ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00136708Updated Jul 31, 2014

First Breath: Neonatal Resuscitation in Developing Countries

An interventional study of Neonatal Resuscitation in Asphyxia Neonatorum, sponsored by NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health. Completed at 7 sites in 6 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-07-31.

Sponsored by NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120,009
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In developing countries, neonatal death from birth asphyxia is a major problem. This study will be conducted in several countries to determine if the combined Neonatal Resuscitation Program/Essential Newborn Care Program compared to the new World Health Organization (WHO) basic perinatal care education of health care providers (Essential Newborn Care Program) results in reduced mortality due to perinatal asphyxia.

Read the detailed description

Birth asphyxia (defined as "failure to initiate and sustain breathing at birth") has been identified by the WHO as the most frequent cause of early deaths worldwide, accounting for about 20% of neonatal mortality. Although prompt resuscitation after birth can prevent many of the deaths and reduce disabilities in survivors from birth asphyxia, the WHO has concluded that resuscitation is often not initiated or the methods used are inadequate or wrong. The Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) has been universally accepted in the developed world but has had limited dissemination in many developing countries. The primary hypothesis of this randomized controlled trial is that implementation of the combined Neonatal Resuscitation Program/WHO Essential Newborn Care (ENC) Program, compared to basic neonatal care education of health care providers (ENC only) will result in reduced neonatal 7 day mortality.

The study design will include education and training of personnel at the community level and implementation of an NRP intervention to assure validity, accuracy, and precision of the estimate of the treatment effects. The primary hypothesis is that implementation of the NRP educational programs will result in a decrease in neonatal mortality. The primary outcome will be a decrease in all cause early (7 day) neonatal mortality, mortality due to any cause, in the NRP trained communities when compared to the non-NRP trained communities. Secondary outcomes will include early (7 day) neonatal mortality associated with perinatal asphyxia, mortality or hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) at 7 days, need for advanced resuscitation, and Apgar scores at 5 minutes as well as providers' self-efficacy, knowledge, competence, and performance in neonatal resuscitation.

This cluster randomized trial will be performed in communities of the Global Network (GN) sites. One half of the communities will be randomized to Early Training and Intervention with NRP; the other half will be randomized to Late Training and Intervention. Data collection will be obtained at baseline for both groups in order to establish baseline data including neonatal mortality and asphyxia. Following the baseline data collection period, training of the health care providers with the WHO Integrated Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth: Pregnancy, Postpartum, and Newborn Care Guide for Essential Practice (2003): Essential Newborn Care Program (ENC) will be performed using a train-the-trainer system. Following this training, communities will be randomized to Early or Late Training and Intervention with ENC. Initially, the Early Training and Intervention sites will have a program of train-the-trainers in NRP. Following a 12-month period of intervention (NRP vs. control), the providers of the Late Training and Intervention sites will have training in NRP.

Based on the early (first 7 days after birth) neonatal mortality data collected in preparation for this protocol, we estimate that there are 25 neonatal deaths/1000 live births. The trial is designed to identify a relative risk reduction of at least 20% (absolute risk reduction of 5% or 5/1000 live births, from 25/1000 to 20/1000 live births) in the treatment group as compared to the control group. The sample size necessary for the 20% relative risk reduction will be at least 32 communities with an average number of births of >500 per year; however, we plan to randomize at least 40 communities to account for potential drop-out. The proposed enrollment period for the randomized intervention will last one year.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asphyxia Neonatorum

Keywords

  • Global Network
  • Neonatal mortality
  • Asphyxia
  • Maternal and child health
  • International
  • Zambia
  • Pakistan
  • India
  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Uruguay
  • Guatemala
  • Argentina
  • Neonatal resuscitation
03

In context

Asphyxia Neonatorum

106 studies on the registry are indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120,009 is above the median of 173 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Asphyxia Neonatorum.

Browse Asphyxia Neonatorum studies →

Lead sponsor

NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Live births with a weight ≥ 1500 grams (community minimum)
  • Infants born in participating communities

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stillbirths
  • Infants with suspected/confirmed lethal malformations (e.g. anencephaly, Trisomy 13 or 18, or cyanotic or left-sided congenital heart disease that will not be repaired)
  • Any infant who is transported/brought to the center after delivery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120,009 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NRP Training (Intervention)

    Training in AAP neonatal resuscitation training program

    Procedure: Neonatal Resuscitation

  • Other
    Control

    Procedure: Neonatal Resuscitation

Interventions

  • ProcedureNeonatal Resuscitation
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neonatal mortality

    Time frame: 7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neonatal mortality due to perinatal asphyxia

    Time frame: 7 days

  2. Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Need for advanced resuscitation

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Apgar score at 5 minutes

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  5. Perinatal mortality at 7 days

    Time frame: 7 days

  6. Stillbirth or neonatal mortality

    Time frame: 7 days

  7. Stillbirth and/or neonatal mortality at 28 days

    Time frame: 28 days

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Kinshasa, Congo
  • Guatemala City, Guatemala
  • Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India
  • Belgaum, India
  • Karachi, Pakistan
  • Lusaka, Zambia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Matendo R, Engmann C, Ditekemena J, Gado J, Tshefu A, Kinoshita R, McClure EM, Moore J, Wallace D, Carlo WA, Wright LL, Bose C. Reduced perinatal mortality following enhanced training of birth attendants in the Democratic Republic of Congo: a time-dependent effect. BMC Med. 2011 Aug 4;9:93. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-93. PubMed 21816050 ↗
  • Carlo WA, Goudar SS, Jehan I, Chomba E, Tshefu A, Garces A, Parida S, Althabe F, McClure EM, Derman RJ, Goldenberg RL, Bose C, Hambidge M, Panigrahi P, Buekens P, Chakraborty H, Hartwell TD, Moore J, Wright LL; First Breath Study Group. High mortality rates for very low birth weight infants in developing countries despite training. Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1072-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1183. Epub 2010 Oct 11. PubMed 20937655 ↗
  • Carlo WA, Goudar SS, Jehan I, Chomba E, Tshefu A, Garces A, Parida S, Althabe F, McClure EM, Derman RJ, Goldenberg RL, Bose C, Krebs NF, Panigrahi P, Buekens P, Chakraborty H, Hartwell TD, Wright LL; First Breath Study Group. Newborn-care training and perinatal mortality in developing countries. N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 18;362(7):614-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0806033. PubMed 20164485 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 31, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00136708
Lead sponsor
NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 29, 2005
Start date
Mar 2005
Primary completion
Jun 2008
Completion
Jun 2008
Last update
Jul 31, 2014

Study contacts

Waldemar Carlo, MD
principal investigator · University of Alabama at Birmingham

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion