CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00262769ABC-02Updated Jul 17, 2012

Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Treating Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma or Other Biliary Tract Tumors

A Phase 3 interventional study of cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride in Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer and Gallbladder Cancer, sponsored by University College, London. Completed at 25 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 16 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-07-17.

Sponsored by University College, London · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
324
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as gemcitabine and cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Giving more than one drug (combination chemotherapy) may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether gemcitabine is more effective with or without cisplatin in treating cholangiocarcinoma or biliary tract tumors.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying gemcitabine and cisplatin to see how well they work compared to gemcitabine alone in treating patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare the overall survival of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma or other biliary tract tumors treated with gemcitabine hydrochloride with vs without cisplatin.

Secondary

  • Compare the progression-free survival of patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, primary site of disease (gallbladder vs bile ducts vs ampulla), prior therapy (photodynamic therapy [PDT] vs non-PDT therapy vs none), ECOG performance status (0 vs 1 vs 2), and disease status (locally advanced vs metastatic). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

  • Arm I: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
  • Arm II: Patients receive gemcitabine hydrochloride IV over 30 minutes and cisplatin IV over 1½ hours on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, and after finishing treatment.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed periodically for at least 3 years.

Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 400 patients will be accrued for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer
  • Gallbladder Cancer

Keywords

  • cholangiocarcinoma of the extrahepatic bile duct
  • recurrent extrahepatic bile duct cancer
  • unresectable extrahepatic bile duct cancer
  • cholangiocarcinoma of the gallbladder
  • recurrent gallbladder cancer
  • unresectable gallbladder cancer
  • metastatic extrahepatic bile duct cancer
  • metastatic gallbladder cancer
03

In context

Cholangiocarcinoma

914 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholangiocarcinoma; 286 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 324 is above the median of 50 across 687 interventional studies indexed under Cholangiocarcinoma.

Browse Cholangiocarcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 632 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed biliary tract, gallbladder, or ampullary carcinoma

    • Intra- or extra-hepatic disease allowed
  • Unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease
  • No brain metastases

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

Performance status

  • ECOG 0-2

Life expectancy

  • At least 3 months

Hematopoietic

  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mm\^3
  • Platelet count ≥ 100,000/mm\^3
  • Hemoglobin ≥ 10 g/dL (transfusion allowed)
  • WBC ≥ 3,000/mm\^3

Hepatic

  • AST and ALT ≤ 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (5 times ULN if liver metastases are present)
  • Bilirubin ≤ 1.5 times ULN
  • Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 3 times ULN (5 times ULN if liver metastases are present)
  • Adequate biliary drainage
  • No unresolved biliary tract obstruction

Renal

  • Creatinine \< 1.5 times ULN
  • Urea \< 1.5 times ULN
  • Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 45 mL/min

    • If GFR \< 60 mL/min, isotope EDTA confirmation of adequate renal function is required

Other

  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 3 months after study participation
  • No active, uncontrolled infection
  • No other severe or uncontrolled systemic disease
  • No other malignancy within the past 5 years except nonmetastatic basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix treated by cone-biopsy or resection
  • No psychiatric disorder that would preclude giving informed consent

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

Chemotherapy

  • At least 6 months since prior adjuvant chemotherapy
  • No prior gemcitabine hydrochloride
  • No prior cisplatin
  • No prior systemic chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease except low-dose radiosensitizing chemotherapy in conjunction with radiotherapy

Radiotherapy

  • Prior radiotherapy for localized disease allowed provided there is clear evidence of disease progression afterwards

Surgery

  • Prior curative surgery allowed provided there is evidence of nonresectable disease relapse requiring systemic chemotherapy

Other

  • Recovered from all prior therapies
  • Prior photodynamic therapy (PDT) allowed provided it was given for localized disease only (with no evidence of metastatic disease) and resulted in subsequent disease progression after completion of therapy OR to relieve biliary obstruction in the presence of metastatic disease

    • PDT must have been completed ≥ 4 weeks ago
  • At least 4 weeks since prior investigational agents
  • No other concurrent, curative anticancer therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
324 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    A - Gemcitabine

    Gemcitabine alone

    Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride

  • Experimental
    B - Gemcitabine and Cisplatin

    Gemcitabine and Cisplatin

    Drug: cisplatin · Drug: gemcitabine hydrochloride

Interventions

  • Drugcisplatin

    25 mg/m2 in 1000 mls 0.9% saline given over 1 hour followed by 500 mls 0.9% saline over 90 mins

    Also known as: CDDP, cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), cisplatinum

  • Druggemcitabine hydrochloride

    1000mg/m2 in 250-500mls 0.9% saline over 30 mins by intravenous infusions on day 1, 8 and 15 (Arm A only) of each 28 (Arm A) or 21 (Arm B) day cycle.

    Also known as: Gemzar

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)

    Time frame: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival

    From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)

    Time frame: From date of randomisation till date of death or last date of follow-up (up to 5 years)

  2. Quality of life

    Quality of life as measured by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 Items periodically

    Time frame: Before and 12 weeks after completion of treatment

  3. Toxicity

    Toxicity as measured by NCI CTC periodically. The proportion of patients who experience a toxicity of grade 3 or 4 will be compared between the two arms of the trial.

    Time frame: During treatment and follow-up

07

Study locations

25 sites
  • Basingstoke and North Hampshire NHS Foundation Trust
    Basingstoke, England RG24 9NA, United Kingdom
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital at University Hospital of Birmingham NHS Trust
    Birmingham, England B15 2TH, United Kingdom
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital
    Cambridge, England CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
  • Cumberland Infirmary
    Carlisle, England CA2 7HY, United Kingdom
  • Gloucestershire Oncology Centre at Cheltenham General Hospital
    Cheltenham, England GL53 7AN, United Kingdom
  • Derbyshire Royal Infirmary
    Derby, England DE1 2QY, United Kingdom
  • Princess Alexandra Hospital
    Essex, England CM20 1QX, United Kingdom
  • Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
    Gloucester, England GL1 3NN, United Kingdom
  • Princess Royal Hospital at Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
    Hull, England HU8 9HE, United Kingdom
  • Leeds Cancer Centre at St. James's University Hospital
    Leeds, England LS9 7TF, United Kingdom
  • Helen Rollason Cancer Care Centre at North Middlesex Hospital
    London, England N18 1QX, United Kingdom
  • Royal Marsden - London
    London, England SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom
  • Hammersmith Hospital
    London, England W12 OHS, United Kingdom
  • UCL Cancer Institute
    London, England WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom
  • University College of London Hospitals
    London, England WIT 3AA, United Kingdom
  • Maidstone Hospital
    Maidstone, England ME16 9QQ, United Kingdom
  • Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology
    Merseyside, England CH63 4JY, United Kingdom
  • Mount Vernon Cancer Centre at Mount Vernon Hospital
    Northwood, England HA6 2RN, United Kingdom
  • Nottingham City Hospital
    Nottingham, England NG5 1PB, United Kingdom
  • Portsmouth Oncology Centre at Saint Mary's Hospital
    Portsmouth Hants, England PO3 6AD, United Kingdom
  • Cancer Research Centre at Weston Park Hospital
    Sheffield, England S10 2SJ, United Kingdom
  • Belfast City Hospital Trust Incorporating Belvoir Park Hospital
    Belfast, Northern Ireland BT9 7AB, United Kingdom
  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
    Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2ZN, United Kingdom
  • Velindre Cancer Center at Velindre Hospital
    Cardiff, Wales CF14 2TL, United Kingdom
  • Glan Clwyd Hospital
    Rhyl, Denbighshire, Wales LL 18 5UJ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721. PubMed 20375404 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00262769
Lead sponsor
University College, London
Collaborators
Eli Lilly and Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 7, 2005
Start date
May 2005
Primary completion
Aug 2008
Last update
Jul 17, 2012

Study contacts

John A. Bridgewater
study chair · University College London (UCL) Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion