CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00241254PROMESSUpdated Mar 15, 2012

Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide Versus Methylprednisolone in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Cyclophosphamide (drug) and Methylprednisolone (drug) in Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 26 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-03-15.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
138
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide as compared to IV methylprednisolone administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year, on the delay to confirmed disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy at 2 years on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), the percentage of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS) and the number of relapses. An intention-to-treat statistical analysis will be carried out.

Read the detailed description

Background

Preliminary not-controlled clinical studies of the efficacy of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide administration in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis reported encouraging results, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted so far. A slight efficacy of Methylprednisolone has been reported in this indication.

Objectives

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide on the prevention of disability deterioration in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

The secondary objectives are to evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of IV cyclophosphamide on the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the number of relapses.

Study design

Randomized double-blind two-arm controlled trial.

Intervention

Experimental group : IV cyclophosphamide infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.

Control group : IV methylprednisolone infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.

Outcomes

Primary outcome : delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score) evaluated every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year.

Secondary outcomes : proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score), Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three components, number of MS relapses, proportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse events, quality of life questionnaires.

  • Quality of life questionnaires
  • Disability self-assessment questionnaires Main time of assessment : 2 years.

Sample size

360 patients

Statistical analysis

Intention-to-treat analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive

Keywords

  • Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive
  • Cyclophosphamide
  • Methylprednisolone
  • Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Double-Blind Study
03

In context

Multiple Sclerosis

3,460 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Sclerosis; 661 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 138 is above the median of 50 across 2,342 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Sclerosis.

Browse Multiple Sclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects (Mc Donald et al criteria),
  • Aged 18 to 65
  • Diagnosis of secondary progressive MS ( Lublin and Reingold criteria)
  • Progressive deterioration phase of at least 6 months and less than 4 years.
  • Reduction of walking capacity and increase EDSS not ascribed to consequence of relapses (at least 0.5 point) in the last 12 months
  • EDSS between 4.0 and 6.5 included
  • Female participating must use contraceptives while on study drug
  • Written informed consent
  • Patient protected by French social security system

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Others diseases interfering with MS or treatment
  • Recent history (within the previous 2 years) of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Patients with psychiatric illnesses who are unable to provide written, informed consent prior to any testing under this protocol
  • Hemorrhagic cystitis
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Known allergy at cyclophosphamide, corticoids and in particular methylprednisolone
  • Persistent infectious diseases
  • Patients with bladder permanent catheterization
  • Known history of cardiac arrhythmia after methylprednisolone intravenous treatment
  • Abnormal screening/baseline blood tests exceeding any of the limits defined below : Hb \< 9g/dl or Total white blood cell count less than 3 000/mm3 or lymphocytes count less than 900/ mm3 or Platelet count less than 125 000/mm3
  • Gastric or duodenal ulcer in evolution
  • Gut diverticulosis
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Known history of active hepatitis (ASAT >3 X ULN)
  • Known history of renal failure (creatinine level > 180 µmol/L)
  • Psychosis
  • Current or past (\< 3 months) participation in another drug trial
  • Prior use of cyclophosphamide, lymphoid irradiation, monoclonal antibodies anti CD4 or anti CD52 or anti-VLA-4 therapies, cladribine ou cyclosporine A
  • Other clinical types of MS : Secondary progressive phase evolving for more than 4 years ; Remittent type of MS without progression between relapses ; Primary progressive type of MS
  • Use of interferon beta, methotrexate or imurel in the month prior to study.
  • Treatment with intravenous monthly corticoids in the year prior to study.
  • Treatment with corticoids (3 to 5 days) in the 2 month prior to study.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
138 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Cyclophosphamide

    Drug: Cyclophosphamide (drug)

  • Active comparator
    2

    Methylprednisolone

    Drug: Methylprednisolone (drug)

Interventions

  • DrugCyclophosphamide (drug)

    IV cyclophosphamide infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.

  • DrugMethylprednisolone (drug)

    Control group : IV methylprednisolone infusion administered every 4 weeks during 1 year and every 8 weeks during 1 year.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Delay to disability deterioration as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score)

    Time frame: every 4 weeks for one year, then every 8 weeks for one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with disability deterioration (EDSS: 0.5 or 1 point increase, depending on baseline score)

    Time frame: every month during one year then every two months during the 2nd year

  2. Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) and the Z scores of MSFC three components

    Time frame: Visit number 1, 2, 13(at one year),19 (at two years) and 20 (last visit)

  3. Number of MS relapses

    Time frame: all along the follow up period

  4. Proportion of patients with adverse events and delay of occurrence of adverse events

    Time frame: all along the follow up period

  5. Quality of life questionnaires

    Time frame: visit 2, 13(at one year) and 19 (at two years)

  6. Disability self-assessment questionnaires

    Time frame: visite 2, 13 et 19

07

Study locations

26 sites
  • CH de la Cote Basque
    Bayonne, 64109, France
  • CHU Besançon
    Besançon, 25030, France
  • Hôpital Pellegrin, Département de neurologie
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • CHU Caen
    Caen, 14033, France
  • Hôpital Gabriel Montpied
    Clermont Ferrand, 63003, France
  • AP HP Henri Mondor
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • CHU Dijon
    Dijon, 21033, France
  • CHU Lille Hôpital Salengro
    Lille, 59037, France
  • CHU Limoges
    Limoges, 87042, France
  • GHICL Hôpital St. Philibert
    Lomme, 59462, France
  • (CHU Lyon) Hôpital neurologique
    Lyon, 69394, France
  • Hôpital La Timone
    Marseille, 13385, France
  • (CHR Metz-Thionville) Hôpital Notre Dame de Bon Secours
    Metz, 57038, France
  • (CHU Montpellier), Hôpital de Gui de Chauliac
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • CHU Nancy Hôpital central
    Nancy, 54035, France
  • Hôpital Guillaume et René Laënnec
    Nantes, 44093, France
  • CHU Nice Hôpital Pasteur
    Nice, 06002, France
  • (CHU Nîmes) Hôpital Caremeau
    Nîmes, 30029, France
  • Fondation Rothschild
    Paris, 75019, France
  • (AP HP) Hôpital Tenon
    Paris, 75970, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Pau
    Pau, 64046, France
  • CHU de POISSY
    Poissy, 78300, France
  • (CHU Reims) Hôpital Robert Debré
    Reims, 51092, France
  • CHU Ponchaillou
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • CH d'Angoulême Girac
    Saint Michel, 16470, France
  • (CHRU Starsbourg) Hôpital civil
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brochet B, Deloire MS, Perez P, Loock T, Baschet L, Debouverie M, Pittion S, Ouallet JC, Clavelou P, de Seze J, Collongues N, Vermersch P, Zephir H, Castelnovo G, Labauge P, Lebrun C, Cohen M, Ruet A; PROMESS study investigators. Double-Blind Controlled Randomized Trial of Cyclophosphamide versus Methylprednisolone in Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0168834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168834. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28045953 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00241254
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 18, 2005
Start date
Dec 2005
Primary completion
Mar 2010
Completion
Mar 2012
Last update
Mar 15, 2012

Study contacts

Bruno Brochet, Professor
principal investigator · University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
Paul Perez, Dr
study chair · University Hospital, Bordeaux, France

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion