CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00213239Updated Dec 2, 2019Results posted

A Dose Finding Study of Remifentanil and Propofol for Lumbar Punctures in Children

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Remifentanil and Remifentanil in Hematologic Diseases and Neoplasms, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 11 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-02.

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 11 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine whether the combination of two anaesthetic medications, propofol and remifentanil, is suitable for short duration surgical procedures, providing a shorter recovery time and fewer side effects than either drug used alone.

Read the detailed description

Propofol is the primary medication used by anesthesiologists at HSC to provide sedation for lumbar puncture. Propofol provides amnesia, anxiolysis, and hypnosis, but because propofol has no analgestic properties patients often respond to the pain of LP needle insertion. To ensure patient immobility, the dose of propofol is often increased, resulting in a duration of action that is excessive for lumbar puncture. Remifentanil is an ultra-short acting opioid which can be used to provide analgesia and sedation for short painful procedures with minimal residual pain. However, when used as the sole agent, remifentanil is associated with a high incidence of respiratory depression and/or arterial oxygen desaturation and does not provide amnesia or anxiolysis. The combination of propofol and remifentanil may be particularly suitable for short duration procedures, providing a shorter recovery time and fewer side effects than either drug used alone.

The objective is to determine the minimum effective dose of remifentanil required to prevent movement for insertion of a lumbar puncture needle when co-administered with propofol. The results obtained from this study will be used in a future study of the recovery characteristics of propofol and remifentanil in children undergoing lumbar puncture.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hematologic Diseases
  • Neoplasms

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • spinal puncture
  • remifentanil
  • propofol
  • anesthesia
  • dose finding
  • pediatrics
03

In context

Hematologic Diseases

460 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematologic Diseases; 105 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is above the median of 50 across 274 interventional studies indexed under Hematologic Diseases.

Browse Hematologic Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 11 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of a hemato-oncological disorder
  • Scheduled to undergo a lumbar puncture
  • Aged 4-11 years
  • Male or female
  • Unpremedicated
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent (or informed consent by parents)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who are known or suspected to be difficult to ventilate by face mask
  • Children who are deemed medically unfit to receive either of the two study medications
  • Children who are obese (weight for height > 95th percentile,
  • Children who do not have an indwelling intravenous line
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Propofol 4 mg/kg group

    First patient in this arm will receive a bolus of propofol 4 mg/kg followed by remifentanil 0.5 mcg/kg. Subsequent patients randomized to this arm will receive propofol 4 mg/kg but the dose of remifentanil will be determined using the Dixon up-and-down method (i.e. based on the response of the previous patient)

    Drug: Remifentanil

  • Experimental
    Propofol 2 mg/kg group

    First patient in this arm will receive a bolus of propofol 2 mg/kg followed by remifentanil 1 mcg/kg. Subsequent patients randomized to this arm will receive propofol 2 mg/kg but the dose of remifentanil will be determined using the Dixon up-and-down method (i.e. based on the response of the previous patient)

    Drug: Remifentanil

Interventions

  • DrugRemifentanil

    The first patient in this group will receive 4 mg/kg propofol and 0.5 ug/kg respectively. The dose of remifentanil in subsequent patients will be determined by the Dixon up-and-down method.

  • DrugRemifentanil

    The first patient in this group will receive 2 mg/kg propofol and 1.0 ug/kg respectively. The dose of remifentanil in subsequent patients will be determined by the Dixon up-and-down method.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Dose of Remifentanil Required to Prevent Movement in Response to Lumbar Puncture Needle Insertion

    Minimum effective dose (Dixon methodology) and ED98 required to prevent movement during lumbar puncture needle insertion

    Time frame: Movement measured at the time of lumbar puncture needle insertion.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Adverse Events.

    Time frame: Followed for the length of the procedure.

07

Results

Posted Aug 10, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePropofol 4 mg/kgPropofol 2mg/kg
Started3232
Completed3232
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryDose of Remifentanil Required to Prevent Movement in Response to Lumbar Puncture Needle Insertion

Minimum effective dose (Dixon methodology) and ED98 required to prevent movement during lumbar puncture needle insertion

Time frame:
Movement measured at the time of lumbar puncture needle insertion.
Reported as:
Mean · micrograms/kg
Dose of Remifentanil Required to Prevent Movement in Response to Lumbar Puncture Needle Insertion
micrograms/kg2.0 mg/kg Propofol4.0 mg/kg Propofol
Minimum effective dose0.96 ± 0.230.28 ± 0.22
ED981.50 ± 1.00.52 ± 1.06
SecondaryIncidence of Adverse Events.
Time frame:
Followed for the length of the procedure.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Adverse Events.
Participants2.0 mg/kg Propofol4.0 mg/kg Propofol
Bradycardia00
Hypotension00

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were recorded from administration of study drugs until discharge from recovery room.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Propofol 4 mg/kg0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)
Propofol 2mg/kg0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPropofol 4 mg/kgPropofol 2mg/kg
BradycardiaGeneral disorders0/320/32
HypotensionGeneral disorders0/320/32

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Propofol 4mg/kgPropofol 2mg/kgTotal
Mean5.6 ± 2.65.2 ± 2.15.3 ± 2.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Propofol 4mg/kgPropofol 2mg/kgTotal
Female101323
Male221941
08

Study locations

1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hayes JA, Lopez AV, Pehora CM, Robertson JM, Abla O, Crawford MW. Coadministration of propofol and remifentanil for lumbar puncture in children: dose-response and an evaluation of two dose combinations. Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):613-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818629f3. PubMed 18813039 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 2, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00213239
Lead sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Responsible party
Jason Hayes (Staff Anesthesiologist, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2005
Start date
Sep 2005
Primary completion
Sep 2007
Completion
Jan 2008
Results posted
Aug 10, 2018
Last update
Dec 2, 2019

Study contacts

Jason Hayes, MD
principal investigator · The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion