A Phase 3 interventional study of tiotropium inhalation powder capsule and ipratropium bromide Metered Dose Inhaler in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 6 sites in China. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-05-14.
Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The objective of this study is to compare the bronchodilator efficacy and safety of once daily dosing of tiotropium inhalation capsules (18 ?g) and Atrovent? MDI (2 puffs of ipratropium bromide 20 ?g four times daily) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study to compare the bronchodilator efficacy and safety of tiotropium inhalation capsules and Atrovent? MDI in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Following an initial screening visit, patients will enter a 2-week baseline period. Patients who successfully complete this phase will be randomized into the double-blind portion of the study in which they will receive tiotropium once daily (morning) or Atrovent? four times daily for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function testing will be conducted just prior (i.e. 5 minutes before) to the start of therapy at Visit 2 (i.e. randomization visit after completion of the 2-week run-in period) and at 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes post-dosing. Pulmonary function testing will be repeated at the same time intervals after 14 days of therapy (visit 3) and at the end of therapy.
Those patients taking theophylline, will be questioned about their last theophylline intake in order to ensure adherence to the washout requirements.
Vital signs will be measured in conjunction with the pulmonary function tests. Adverse events will be recorded throughout the entire run-in and treatment period.
Study Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in mean response between tiotropium and Atrovent. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a difference in mean response between tiotropium and Atrovent.
Comparison(s):
The primary pulmonary function variable will be FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in one second) and trough FEV1 response at the end of the four week treatment period, i.e. visit 4, will be the primary efficacy endpoint.
Trough FEV1 is defined as FEV1 at the end of the dosing interval (for tiotropium at approximately 24 hours post treatment administration). On test days (Visits 3 and 4) it is measured by the PFT just prior to dosing. Trough FEV1 response is defined as change from baseline in trough FEV1. Baseline FEV1 is defined as FEV1 measured just prior to first dosing in the morning of randomization visit (Visit 2).
3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.
Browse Lung Diseases studies →Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.
Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All patients must have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease according to the following criteria:
Patients must have relatively stable airway obstruction with an FEV1 ? 65% of predicted normal and FEV1 70% of FVC.
Predicted normal values will be based on the following formula. Males: FEV1 pred.(L) = height2(m) x (-0.016 x age(year) + 1.823) Females: FEV1 pred.(L) = height2(m) x (-0.012 x age(year) + 1.4427)
Exclusion Criteria:
Trough FEV1 response: change from baseline trough FEV1 (visit 2) at visit 4
Trough FEV1 response at visit 3 Average FEV1 (AUC0-3) response (change from baseline) for the 3 hours post drug administration Trough FVC response Average FVC (AUC0-3) response (as defined for FEV1) 5. Amount of rescue medication 6. Patient questionnaire
This study is completed, as verified in May 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Boehringer Ingelheim