&D study aimed to test the effectiveness of a psychotherapy intervention for depression combined with illness management to illness management alone in veterans with heart failure.

Objectives:

To demonstrate better depression, health-related quality-of-life, and adherence outcomes for an illness management combined with psychotherapy intervention (COMBO) as compared to an illness management alone program (IMO).

Methods:

This was a two-site, two-arm, randomized controlled trial comparing COMBO to IMO. The total number of patients recruited for the study was 148. Retention was comparable between groups, though depression severity predicted drop out in the IMO condition but not the COMBO condition. Patients completed study assessments at baseline, week 4, week 8 (post-intervention) and at 26- and 52-week follow-up.

Status:

The main study analyses have been conducted. The project team is conducting analysis of secondary hypotheses

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Depression

Keywords

  • Home Monitoring
  • Heart Failure
  • Depression
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 134 is above the median of 72 across 3,736 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Receiving treatment for NYHA Class 2-4 heart failure.
  • Patients of the Iowa City, IA or Columbia, MO Veterans Affairs Medical Center Primary Care or Cardiac Care Clinics.
  • Life expectancy greater than 6 months.
  • Must speak English.
  • Must possess a working telephone.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of major psychiatric illness such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and substance abuse (PTSD patients are eligible).
  • Life expectancy less than 3 months.
  • Planned relocation to a nursing home.
  • Marked visual or hearing impairment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
134 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Single Illness Managment

    This intervention includes standard disease self-management coaching for heart failure and helps patients set goals for fluid management, restricted salt-intake, and medication adherence.

    Behavioral: Single Illness Management

  • Experimental
    Comorbid Illness Management

    This intervention includes the same self-management coaching found in the comparator arm, but also includes discussion of ways to cope and manage mood.

    Behavioral: Comorbid Illness Management

Interventions

  • BehavioralSingle Illness Management

    8 week nursing intervention addressing Congestive Heart Failure

  • BehavioralComorbid Illness Management

    8 week nursing intervention to address Congestive Heart Failure and emotional coping

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Depressive Symptoms measured on a Beck Depression Inventory Revised Possible Range 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater depression. Effectiveness of treatment indicated by a decline in the BDI-II score.

    Time frame: Depression and psychological health will be assessed at week 1, week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 Physical Function Subscale- 10 Items Range 0 to 100, Higher Scores indicate higher functioning.

    Time frame: Measured at week 1, week 8

07

Results

Posted Oct 21, 2015

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone8-week Phone Based Single Illness Management8-week Phone Based Comorbid Illness Management
Started7474
Completed6668
Not completed86

Outcome measures

PrimaryBeck Depression Inventory II

Depressive Symptoms measured on a Beck Depression Inventory Revised Possible Range 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate greater depression. Effectiveness of treatment indicated by a decline in the BDI-II score.

Time frame:
Depression and psychological health will be assessed at week 1, week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Beck Depression Inventory II
units on a scale8-week Phone-based Single Illness Management8-week Phone-based Comorbid Illness Management
Week 19.3 ± 0.859.2 ± 0.84
Week 89.0 ± 0.958.6 ± 0.96
Statistical analysis
  • 8-week Phone-based Single Illness Management vs 8-week Phone-based Comorbid Illness Management · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.90
SecondaryHealth-Related Quality of Life

Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 Physical Function Subscale- 10 Items Range 0 to 100, Higher Scores indicate higher functioning.

Time frame:
Measured at week 1, week 8
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Health-Related Quality of Life
units on a scale8-Week Phone-Based Single Illness Management8-Week Phone-Based Comorbid Illness Management
Week 136.82 ± 2.737.2 ± 2.7
Week 836.5 ± 2.943.1 ± 2.9
Statistical analysis
  • 8-Week Phone-Based Single Illness Management vs 8-Week Phone-Based Comorbid Illness Management · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.13F(2,110)=2.08; P=0.13

Adverse events

Collected over 8 weeks- duration of the clinical trial. Adverse event was assessed at Week 4 and Week 8.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
8-week Telephone Based Single Illness Management—0/66 (0%)0/66 (0%)
8-Week Phone Based Comorbid Illness Management—0/68 (0%)0/68 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event8-week Telephone Based Single Illness Management8-Week Phone Based Comorbid Illness Management
SuicidePsychiatric disorders0/660/68

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)8-week Phone Based Single Illness Management8-Week Phone-based Comorbid Illness ManagementTotal
Mean72.4 ± 8.967.8 ± 9.170.1 ± 9.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)8-week Phone Based Single Illness Management8-Week Phone-based Comorbid Illness ManagementTotal
Female123
Male6566131
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)8-week Phone Based Single Illness Management8-Week Phone-based Comorbid Illness ManagementTotal
United States6668134
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Iowa City VA Medical Center
    Iowa City, Iowa 52246, United States
  • Harry S. Truman Memorial VA Medical Center
    Columbia, Missouri 65201-5297, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Turvey C, Sheeran T, Dindo L, Wakefield B, Klein D. Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9, administered through interactive-voice-response technology. J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Sep;18(6):348-51. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120220. Epub 2012 Aug 29. PubMed 22933480 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00321269
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2006
Start date
Oct 2007
Primary completion
Oct 2010
Completion
Dec 2010
Results posted
Oct 21, 2015
Last update
Dec 24, 2015

Study contacts

Carolyn L Turvey, PhD MS
principal investigator · VA Medical Center, Iowa City

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion