ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00289133Updated Apr 24, 2017Results posted

Gamma Vacuum Foil (GVF) Versus Cross-linked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty Study

An interventional study of total knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis, Knee and Arthritis, Rheumatoid, sponsored by DePuy Orthopaedics. Completed at 9 sites in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-24.

Sponsored by DePuy Orthopaedics (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2005, registered Feb 2006).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
938
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic data between geometrically identical GVF and cross-linked polyethylene-bearing inserts in total knee arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

In 1996, Gamma Vacuum Foil (GVF) polyethylene was introduced as the first polyethylene to be gamma irradiated and packaged in an inert environment. This polyethylene, with its patented process and packaging, continues to be the only barrier-packaged process that is impermeable to both Hydrogen (H2) and Oxygen (O2), and allows the polyethylene to recombine and cross-link in the package. Though the new moderately cross-linked polyethylene being evaluated in this protocol is comparable to GVF geometrically and mechanically, the P.F.C.® Sigma™ cross-linked polyethylene also has the added benefit of being completely oxidatively stable both on the shelf and in-vivo.

The P.F.C. Sigma tibial tray component being assessed in this study is made of Cobalt Chrome (CoCr). The new CoCr tibial tray has the same design geometrically as the original titanium (Ti) tray, however, it features a highly polished top surface where it is joined to the polyethylene. This polished surface is designed to decrease the coefficient of friction between the polyethylene and the tray, thus minimizing backside wear. A comparative clinical study will be conducted to evaluate long-term clinical and radiographic data between geometrically identical cemented implants using GVF and crosslinked polyethylene tibial tray bearing inserts in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) using the P.F.C. Sigma Total Knee System. Patients will be assigned to study treatment groups at random if they meet specific demographic and pathophysiologic criteria for cemented total knee arthroplasty. The anticipated duration of this investigation is a minimum six years, which includes a one-year enrollment phase.

The specific aims of this study are as follows:

  1. Examine whether crosslinked polyethylene performs as well, if not better, than GVF polyethylene through standard clinical evaluations.
  2. Evaluate long-term survivorship rates.
  3. Report complications/adverse events.
  4. Report radiographic findings of geometrically identical implants.
02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Knee

3,391 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee; 628 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 938 is above the median of 69 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Knee.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Knee studies →

Lead sponsor

DePuy Orthopaedics is the lead sponsor of 45 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (100%) have results posted.

First submitted after DePuy Orthopaedics became part of Johnson & Johnson.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Osteoarthritis of the affected joint appropriate for Total Knee Arthroplasty.
  2. Diagnosis of any of the following: rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.
  3. Radiographic evidence of sufficient sound bone stock to seat and support the prosthesis.
  4. Subject requires a primary total knee replacement and is considered to be suitable for the specific knee prosthesis identified in protocol.
  5. Subject has given consent to the transfer of his/her information to sponsor.
  6. Subject will be compliant with requirements of protocol by returning for follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of recent/active joint sepsis.
  2. Charcot neuropathy.
  3. Psycho-social disorders that would limit rehabilitation.
  4. Women who are pregnant or planning on being pregnant.
  5. Greater than 80 years of age at the time of surgery.
  6. Prior ipsilateral knee arthroplasty.
  7. Metabolic disorders of calcified tissues, such as Paget's disease.
  8. Severe diabetes mellitus that is not controlled by diet or oral agents.
  9. Require joint replacement due to immunodeficiency syndromes.
  10. Skeletal immaturity.
  11. Avascular necrosis of the affected knee.
  12. Chronic renal disease.
  13. Subjects involved in medical-legal or worker's compensation claims.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
938 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    GVF

    Gamma Vacuum Foil polyethylene tibial insert

    Device: total knee arthroplasty

  • Active comparator
    P.F.C.

    Cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert

    Device: total knee arthroplasty

Interventions

  • Devicetotal knee arthroplasty

    Gamma Vacuum Foil polyethylene tibial insert

  • Devicetotal knee arthroplasty

    cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert

    Also known as: P.F.C. Sigma cross-linked bearing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survivorship (Revision of Any Component for Any Reason)

    Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis estimates the proportion of a population that will survive past a certain time avoiding a certain event. In this study, the event is removal of any component for any reason, also known as revision for any reason. Survival estimates are provided when 40 devices are left still being followed.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score

    American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.

    Time frame: 2 year

  2. American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score

    American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.

    Time frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

  3. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score

    WOMAC is a patient reported outcome (PRO) that evaluates the condition of subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and includes pain (score range 0-20), stiffness (score range 0-8), and physical function (score range 0-68) of the joint. The total score ranged from 0 to 96. The subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: 2 year

  4. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score

    WOMAC is a patient reported outcome (PRO) that evaluates the condition of subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and includes pain (score range 0-20), stiffness (score range 0-8), and physical function (score range 0-68) of the joint. The total score ranged from 0 to 96. The subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

  5. Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Radiolucencies (>2mm)

    Time frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

  6. Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Radiolucencies (>2mm)

    Time frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

  7. Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Osteolysis (>2mm)

    Time frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

  8. Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Osteolysis (>2mm)

    Time frame: Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years

07

Results

Posted Jul 15, 2016
Limitations and caveats
Serious adverse events were not collected in this study per the modern definition. All adverse events collected for this study will be reported in the 'Other Adverse Events' table. MedDRA was used to classify each AE into SOC, but not Preferred Term.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGVF PolyXLK Poly
Started461477
Completed189179
Not completed272298
Withdrew: Non-study device implanted120
Withdrew: Protocol violation3238
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject910
Withdrew: Death510
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up - hurricane katri7374
Withdrew: Physician decision4145
Withdrew: Revision86
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up92115

Outcome measures

PrimarySurvivorship (Revision of Any Component for Any Reason)

Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Kaplan Meier survivorship analysis estimates the proportion of a population that will survive past a certain time avoiding a certain event. In this study, the event is removal of any component for any reason, also known as revision for any reason. Survival estimates are provided when 40 devices are left still being followed.

Time frame:
5 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of knees
Survivorship (Revision of Any Component for Any Reason)
percentage of kneesGVF PolyXLK Poly
Survivorship (Revision of Any Component for Any Reason)96.8 (93.9 to 98.4)98.1 (95.6 to 99.2)
SecondaryAmerican Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score

American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.

Time frame:
2 year
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score
scores on a scaleGVF PolyXLK Poly
American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score94.7 ± 7.993.5 ± 9.5
SecondaryAmerican Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score

American Knee Society (AKS) knee score is a 0-100 point score (where 100 indicates excellent knee condition) that evaluates the affected knee. The knee score is composed of Pain, Range of Motion, and Stability.

Time frame:
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Reported as:
Mean · scores on a scale
American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score
scores on a scaleGVF PolyXLK Poly
American Knee Society Evaluation - Total Score93.5 ± 9.293.1 ± 8.5
SecondaryWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score

WOMAC is a patient reported outcome (PRO) that evaluates the condition of subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and includes pain (score range 0-20), stiffness (score range 0-8), and physical function (score range 0-68) of the joint. The total score ranged from 0 to 96. The subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame:
2 year
Reported as:
Mean · scores (points) on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score
scores (points) on a scaleGVF PolyXLK Poly
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score10.2 ± 13.411.5 ± 15.3
SecondaryWestern Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score

WOMAC is a patient reported outcome (PRO) that evaluates the condition of subjects with knee osteoarthritis, and includes pain (score range 0-20), stiffness (score range 0-8), and physical function (score range 0-68) of the joint. The total score ranged from 0 to 96. The subscales are combined (summed) to compute a total score, where a lower score indicates a better outcome.

Time frame:
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Reported as:
Mean · scores (points) on a scale
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score
scores (points) on a scaleGVF PolyXLK Poly
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Total Score11.0 ± 14.19.8 ± 13.2
SecondaryRadiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Radiolucencies (>2mm)
Time frame:
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of knees
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Radiolucencies (>2mm)
percentage of kneesGVF PolyXLK Poly
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Radiolucencies (>2mm)9.57.6
SecondaryRadiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Radiolucencies (>2mm)
Time frame:
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of knees
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Radiolucencies (>2mm)
percentage of kneesGVF PolyXLK Poly
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Radiolucencies (>2mm)02.1
SecondaryRadiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Osteolysis (>2mm)
Time frame:
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of knees
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Osteolysis (>2mm)
percentage of kneesGVF PolyXLK Poly
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Femoral Osteolysis (>2mm)00
SecondaryRadiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Osteolysis (>2mm)
Time frame:
Minimum 5 years, up to 7.6 years
Reported as:
Number · percentage of knees
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Osteolysis (>2mm)
percentage of kneesGVF PolyXLK Poly
Radiographic Outcomes - Percentage of Knees With Tibial Osteolysis (>2mm)2.01.4

Adverse events

Collected over Intraoperatively and postoperatively through 6 years.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
GVF Poly—16/461 (3.5%)146/461 (31.7%)
XLK Poly—15/477 (3.1%)164/477 (34.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 18
Most frequent serious events
EventGVF PolyXLK Poly
DeathGeneral disorders5/4614/477
LooseningProduct Issues3/4610/477
DeathInfections and infestations2/4610/477
DislocationProduct Issues1/4612/477
Other - Flexion InstabilityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/4610/477
Other - Left Hip RevisionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/4610/477
Other - Severe Low Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/4610/477
Other - Stage 4 Terminal CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/4610/477
Other - Stage 4 CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/4610/477
Other - Had fall and fractured left shoulder and had a concussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/4611/477
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 72
Most frequent other events
EventGVF PolyXLK Poly
MusculoskeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders30/46137/477
PainGeneral disorders15/46117/477
Stiffness, Arthrofibrosis, Ankylosis, Limited Range of MotionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders12/4619/477
MusculoskeletalSurgical and medical procedures10/46110/477
CardiovascularCardiac disorders7/4618/477
Peri-op AE - OtherSurgical and medical procedures4/4618/477
Central Nervous SystemNervous system disorders5/4617/477
InfectionInfections and infestations6/4615/477
Thrombosis/ThrombophlebitisVascular disorders6/4610/477
MusculoskeletalInjury, poisoning and procedural complications3/4615/477

Baseline characteristics

Enrolled Subjects

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GVF PolyXLK PolyTotal
Mean66.3 ± 8.566.4 ± 8.566.3 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GVF PolyXLK PolyTotal
Female290308598
Male159169328
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)GVF PolyXLK PolyTotal
United States449477926
08

Study locations

9 sites
  • Alabama Orthopaedic Clinic
    Mobile, Alabama 36608, United States
  • Pacific Bone and Joint Clinic
    Berkley, California 94705, United States
  • Orthopedic Center of the Rockies
    Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, United States
  • Holy Cross Hospital
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33308, United States
  • Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic
    Orlando, Florida 32817, United States
  • Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic
    Winter Park, Florida 32792, United States
  • Loyola University
    Chicago, Illinois 60153, United States
  • Rockford Orthopedic Associates
    Rockford, Illinois 61107, United States
  • Orthopaedic & Spine Specialists
    York, Pennsylvania 17402, United States
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2005 to primary completion in May 2013, 99 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2016, 3 years 2 months after primary completion.

Of 142 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 33. This study's 99 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,285 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 7, 2006
First posted
Feb 9, 2006
StartActual
Feb 1, 2005
Primary completionActual
May 1, 2013
CompletionActual
May 1, 2013
Results first posted
Jul 15, 2016
Last update
Apr 24, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00289133
Lead sponsor
DePuy Orthopaedics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2006
Start date
Feb 1, 2005
Primary completion
May 1, 2013
Completion
May 1, 2013
Results posted
Jul 15, 2016
Last update
Apr 24, 2017

Study contacts

Gracia Etienne, MD
principal investigator · Orthopaedic & Spine Specialists
Michael L. Granberry, MD
principal investigator · Alabama Orthopaedic Clinic
Richard M. Konsens, MD
principal investigator · Jewett Orthopaedic Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion