ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT00260572Updated Apr 14, 2026

Outcomes After Medical and Surgical Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

An observational study in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,500
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aims of this study are to create a prospective data base to evaluate the long term outcomes of medical and surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); to measure standard outcomes as well as patient derived outcomes such as general and disease specific quality of life (QOL) issues and patient satisfaction; to refine the parameters that may identify patients who will benefit from surgery for GERD; and to identify possible determinants of failure of both medical and surgical treatments of reflux.

Read the detailed description

GERD is a significant public health problem and when it is severe it may have a considerable impact on patients' QOL. Relatively new treatments such as proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and laparoscopic fundoplication (wrapping or gathering the stomach around the lower end of the esophagus to reduce or prevent reflux) are now available. Patient derived outcomes such as QOL and satisfaction are rarely taken into consideration when evaluating such new treatments. Outcome analysis of the results of medical and surgical treatments using an ongoing database of patients will enhance our ability to treat patients with GERD.

This study's goal is to build a database to collect the outcome information on patients who are having medical or surgical treatment of GERD. In addition we want to measure standard outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, medication use and patient derived outcomes such as general and disease specific QOL, and patient satisfaction with the treatment. We also want to assess if and how long QOL is improved by medical and surgical treatment methods. In addition we want to see if low QOL scores on medical treatment as well as the standard medical criteria can help to identify which patients may benefit from surgical (an operation) rather than the medical treatment. It is hoped that we can also identify which factors might predict or help to determine which patients will have failure of both medical and surgical treatments of GERD. Using this information we want to identify if a psychological profile done before treatment will influence or predict the outcomes of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Keywords

  • GERD
  • nissen
  • fundoplication
  • reflux
  • toupet
  • QOL
  • dyspepsia
  • heartburn
  • Patients with reflux symptoms for at least 6 months
  • Patients scheduled for lap nissen or toupet fundoplication
  • Reflux diagnosed by either endoscopy, upper GI, or 24hr. pH (numeric scale used to specify the acidity of gastric contents)
  • On or starting treatment with PPI or pro-motility agents
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,211 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 202 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,500 is above the median of 178 across 348 observational studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with a diagnosis of reflux seeking treatment in a physician's office.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with reflux symptoms present for at least 6 months, caused by documented reflux. Reflux symptoms include:

    • heartburn
    • acid regurgitation
    • waterbrash
    • non-cardiac chest pain
    • dyspepsia
  • Reflux diagnosis either by endoscopy, upper gastrointestinal (GI), or 24 hour pH.
  • Patients scheduled for surgical management of GERD and/or hiatal hernia
  • Patients currently or commencing treatment with at least proton pump inhibitors or pro-motility agents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to comprehend or complete the QOL instruments.
  • Patients less than 18 years of age.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,500 participants (estimated)

Interventions

  • BehavioralQuestionnaires to evaluate QOL

    Questionnaire to evaluate QOL administered preoperatively and postoperatively at set intervals.

  • BehavioralQuestionnaires to evaluate heartburn and quality of life

    Questionnaires to evaluate heartburn and quality of life administered preoperatively and at set intervals postoperatively.

  • BehavioralQuestionnaire to evaluate satisfaction with treatment

    Questionnaire administered postoperatively at set intervals.

  • BehavioralQuestionnaire to evaluate presence or absence of pain

    Questionnaire administered preoperatively and at set intervals postoperatively.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • UPMC Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 1999, a primary completion of Dec 2050 and a completion of Dec 2050. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 28, 2005
First posted
Dec 1, 2005
Start
Apr 1999
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2050
CompletionEst.
Dec 2050
Last update
Apr 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00260572
Responsible party
James Luketich (MD, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 1, 2005
Start date
Apr 1999
Primary completion
Dec 2050 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2050 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

James D. Luketich, MD
principal investigator · Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion