CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00281203Updated Jul 16, 2013

Comparison of Alveolar Macrophages in Healthy Individuals Versus Individuals With COPD

An observational study in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive and Lung Diseases, Obstructive, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-07-16.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
32
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study group forms the normal subject control group in an experiment designed to determine whether the alveolar macrophages (AMø) of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) show abnormal responsiveness to bacterial and viral products. Specifically, the study will determine the dose-response characteristics of AMø for production of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-18, and IL-23 (pro-inflammatory cytokines) on stimulation by purified lipopolysaccharide, a synthetic lipopeptide (PAM3-Cys), or poly I:C. These stimuli mimic the response to Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and RNA viruses, respectively. Results of the AMø from these healthy volunteers will be compared with AMø of COPD patients and smokers (or ex-smokers) with normal pulmonary function; those samples are being obtained during clinically indicated bronchoscopies under a separate consent form.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

COPD is one of the most pressing healthcare problems facing our nation. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) are responsible for the bulk of healthcare costs, and much of the morbidity and decline in health status among individuals with this common disease. The lack of accepted animal models of AE-COPD necessitates novel approaches using human samples. Advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis have been slowed, in part, due to controversy as to how exacerbations should be defined. The prevailing paradigm has defined AE-COPD as event-based. Such definitions clearly identify groups of patients with accelerated loss of pulmonary function and increased mortality. However, limited data show that symptom-based definitions of AE-COPD also capture episodes inducing significant morbidity and functional decline, and hence of concern to patients. Fundamental mechanisms are lacking to explain AE-COPD defined by either means.

Controversy also surrounds triggers of AE-COPD. Bacteria and viruses are involved in some episodes, but the relative importance of each is intertwined with disputes over the definition of AE-COPD. Progress at linking specific pathogens to molecular pathogenesis has been slow, both due to their diversity, and to the high rates of bacterial colonization of patients with COPD, even in the stable state. Moreover, in many AE-COPD cases, no pathogen can be identified. Without negating the value of analyzing infections with specific species of pathogens, it appears that progress in molecular pathogenesis could be accelerated by focusing on unifying features of the pulmonary immune response during AE-COPD.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

Bronchoscopies will be performed on healthy volunteers. Subjects are reimbursed $30 for the initial visit and $150 at completion of the bronchoscopy to help defray travel expenses and for the time spent participating as a volunteer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
  • Lung Diseases, Obstructive

Keywords

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • COPD
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 157 across 929 observational studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy individuals with normal pulmonary function as defined by AmericanThoracic Society criteria (entry spirometry)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Unstable cardiovascular disease
  • Other systemic disease in which survival of more than 2 years is unlikely
  • Mental incompetence or active psychiatric illness
  • Currently taking more than 20 mg/day of Prednisone
  • Participation in another experimental protocol within 6 weeks of study entry
  • Asthma
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Clinically significant bronchiectasis
  • Lung cancer
  • Other inflammatory or fibrotic lung disease
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • healthy smokers

    Must be free of serious diseases that might make it dangerous to undergo bronchoscopy.

    Procedure: blood drawing · Procedure: fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Interventions

  • Procedureblood drawing

    blood will be drawn on the entry visit and will starting the intravenous (IV) line on the day of bronchoscopy

  • Procedurefiberoptic bronchoscopy

    A flexible instrument will be passed through the mouth and into the lungs. Portions of the lungs will be washed, by injecting and immediately suctioning out a small amount of fluid. The entire return will be used for research purposes, and no results will be reported to the participant. Bronchoscopy is performed once.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. alveolar macrophage functions in vitro

    Time frame: day of bronchoscopy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Michigan at Ann Arbor
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Freeman CM, Curtis JL, Chensue SW. CC chemokine receptor 5 and CXC chemokine receptor 6 expression by lung CD8+ cells correlates with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity. Am J Pathol. 2007 Sep;171(3):767-76. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2007.061177. Epub 2007 Jul 19. PubMed 17640964 ↗
  • Freeman CM, Han MK, Martinez FJ, Murray S, Liu LX, Chensue SW, Polak TJ, Sonstein J, Todt JC, Ames TM, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Cytotoxic potential of lung CD8(+) T cells increases with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity and with in vitro stimulation by IL-18 or IL-15. J Immunol. 2010 Jun 1;184(11):6504-13. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000006. Epub 2010 Apr 28. PubMed 20427767 ↗
  • Freeman CM, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Ames TM, Chensue SW, Todt JC, Arenberg DA, Meldrum CA, Getty C, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Lung dendritic cell expression of maturation molecules increases with worsening chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec 15;180(12):1179-88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0552OC. Epub 2009 Sep 3. PubMed 19729666 ↗
  • Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, Fabbri LM, Goldin JG, Jones PW, Macnee W, Make BJ, Rabe KF, Rennard SI, Sciurba FC, Silverman EK, Vestbo J, Washko GR, Wouters EF, Martinez FJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Sep 1;182(5):598-604. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200912-1843CC. Epub 2010 Jun 3. PubMed 20522794 ↗
  • Curtis JL, Todt JC, Hu B, Osterholzer JJ, Freeman CM. Tyro3 receptor tyrosine kinases in the heterogeneity of apoptotic cell uptake. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2009 Jan 1;14(7):2631-46. doi: 10.2741/3401. PubMed 19273223 ↗
  • Curtis JL, Freeman CM, Hogg JC. The immunopathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: insights from recent research. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007 Oct 1;4(7):512-21. doi: 10.1513/pats.200701-002FM. PubMed 17878463 ↗
  • Erb-Downward JR, Thompson DL, Han MK, Freeman CM, McCloskey L, Schmidt LA, Young VB, Toews GB, Curtis JL, Sundaram B, Martinez FJ, Huffnagle GB. Analysis of the lung microbiome in the "healthy" smoker and in COPD. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 22;6(2):e16384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016384. PubMed 21364979 ↗
  • Punturieri A, Copper P, Polak T, Christensen PJ, Curtis JL. Conserved nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae-derived TLR2-binding lipopeptides synergize with IFN-beta to increase cytokine production by resident murine and human alveolar macrophages. J Immunol. 2006 Jul 1;177(1):673-80. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.1.673. PubMed 16785566 ↗
  • Todt JC, Freeman CM, Brown JP, Sonstein J, Ames TM, McCubbrey AL, Martinez FJ, Chensue SW, Beck JM, Curtis JL. Smoking decreases the response of human lung macrophages to double-stranded RNA by reducing TLR3 expression. Respir Res. 2013 Mar 9;14(1):33. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-33. PubMed 23497334 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 16, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00281203
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Jeffrey L. Curtis (Professor of Internal Medicine (Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine), University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2006
Start date
Sep 2005
Primary completion
Jul 2010
Completion
Jul 2010
Last update
Jul 16, 2013

Study contacts

Jeffrey L. Curtis
study chair · University of Michigan at Ann Arbor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion